Jus Pro Homine, Natura et Animalis: Dignifying the Right to Life of Arctic Indigenous Peoples
In: The Yearbook of Polar Law OnlineSearch for other papers by Yota Negishi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Indigenous theorists have developed the multi-spatio-temporal accounts of relationality among humans, natures, and animals. In the context of the Arctic, a holistic approach that integrates the indigenous peoples, frozen water, and polar animals is advocated to ensure identity, spirituality, and hydrosocial or cryosocial relations. Such an ontological approach gains importance as the life-threatening phenomenon of climate change is increasingly affecting every aspect of the relationality, happening faster in the Arctic than anywhere on the planet. The adverse effects of climate change on the lives of Arctic indigenous peoples living together with natures and animals pressure us to reconceptualize the meaning of life in constitutional and international law. This paper examines the recent trend to extend the right to life from physical existence to decent existence of indigenous peoples, natures, and animals. It particularly analyses the climate litigations filed by Arctic indigenous peoples, in which they tailor their legal arguments in line with the concept of a dignified life. The author argues that the ontological right to life with dignity not only remedies the vulnerable positions of Arctic indigenous peoples but also corroborates the resilience of their hydrosocial or cryosocial relations with natures and animals.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 449 | 205 | 48 |
| Full Text Views | 159 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 229 | 28 | 0 |
Jus Pro Homine, Natura et Animalis: Dignifying the Right to Life of Arctic Indigenous Peoples
In: The Yearbook of Polar Law OnlineSearch for other papers by Yota Negishi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Indigenous theorists have developed the multi-spatio-temporal accounts of relationality among humans, natures, and animals. In the context of the Arctic, a holistic approach that integrates the indigenous peoples, frozen water, and polar animals is advocated to ensure identity, spirituality, and hydrosocial or cryosocial relations. Such an ontological approach gains importance as the life-threatening phenomenon of climate change is increasingly affecting every aspect of the relationality, happening faster in the Arctic than anywhere on the planet. The adverse effects of climate change on the lives of Arctic indigenous peoples living together with natures and animals pressure us to reconceptualize the meaning of life in constitutional and international law. This paper examines the recent trend to extend the right to life from physical existence to decent existence of indigenous peoples, natures, and animals. It particularly analyses the climate litigations filed by Arctic indigenous peoples, in which they tailor their legal arguments in line with the concept of a dignified life. The author argues that the ontological right to life with dignity not only remedies the vulnerable positions of Arctic indigenous peoples but also corroborates the resilience of their hydrosocial or cryosocial relations with natures and animals.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 449 | 205 | 48 |
| Full Text Views | 159 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 229 | 28 | 0 |
