BIOTIC COMMUNITY—REAL OR UNREAL: A PHILOSOPHICAL DILEMMA

in Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

As defined over time, biotic community has meant anything from superorganism to ecosystem. Some ecologists entirely reject any such holistic concept. This spectrum of positions—from holism to reductionism—reflects a divide among ecologists. Ordinarily, such battles pass with little notice beyond the confines of science. Ecology, however, has impact well outside its borders. In the popular arena the expression "biotic community" is widely, albeit sometimes uncritically, accepted. Even though both scientists and philosophers disagree about the validity of the concept, arguments for or against rely upon a common principle: novel properties signify a new reality. Conclusions divide based upon what may count as real. Must the new entity be a material object or is it merely conceptual? I review the evolution of meanings for biotic community and examine representative objections to either the reality or the utility of the concept. I argue that what is lacking in all discussions of biotic community is attention to the mode of existence of community, and conclude that biotic community is real, although its mode of existence is relational, not material.

BIOTIC COMMUNITY—REAL OR UNREAL: A PHILOSOPHICAL DILEMMA

in Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology

Sections

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 4 4 1
Full Text Views 2 2 2
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0