Bringing the Empire Back In: The Gradual Discovery of the Ottoman Empire in Turkish Foreign Policy
In: Die Welt des IslamsSearch for other papers by Lerna K. Yanık in
Current site
Google Scholar
This article traces the emergence of references to the Ottoman Empire in the discourse and practice of Turkish foreign policy since the late 1940s. It argues that present-day emphasis on the Ottoman Empire and its legacy in Turkey has not happened in a vacuum, but rather has been a gradual process that has taken place over decades, helping to justify Turkey’s foreign policy. The article also shows that politicians from different sections of the political spectrum were crucial in reclaiming the Ottoman past in foreign policy. The consequences of this reclamation have been twofold. First, foreign policy, both in terms of practice and discourse, has become yet another venue, among many, for the continuous framing and reframing of Turkey’s past, paving the way for further Ottomanisation of the Turkish identity. Second, this Ottomanisation, or reclaiming of aspects that characterised the Ottoman Empire, has helped Turkey’s political actors justify and legitimise Turkey’s policies not only externally but, at times, also internally – as was the case in the 1990s, when some of these political actors tried to deal with Kurdish separatism by using the legacy of the Ottoman Empire.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
3
Hakan Övunç Ongur, “Identifying Ottomanisms: The Discursive Evolution of Ottoman Pasts in the Turkish Presents”, MES 51, no. 3 (2015): 416–32.
-
8
Metin Heper, “The Ottoman Legacy and the Turkish Politics”, Journal of International Affairs 54, no. 1 (2000): 63–82; Dietrich Jung, “The Sevres Syndrome: Turkish Foreign Policy and Its Historical Legacies”, American Diplomacy 8, no. 2 (2003), available at <http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/archives_roll/2003_07-09/jung_sevres/jung_sevres.html> (accessed 3 November 2016); Ali L. Karaosmanoğlu, “The Evolution of the National Security Culture and the Military in Turkey”, Journal of International Affairs 54, no. 1 (2000): 199–216; Joshua Walker, “Turkey’s Imperial Legacy: Understanding Contemporary Turkey through Its Ottoman Past”, Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 8, no. 2 (2009): 494–508.
-
15
Gavin D. Brockett, “When Ottomans Become Turks: Commemorating the Conquest of Constantinople and Its Contribution to World History”, American Historical Review 119, no. 2 (2014): 411.
-
16
Nicholas Danforth, “Multipurpose Empire: Ottoman History in Republican Turkey”, MES 50, no. 4 (2014): 655–78.
-
17
Gökhan Çetinsaya, “Rethinking Nationalism and Islam: Some Preliminary Notes on the Roots of ‘Turkish-Islamic Synthesis’ in Modern Turkish Political Thought”, MW, 89, no. 3–4 (1999): 368.
-
19
Yılmaz Çolak, “Ottomanism Vs. Kemalism: Collective Memory and Cultural Pluralism in 1990s Turkey”, MES 42, no. 4 (2006): 591.
-
21
Danforth, “Multipurpose Empire”, 655; Brockett, “When Ottomans Became Turks”.
-
23
Kasım Gülek, “Democracy Takes Root in Turkey”, Foreign Affairs 30, no. 1 (1951): 143.
-
34
Mahmut Bali Aykan, “Turkey and the OIC: 1984–1992”, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations 23 (1993): 103.
-
35
Mahmut Bali Aykan, “Turkey and the OIC: 1984–1992”, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations 23 (1993): 103.
-
43
Kenan Evren, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanı Kenan Evren’in Söylev ve Demeçleri (9 Kasım 1987–9 Kasım 1988) (Ankara: TBMM Basımevi, 1988), 24.
-
46
Vahit Halefoğlu, “İngiltere Dışişleri Bakanı Sir Geoffrey Howe Onuruna Verdikleri Ye-mekte Yaptıkları Konuşma (12 Şubat 1985)”, in Dışişleri Bakanı Vahit Halefoğlu’nun Konuşmaları, Demeçleri ve Basına Verdikleri Mülakatlar (1 Ocak 1985–31 Aralık 1985) (n.p.: Ankara, 1985), 23.
-
49
Fikret Adanır, “Turkey’s Entry Into the Concert of Europe”, European Review 13, no. 3 (2005): 395–417; Thomas Naff, “The Ottoman Empire and the European States System”, in Hedley Bull/Adam Watson (eds.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon University Press, 1984), 143–69.
-
53
M. Hakan Yavuz, “Turkish Identity and Foreign Policy in Flux: The Rise of Neo-Ottomanism”, Middle East Critique 7, no. 12 (1998): 24.
-
54
Yavuz, “Turkish Identity and Foreign Policy in Flux”, 29, 35.
-
58
Özal, “Özal: Türkiye’nin Önünde Hacet Kapıları Açılmıştır”, 14.
-
62
Demirel, “Dış Politika Enstitüsü Tarafından Düzenlenen ‘21’inci Yüzyıl Eşiğinde Türk Dış Politikası,’ Konulu Konferansta Yaptıkları Konuşma”, 685.
-
63
Demirel, “Dış Politika Enstitüsü Tarafından Düzenlenen ‘21’inci Yüzyıl Eşiğinde Türk Dış Politikası,’ Konulu Konferansta Yaptıkları Konuşma”, 687.
-
71
İsmail Cem, Türkiye Avrupa Avrasya (İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2004), 33.
-
72
Ali Balcı/Nebi Miş, “Turkey’s Role in the Alliance of Civilizations: A New Perspective in Turkish Foreign Policy?”, Turkish Studies 9, no. 3 (2008): 389.
-
78
Eric Rouleau, “The Challenges to Turkey”, Foreign Affairs 72, no. 5 (1993): 110–26. See also Ola Tunander, “A New Ottoman Empire? The Choice for Turkey: Euro-Asian Centre vs. National Fortress”, Security Dialogue 26, no. 4 (1995): 424.
-
80
Hasret Dikici Bilgin, “Foreign Policy Orientation of Turkey’s Pro‐Islamist Parties: A Comparative Study of the AKP and Refah”, Turkish Studies 9, no. 3 (2008): 410.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1162 | 168 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 371 | 17 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 233 | 35 | 6 |
Bringing the Empire Back In: The Gradual Discovery of the Ottoman Empire in Turkish Foreign Policy
In: Die Welt des IslamsSearch for other papers by Lerna K. Yanık in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This article traces the emergence of references to the Ottoman Empire in the discourse and practice of Turkish foreign policy since the late 1940s. It argues that present-day emphasis on the Ottoman Empire and its legacy in Turkey has not happened in a vacuum, but rather has been a gradual process that has taken place over decades, helping to justify Turkey’s foreign policy. The article also shows that politicians from different sections of the political spectrum were crucial in reclaiming the Ottoman past in foreign policy. The consequences of this reclamation have been twofold. First, foreign policy, both in terms of practice and discourse, has become yet another venue, among many, for the continuous framing and reframing of Turkey’s past, paving the way for further Ottomanisation of the Turkish identity. Second, this Ottomanisation, or reclaiming of aspects that characterised the Ottoman Empire, has helped Turkey’s political actors justify and legitimise Turkey’s policies not only externally but, at times, also internally – as was the case in the 1990s, when some of these political actors tried to deal with Kurdish separatism by using the legacy of the Ottoman Empire.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1162 | 168 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 371 | 17 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 233 | 35 | 6 |