Co-Creator or Creative Predator?

James Nash’s Contributions to Catholic Social Teaching on Ecological Ethics

in Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

While the Catholic Church’s official teaching on the environment presents a hopeful and comprehensive ecological ethic rooted in the goodness of creation and humanity’s privileged role as co-creator, it does not sufficiently account for the violence of predation and humanity’s necessary participation in it. James Nash’s understanding of humans as altruistic, creative predators can further Catholic ecological ethics because it strikes a better balance between humanity’s call to love creation and the moral ambiguity of the evolutionary process. Humans as creative predators suggests three new understandings of what ecological sacrifice could entail: 1) to see the death of every creature, even if a morally justifiable death, as a kind of sacrifice; 2) to recognize that ecological sustainability may demand dramatic and subversive shifts in behavior; and 3) to sacrifice our tendency to view nonhumans instrumentally by advocating a Biotic Bill of Rights.

Co-Creator or Creative Predator?

James Nash’s Contributions to Catholic Social Teaching on Ecological Ethics

in Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology

Sections

References

12

In 1991the U.S. Bishops estimated that Americans use twenty-eight times the resources of those in other countries (U.S. Bishops 1991).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 13 13 10
Full Text Views 13 13 13
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0