ʿAlī Sharīʿatī and the Notion of tawḥīd: Re-exploring the Question of God’s Unity


In: Die Welt des Islams
View More View Less
  • 1 1Tel Aviv
machlise@post.tau.ac.il


This paper evaluates the intellectual roots of ʿAlī Sharīʿatī, the leading ideologist of the Islamic revolution in Iran. It focuses on his unique worldview of tawḥīd and places his writings within the broader context of both Western and Muslim thought. Sharīʿatī ­created a new merger between a holistic approach to Islam promoted by both Sunni and Shiʿi reformists, and an existentialist worldview, tied to a religious-philosophical basis. Through this exchange with existentialism, Sharīʿatī sought to transform Shiʿi Islam into an all-encompassing faith, anchored in human existence and reaching its full realization through political action. His aim was to mobilise the Iranian intelligentsia towards an Islamic revolution by relying on a dualist Muslim-existentialist vocabulary. The outcome was a new blend between ontology, ethics, society and politics, and a new inter-connectivity between God, man, this world and the hereafter, resulting from Sharīʿatī’s effort to promote religious renewal and social justice, through his innovative interpretation to tawḥīd.


  • 1

    See Charles Kurzman, “Historiography of the Iranian Revolutionary Movement, 1977–79”, Iranian Studies 28:1–2 (1995), 34–8; Nikki R. Keddie, “Change in Islam; Islam and Change”, IJMES 11:4 (1980), 535f.; on Sharīʿatī’s popularity see also, Assef Bayat, “Shariati and Marx: A Critique of an ‘Islamic’ Critique of Marxism”, Alif 10 (1990), 19f.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    See, Shahrough Akhavi, “Islam, Politics and Society in the Thought of Ayatullah Khomaini, Ayatullah Taliqani and Ali Shariati”, MES 24:4 (1988), 404–31.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Rahnema, An Islamic Utopian, 246–9.

  • 22

    Sharīʿatī, Islām shenāsī, 31.

  • 23

    See, Meir Litvak, Shiʿi Scholars on Nineteenth-Century Iraq: The ʿUlamaʾ of Najaf and Karbalaʾ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 21–44, 193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    See Rula  Jurdi Abisaab, Converting Persia: Religion and Power in Safavid Iran (London: I.B. Tauris, 2004); Hamid Algar, Religion and State in Iran, 1785–1906: The Role of the Ulama in the Qajar Period (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980), 22ff., 27f.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    See Sharīʿatī, Islām shenāsī, 11–5.

  • 36

    Priest (ed.),  Jean-Paul Sartre, 20–57;  Jonathan Webber, “Existentialism”, in  John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics (London & New York: Routledge, 2010), 230–40; entry “Jean-Paul Sartre”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online edition: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sartre/ (22 April 2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Priest (ed.),  Jean-Paul Sartre, 20–57;  Jonathan Webber, “Existentialism”, in  John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics (London & New York: Routledge, 2010), 230–40; entry “Jean-Paul Sartre”, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online edition: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sartre/ (22 April 2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    On this idea, see also Emmanuel Sivan, “Sunni Radicalism in the Middle East and the Iranian Revolution”, IJMES 21:1 (1989), 1–30.

  • 45

    See Mehrzad Boroujerdi, Iranian Intellectuals and the West: The Tormented Triumph of Nativism (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1996), 52–76, 106–12; Ali Mirse­passi, Political Islam, Iran, and the Enlightenment: Philosophies of Hope and Despair (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 28–33.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46

    See Ali Mirsepassi, Intellectual Discourse and the Politics of Modernization: Negotiating Modernity in Iran (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 58–64.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51

    Thomas Langan, The Meaning of Heidegger: A Critical Study of an Existentialist Pheno­menology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1959), 13–41; see also Martin Heidegger, The Question of Being; translated with an introduction by William Kluback and  Jean T. Wilde (New Haven, CT: College & University Press Publishers, 1958).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    See Sharīʿatī, Insān bī khūd, 77–144; see also ʿAli Shariʿati, “Civilisation and Modernisation”, in Lloyd Ridgeon (ed.), Religion and Politics in Iran: A Reader (London: I.B. Tauris, 2005), 175–96.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59

    Sharīʿatī, Insān bī khūd, 136–44.

  • 60

    See Robert S. Gall, Beyond Theism and Atheism: Heidegger’s Significance for Religious Thinking (Dordrecht & Boston; Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987);  John Reynold Williams, Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Religion (Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, cop. 1977); James K. A. Smith, “Liberating Religion from Theology: Marion and Heidegger on the Possibility of a Phenomenology of Religion”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 46:1 (1999), 17–33.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62

    See Negin Nabavi, “The Changing Concept of the ‘Intellectual’ in Iran of the 1960s”, Iranian Studies 32:3 (1999), 333–50; Ervand Abrahamian, “The Guerilla Movement in Iran, 1963–1977”, MERIP Reports 86, The Left Forces in Iran (Mar.–Apr., 1980), 3–15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63

    Nabavi, The Changing Concept of the Intellectual, 347.

  • 76

    Sharīʿatī, al-Insān wa-l-islām, 18.

  • 77

    Sharīʿatī, al-Insān wa-l-islām, 19.

  • 78

    See Terenjit Sevea, “Islamist Questioning and [C]olonialism: Towards an Understanding of the Islamist Oeuvre”, Third World Quarterly 28:7 (2007), 1375–400; Fathi Osman, “Mawdūdī’s Contribution to the Development of Modern Islamic Thinking in the Arabic-Speaking World”, MW 93 (2003), 465–85.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81

    See Ellen Kennedy, “Bergson’s Philosophy and French Political Doctrines: Sorel, Maurras, Péguy and de Gaulle”, Government and Opposition 15:1 (1980), 75–91. See also, entry “Henri Bergson”, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online edition: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bergson/ (12  July 2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 82

    On this concept see, L. Gardet, “al-Ḳaḍāʾ wa-l-Ḳadar”, in EI 2 IV, 364–7; See also, William M. Watt, “Free Will and Predestination in Early Islam”, The Moslem World 36:2 (1946), 124–52.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 90

    Sharīʿatī, al-Umma wa-l-imāmā, 37–42.

  • 92

    See Sharīʿatī, al-Umma wa-l-imāma, 195.

  • 93

    See Sharīʿatī, al-Insān wa-l-islām, 22, 185–209; Sharīʿatī, Islām shenāsī, 210–3.

  • 94

    Sharīʿatī, al-Insān wa-l-islām, 209.

  • 96

    See C. Ernest Dawn, “The Formation of Pan-Arab Ideology in the Interwar Years”, IJMES 20:1 (1988), 67–91; Yusri Hazran, “The Rise of Politicized Shi‘ite Religiosity and the Territorial State in Iraq and Lebanon”, MEJ 64:4 (2010), 525;U. Haarmann,“Abū Dharr: Muḥammad’s Revolutionary Companion”, MW 68 (1978),285–9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 97

    Mir Mohammad Ibrahim, Sociology of Religions: Perspectives of Ali Shariati (New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India, 2008), 89f.

  • 100

    See Mehdi Abedi, “Ali Shariati: The Architect of the 1979 Revolution of Iran”, Iranian Studies 19:3–4 (1986), 229–34; Mohammad Emami, “Commentary: Louis Massignon and Ali Shari’ati: An Enigmatic Encounter of Christianity and Islam”, Religious Studies and Theology 30:1 (2011), 101–6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 104

    Sharīʿatī, Islām shenāsī, 56–63.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 87 28 1
Full Text Views 167 6 0
PDF Downloads 23 12 2