Right, Power, and Faquanism, Tong Zhiwei proposes that right and power are ultimately a unified entity which can be named “faquan,” and that the purpose of law should be to establish a balanced faquan structure and to promote its preservation and proliferation. “Faquan” is thus a jurisprudential category reflecting the understanding of the unity of right and power. It has interest protected by the law and property with defined ownership as its content, and manifests itself as the external forms of jural right, freedom, liberty, jural power, public function, authority, competence, privilege, and immunity, etc. Faquanism relies mainly on six basic concepts (faquan, right, power, quan, residual quan and duty) to analyze the content of interests and property in all legal phenomena.
Tong Zhiwei, Ph.D in Law (1994, Wuhan University), is Professor of Law at East China University of Political Science and Law. He has published many articles and books on jurisprudence and constitutional law, including
Constitutional Reforms in Contemporary China (City University of Hong Kong Press, 2016) and
Forms of State Structure (Peking University Press, second edition, 2015).
Introduction I From Analytical Jurisprudence of the West to Semantic Analysis Jurisprudence of Present China
II The Limitations and Shortcomings of Chinese and Foreign Semantic Analysis Jurisprudence
III Elaboration of a Practical Legal Theory with Faquan as the Core Category
Investigation and Reflection on Fundamental Propositions of Traditional Legal Studies of China I Re-examination of the Status of Rights and Duties and Their Relationship
II An Overview of Right-Centric Theory in the First Half of 20th Century in China
III Renewal of Existing Chinese Semantic Analysis Jurisprudence
The Fundamentals of Faquanism I Legal-Philosophical Explications of Faquan
II Fundamental Propositions of Faquanism
III Elaboration on the Connotation of Faquan in Legal Relations
Faquanist Theory of the Center of Law I How Does a Faquanist View the Center of Law
II The Core Contents of Faquanism
III Supplementary Argumentation for Faquanism
Methodological Foundation of Faquanism I The Epistemologist Basis of Faquanism
II Proper Positioning of Class Analysis and Faquan Analysis
III The Essence of Law in Faquanism
Interpretative Framework of Legal Phenomena of Faquanism I Categorical System of Faquanism as a Legal Theory
II Analytical Model of Faquan as a Tool for Legal Studies
III Interpretative Design of Legal Phenomena of Faquanism
Conclusion Selected Bibliography Index
All interested in legal philosophy, jurisprudence, Chinese legal theory, Chinese law and Asian society in general.