Social and Local Inequalities in Leisure. Adolescents’ Experiences in Their Living Space
In: Youth and GlobalizationSearch for other papers by Isabelle Danic in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Barbara Fontar in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Agnès Grimault-Leprince in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article analyses how the political-institutional, spatial, social and symbolic dimensions of their living space influence teenagers’ leisure experiences, both separately and in conjunction with one another. We look in particular at how leisure policies for youth in France, as implemented by urban and rural municipalities, influence adolescents’ experience by defining opportunities, and how territorial inequalities combine with social inequalities. In this perspective, the article reports the results of research based on quantitative and qualitative surveys on leisure activities of teenagers living in diverse geographical and political territories, differentiated in terms of their leisure offer and its geographical accessibility. It appears that territorial inequalities in leisure and transport can be accentuated or compensated for by socio-familial resources and the representations that adolescents and their parents have of their living space.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abbott-Chapman, J., and Robertson, M. (2009). Leisure activities, place and identity. In: A. Furlong, ed., Handbook of Youth and Young Adulthood. New Perspectives and Agendas, London: Routledge, p. 135–150.
-
Alpe, Y. and Barthes, A. (2014). Les élèves ruraux face à la stigmatisation des territoires. Agora débats/jeunesses, 68 (3), p. 7–23.
-
Authier, J.-Y. (2012). Espace et socialisation: regards sociologiques sur les dimensions spatiales de la vie sociale, Saarbrücken: Éditions universitaires européennes.
-
Baudelot, C., Cartier, M., and Détrez, C. (1999). Et pourtant ils lisent… Paris: Le Seuil.
-
Ben Ayed, C. (2009). Le nouvel ordre éducatif local. Mixité, disparités, luttes locales. Paris: PUF.
-
Bertrand, A. (2013). Douze ans après. Dans: Yves Alix éd., Bibliothèques en France, 1998–2013 (p. 11–19). Paris: Éditions du Cercle de la Librairie.
-
Borgonovi, F. (2016). Video gaming and gender differences in digital and printed reading performance among 15-year-olds students in 26 countries. Journal of Adolescence. Vol. 4, p. 45–61.
-
Bourdieu, P. (Ed) (1993). “Effets de lieu”, La misère du monde, Paris: Seuil, p. 159–167.
-
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La Reproduction. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
-
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale: Yale University Press.
-
Casilli, A. (2010). Les liaisons numériques. Paris: Seuil.
-
Cayouette-Remblière, J., Lion, G. & Rivière, C. (2019). Socialisations par l’espace, socialisations à l’espace: Les dimensions spatiales de la (trans)formation des individus. Sociétés contemporaines, 3 (3), p. 5–31.
-
Danic, I., Fontar, B., Grimault-Leprince, A. (2021). Différenciation des pratiques de loisirs des adolescents: de l’influence des caractéristiques socio-scolaires et des espaces de vie à la singularité des pratiques ». In Danic I., Hardouin, M., Keerle, R., Plantard, P., David, O. (Ed), Adolescentes et adolescents des villes et des champs. La dimension spatiale des inégalités éducatives. Rennes: PUR.
-
Danic, I., Fontar, B., Grimault-Leprince, A., Le Mentec, M. et David, O. (eds.) (2019). Les espaces de construction des inégalités éducatives. Rennes: PUR.
-
Danic, I., Hardouin, M., Keerle, R., Plantard, P., David, O. (eds.) (2021). Adolescentes et adolescents des villes et des champs. La dimension spatiale des inégalités éducatives. Rennes: PUR.
-
David, O. (2014). Le temps libre des jeunes ruraux: des pratiques contraintes par l’offre de services et d’activités de loisirs ». Territoires en mouvement [on line], 22.
-
David, O., Le Grand, E., Loncle, P. (2012) Systèmes locaux et action publique: l’exemple des jeunes vulnérables. Agora débats/jeunesse, 62, p. 81–95.
-
Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., Stone, M., and Hunt, J. (2003). Extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Journal of Social Issues 59, p. 865–889.
-
Eloy, F. (2014). Le rapport des élèves de milieux favorisés à la culture scolaire: Le cas de l’éducation musicale au collège. Agora débats/jeunesses 66 (1), pp. 77–90.
-
Farrugia, D (2014). Towards a Spatialised Youth Sociology: The Rural and the Urban in Times of Change. Journal of Youth Studies 17 (3), pp. 293–307.
-
Fomby, P., Goode, J. A., Truong-Vu, K.-P. and Mollborn, S. (2019). Adolescent Technology, Sleep, and Physical Activity Time in Two U.S. Cohorts. Youth & Society. p. 1–25.
-
Glendenning, A., Hendry, L., Love, J. and Shucksmith, J. (2003). Young People’s Leisure and Lifestyles. London: Routledge.
-
Halter, J.-P. (2017). Monographie de la politique jeunesse du pays de la vallée du Lot. Paris: INJEP.
-
Haschar-Noé, N. (2004). L’évolution des politiques sportives municipales en France : Entre « rationalisation » et construction identitaire. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 27 (2), p. 489–527.
-
Holloway, S. L. and Valentine, G. (2000). Children’s Geographies: Playing, Living, Learning. London: Routledge.
-
Laforets, V. (2016). L’éducatif local : les usages politiques du temps libre des enfants. Thèse de doctorat. Grenoble: Université Grenoble Alpes.
-
Loncle, P. (2011). « La jeunesse au local : sociologie des systèmes locaux d’action publique », Sociologie 2, p. 129–147.
-
Lieury, A., Lorant, S., Trosseille, B., Champault, F. and Vourc’h, R. (2016). Video games vs. reading and school/cognitive performances: a study on 27000 middle school teenagers. Educational Psychology 36 (9), p. 1560–1595.
-
Matthews, H. and Tucker, F. (2006). “On the other side of the tracks: the psychogeographies and everyday lives of rural teenagers in the UK.” In: C. Spencer and M. Blades (Éds.), Children and their Environments : Learning, Using and Designing Spaces (p. 161–175). Cambridge University Press.
-
Ministère de l’Éducation nationale et de la jeunesse (2019). Une typologie des communes pour décrire le système éducatif. Note d’information, DEPP, n°35.
-
Moulinier, P. (2020). Chapitre iv. Les collectivités territoriales. In: Les politiques publiques de la culture en France, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 8e éd., p. 67–85.
-
Octobre, S., Détrez, C., Mercklé, P. and Berthomier, N. (2010). L’enfance des loisirs. Trajectoires communes et parcours individuels de la fin de l’enfance à la grande adolescence. Paris: DEPS Questions de culture.
-
Paino, M. and Renzulli, L.A. (2013). Digital Dimension of Cultural Capital: The (In)Visible Advantages for Students Who Exhibit Computer Skills. Sociology of Education, 86 (2), p. 124–138.
-
Parazelli, M. (2002). La rue attractive. Parcours et pratiques identitaires des jeunes de la rue. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
-
Pasquier, D. (2005), Cultures lycéenne: la tyrannie de la majorité, Paris: Autrement.
-
Pesle, M. (2016). La petite fabrique de l’action éducative : ethnographie métropolitaine, thèse de doctorat. Grenoble: Université Grenoble Alpes.
-
Pilkington, H. (2004). Youth strategies for global living: space, power and communication in everyday cultural practice. In: A. Bennett, and K. Kahn-Harris, eds., After Subculture, London: Palgrave.
-
Rivière, C. (2017). La fabrique des dispositions urbaines. Propriétés sociales des parents et socialisation urbaine des enfants, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 216–217, p. 64–79.
-
Séchet, R., David, O. et Keerle, R. (2013). « Penser la justice pour penser les politiques territorialisées. Une application à partir des cas du sport et de la petite enfance », in F. Dufaux et P. Philfert (dir.), Justice spatiale et politiques territoriales, Nanterre: Presses universitaires de Paris-Ouest, p. 65–81.
-
Sélimanovski, C. (2009). « Effets de lieu et processus de disqualification sociale », Espace populations sociétés, p. 119–133.
-
Shildrick, T. and MacDonald, R. (2006). In Defence of Subculture: Young People, Leisure and Social Divisions. Journal of Youth Studies 9 (2), p. 125–140.
-
Sullivan, A. (2001). Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment. Sociology 35 (4), p. 893–912.
-
Valentine, G., Holloway, S.L. and Bingham, N. (2000). Transforming cyberspace: children’s intervention in the new public sphere. In: G. Valentine and S.L Holloway, eds, Children’s geographies: playing, Living and learning. London: Routledge.
-
Wight, V.R., Price, J.M., Bianchi, S.M. and Hunt, B.R. (2009). The time use of teenagers. Social Science Research, 38 (4), p. 792–809.
-
Worth, N. (2015). Youth, Relationality, and Space: Conceptual Resources for Youth Studies from Critical Human Geography. In: J. Wyn and H. Cahill, eds, Handbook of Children and Youth Studies. Singapore: Springer.
-
Zaffran, J. (2010). Le temps de l’adolescence. Entre contrainte et liberté. Rennes: PUR.
-
Zick, C. D. (2010). The Shifting Balance of Adolescent Time Use. Youth & Society 41 (4), p. 569–596.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 429 | 156 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 35 | 8 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 61 | 25 | 15 |
Social and Local Inequalities in Leisure. Adolescents’ Experiences in Their Living Space
In: Youth and GlobalizationSearch for other papers by Isabelle Danic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Barbara Fontar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agnès Grimault-Leprince in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article analyses how the political-institutional, spatial, social and symbolic dimensions of their living space influence teenagers’ leisure experiences, both separately and in conjunction with one another. We look in particular at how leisure policies for youth in France, as implemented by urban and rural municipalities, influence adolescents’ experience by defining opportunities, and how territorial inequalities combine with social inequalities. In this perspective, the article reports the results of research based on quantitative and qualitative surveys on leisure activities of teenagers living in diverse geographical and political territories, differentiated in terms of their leisure offer and its geographical accessibility. It appears that territorial inequalities in leisure and transport can be accentuated or compensated for by socio-familial resources and the representations that adolescents and their parents have of their living space.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 429 | 156 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 35 | 8 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 61 | 25 | 15 |