The Challenge of Christian Deliberation in a Libertarian Context
The Case of the ELCA’s Social Statement on Genetics
In: Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and EcologySearch for other papers by Leland L. Glenna in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Curtis W. Stofferahn in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In 2005, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America’s (ELCA) Churchwide Assembly authorized the formation of a task force to prepare a social statement on genetics and faith. Although the Churchwide Assembly voted to adopt the social statement in August of 2011 by a wide margin, there had been an earlier controversy. In June 2010, an article in the Dakota Farmer questioned whether the ELCA was accusing farmers of “sin” for planting genetically engineered crop seeds. At least two churches in rural North Dakota cited this factor as a reason for leaving the ELCA. Seven synods with strong farmer constituencies proposed resolutions challenging the social statement. This paper explores how the opposition used agrarianism and libertarianism to attack the ELCA’s use of the Christian concept of the common good in the social statement. This case reveals the challenges that the Church faces when contributing to ethical deliberations on controversial issues.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Antle, J., and L. Houston. 2013. “A Regional Look at the Distribution of Farm Program Payments and How It May Change with a New Farm Bill”. Choices. Quarter 4. http://choicesmagazine.org/choices-magazine/submitted-articles/a-regional-look-at-the-distribution-of-farm-program-payments-and-how-it-may-change-with-a-new-farm-bill (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Anonymous. 2011. “ELCA Assembly Adopts Genetics Statement.” https://ministrylink.org/elca-assembly-adopts-genetics-statement/. (Accessed 12/20/2021.)
-
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors—A Conference of the Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research and the Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Research Council, edited by National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, 609–626. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Banks, Adelle M. 2010. “Rural church leaves ELCA over gay clergy, genetics proposal.” The Christian Century. November 15. https://www.christiancentury.org/article/2010-11/rural-church-leaves-elca-over-gay-clergy-genetics-proposal. (Accessed 12/20/2021.)
-
Brandl, Barbara and Leland Glenna. 2017. “Intellectual Property and Agricultural Science and Innovation in Germany and the United States.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 42(4): 622–656.
-
Broadway, Bill. 2000. “You May Swear on the Bible, But It’s Not in the Bible.” The Los Angeles Times. 11 September. http://articles.latimes.com/2000/sep/11/news/cl-18991. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Colihan, Leigh E. 2015. “Child’s Play: The Case Against the Department of Labor for Its Failure to Protect Children Working on America ’s Tobacco Farms.” American University Law Review 64(3): 645–686.
-
Cox, Harvey. 1999. “The Market as God: Living in the New Dispensation.” The Atlantic. March. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1999/03/the-market-as-god/306397/. (Accessed: 12/20/2021.)
-
Cromarie, John, and Shawn Bucholtz. 2008. “Defining the ‘Rural’ in Rural America.” United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2008/june/defining-the-rural-in-rural-america/. (Accessed 1/20/2021.)
-
Deifelt, Wanda. 2009. “Seeking the Common Good: Lutheran Contributions to Global Citizenship.” Intersections 29: 22–27.
-
DeGroote, Michael. 2011. “Ronald Reagan’s 10 Best Quotes.” Desert News. 7 February. https://www.deseretnews.com/top/103/6/Government-is-the-problem-Ronald-Reagans-10-best-quotes.html. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Durkheim, Emile. 1982[1895]. The Rules of Sociological Method. Translated by W.D. Halls. New York, NY: The Free Press.
-
Engels, Frederick. 1926(1850). The Peasant War in Germany. Translated by Moissay J. Olgin. New York, NY: International Publishers. Available online. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1850/peasant-war-germany/index.htm (Accessed: 21 October 2017)
-
Glenna, Leland, Sally Shortall, and Barbara Brandl. 2015. “The University, Public Goods, and Food & Agricultural Innovation.” Sociologia Ruralis 55(4): 438–459.
-
Glenna, Leland L., William B. Lacy, Rick Welsh, and Dina Biscotti. 2007. “University Administrators, Agricultural Biotechnology, and Academic Capitalism: Defining the Public Good to Promote University-Industry Relationships.” The Sociological Quarterly 48(1): 141–164.
-
Glenna, Leland. 2002. “Liberal Economics and the Institutionalization of Sin: Christian and Stoic Vestiges in Economic Rationality.” Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion 6: 31–57.
-
Goldberg, Joshua A. 2009. “Lutherans Narrowly Adopt New Sexuality Statement.” The Christian Post. 20 August. https://www.christianpost.com/news/elca-delegates-narrowly-adopt-new-sexuality-statement.html. (Accessed 1/14/2021.)
-
Grand Forks Herald. 2010. “Devils Lake Church Votes 87–0 to Leave ELCA.” Grand Forks Herald. 26 December. http://www.grandforksherald.com/content/devils-lake-church-votes-87-0-leave-elca. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Guardian. 2013. “Margaret Thatcher: A Life in Quotes.” The Guardian. 8 April. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/08/margaret-thatcher-quotes. (Accessed 21 October 2017).
-
Hiebert, Thodore. 1996. The Yahwist’s Landscape: Nature and Religion in Early Israel. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
Hilde, Thomas C. and Paul B. Thompson. 2000. “Introduction: Agrarianism and Pragmatism.” Pp. 1–24 in Paul B. Thompson and Thomas C. Hilde (Eds.) The Agrarian Roots of Pragmatism Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
-
Hirschl, Thomas A., James G. Booth, Leland L. Glenna, and Brandn Q. Green. 2012. “Politics, Religion, and Society: Is the United States Experiencing a Period of Religious-Political Polarization?” Review of European Studies 4(4): 95–109.
-
Hunter, James Davison. 1992. Culture Wars: The Struggle To Control The Family, Art, Education, Law, And Politics In AmericaNew York, NY: Basic Books.
-
Inglehart, Ronald and Wayne E. Baker. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65(1): 19–51.
-
Jacobson, Janet. 2010. “ELCA Right about GMO Warning.” Dakota Farmer. Page 11. http://magissues.farmprogress.com/DFM/DK10Oct10/dfm011.pdf. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Kirwan, Barrett E. 2017. “U.S. Farm Dynamics and the Distribution of US Agricultural Subsidies.” Applied Economics Letters 24(3): 207–209.
-
Kleinhans, Kathryn A. 2006. “The Word Made Words: A Lutheran Perspective on the Authority and Use of the Scriptures.” Word & World 26(4): 402–411.
-
Lee, Steve. 2011. “Update: ELCA Issues Revised Statement on Genetics and Faith.” Grand Forks Herald. 24 February. http://www.grandforksherald.com/news/agriculture/2148836-update-elca-issues-revised-statement-genetics-and-faith. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Lichterman, Paul. 1995. “Piecing Together Multicultural Community: Cultural Differences in Community Building Among Grass-Roots Environmentalists.” Social Problems 42(4): 513–533.
-
Lovas, Sarah E.H. 2011. “ELCA Not Rejecting Biotech.” The Grand Forks Herald. 23 November. https://www.inforum.com/letters/2941996-elca-not-rejecting-biotech. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Lutheran, The. 2011a. “Assemblies Discuss Bullying and Other Issues.” The Lutheran. July. Pages 34–37. http://content.yudu.com/A1sl1m/July2011/resources/index.htm?referrerUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thelutheran.org%2Farticle%2Fpastdigital.cfm. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Lutheran, The. 2011b. “Assemblies Discuss Bullying and Other Issues.” The Lutheran. August. Pages 34–37 and 47. http://content.yudu.com/A1sysd/August2011/resources/index.htm?referrerUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thelutheran.org%2Farticle%2Fpastdigital.cfm. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
MacLean, Nancy. 2017. Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America. New York, NY: Viking.
-
Mansbridge, Jane. 1998. “On the Contested Nature of the Public Good.” Pp. 3–19 in Walter W. Powell and Elisabeth S. Clemens (Eds.) Private Action and the Public Good. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
-
Mercer, Shane. 2010. “North Dakota Church Bolts over ELCA Agricultural Proposal.” Grand Forks Herald. 12 November. http://www.inforum.com/content/north-dakota-church-bolts-over-elca-agricultural-proposal-0. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
McKibben, Bill. 2005. “The Christian Paradox: How a Faithful Nation Gets Jesus Wrong.” Harper’s. August. https://harpers.org/archive/2005/08/the-christian-paradox/. (Accessed 21 October 2017).
-
National Academies of Science. 2016. Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
-
Offut, Susan, Katherine R. Smith, and Nicole Ballenger. 1998. “Have Farmers Lost their Uniqueness? Comment.” Review of Agricultural Economics 20(1): 203–205.
-
Randall, Eric. 2011. “Jay Carney’s Not The Only One Misquoting the Bible.” The Atlantic. 3 November. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/11/jay-carneys-not-only-one-misquoting-bible/335959/. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Riesebrodt, Martin. 1998. Pious Passion: The Emergence of Modern Fundamentalism in the United States and Iran. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
-
Ruhl, J.B. 2000. “Farms, Their Environmental Harms, and Environmental Law.” Ecology Law Quarterly 27(2): 263–349.
-
Samuelson, Paul A. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 36 (4): 387–389.
-
Sandel, Michael J. 1998. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
-
Tonneson, Lon. 2010a. “Farming and Faith Collide: Our Say.” Dakota Farmer. June. Page 8. http://magissues.farmprogress.com/DFM/DK06Jun10/dfm008.pdf. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Tonneson, Lon. 2010b. “Farmers at Odds with ELCA Proposal.” Dakota Farmer. September. Page 8. http://magissues.farmprogress.com/DFM/DK09Sep10/dfm008.pdf. (Accessed: 21 October 2017).
-
Wellman, Carl. 2000. “Solidarity, the Individual, and Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 22(3): 639–657.
-
Zerger, Kirsten. 1977. “The NLRA Agricultural Exemption—A Functional or Mechanical Approach.” Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law 2(1): 131–161.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 626 | 401 | 46 |
| Full Text Views | 13 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 29 | 4 | 0 |
The Challenge of Christian Deliberation in a Libertarian Context
The Case of the ELCA’s Social Statement on Genetics
In: Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and EcologySearch for other papers by Leland L. Glenna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Curtis W. Stofferahn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In 2005, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America’s (ELCA) Churchwide Assembly authorized the formation of a task force to prepare a social statement on genetics and faith. Although the Churchwide Assembly voted to adopt the social statement in August of 2011 by a wide margin, there had been an earlier controversy. In June 2010, an article in the Dakota Farmer questioned whether the ELCA was accusing farmers of “sin” for planting genetically engineered crop seeds. At least two churches in rural North Dakota cited this factor as a reason for leaving the ELCA. Seven synods with strong farmer constituencies proposed resolutions challenging the social statement. This paper explores how the opposition used agrarianism and libertarianism to attack the ELCA’s use of the Christian concept of the common good in the social statement. This case reveals the challenges that the Church faces when contributing to ethical deliberations on controversial issues.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 626 | 401 | 46 |
| Full Text Views | 13 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 29 | 4 | 0 |