Jus Post bellum: Restraint, Stabilisation and Peace seeks to answer the question “is restraint in war essential for a just and lasting peace”? With a foreword by Professor Brian Orend who asserts this as “a most commendable subject” in extending Just War Theory, the book contains chapters on the ethics of war-fighting since the end of the Cold War and a look into the future of conflict. From the causes of war, with physical restraint and reconciliation in combat and political settlement, further chapters written by expert academics and military participants cover international humanitarian law, practicalities of the use of force and some of the failures in achieving safe and lasting peace in modern-day theatres of conflict.
Patrick Mileham, PhD (2001), a graduate of Cambridge and Lancaster universities, is an academic and former British Army officer with operational experience in South Arabia and Northern Ireland. An author of many publications and conference papers, he has organized numerous conferences and published proceedings such as War and Morality (RUSI, 2004). He is a board Member of EuroISME.
Foreword: A most Commendable Subject: Justice After War Brian Orend Preface: Restraint in War: Essential for a Just Peace? Benoit Royal Notes on Contributors
Part 1: General: War and Peace
1 Jus Post Bellum Frigidum: A Kantian Idealistic Critique of Three Decades of Post-Cold War Global SecurityEdwinR.Micewski
2 Causation, Luck, and Restraint in War Florian Demont-Biaggi
3 Τhe Ancient Greek Ἄγος (Agos) and the Warrior Ethos Evaggelia Kiosi
Part 2: Just War and the Causes of Peace
4 Fighting Well for a Just Peace? Exploring the in Bello/post bellum Dependence Thesis Carl Ceulemans
5 Exploring the Relationship between jus ad bellum and jus post bellum Lonneke Peperkamp
6 In Our Obedience to Jus Post Bellum, could Respect for Jus in Bello Require Us to be Machiavellian? Marie-des-Neiges Ruffo de Calabre
7 What of Jus Post bellum if Just War Theory Rests on a Category mistake?Boris Kashnikov
Part 3: Reconciliation Root and Branch
8 Fostering Reconcilation as a Goal of Military Endeavour Nigel Biggar
9 Counter-intuition in a Violent and Retro-futuristic World: A Rejoinder to the
ICRC
‘Roots of Restraint in War’ Research Patrick Mileham
10 Dayton Peace Agreement for Bosnia and Herzegovina – Jus Post Bellum: A Choice between Stability and Change Srđan Starčević and Ilija Kajtez
11 Colombia’s Fuerza Pública (Security Forces) in the Special Jurisdiction for Peace: Special Treatment or Preferential Treatment? Camila Andrea Santamaría Chavarro, Diana Isabel Güiza Gómez and Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes
12 Safeguarding and Preserving Identity in War and Peace: A Moral and Military Necessity and a Resource for Reconciliation JorisD.Kila
Part 4: War Fighting and Peace Generating
13 Restraint: Dutch Soldiers’ Point of View,
ISAF
Afghanistan 2006–2010 Jan Peter van Bruggen
14 Towards Jus Post Bellum – ‘Ethical Warfare’ for Stabilisation in Iraq and Afghanistan Dennis Vincent
15 Paramilitary Organizations and Private Military Companies in War: How to Restrain What You Do Not Control? Dragan Stanar
16 The Dichotomy of Training and War: Making Sense of Soldiers’ Activities Juha Mäkinen
17 The Ethics of Stabilisation and Security: Principles for Jus Post Bellum – United Kingdom Seminar Proceedings Patrick Mileham
Index
Academics who specialize in the ethics of military force, interested professional armed forces personnel, lawyers, political scientists as well as the growing number of university programmes and military institute libraries.