Reading Talmudic Sources as Arguments: A New Interpretive Approach elucidates the unique characteristics of Talmudic discourse culture. Approaching Talmudic literature from a linguistic perspective, the book shows the extensive and hidden ways in which later rabbis used early formulations. Applying Quentin Skinner's interpretive question “What was the author doing in composing the text in this particular way?" to Talmudic literature reveals that Talmudic debate is not only about ideas, concepts and laws but also about the latter's connection to pre-existing formulations. These early traditions, rather than only being accepted or not, are
used by later generations to build their own arguments. The book articulates the function of tradition at the time that Rabbinic Judaism was forged.
Yuval Blankovsky, Ph.D. (1978), served as a research fellow at NYU Law School and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He has published monographs and articles including "A Silent Revolution: Talmudic Discussion about Tort Law" (
Jewish Quarterly Review 109.1) and
Sin for the Sake of God (Magnes 2017, Heb.).
Anyone with an interest in rabbinic literature, especially anyone who is interested in hermeneutics.