This volume, the fourth in the
Current Research in Semantics/Pragmatics Interface series, is a collection of nine papers dealing with the topic of reporting on beliefs and other attitudes, and in particular with the issue of the semantics-pragmatics boundary dispute which is the core topic of the current research in the field. Written by highly-regarded philosophers of language and linguists working on theoretical semantics and pragmatics, it brings together works in the mainstream tradition of logical form and the contextualism-anticontextualism debate and the research on the role of intentions, conventions, goals, plans and cultural stereotypes in attitude ascriptions. The editor's introductory chapter gives a valuable overview of the work, discussing the importance of all these aspects of propositional attitude research and stressing their compatibility and interdependence.
Introduction
Belief reports and pragmatic theory: the state-of-the-art,
K.M. Jaszczolt Propositional attitudes in direct-reference semantics,
S. Schiffer Interpreted logical forms, belief attribution, and the dynamic lexicon,
P. Ludlow Beyond sense and reference: an alternative response to the problem of opacity,
L. Clapp How do we know what Galileo said?,
M.J. Cresswell A puzzle about belief reports,
K. Bach Do belief reports report beliefs?,
K. Bach Attitude ascriptions, context and interpretive resemblance,
A. Bezuidenhout The default-based context-dependence of belief reports,
K.M. Jaszczolt The background of propositional attitudes and reports thereof,
D. Woodruff Smith