This article will unpack the intellectual and sociopolitical conditions under which the idea of neo-Ottomanism was formulated, by focusing on the following questions: What is neo-Ottomanism, who constructed the term, and for what purpose? What aspects of the Ottoman legacy have been incorporated in the ‘self’ definition of a new Turkey? Is this shift temporary or rooted in a more far-reaching transformation of Turkish society that will shape future sociopolitical choices? The article examines the intellectual origins of the term ‘neo-Ottomanism’ by examining the role of cultural entrepreneurs, such as Yahya Kemal and Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, along with the interactions among social factors, in the search for a new ‘old’ identity of Ottomanism by reimagining the Ottoman past. It seeks to provide a historical and sociological perspective of the process of reconfiguring the past, and especially its implications in domestic and foreign policy. Due to the oppressive nation-building project of the Kemalist regime, literature, art, music, and poetry became alternative sites for preserving, updating, and reconstructing the Ottoman memory. After explaining the formation of neo-Ottoman discourse in the 1990s, the article will address the debate about the politics of identity under the Justice and Development Party (JDP).
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Michel Rolph Trouillot, Silencing the Past (Massachusetts: Beacon Press, 1995), 15.
Nora Fisher Onar, “Echoes of a Universalism Lost: Rival Representations of the Ottomans in Today’s Turkey”, MES 45, no. 2 (2009): 229–41.
Fredrick Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham: Duke University Press, 1992).
Kathleen Stewart, “Nostalgia: A Polemic”, Cultural Anthropology 3, no. 3 (1988): 227–41.
Christopher Lasch, The True and Only Heaven: Progress and Its Critics (New York: Norton, 1991), 14.
Paul Ricoeur, Memory, History, Forgetting (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2004), 412.
Hasan Kayalı, Arabs and Young Turks: Ottomanism, Arabism, and Islamism in the Ottoman Empire, 1908–1918 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 18–24; Eyal Ginio, The Ottoman Culture of Defeat: The Balkan Wars and Their Aftermath (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), 11f.; Feroz Ahmad, The Young Turks and the Ottoman Nationalities: Armenians, Greeks, Albanians, Jews, and Arabs,1908–1918 (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2015).
Stefano Taglia, Intellectuals and Reform in the Ottoman Empire: The Young Turks on the Challenges of Modernity (London: Routledge, 2015), 3f., 139–49.
Halide Edib Adıvar, Türkiye’de Şark-Garp ve Amerikan Tesiri (Istanbul: Kardeş Yayınları, 1956); Peyami Safa, Millet ve Insan (Istanbul: Akbaba Yayınları, 1943); Safa, Türk Inkılabına Bakışlar (Istanbul: Kanaat Kitapevi, 1938); Safa, Doğu-Batı Sentezi (Istanbul: Yağmur Yayınları, 1962); Beşir Ayvazoğlu, Peyami, Hayatı, Sanatı, Felsefesi, Dramı (Istanbul: Kapı Yayınları, 1997).
David Barchard, Turkey and the West (London: Routledge Chatham House Papers 27, 1985), 91. Although Kemal H. Karpat claims that the term was first used by the Greeks during the 1974 Cyprus War, he does not substantiate his claim with evidence. Moreover, as a result of my exchange with Barchard and a group of historians in Greece, it is conclusive that the term, as it is understood today, was coined by Barchard in 1985. Kemal H. Karpat, Studies on Ottoman Social and Political History: Selected Articles and Essays (Leiden: Brill, 2002), 524.
Justin McCarthy, Death and Exile: Ethnic Cleansing of the Ottoman Muslims, 1821–1922 (Princeton: The Darwin Press, 1995); Cathie Carmichael, Ethnic Cleansing in the Balkans: Nationalism and the Destruction of Tradition (New York: Routledge, 2002); Benjamin Lieberman, Terrible Fate: Ethnic Cleansing in the Making of Modern Europe (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006); Paul Mojzes, Balkan Genocides: Holocaust and Ethnic Cleansing in the Twentieth Century (New York: Rowman & Litlefield, 2011).
Rasim Koç, İdam Sehbasındaki Dışişleri Bakanı Fatin Rüstü Zorlu (Istanbul: Ötüken, 2010); Nicholas L. Danforth, Memory, Modernity, and the Remaking of Republican Turkey: 1945–1960, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Georgetown University, 2015, 92–128.
M. Hakan Yavuz, Islamic Political Identity (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 59–65; M. Hakan Yavuz, “The Assassination of Collective Memory: The Case of Turkey”, MW 89, no. 3–4 (1999): 193–207.
Fredrick Jameson, “Nostalgia for the Present”, The South Atlantic Quarterly 88, no. 2 (1989): 527.
Pam Cook, Screening the Past: Memory and Nostalgia in Cinema (London: Routlege, 2005), 2.
Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, Yahya Kemal (Istanbul: Dergah Yayınları, 1995); Beşir Ayvazoğlu, Yahya Kemal Eve Dönen Adam (Istanbul: Ötüken Yayınları, 1999).
Banarlı, Bir Dağdan Bir Dağa (Istanbul: Kubbealtı Nesriyat, 1984), 22; Tarih ve TasavvufSohbetleri (Istanbul: Kubbealtı Nesriyat, 1985).
Şerif Mardin, Religion and Social Change in Modern Turkey: The Case of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi (New York: University of New York Press, 1989); M. Hakan Yavuz, “Nur Study Circles (Dershanes) and the Formation of New Religious Consciousness in Turkey”, in Ibrahim Abu-Rabi, ed. Islam at the Crossroads: On the Life and Thought of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi (New York: State University of New York Press, 2003), 297–316.
Sedat Laçiner, “Özalism (Neo-Ottomanism): An Alternative in Turkish Foreign Policy”, Journal of Administrative Science 1, no. 2 (2003): 161–202.
Hikmet Özdemir, Turgut Özal, Biyografi (Istanbul: Doğan, 2014).
M. Hakan Yavuz, “Turkish Identity and Foreign Policy in Flux: The Rise of Neo‐Ottomanism”, Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 7, no. 12 (1998): 19–41.
Evren Hosgör, “Islamic Capital/Anatolian Tigers: Past and Present”, MES 47, no. 2 (2011): 343–60; M. Hakan Yavuz, ed., The Emergence of a New Turkey: Democracy and the Ak Parti (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2006), 4–9.
Turgut Özal, Turkey in Europe and Europe in Turkey (Northern Cyprus: K. Rustem and Brothers, 1991), 290.
Ruşen Cakır, Ne Şeriat Ne Demokrasi (Istanbul: Metis, 1994); M. Hakan Yavuz, “Political Islam and the Welfare (Refah) Party in Turkey”, Comparative Politics 30, no. 1(1997): 63–82.
Alev Cinar, Modernity, Islam, and Secularism in Turkey: Bodies, Places, and Time (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2005); Uğur Akıncı, “The Welfare Party’s Municipal Track Record: Evaluating Islamist Municipal Activism in Turkey,” MEJ 53, no. 1 (1999): 75–94.
Anne Friedberg, Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), 103.
Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs, 2004), 5–15.
Josh Carney, “Re-Creating History and Recreating Publics: The Success and Failure of Recent Ottoman Costume Dramas in Turkish Media”, European Journal of Turkish Studies 19 (2014), online journal, <https://ejts.revues.org/5050> (accessed 16 September 2016).
Ben Lombardi, “Turkey & Israel: Brinkmanship & The Grand Strategy of The Erdoğan Government”, The Levantine Review 1, no. 1 (2012): 10.
Alexander Murinson, “The Strategic Depth Doctrine of Turkish Foreign Policy”, MES 42, no. 6 (2006): 950f.
Yılmaz Çolak, “Ottomanism vs. Kemalism: Collective Memory and Cultural Pluralism in 1990s Turkey”, MES 42, no. 4 (2006): 587–602. This informative essay fails to differentiate different modes of neo-Ottomanism.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1728 | 401 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 424 | 26 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 440 | 72 | 5 |
This article will unpack the intellectual and sociopolitical conditions under which the idea of neo-Ottomanism was formulated, by focusing on the following questions: What is neo-Ottomanism, who constructed the term, and for what purpose? What aspects of the Ottoman legacy have been incorporated in the ‘self’ definition of a new Turkey? Is this shift temporary or rooted in a more far-reaching transformation of Turkish society that will shape future sociopolitical choices? The article examines the intellectual origins of the term ‘neo-Ottomanism’ by examining the role of cultural entrepreneurs, such as Yahya Kemal and Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar, along with the interactions among social factors, in the search for a new ‘old’ identity of Ottomanism by reimagining the Ottoman past. It seeks to provide a historical and sociological perspective of the process of reconfiguring the past, and especially its implications in domestic and foreign policy. Due to the oppressive nation-building project of the Kemalist regime, literature, art, music, and poetry became alternative sites for preserving, updating, and reconstructing the Ottoman memory. After explaining the formation of neo-Ottoman discourse in the 1990s, the article will address the debate about the politics of identity under the Justice and Development Party (JDP).
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1728 | 401 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 424 | 26 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 440 | 72 | 5 |