Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
De Proost, M., and Segers, S. (2022). We Need to Talk About Disruption in Bioethics: A Commentary on Rueda, Pugh and Savulescu. Trends in Biotechnology. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.001.
Mertes, H., Goethals, T., Segers, S., Huysentruyt, M., Pennings, G., und Provoost, V. (2022). Enthusiasm, Concern and Ambivalence in the Belgian Public’s Attitude Towards in-Vitro Gametogenesis. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online 14, 156–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.005.
Rolfes, V., Bittner, U., Krussel, J.-S., Fehm, T., und Fangerau, H. (2022). In Vitro Gametogenesis: A Benefit for Women at Advanced and Very Advanced Age? An Ethical Perspective. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 272, 247–250.
Rueda, J., Pugh, J., and Savulescu, J. (2022). The Morally Disruptive Future of Reprogenetic Enhancement Technologies. Trends in Biotechnology. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.10.007.
Rueda, J., Pugh, J., and Savulescu, J. (2023). Rethinking Techno-Moral Disruption in Bioethics, Society, and Justice. Trends in Biotechnology. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.01.008.
Carter, M. (2022). Trans Women Are (or Are Becoming) Female. Disputing the Endogeneity Constraint. Hypatia 37 (2), 384–401. DOI: 10.1017/hyp.2022.12.
Cerullo, L., Gerhards, H., und Weber, K., Hrsg. (2022). In-vitro-Gametogenese (IVG) und artifizieller Uterus (AU) – Problemauslöser oder Problemlöser? Ethische, soziale und rechtliche Aspekte zukünftiger reproduktionsmedizinischer Verfahren. Abstractband I. Klausurwoche für Early Career Researchers (19. September bis 23. September 2022, OTH Regensburg). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30303.53928.
Chapman, A. R. (2022). Do Pluripotent Stem Cells Offer a New Path to Reproduction? American Journal of Law & Medicine 48 (2–3), 256 – 265. DOI: 10.1017/amj.2022.23.
Lorenzo, D., Esquerda, M., Palau, F., Cambra, F. J., und Grup Investigació en Bioética (2022). Ethics and Genomic Editing Using the CrisprCas9 Technique: Challenges and Conflicts. Nanoethics 16, 313–321. DOI: 10.1007/s11569-022-00425-y.
Pugeda III, T. G. S. (2022). A Catholic Moral Appraisal of In Vitro Gametogenesis. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (1), 57–67. DOI: 10.5840/ncbq20222216.
Rao, R. (2022). Egg-Freezing, Uterine Transplants, and In Vitro Gametogenesis: Disruptive or Normalizing Reproductive Technologies? Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy 22, 121–145.
Rueda, J. (2022). From Self-Determination to Offspring-Determination? Reproductive Autonomy, Procrustean Parenting, and Genetic Enhancement. Theoria 88, 1086–1110. DOI: 10.1111/theo.12349.
Serour, G., Ghaly, M., Saifuddeen, S., Anwar, A., Isa, N. M., und Chin, A. H. B. (2022). Sunni Islamic Perspectives on Lab-Grown Sperm and Eggs Derived from Stem Cells – In Vitro Gametogenesis (IVG). The New Bioethics. DOI: 10.1080/20502877.2022.2142094.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 159 | 102 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 136 | 27 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 247 | 65 | 3 |
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 159 | 102 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 136 | 27 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 247 | 65 | 3 |