Browse results
Contributors
Necati Alkan, Federico Alpi, Gabrielle Angey, Armand Aupiais, Katia Boissevain, Naima Bouras, Philippe Bourmaud, Gaetan du Roy, Séverine Gabry-Thienpont, Maria-Chiara Giorda, Bernard Heyberger, Emir Mahieddin, Michael Marten, Norig Neveu, Maria Chiara Rioli, Karène Sanchez Summerer, Heather Sharkey, Ester Sigillò, Sébastien Tank Storper, Emanuela Trevisan Semi, Annalaura Turiano and Vincent Vilmain.
Contributors
Necati Alkan, Federico Alpi, Gabrielle Angey, Armand Aupiais, Katia Boissevain, Naima Bouras, Philippe Bourmaud, Gaetan du Roy, Séverine Gabry-Thienpont, Maria-Chiara Giorda, Bernard Heyberger, Emir Mahieddin, Michael Marten, Norig Neveu, Maria Chiara Rioli, Karène Sanchez Summerer, Heather Sharkey, Ester Sigillò, Sébastien Tank Storper, Emanuela Trevisan Semi, Annalaura Turiano and Vincent Vilmain.
Contributors: Sarah Irving, Charbel Nassif, Konstantinos Papastathis, Karène Sanchez Summerer, Cyrus Schayegh
Contributors: Sarah Irving, Charbel Nassif, Konstantinos Papastathis, Karène Sanchez Summerer, Cyrus Schayegh
Abstract
Can and should religio-legal norms change with the times? Can changes in religious practices ever be permissible, or should they be categorically rejected as bidʾat (blameworthy innovations)? This chapter comprises a discussion of how Muslim scholars grappled with these questions in the seventeenth-century Ottoman Empire, where adherents of the Sunni revivalist movement, known as the Kadızâdelis, waged a campaign against a wide variety of beliefs and practices they considered to be bidʾat. One of the condemned practices was the congregational performance of supererogatory prayers on the nights of Regaib, Berat and Kadir. These nocturnal services were very popular with Muslims in the core Ottoman lands, had the sanction of many of the leading Ottoman scholars of the past and had been actively sponsored by the imperial authorities. Yet, they were also clearly an ‘nvented tradition’, which went against the express pronouncements of the earliest Muslim authorities. The author, then, examines how two scholars in the early-seventeenth century, Mustafa bin Hamza bin İbrahim bin Veliyüddin, alias Nushî, and ʿAbdülkerim el-Sivasî, tried to find a way around this conundrum by evoking the juridical principle, ‘sharʾi judgments change with the change of times.’
Contributors: Helen Pfeifer; Nabil al-Tikriti; Derin Terzioğlu; Tijana Krstić; Nir Shafir; Guy Burak; Çiğdem Kafesçioğlu; Grigor Boykov; H. Evren Sünnetçioğlu; Ünver Rüstem; Ayşe Baltacıoğlu-Brammer; Vefa Erginbaş; Selim Güngörürler.
Contributors: Helen Pfeifer; Nabil al-Tikriti; Derin Terzioğlu; Tijana Krstić; Nir Shafir; Guy Burak; Çiğdem Kafesçioğlu; Grigor Boykov; H. Evren Sünnetçioğlu; Ünver Rüstem; Ayşe Baltacıoğlu-Brammer; Vefa Erginbaş; Selim Güngörürler.