An International Polar Code of Navigation: Consequences and Opportunities for the Arctic
In: The Yearbook of Polar Law OnlineSearch for other papers by Andrea Scassola in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The Arctic regime on vessel-source pollution is currently fragmented and inadequate to tackle the emerging environmental risks. Thus, a harmonized set of norms is needed to ensure compliance with internationally recognized standards. During the IMO’s Polar Code negotiations, Canada and the Russian Federation claimed that the regulations adopted pursuant to article 234 shall not be infringed. If ratified and complied with by a large majority of the international shipping community, The Code could acquire the status of generally accepted international rules and standard (GAIRAS). It follows that a Polar Code is not likely to substitute existing national norms, nor will it impede Arctic coastal states to use article 234 in the future. The tension between harmonization and the persistence of national regulations will likely result in a partially harmonized regime. While the Code will extend environmental protection to the high seas, national regulations will be harmonized in the EEZ insofar as design, construction, equipment and manning standards are concerned. Aside from the Polar Code process, designation of Special Areas and PSSAs may integrate the future Polar Code and the national regulatory frameworks now in force. Bilateral or multilateral harmonization should not be excluded to the extent practicable.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 242 | 22 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 95 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 51 | 2 | 0 |
An International Polar Code of Navigation: Consequences and Opportunities for the Arctic
In: The Yearbook of Polar Law OnlineSearch for other papers by Andrea Scassola in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The Arctic regime on vessel-source pollution is currently fragmented and inadequate to tackle the emerging environmental risks. Thus, a harmonized set of norms is needed to ensure compliance with internationally recognized standards. During the IMO’s Polar Code negotiations, Canada and the Russian Federation claimed that the regulations adopted pursuant to article 234 shall not be infringed. If ratified and complied with by a large majority of the international shipping community, The Code could acquire the status of generally accepted international rules and standard (GAIRAS). It follows that a Polar Code is not likely to substitute existing national norms, nor will it impede Arctic coastal states to use article 234 in the future. The tension between harmonization and the persistence of national regulations will likely result in a partially harmonized regime. While the Code will extend environmental protection to the high seas, national regulations will be harmonized in the EEZ insofar as design, construction, equipment and manning standards are concerned. Aside from the Polar Code process, designation of Special Areas and PSSAs may integrate the future Polar Code and the national regulatory frameworks now in force. Bilateral or multilateral harmonization should not be excluded to the extent practicable.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 242 | 22 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 95 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 51 | 2 | 0 |