Browse results
Every article in Cahiers Chronos is reviewed by two peer-reviewers using the double-blind system.
The study of temporal reference represents a wide subject area with various and complex issues. The Cahiers Chronos series proposes collected studies representative of the diversity of approaches in the field of temporal semantics.
The reader will find here, for example, studies on the temporality of the verb in general, particular verb tenses, aspect and actionality, temporal subordination, or the interaction between tense and temporal complementation.
The diversity of theoretical approaches (temporal logic, Vendler’s ontology, pragmatics, relevance theory, Guillaume’s model, etc.) and the survey of languages (among which, French, English, German, Spanish and many others) generate interesting and sometimes unexpected points of view on a subject area that nowadays captivates many linguists and scholars.
L'étude de la référence temporelle constitue un domaine très vaste où se dégagent des problématiques diverses et complexes. La collection Cahiers Chronos propose des recueils d'articles - et à l'avenir également des monographies - représentatifs de la diversité des approches dans le domaine de la sémantique temporelle. Le lecteur y trouvera, entre autres, des études consacrées à la temporalité du verbe en général, à des temps verbaux particuliers (par exemple, le passé simple français ou le present perfect anglais), à la problématique de l'aspect et du mode d'action, aux subordonnées temporelles ou à l'interaction entre le temps du verbe et les compléments de temps. La diversité des approches théoriques (logique temporelle reichenbachienne, ontologie de Vendler, repérages énonciatifs de Culioli, modèle guillaumien, grammaire fonctionnelle de Dik, pragmasémantique de Kleiber, théorie de la pertinence, etc.) permet de jeter des regards intéressants et parfois inattendus sur un domaine qui passionne actuellement beaucoup de linguistes. La collection ne s'intéresse pas seulement à la linguistique française; on y trouve aussi des études consacrées à l'anglais, l'allemand, les langues slaves ou la linguistique comparée.
Abstract
This study investigates the English Way-construction, as defined in Construction Grammar terms, as a case study to explore agency attribution processes at the intersection of animacy and agentive properties of verbs, on the basis of the construction’s constraints previously described in literature – that the construction implies self-propelled, intentional movement and that the verb slot is restricted to unergative, agentive verbs. Corpus-based research is conducted to collect evidence of non-agentive verbs and inanimate subjects used in the construction and describe how they reconcile with the construction. The results provide a more accurate description of the way construction, showing that agency attribution processes define the construction’s usage beyond its single components and relate to more general cognitive processes. On the broader picture, this study shows that the conceptualization of agency attributed to inanimate entities has consequences in the way they are accounted responsibility and seen as blameworthy.
Abstract
Agents’ actions and intentions can be prompted or hindered in multiple ways. Across languages, verbs that lexicalize the causative primitives of CAUSE, ENABLE or PREVENT (Wolff & Song 2003) can help us understand the nature of agency, precisely because they involve multiple participants which are sometimes seen as being in a position of influencing each other via different types of relations. In this paper, we focus on the role of authority, intended as an influence that affects the choices available to a free agent with respect to the actions in service of their goal. We show that, while many causative verbs seem to imply the type of force relation between the participants in their lexical meaning, the French causative verb laisser is underspecified: the type of influence exerted by the two participants in a laisser relation is determined by the syntactic structure of the causative construction.
Abstract
Recent research on subjunctive obviation, i.e. the unavailability of de se reading in (mostly) subjunctive clauses holding in a number of languages, has pointed out that obviation may depend on semantic and pragmatic constraints involving attitude predicates and the propositional content of the attitude itself. In line with this approach, the article explores the hypothesis whereby subjunctive obviation is related to the epistemic access to a propositional content. In particular I will discuss subjunctive obviation in Italian focusing on sentences involving doxastic attitude predicates in the first person. I will propose that subjunctive obviation is caused by a semantic clash arising when (i) the attitude predicate presupposes that the information conveyed in the embedded clause is epistemically accessed in an indirect way (by guessing, inferring, etc.) and (ii) the propositional content expressed in the embedded clause can only be accessed via introspection (i.e., it is object of “self-knowledge”, as generally understood in the field of philosophy of language). This analysis accounts for the basic facts involving obviation in doxastic environments as well as novel data previously not reviewed; moreover, it suggests that the phenomenon is not limited to subjunctive clauses, but can also occur in indicative clauses, as long as a semantic clash arises between the attitude predicate semantics and the embedded clause semantics. While empirically limited to doxastic predicates, the present study may provide the founding for further analysis on obviation in other syntactic environments.
Abstract
Some languages have special constructions which appear to encode unintentional causation. In previous research, two distinct ways of deriving this reading have been proposed: one that involves a circumstantial necessity modal and one that involves introducing a possessor onto a change of state event. While in the former unintentional causation boils down to an event being forced by circumstances, in the latter it is derived as an implicature in the absence of a canonical agent relation in syntax. In this paper, I investigate two morphosyntactically distinct constructions in Laz (South Caucasian) which both allow the unintentional causation reading. I show that these two constructions instantiate the proposed distinct semantic paths to unintentional causation, providing empirical evidence that the modal and the non-modal paths can co-exist in a grammar. The investigation also reveals that what enables the modal path in Laz is a circumstantial possibility modal, which exhibits force variability in the absence of its dual.
This book outlines the development and research results of cultural semantic theory, and then proposes the distinction between two types of cultural semantics at the synchronic level: conceptual gap items and items with a cultural meaning. It provides criteria for identifying these items by using detailed examples from theory and application. Finally, the two types of cultural semantics are applied to the case of modern Chinese. The criteria proposed for determining the Chinese cultural semantics apply not only to this, but also to other languages. Therefore, this book offers an operational basis for further studies of cultural semantics in academia.
This book outlines the development and research results of cultural semantic theory, and then proposes the distinction between two types of cultural semantics at the synchronic level: conceptual gap items and items with a cultural meaning. It provides criteria for identifying these items by using detailed examples from theory and application. Finally, the two types of cultural semantics are applied to the case of modern Chinese. The criteria proposed for determining the Chinese cultural semantics apply not only to this, but also to other languages. Therefore, this book offers an operational basis for further studies of cultural semantics in academia.