The Independent Path of Shaykh al-Azhar ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm Maḥmūd


in Die Welt des Islams
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The present article calls into question the widely-held notion that the Islamic establishment in contemporary Egypt is subservient to the ruling class. We eschew the simplistic binary approach to interactions between the political and religious leadership, and claim that under the stewardship of Shaykh ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm Maḥmūd, al-Azhar maintained an autonomous agenda that diverged from the regime’s views on a fair share of public and political issues. By dint of a careful analysis of several major disagreements between Shaykh Maḥmūd and the ruling elite, we hope to shed new light on the complex dynamics that limited the regime’s ability to compel the religious establishment to toe the ‘party line’. Although al-Azhar indeed strengthened the regime and legitimized its overall policy, the institution also challenged the latter on crucial topics, such as the Personal Status Law, the sale of alcohol, and the integration of Islamic values into the education system’s curricula.


The Independent Path of Shaykh al-Azhar ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm Maḥmūd


in Die Welt des Islams

Sections

References

1

Yoram MeitalEgypt’s Struggle for Peace: Continuity and Change 1967–1977 (Gainesville: University Press of Florida1997) pp. 131–172.

4

Malika Zeghal“Religion and Politics in Egypt: The Ulema of al-Azhar, Radical Islam, and the State” IJMESvol. 3 (1999) pp. 378–395.

6

Hatsuki Aishima and Armando Salvatore“Doubt, Faith, and Knowledge: The Reconfiguration of the Intellectual Field in Post-Nasserist Cairo”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institutevol. 15 (May 2009) p. 44.

12

Gershoni and JankowskiRedefining the Egyptian Nation 1930–1945 p. 65.

16

Muhammad Qasim ZamanThe Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change (Princeton: Princeton University Press2002) pp. 3–11 144–151.

17

Zeghal“Religion and Politics in Egypt” p. 383. See also: Tamir Moustafa “The State and Religious Institution in Egypt” IJMES vol. 32 (2000) pp. 7–10. Moustafa shows convincingly how the regime tried to gain control over al-Azhar through the Ministry of Endow­ments and by legislation.

32

Ibid. p. 437.

37

Maḥmūd“Min al-ῑmām al-akbar ilā raʾīs majlis al-shaʿb wa-l-wuzarāʾ”Majallat al-Azhar (August 1976) pp. 734–735.

39

Nathalie Bernard MaugironJudges and Political Reform in Egypt (Cairo: American University in Cairo Press2008) pp. 175f. 233f.

40

John Esposito and Natana Delong-Bas Women in Muslim Family Law (New York: Syracuse University Press2001) pp. 47–61; Nathan Brown The Rule of Law in theArab World: Courts in Egypt and the Gulf (New York: Cambridge University Press 1997) pp. 195–202.

55

Jamal J. NasirThe Islamic Law of Personal Status (London: Graham and Trotman1990) 2nd edition pp. 345f.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 16 16 2
Full Text Views 71 71 62
PDF Downloads 5 5 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0