“The Production of Post-Supernaturalistic Mythopoesis in Contemporary Nature Religion”

in Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Are there new, emerging forms of nature reverencing religion? If so, what might these look like? This paper seeks to answer this question by drawing on both Bron Taylor's Dark Green Religion (and especially his nature religion schema found therein that includes the category of “Gaian Earth Religion”) and the work of environmental philosopher Donald Crosby (and his category of “religion of nature”). I argue that science writers like Edward Wilson and Carl Sagan, along with ecopoets like Mary Oliver, are creating a new mythopoesis of post-supernaturalistic nature religion. I also look at the complex interaction of religion/science and the role reverence for nature plays in this dialogue. I argue that the nature religion schema put forth by Taylor and the “physisology” put forth by Crosby can help us better theorize emerging strands of post-supernaturalistic religious-like sentiments and narratives that continue to grow 150 years after Darwin's theory revolutionized both science and religion.

“The Production of Post-Supernaturalistic Mythopoesis in Contemporary Nature Religion”

in Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology

Sections

References

AlbaneseCatherine. 2002. Reconsidering Nature Religion. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.

AnttonenVeikko. 2000. “Sacred” in Willi Braun and Russell McCutcheonT. (eds) Guide to the Study of Religion. New York: Cassell pp. 271282.

BerryGeoff. 2005. “Mythopoeica Today.” Nebula 2: 3442.

BrysonJ. Scott. 2000. “Seeing the West Side of Any Mountain: Thoreau and Contemporary Ecological Poetry” in SchneiderRichard J. (ed) Thoreau’s Sense of Place: Essays in American Environmental Writing. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press pp. 133145.

ChidesterDavidLinenthalEdward T.. 1995. “Introduction” in ChidesterDavidLinenthalEdward (eds) American Sacred Space. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press pp. 142.

CrosbyDonald. 2007. “A Case for Religion of Nature.” Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture 1.4: 489502.

DraffanGeorgeJensenDerrick. 2004. Welcome to the Machine: Science Surveillance and the Culture of Control. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.

EnglerStevenGrieveGregory (eds). 2005. Historicizing “Tradition” in the Study of Religion. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

GattaJohn. 2004. Making Nature Sacred: Literature Religion and Environment in America from the Puritans to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.

GlackenClarence J. 1967. Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

GottliebRoger. 2001. “Spiritual Deep Ecology and World Religions: A Shared Fate, A Shared Task” in BarnhillDavid LandisGottliebRoger (eds) Deep Ecology and the World’s Religions. New York: State University of New York Press pp. 1733.

HarrisonPeter. 2006. “‘Science’ and ‘Religion’” Constructing the Boundaries.” The Journal of Religion 86: 81106.

JamesWilliam. 1982. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Penguin Classics.

JohnstonLucas. “From Biophilia to Cosmophilia: The Role of Biological and Physical Sciences in Promoting Sustainability.” Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture 4 (1): 723.

LevinsRichardLewontinRichard. 1985. The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

MackBurton. 2001. The Christian Myth: Origins Logic and Legacy. New York: Continuum.

MarianiPaul. 2002. God and the Imagination: On Poets Poetry and the Ineffable. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

McIntoshAlastair. 2004. Soil and Soul: People Versus Corporate Power. London: Aurum Press.

MerchantCarolyn. 1990. The Death of Nature: Women Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: HarperCollins.

OliverMary. 1979. Twelve Moons. Boston: LittleBrown and Company.

——. 1983. American Primitive. Boston: LittleBrown and Company.

——. 1992. New and Selected Poems. Boston: Beacon Press.

——. 1995. Blue Pastures. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.

Sagan Carl with Ann Druyan (ed). 2006. The Varieties of Scientific Experience: A Personal View of the Search for God. New York: Penguin Books.

ScottNathan A.Jr. 1971. The Wild Prayer of Longing: Poetry and the Sacred. New Haven: Yale University Press.

TakacsDavid. 1996. The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

TaylorBron. 2010. Dark Green Religion: Nature Spirituality and the Planetary Future. Berkeley: University of California Press.

WilsonE. O. 2006. The Creation: An Appeal to Save Life on Earth. New York: W.W. Norton.

WorsterDonald. 1996. Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

ZalehaBernard. 2010. “Nature and Nature Religion” in LippyCharles H.WilliamsPeter W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Religion in America. Sage Publications/CQ Press.

14)

 See for example Worster (1996) and Gatta (2004).

15)

 See Chidester and Linenthal (1995) Introduction. Interestingly the debate between science and religion as well as the current dispute of viewing this world as sacred for its own non-supernaturalistic intrinsic meaning versus seeing this type of worldview about the world as being atheism/not religious is also evidence that supports Chidester's and Linenthal's central thesis that religion and the production of religious space and meanings is an inherently political act and struggle.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 7 7 3
Full Text Views 8 8 2
PDF Downloads 5 5 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0