Interrogating Two Concepts in Islamic Criminal Jurisprudence: Victim’s Family vs. Offender’s Family
In: Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law OnlineAssistant Lecturer, School of Shariʿa and Law, Al-Azhar University Cairo Egypt
Search for other papers by Gaber Mohamed in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Calls for abolition of the death penalty invariably encounter a negative response by those political regimes which exploit the classical rigid definition of victim’s family concept. The death penalty could not be abolished by the legislative authority because the heirs of victim are the only people who have the right to waive death penalty based on the classical understanding of the definition of the victim’s family. I argue that if the definition of the victim’s family is revisited to have the same flexibility as the offender’s family, the Nation-State may be included in the definition, and the legislative authority will have the power to abolish the death penalty. Furthermore, revisiting these two terms within the contemporary context would have an impact on the gap between Shariʿa and national legal systems. The social contexts of the two legal systems have been shaped based on two different social bases: modernity and pre-modernity. The two different social bases have created a gap that is exploited in many controversial issues, not only the death penalty in the Muslim world but also harsh penalties in some Muslim legal systems, the right of a husband to discipline his wife, gender equality, legal perspectives on homosexuality, the absence of a clear distinction between public and private realms, and ignoring any distinction separating out the role to the public and nation in crimes of homicide and bodily injuries. Thus, the purpose of reviewing these two concepts from a perspective oriented towards the contemporary context is an attempt to bridge the gap between national criminal legal systems and the Shariʿa pre-modern criminal system, so that these controversial issues may be appropriately relocated in the modern national systems of Egypt and the Muslim world.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abdel-Haleem, M. A., The Qurʾan: English Translation and Parallel Arabic Text, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
-
Abū al-Maʿālī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad, al-Muḥīṭ al-burhānī fī al-fiqh al-Nuʿmānī (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 2004).
-
Abū Zahrah, Muḥammad, al-Jarīmah wa-al-ʿuqūbah fī al-fiqh al-Islāmī [Crimes and Punishments in Islamic Law] (Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī, 2007).
-
al-ʿAwwā, Muḥammad Salīm, Fī uṣūl al-niẓām al-jināʾī al-Islāmī [The Origins of Islamic Criminal Regulation] (Cairo: Nahḍat Miṣr, 2006).
-
Al-Ḥalabī, al-Samīn, ʿUmdat al-ḥuffāẓ fī tafsīr Ashraf al-alfāẓ (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1996).
-
al-Ḥānūtī, Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar, Ijābāt al-sāʾilīn bi-fatāwá al-mutaʾakhkhirīn (unpublished manuscript).
-
Al-Aṣfahānī, Abū al-Qāsim al-Rāghib, Mufradāt alfāẓ al-Qurʾān [The Vocabulary of Qurʾān] (Damascus: Dār al-Qalam, 2009).
-
Al-Jaṣṣāṣ, Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī, Aḥkām al-Qurʾān, vol. 3 (Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 2010).
-
Al-Kāsānī, Abū Bakr ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn, Badāʾiʿ al-ṣanāʾiʿ fī tartīb al-sharāʾiʿ, vol. 7 (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1986).
-
Al-Marghīnānī, ʿAlī ibn Abū Bakr, al-Hidāyah sharḥ bidāyat al-mubtadī, vol. 8 (Pakistan: Idārat al-Qurʾān, 1996).
-
Al-Māwardī, ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad, al-Ḥāwī al-kabīr, vol. 12 (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1994).
-
Al-Nasāʾī, Abū `Abd ar-Raḥmān Aḥmad, Sunan an-Nasaʾi, 4128, book 37, Hadith 163, vol. 5 (Beirut: al-Risālah, 2001).
-
Al-Nawawī, Muḥyī al-Dīn, Rawḍat al-ṭālibīn wa-ʿumdat al-muftīn, vol. 9 (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1991).
-
Al-Qarāfī, Shihāb al-Dīn, al-Iḥkām fī Tamyīz al-Fatāwá ʿan al-aḥkām wtṣrfāt al-Qāḍī wa-al-Imām (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 2004).
-
Al-Qarāfī, Shihāb al-Dīn, al-Dhakhīrah, vol. 12 (Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1994).
-
Al-Qurṭubī, Shams al-Dīn, al-Jāmiʿ li-aḥkām al-Qurʾān, vol. 5 (Cairo: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Masriyah, 1964).
-
Al-Sālūs, ʿAlī Aḥmad, Contemporary Financial Transactions in the Light of Islamic Shariʿa (Cairo: Dar al-iaʾtisam, 1987).
-
Al-Samarqandī, Naṣr ibn Muḥammad, Fatāwā al-nawāzil (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 2004).
-
Al-Sarakhsī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad, al-Mabsūṭ, vol. 27 (Beirut: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1993).
-
Al-Shaybānī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan, al-Aṣl, vol. 4, 597 (Qatar: Ministry of Islamic endowment and affairs, 2012).
-
Al-Shirbīnī, Mohamed ibn Ahmed al-Khaṭīb, Mughnī al-muḥtāj, vol. 4 (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1994).
-
Al-Sijistānī, Abū Dāwūd Sulaymān, ‘Sunanu Abī Dāwūd’ Types of Blood Money: The Imam Enjoining a Pardon in The Case of Bloodshed. Book 41, Hadith 8 (Beirut: Dār al-Risālah al-ʿĀlamīyah, 2009).
-
Al-Walwalījy, ʿAbd al-Rashīd ibn Abī Ḥanīfah, al-Fatāwá al-walwalījyh, vol. 5 (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 2003).
-
Al-Zaylaʿī, ʿUthmān ibn ʿAlī, Tabyīn al-ḥaqāʾiq, vol. 5 (Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyah, 1895).
-
Anderson, James N. D., ‘Homicide in Islamic Law’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 13 (4) (1951): 811–828.
-
An-Naʾim, Abdullahi Ahmed, ‘The Compatibility Dialectic: Mediating the Legitimate Coexistence of Islamic Law and State Law’, The Modern Law Review 73(1) (2010): 1–29.
-
An-Naʿim, Abdullahi Ahmed, Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law, (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1990).
-
Aquinas, Thomas, Aquinas: Political Writings, R. W. Dyson (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
-
Asad, Talal, ‘Boundaries and Rights in Islamic Law: Introduction’, Social Research 70(3) (2003): 683–686.
-
ʿAuda, ʿAbd-al-Qādir, al-Tashrīʿ al-jināʾī al-Islāmī [The Islamic Criminal Legislation] (Cairo: Dār al-Kātib al-ʿArabī, 2006).
-
ʿAwaḍ, ʿAwaḍ Muḥammad, ‘Natharyat al-aʾaqila’ [Theory of Murderer’s Family] (1983), Al Muslim Al Muaasir, vol. 129, Cairo.
-
Baderin, Mashood A., ‘Effective Legal Representation in Shariʿa Courts as a Means of addressing Human Rights Concerns in the Islamic Criminal Justice System of Muslim States’ YIMEL 11(1) (2004): 135–167.
-
Baderin, Mashood A., ‘Establishing Areas of Common Ground between Islamic Law and International Human Rights’, The International Journal of Human Rights 5(2) (2001): 72–113.
-
Bahnasī, Aḥmad Fatḥī, Madkhal al-fiqh al-jināʾī al-Islāmī [Introduction to the Islamic Criminal Jurisprudence] (Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 1989).
-
Bassiouni, Cherif, ‘Quesas Crimes’ in Cherif Bassiouni (ed), The Islamic Criminal Justice System (New York: Oceana, 1982).
-
Bederman, David J., Custom as a Source of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
-
Berman, Harold J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983).
-
Carter, James Coolidge, Law, Its Origin, Growth and Function (Nabu Press, 2012).
-
Coulson, N. J., A History of Islamic Law (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1964).
-
Cromartie, Alan, ‘The Idea of Common Law as Custom’ in Amanda Perreau-Saussine and James B. Murphy (eds) The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007), 203–227.
-
Dupret, Baudouin, Positive Law from the Muslim World: Jurisprudence, History, Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).
-
Dyson, Matthew, ‘The State’s Obligation to Provide a Coherent System of Remedies Across Crime and Tort’ in Antje du Bois-Pedain, Magnus Ulväng and Petter Asp (eds) Criminal Law and the Authority of the State (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017), 171–198.
-
Farmer, Lindsay, ‘Criminal Wrongs in Historical Perspective’ in R. A. Duff, Lindsay Farmer, S. E. Marshall, Massimo Renzo and Victor Tadros (eds), The Boundaries of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
-
Fisch, Jorg, Cheap Lives and Dear Limbs: The British Transformation of the Bengal Criminal Law 1769–1817, (vol. 79 of Beitrage Zur Sudasienforschung, Ergon Verlag, Baden Baden, 1983).
-
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, (New York: Pantheon Books, 1977).
-
Gabal, Mohamed Hassen, The Rooted Etymological Lexicon of Qurʾanic Terms, (Cairo: Al-Adab Library Publisher, 2010).
-
Hallaq, Wael, Sharia: Theory, Practice, Transformations, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
-
Hurgronje, C. Snouck, Mohammedanism; Lectures on Its Origin, Its Religious and Political Growth and Its Present State, (New York: G. P. Putnam & Sons, 1916).
-
Ḥusnī, Maḥmūd Najīb, Sharḥ Qānūn al-ʿUqūbāt [Annotation of Egyptian Penal Law] (Cairo: Dār al-Nahḍah al-ʿArabīyah, 1992).
-
Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad Amīn, al-ʿUqūd al-durrīyah fī Tanqīḥ al-Fatāwá al-Ḥāmidīyah, vol. 2 (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 2008).
-
Ibn ʿAbidin, Mohamed Amin, Nashr al-arf fi binaa baʾad al-ahkam aʾla al-urf (Amman: Anwār al-ʿulamāʾ lil-Dirāsāt, 2020).
-
Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad Amin Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Radd al-muḥtār ʿalá al-Durr al-Mukhtār, vol. 10 (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1992).
-
Ibn ʿĀshūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir, al-Taḥrīr wa-al-tanwīr (Tunis: al-Dār al-Tūnisīyah lil-Tawzīʿ, 1970).
-
Ibn Farḥūn, Burhān al-Dīn, Tabṣirat al-ḥukkām fī uṣūl al-aqḍiyah wa-manāhij al-aḥkām (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 2015).
-
Ibn Fāris, Aḥmad, Maqāyīs al-lughah [Glossary of Language Standards] (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 2007).
-
Ibn manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī, Lisān al-ʿArab, [Tongue of the Arabs] vol. 8, Part 15 (Cairo: Supreme Egyptian Committee of Books, 2014).
-
Ibn Qudāmah, Muwaffaq al-Dīn ibn Muḥammad, al-Mughnī, vol. 9, (Cairo, 1968).
-
Imber, Colin, Ebu’s-suʿud: The Islamic Legal Tradition (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997).
-
Kadivar. Mohsen, ‘An Introduction to the Public and Private Debate in Islam’, Social Research 70 (3) (2003):659–680.
-
Kamali, Mohammad H., Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law: A Fresh Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).
-
Kanner, Allan, ‘Public and Private Law’, Tulane Environmental Law Journal 10(2) (1997): 235–277.
-
Kidder, Robert, Connecting Law and Society: An introduction to research and theory (Englewood Cliffs: Penrice-Hall, Inc., 1983).
-
Landau-Tasseron, Ella, ‘Alliance among the Arabs’, Al-Qantara 26(1) (2005): 141–174.
-
Landau-Tasseron, Ella, ‘The Status of Allies in Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Arabian Society’, Islamic Law and Society 13(1) (2006): 6–32.
-
Lippman, Matthew Ross, McConville, Seán and Yerushalmi, Mordechai, Islamic Criminal Law and Procedure: An Introduction (New York: Praeger, 1988).
-
Loewe, Markus, Zintl, Tina, and Houdret, Annabelle, ‘The social contract as a tool of analysis: Introduction to the special issue on “Framing the evolution of new social contracts in Middle Eastern and North African countries”’ (2021) World Development, vol. 145.
-
Messick, Brinkley, ‘Property and the Private in a Shariʿa System’, Social Research 70(3) (2003): 711–734.
-
Milsom, S. F. C., Historical Foundations of the Common Law (Lexis Law Publishing, 1981).
-
Mohamed, Gaber, Reforming the Death Penalty in Egypt: An Islamic Law Perspective (Maurer Theses and Dissertations, 2017).
-
Murphy, James B., The Philosophy of Customary Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).
-
Neawshi, Majed, ‘Tasawr Muaʾsir Li Tahamul Al Dīyah ʿan Al ‘Aqela’ [A Contemporary Hypothesis concerning Blood Money] Arab Law Info (2000): 99–144 (Irbid National University, Amman).
-
Perreau-Saussine, Amanda and Murphy, James Bernard, ‘The Character of Customary Law: An Introduction’ in Amanda Perreau-Saussine and James B. Murphy (eds) The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
-
Peters, Rudolph, Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law: Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-First Century, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
-
Peters, Rudolph, ‘From Jurists’ Law to Statute Law or What Happens When the Shariʿa is Codified’ in R. S. Peters, Shariʿa, Justice and Legal Order: Egyptian and Islamic Law: Selected Essays (Leiden: Brill, 2020).
-
Peters, Rudolph, Shariʿa, Justice and Legal Order (Leiden: Brill, 2020).
-
Qāḍīkhān, Ḥasan ibn Manṣūr Fakhr al-Dīn, Fatāwā qāḍīkhān fī madhhab al-Imām al-Aʿẓam Abī Ḥanīfah al-Nuʿmān, (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 2009).
-
Qazāmil, Seif Ragab, alʿ-Aqila fī al-fiqh al-Islāmī: Dirāsa maqārana [The Concept of Male Blood Relative in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Comparative Study] (Cairo: al-Ishāʿah al-fannīyah Press, 1999).
-
Rahman, Fazlur, ‘The Concept of Hadd in Islamic Law’, Islamic Studies 4(3) (1965): 237–251.
-
Reinhart, A. Kevin, ‘What We Know about Maʿruf’, Journal of Islamic Ethics 1(1–2) (2017): 56–62.
-
Renzo, Massimo and Tadros, Victor (eds), The Boundaries of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
-
Schabas, William A., ‘Islam and the Death Penalty’, William. & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 9 (2000): 223.
-
Shabana, Ayman, Custom in Islamic Law and Legal Theory: The Development of the Concepts of ʿurf and ʿādah in the Islamic Legal Tradition, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
-
Smith, Bruth, ‘The Myth of Private Prosecution in England 1750–1850’ in Markus Dirk Dubber and Lindsay Farmer (eds) Modern Histories of Crime and Punishment (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007), 159.
-
Sobhy, Hania, ‘The Lived Social Contract in Schools: From protection to the production of hegemony’, World Development (2021): 137.
-
Stewart, Frank H., ‘Archaic forms of contract in Max Weber’s theories and in Arab and Somali customary law’, in Ron Shaham (ed) Law, Custom, and Statute in the Muslim World: Studies in Honor of Aharon Layish, 131–148 (Leiden: Brill, 2007).
-
Ibn Taymīyah, Taqī al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm, Majmūʿ Fatāwá Shaykh al-Islām ibn Taymīyah, Vol. 19, Abdalrahman al-asimi (ed) (Cairo: Maktabat Ibn Taymīyah, 1970).
-
Tsafrir, Nurit, Collective Liability in Islam: The ʾAqila and Blood Money Payments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).
-
UNDP and NOREF, ‘Engaged Societies, Responsive States: The Social Contract in Situations of Conflict and Fragility’ (New York and Oslo, 2016).
-
Vogel, Frank E., ‘The Public and Private in Saudi Arabia: Restrictions on the Powers of Committees for Ordering the Good and Forbidding Evil’ Social Research 70(3) (2003): 749–768.
-
Wakin, Jeanette, ‘Remembering Joseph Schacht (1902–1969)’ Islamic Legal Studies Program (ILSP) (Occasional Publications 4, Harvard Law School, January 2003).
-
Zakariyah, Luqman, Legal Maxims in Islamic Criminal Law: Theory and Applications (Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2015).
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 59 | 59 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 76 | 76 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 129 | 129 | 9 |
Interrogating Two Concepts in Islamic Criminal Jurisprudence: Victim’s Family vs. Offender’s Family
In: Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law OnlineAssistant Lecturer, School of Shariʿa and Law, Al-Azhar University Cairo Egypt
Search for other papers by Gaber Mohamed in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Calls for abolition of the death penalty invariably encounter a negative response by those political regimes which exploit the classical rigid definition of victim’s family concept. The death penalty could not be abolished by the legislative authority because the heirs of victim are the only people who have the right to waive death penalty based on the classical understanding of the definition of the victim’s family. I argue that if the definition of the victim’s family is revisited to have the same flexibility as the offender’s family, the Nation-State may be included in the definition, and the legislative authority will have the power to abolish the death penalty. Furthermore, revisiting these two terms within the contemporary context would have an impact on the gap between Shariʿa and national legal systems. The social contexts of the two legal systems have been shaped based on two different social bases: modernity and pre-modernity. The two different social bases have created a gap that is exploited in many controversial issues, not only the death penalty in the Muslim world but also harsh penalties in some Muslim legal systems, the right of a husband to discipline his wife, gender equality, legal perspectives on homosexuality, the absence of a clear distinction between public and private realms, and ignoring any distinction separating out the role to the public and nation in crimes of homicide and bodily injuries. Thus, the purpose of reviewing these two concepts from a perspective oriented towards the contemporary context is an attempt to bridge the gap between national criminal legal systems and the Shariʿa pre-modern criminal system, so that these controversial issues may be appropriately relocated in the modern national systems of Egypt and the Muslim world.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 59 | 59 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 76 | 76 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 129 | 129 | 9 |