How Do We See That Something Is Living? Synthetic Creatures and Phenomenology of Perception

in Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The creation of synthetic life forms raises the question of what we mean when we say that a synthetic cell is “alive.” This paper analyzes the problem of aliveness both as an epistemological question (how can we know?) and as a phenomenological question (how can we perceive?). It introduces basic concepts that can be used in a phenomenological analysis of the “givenness” of life and argues that aliveness can only be seen with reference to the experiences of the observer as him/herself living. Life is therefore inherently ambiguous. When perceiving other life forms, we are aware of our own life. In order to develop a concept of the “other life” of a synthetic bacterium, we need to be aware of projecting perceptual evidence of our own life onto that of other species. The concept of “other life” can address a very basic layer: seeing another life form’s being-in-the-world as (1) a center of its own spontaneity, (2) a particular way of being in time that can be described as duration, and (3) as a system of processes that contain their own sense as practices.

How Do We See That Something Is Living? Synthetic Creatures and Phenomenology of Perception

in Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology

Sections

References

BayerKlaus. 1999. Argument und Argumentation Logische Grundlagen der Argumentationsanalyse. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

BedauMark A. and Emily C.Parke (eds). 2009. The Ethics of Protocells. Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

CruseD. Alan. 2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DehaeneStanislas and Jean-PaulChangeux. 2011. “Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious procession.” Neuron 70: 200227.

DouglasThomas and JulianSavulescu. 2010. “Synthetic biology and the ethics of knowledge.” Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 687693.

GadamerHans-Georg. 1986. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik (1960) 5th ed. Tübingen: Mohr.

HaseloffJim and JimAjioka. 2009. “Synthetic biology: history, challenges and prospects.” J. R. Soc. Interface. Published online. doi:.

HusserlEdmund. 1913. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner 2009.

——. 1929. Cartesianische Meditationen. Hamburg: Meiner 1987.

JonasHans. 1966. The Phenomenon of Life Towards a Philosophical Biology. New York: Harper & Row.

LuisiPier Luigi. 1998. “About various definitions of life.” Origins of Life and the Evolution of the Biosphere 28: 613622.

Merleau-PontyMaurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.

MoranDermot. 2000. Introduction to Phenomenology. London: Routledge.

NagelThomas. 1974. “What it is Like to Be a Bat.” Philosophical Review 83: 435450.

NerlichBrigitte Richard Elliott and BrendonLarson (eds) 2009. Communicating Biological Sciences. Ethical and Metaphorical Dimensions. Farnham: Ashgate.

Phenomenology: Encyclopedia Britannica 2011. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/455564/phenomenology.

ReaderSoran. 2007. “The other side of agency.” Philosophy 82: 579604.

Rehmann-SutterChristoph. 1996. Leben beschreiben Über Handlungszusammenhänge in der Biologie. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

——. 1998. “An Introduction to Places.” Worldviews: Environment Culture Religion 2: 171177.

——. 2004. Eigener Sinn. Kritik der Gegenständlichkeit von “Leben.” Vierteljahresschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 149: 2937.

——. 2006. “Poiesis and praxis―two ways of describing development” in Neumann-HeldEva M. and Rehmann-SutterChristoph (eds) Genes in Development. Re-reading the Molecular Paradigm. Durham: Duke University Press pp. 313334.

——. 2009. “Lebewesen als Sphären der Aktivität. Thesen zur Interpretation der molekularen Genetik in einer praxisorientierten Naturphilosophie” in KummerChristian (Hg.) Was ist Naturphilosophie und was kann sie leisten? Freiburg/München: Alber pp. 127150.

SchappWilhelm. 1985. In Geschichten verstrickt Zum Sein von Mensch und Ding. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.

SchüesChristina. 2003a. Changes of Perception. Five Systematic Approaches in Husserlian Phenomenology. Frankfurt aM: Lang 2003.

——. 2003b. “Moraphilosophische Fragen zum ‘Embryo’: Am Anfang ist die Beziehung” in: RudolfRehnSchüesChristina and WeinreichFrank (eds) Der Traum vom besseren Menschen. Zum Verhältnis von praktischer Philosophie und Biotechnologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang 2003 pp. 3353.

SchummerJoachim. 2011. Das Gotteshandwerk Die künstliche Herstellung von Leben im Labor. Berlin: Suhrkamp Edition Unseld.

SoberElliott. 1993. Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 28 28 10
Full Text Views 23 23 15
PDF Downloads 5 5 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0