This paper takes water quality as an ethnographic subject. It looks at how water quality monitors in Boston make sense of the quality of water through mundane engagement with three non-human beings who they encounter during their monitoring activities: herring, bacteria and water lily. Each of these organisms suggests a different understanding of water quality for the monitors and poses a dilemma. Water quality monitors who contribute to the production of water quality data come to know water quality as through direct interactions with these beings, mediated by both sensorial experience and laboratory data. These experiences, at the same time, confuse and redraw relationships between science, water flows, non-human vitality, including that of invasive species, and people.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Alley Kelly D.2002. On the Banks of the Ganga; When Wastewater Meets a Sacred River. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bear C, , Eden S. 2011. “Thinking Like a Fish? Engaging with Non-human Difference through Recreational Angling.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29.2: 336–352.
Bourdieu Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chase Brad et. al. 2010. River Herring Habitat Spawning and Nursery Habitat Assessment: Upper Mystic Lake, 2007-2008. Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries.
Classen Constance, , Howes David, and Snynnott Anthony (eds). 1994. Aroma: A Cultural History of Smell. New York: Routledge.
Connerton Paul. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nash Linda. 2006. Inescapable Ecologies: A History of Environment, Disease, and Knowledge.Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Douglas Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Routledge.
Desjarlais Robert. 2003. Sensory Biographies: Lives and Deaths among Nepal’s Yolmo Buddhists. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Feld Steven. 1982. Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Feld Steven, and Basso Keith (eds). 1996. Senses of Place. Seattle: School of American Research Press.
Fortun Kim, and Fortun Mike. 2005. “Scientific Imaginaries and Ethical Plateaus in Contemporary US Toxicology.” American Anthropologist 107.1: 43–54.
Fortun Mike. 2005. “For an Ethics of Promising, or: A Few Kind Words About James Watson.” New Genetics and Society 24.2: 157–173.
Haglund Karl. 2003. Inventing the Charles River. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Haraway Donna J.2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Helmreich Stefan. 2005. “How Scientists Think; About ‘Natives,’ for Example. A Problem of Taxonomy among Biologists of Alien Species in Hawaii.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 11.1: 107–128.
——. 2011. “Nature/Culture/Seawater.” American Anthropologist 113.1: 132–144.
Howes David (ed). 1991. The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology Of the Senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
——. 2003. Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kirksey Eben S. Stefan and Helmreich. 2010. “The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography.” Cultural Anthropology 24.5: 545–575.
Geurts Linn, Kathleen. 2002. Culture and the Senses: Bodily Ways of Knowing in an African Community. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Linton Jamie. 2010. What is Water? Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (Mass DCR). 2007. A Guide to Selected Invasive Non-Native Aquatic Species in Massachusetts. Boston: DCR.
——. 2009. Mystic River Master Plan. Boston: DCR.
Merleau-Ponty Maurice. 2003 [1962]. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. C. Smith. New York: Routledge.
Murphy Michelle. 2006. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers. London, Durham: Duke University Press.
Mystic River Watershed Association, Records 1967-2001, Digital Collections and Archives, Tufts University.
Parr Joy. 2010. Sensing Changes: Technologies, Environments, and the Everyday, 1953-2003. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Paxson Heather. 2008. “Post-Pasteurian Cultures: The Microbiopolitics of Artisanal Raw Milk Cheese in the United States.” Cultural Anthropology 23.1: 15–47.
Raffles Hugh. 2002. In Amazonia: A Natural History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schick Kenney, Amy. 2007. Empty Rivers; the Decline of River Herring and the Need to Reduce Mid-Water Trawl Bycatch. Herring Alliance.
Schneider Khrista L.1997. The Mystic River Inventory, Analysis, and Opportunity Issues Facing the Design and Development of a Comprehensive Master Plan. Boston: MDC.
Schrader Astrid. 2010. “Responding to PfiesteriaPiscicida (the Fish Killer): Phantomatic Ontologies, Indeterminacy, and Responsibility in Toxic Microbiology.” Social Studies of Science 40.2: 275–306.
Seremetakis Nadia. 1991. The Last Word: Women, Death and Divination in Inner Mani. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Star Susan, , and Griesemer James. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19.3: 387–420.
Stoller Paul. 1989. The Taste of Ethnographic Things: The Senses in Anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Strang Veronica. 2004. The Meaning of Water. Oxford, New York: Berg.
——. 2005. “Common Senses: Water, Sensory Experience and the Generation of Meaning.” Journal of Material Culture 10.1: 93–121.
See also Helmreich (2005) on how the categorization of native/invasive in Hawaii depends on evaluation of the presence or absence of human agency.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 843 | 271 | 57 |
Full Text Views | 195 | 44 | 23 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 210 | 94 | 48 |
This paper takes water quality as an ethnographic subject. It looks at how water quality monitors in Boston make sense of the quality of water through mundane engagement with three non-human beings who they encounter during their monitoring activities: herring, bacteria and water lily. Each of these organisms suggests a different understanding of water quality for the monitors and poses a dilemma. Water quality monitors who contribute to the production of water quality data come to know water quality as through direct interactions with these beings, mediated by both sensorial experience and laboratory data. These experiences, at the same time, confuse and redraw relationships between science, water flows, non-human vitality, including that of invasive species, and people.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 843 | 271 | 57 |
Full Text Views | 195 | 44 | 23 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 210 | 94 | 48 |