The Discovery and Publication of Joseph Perl’s Yiddish Writings

in Zutot
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The attitude of Tarnopol satirist Joseph Perl (1773–1839) towards the Yiddish language has been discussed by a number of scholars. In particular, researchers have examined his views with regard to his most well-known satire, Sefer Megaleh temirin, which was printed in Hebrew in Vienna, 1819, with a partial Yiddish translation of the work appearing in Vilna, 1938. However, there remains much to be said concerning the creative process which guided Perl’s writing in Yiddish, as well as the later discovery and publication of his Yiddish works, both of which are chapters in the wider story of the development of Yiddish literature in the first half of the nineteenth century and the increasing scholarly interest in it at the outset of the twentieth century. This article briefly describes these multifaceted matters and then offers suggestions for the future study of Perl’s writing in particular, and maskilic Yiddish literature in general.

The Discovery and Publication of Joseph Perl’s Yiddish Writings

in Zutot

Sections

References

4

S. Katz‘Hosafot le-reshimat defusei Tarnopol,’ Kiryat sefer 15 (1938–1939) 516 and n. 31; idem ‘Targumei tenakh me-et Menahem Mendel Lefin me-Satanov’ Kiryat sefer 16 (1939–1940) 114–115; idem ‘Kitvei Perl’ Davar Musaf (29 Kislev 1937) 4–5; I. Weinlez ‘Mendel Lefin Satanover’ Yivo-Bleter 2 (1932) 345–346. This translation aroused an argument among some of the Galician maskilim as for example in Tuvia Feder’s work Qol mehatzatzim and the polemic with Yaakov Shmuel Bik which reflected differences of opinion regarding the future path of the Haskalah and attitudes to Yiddish and German. See Perl Maʾasiyot ve-iggerot 65; Shmeruk Sifrut yiddish 187; M. Pelli Sugot ve-sugiyot be-sifrut ha-haskala ha-ʿivrit: ha-zjaner ha-maskili ve-avizareihu (Tel Aviv 1999) 73–90; Y. Friedlander Be-mistarei ha-satira: perakim ba-satira ha-ʿivrit ha-hadasha be-meʾah ha-y.t. vol. 1 (Ramat Gan 1984) 14–75 (including an additional bibliography). The Perl Archive contains in addition to a copy of Feder’s Qol mehatzatzim (Joseph Perl Archive National Library of Israel Jerusalem Manuscript department 4º1153 folder 136 aleph) a page of satire mocking Feder’s drunkenness entitled ‘Qotzim le-mehatzetz’ (Joseph Perl Archive National Library of Israel Jerusalem Manuscript department 4º1153 folder 136). Nancy Sinkoff included reproductions of the title pages of these manuscripts as well as a comprehensive discussion of this polemical episode in her book Out of the Shtetl: Making Jews Modern in the Polish Borderlands (Providence 2004) 168–202.

9

ShmerukSifrut yiddish241. Sadan presumed that the texts were known to Perl’s circle and read in manuscript form. See his comments in M. Pines Qorot sifrut yiddish hikdim me-voʾ: Dov Sadan (Ramat Gan 1981) 62.

11

ShmerukSifrut yiddish239–240; Miron A Traveler Disguised 14–15. Levinsohn’s Hebrew and Yiddish satiric writings which merited a significant number of copies in manuscript form constitute a perfect example of this. His work ‘Emek refaʾim is common in manuscript form and influenced other works even before it was printed in the 1860s. On this see Sefer Emek refaʾim le-Rival: Critical Edition by J. Meir and D. Asaf (in preparation).

12

ShmerukSifrut yiddish259–260; Perl Maʾasiyot ve-iggerot 69.

13

I. Weinlez‘Antigonus,’ Yidish-literarisher kalendar (Lemberg 1924) 114–126. These manuscripts were listed in the archive catalogue from the beginning of the twentieth century see the list of Hebrew and Yiddish manuscripts from the Perl collection arranged by Philip Kopler in Tarnopol Joseph Perl Archive National Library of Israel Jerusalem Manuscript department 4º1153 appendix 2 items 9 20 and 48.

17

S. Tshernovitz‘Megule el ha-gola: Tarnopol,’ Ha-tsefira 67 (197) (9 Elul 1928) 2. Perl gave a sermon in Yiddish in the Synagogue he established in Tarnopol about the disagreement regarding the Rabbinate of Rapaport see above n. 2.

18

C.N. Bialik‘Reshamim meha-gola,’ Davar (15 Adar 1 1932) 2. This article spurred others to speed up the effort to ‘save’ the archive. See A. Schwadron ‘ʿOd le-shaʿaruriyat ginzei Perl’ Davar (9 Nissan 1932); A.Y. Braver ‘Ginzei Joseph Perl (hatzeʿa le-hatzalatam)’ Davar Musaf le-shabbat (17 Adar 2 1932); D. Sadan ‘Hiziyonei hitul: ketav-yad mi-ginzei Perl’ in Mazkeret Levy: sefer zikharon likhvod ha-rav dr. Levy Freund z’l (Tel Aviv 1954) 96–97; S. Werses ‘Ginzei Joseph Perl bi-yerushalayim’ Ha-universita 19 vol. 1 (Adar 1974) 38–52; J. Meir Hasidut meduma: ʿiyunim be-ketavav ha-satiriyim shel Joseph Perl (Jerusalem 2013).

19

Y. Shatzky‘Naye arbetn tsu der geshikhte fun der idisher literatur,’ Pinkas 1 (1927) 173–174.

26

Ibid.559 n. 8: ‘the translation of the Hebrew introduction and the footnotes of which Weinlez was unaware I found among the discarded manuscripts of the archive’. On this see also Perl Sefer Megaleh temirin 38.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 12 12 6
Full Text Views 92 92 68
PDF Downloads 7 7 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0