Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
This article surveys the appeal of Ottomanism for non-dominant group members of the Young Turk organisation. It focuses on a specific reading of Ottomanism as a nationalist discourse articulated by Young Turk intellectuals in exile. The article analyses the actions, thoughts and writings of Ottoman Albanian İsmail Kemal who, in 1900, after an influential career in Ottoman officialdom, escaped to Europe and affiliated himself with the leaders of the organisation in exile. What emerges from this study is that Ottomanism was, until the Committee of Union and Progress adopted an authoritarian and pro-Turkist stance, a feasible discourse for Young Turk activists from both a dominant and non-dominant background. The article also suggests that an assessment of the role of Young Turks from a non-Muslim or non-Turkish background needs to include a consideration of a simultaneous and compatible role of such members as working for imperial reform and for the improvement and protection of their own particular community.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
İhsan Burak Birecikli, “Avlonyalı İsmail Kemal Bey’in Siyasi Faatliyetleri (1870–1908)”, Akademik Bakış 3, no. 5 (2009): 102.
Ismail Kemal, “Lettre de Constantinople”, Pro Armenia 1, no. 23 (25 October 1901), 181–82.
Gazmend Sphuza, Pages d’Historie Albanaise (Istanbul: ISIS, 2006), 68.
Gazmend Sphuza, Pages d’Historie Albanaise (Istanbul: ISIS, 2006), 68.
Ahmet Rıza, “Une Explication”, Mechveret Supplément Français 1, no. 10 (May 1896), 1.
Mehmet Sabahettin, Türkiye Nasıl Kurtarılabilir? (İstanbul: Kader Matbaasi, 1334), 96.
La Rédaction, “Notre Programme”, Mechveret Supplément Français 1, no. 1 (December 1895), 1.
Un Ami de la Turquie, “Lettre Ouverte Adressée à S.M. le Sultan”, Mechveret Supplément Français 1, no. 1 (December 1895), 2.
Fuad, “L’Instruction Publique en Turquie”, Mechveret Supplément Français 1, no. 3 (January 1896), 1.
İsmail Kemal, “Un Lettre d’Ismail-Kémal”, Le Matin 26 September 1901.
Ahmet Rıza, “Lettre au Parlement Français”, Mechveret Supplément Français 2, no. 47 (November 1897), 1.
BEO 1843.138152 (1320/M/28).
BEO 3387.254016 (1326/Ş/5).
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 340 | 92 | 9 |
Full Text Views | 225 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 63 | 10 | 0 |
This article surveys the appeal of Ottomanism for non-dominant group members of the Young Turk organisation. It focuses on a specific reading of Ottomanism as a nationalist discourse articulated by Young Turk intellectuals in exile. The article analyses the actions, thoughts and writings of Ottoman Albanian İsmail Kemal who, in 1900, after an influential career in Ottoman officialdom, escaped to Europe and affiliated himself with the leaders of the organisation in exile. What emerges from this study is that Ottomanism was, until the Committee of Union and Progress adopted an authoritarian and pro-Turkist stance, a feasible discourse for Young Turk activists from both a dominant and non-dominant background. The article also suggests that an assessment of the role of Young Turks from a non-Muslim or non-Turkish background needs to include a consideration of a simultaneous and compatible role of such members as working for imperial reform and for the improvement and protection of their own particular community.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 340 | 92 | 9 |
Full Text Views | 225 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 63 | 10 | 0 |