May It Please the Court, artist Xavier Cortada portrays ten significant decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States that originated from people, places, and events in Florida. These cases cover the rights of criminal defendants, the rights of free speech and free exercise of religion, and the powers of states. In
Painting Constitutional Law, scholars of constitutional law analyse the paintings and cases, describing the law surrounding the cases and discussing how Cortada captures these foundational decisions, their people, and their events on canvas. This book explores new connections between contemporary art and constitutional law.
Contributors are: Renée Ater, Mary Sue Backus, Kathleen A. Brady, Jenny E. Carroll, Erwin Chemerinsky, Xavier Cortada, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, Leslie Kendrick, Corinna Barrett Lain, Paul Marcus, Linda C. McClain, M.C. Mirow, James E. Pfander, Laura S. Underkuffler, and Howard M. Wasserman.
M.C. Mirow, Ph.D. (1993), Cambridge University, Dr.jur. (2003), Leiden University, is Professor of Law at FIU College of Law. Focusing on Latin American and Florida legal history, he is the author of
Latin American Law and
Latin American Constitutions.
Howard M. Wasserman, J.D. (1997), Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, is Professor of Law at FIU College of Law. He is the author and editor of numerous books and articles, including
Understanding Civil Rights Litigation.
All interested in U.S. constitutional law and the Supreme Court, including in the subjects of the cases depicted in Cortada’s paintings and analysed in the chapters. Those interested in legal iconography and the intersection of art and law.