Browse results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 1,219 items for :

  • Archaeology, Art & Architecture x
  • Search level: All x
Clear All
After decades of controversy, there is now a growing consensus that Greek warfare was not singular and simple, but complex and multiform. In this volume, emerging and established scholars build on this consensus to explore Greek warfare beyond its traditional focus on hoplites and the phalanx. We expand the chronological limits back into the Iron Age, the geographical limits to the central and eastern Mediterranean, and the operational limits to include cavalry, light-armed troops, and sieges. We also look beyond the battlefield at integral aspects of warfare including religion, the experiences of women, and the recovery of the war dead.
In Kids Those Days, Lahney Preston-Matto and Mary Valante have organized a collection of interdisciplinary research into childhood throughout the Middle Ages. Contributors to the volume investigate childhood from Greece to the “Celtic-Fringe,” looking at how children lived, suffered, thrived, or died young. Scholars from myriad disciplines, from art and archaeology to history and literature, offer essays on abandonment and abuse, fosterage and guardianship, criminal behavior and child-rearing, child bishops and sainthood, disabilities and miracles, and a wide variety of other subjects related to medieval children. The volume focuses especially on children in the realms of religion, law, and vulnerabilities.
Contributors are Paul A. Broyles, Sarah Croix, Gavin Fort, Sophia Germanidou, Danielle Griego, Máire Johnson, Daniel T. Kline, Jenni Kuuliala, Lahney Preston-Matto, Melissa Raine, Eve Salisbury, Ruth Salter, Bridgette Slavin, and Mary A. Valante.
Author: Jessica Nowlin
Etruscan Orientalization provides a historiography of the terms ‘orientalizing’ and ‘orientalization’ in eighteenth through twentieth century European scholarship on early Etruscan history as it sought to understand how civilizational knowledge transferred in antiquity from East to West. This original orientalist framing of cultural influence was influenced by notions of Italian nationalism and colonialism, all traits that can still be felt in modern understandings of ‘orientalizing’ as an art historical style, chronological period, and process of cultural change. This work argues that scholarship on Mediterranean connectivity in early first millennium BCE can provide new insights by abandoning the term ‘orientalizing’.
Author: Jessica Nowlin

Abstract

The terms ‘orientalizing’ and ‘orientalization’ have been employed to describe an art historical style, historical period, and process of cultural interaction between East and West within the early first-millennium BCE Mediterranean. With particular focus on Etruria and Italy, this historiography explores the Orientalist framework at the heart of ‘orientalizing’ terms while outlining how modern political movements and ideologies of nationalism and colonialism have influenced interpretations of ‘orientalizing.’ By showing the political viewpoints underlying the origins of the term and the ways in which these positions have continued to shape modern interpretations of the effects of eastern imported objects, ideas, and practices in Etruria, this work argues that the term ‘orientalizing’ should no longer be used. Instead, the period should be fit into existing chronological periodizations, and the process of cultural change should be interrogated outside of an Orientalist discourse.

In: Etruscan Orientalization
Author: Luke Lavan

Abstract

This book presents a synthesis on a long-neglected aspect of Late Antiquity (A.D. 284–650): the development of civic public space in Mediterranean urban centres, often ignored in favour of new church buildings or luxurious private houses. It examines the material and human environment at the heart of the late antique city: the architectural, artefactual, and behavioural nature of those areas where people could not avoid interacting with each other: the squares, streets, shops, and markets pf the late antique city. The work is largely descriptive in content, intended to support a programme of artistic visualisation, as much as to provide material for reflection. It systematically addresses the physical appearance of buildings, people, and material culture found in each settings, and how they were bound together in human actions, both ritualised and everyday, under the headings of political, social, economic, and religious behaviours. Temporality and cultural aspects of urban experience are also explored in a less systematic manner. For each architectural space and each built structure within it, an attempt is made to provide a standardised discussion of chronological frequency, regional distribution, plan size, height, distinctive materials, decoration, sculptural ornament, urban setting, and function. Within each chapter, questions are asked about the distinctiveness of architecture and behaviour, and the causes of change.

Most of the detail on specific sites is contained within the appendices, which form an integral part of the work. Here methodology is explained and sites are given the same treatment according to a standard set of principles, notably in terms of their dating. A great number of original observations are made in this section, which take the notices beyond summaries of previous work. On occasion, some sites are discussed in greater length within the main text, disturbing the structure outlined above, where detailed knowledge of them seems more appropriate. Conversely, where data is overwhelming in scale, as it is for statues, a broad discussion of themes takes precedence over a presentation of facts. This is justified due to their accessibility, in an Oxford online database. A thematic discussion, with selected discussion of data is also introduced in the treatment of street architecture, for the discussion of encroachment, and for the planning of street grids. The sources for individual chapters, are evaluated briefly at the start of each section. Urban spaces are split unevenly into a three-part treatment of streets (architecture, processions, everyday life) and fora / agorai (4th–5th c., 6th–7th c.), except for markets and shops where single chapter is maintained. Some treatment of socio-political aspects of churches is found in the latter agorai chapter. Nonetheless, all sections cohere.

The conclusions contain thematic discussions of chronological and regional variation, focusing, respectively, on the axiom of continuity versus change, and on defining the limits of the late antique urban koine, whilst also seeking to evaluate the character of public space in the now-obscured city of Constantinople. The significance of the findings to the nature of late antique society is evaluated, for political, social, religious, commercial, and cultural aspects, and the impact of the Church on civic life is discussed in detail. Finally, the significance of public space to contemporary views of late antiquity is explored, with a consideration of the modern political matrices which influence our vision. The study is illustrated by around 170 figures, including urban plans, comparative monument plans, facade sections, and colour photographs of selected sites. The first volume is complemented by tables of architectural measurements and site distribution maps, with an index. The second volume contains a gazetteer of ceramic forms with reference to dating ranges attributed to them in standard manuals and works of reference currently in use.

In terms of the content, readers will find a detailed discussion of the nature of monumental streets in the period, both in terms of their fine architectural elements and ornaments and more mundane elements such as sidewalks and road paving, alongside a comprehensive discussion of the architecture of fora / agorai and shops, where fountains and fixtures are described alongside colonnades and hemispherical malls. The attention paid to the commonest elements of urban life, deliveries of goods to sewers, is designed to give one a comprehensive urban portrait, that is as much bottom-up as it is top-down. Although some textual bias towards the lives of the wealth is admitted, a light is shone towards the habits of stall-holders, beggars, children, wherever this is possible. Stress is placed on the great amenity of the late antique city, accessible without charge to the ordinary citizen, and the survival of complex urban regulation, certainly under the ‘notables’ in the 6th c. East. This, alongside evidence for inter-communal religious coexistence in public life, is seen as being a distinctive feature of urban life in the period, where Christianisation was both slow and subtle, supporting or ignoring, rather than overturning the classical city, which continued in many ways to resemble the form it had in the classical and Hellenistic period. This is nowhere more obvious than in the Aegean region where a distinctively Greek regional urban identity can be seen in the building projects of the 6th c. A.D. as much as the 4th c.

Perhaps the most significant conclusion of the work, is that the Great city of Constantinople, the capital of Greek world, showed a strong affinity to the urbanism of contemporary Syria / Levant rather than to the Aegean and Asia Minor. The extent to which is reflected Balkan urban patterns is less clear, although it did so in materials. Its other major affinity is with Rome, most obvious in terms of its public plazas. Other notable observations, made by accident rather than design, include the identification of a severe recession in public works, not in the 4th c., the supposed time of a ‘decline of the curia’, but rather in the middle years of the 5th c., when construction only continued on public space in Rome and Constantinople. In the West, streets and fora were covered by beaten earth or worse, whereas, in the East, repairs simply stopped, although surfaces remained clean. The late 5th c. is marked by a clear recovery, but rather than being spread evenly across all types of, city as they were in the 4th c., secular building works are now concentrated in larger cities with smaller places dropping out of the classical urban orbit. There is some slight evidence of a recovery in public space in the West, starting before the reconquest and not confined to areas that Justinian’s armies occupied. A few previously undetected urban habits are identified, such as a western tendency to repave only a portion of very wide streets, in the 4th c., and an eastern desire to monumentalise minor streets that were too narrow for conventional porticoes and sidewalks, perhaps inspired by architectural solutions to the very narrow streets of central Constantinople.

The purpose of the work is, however, not merely analytical, but to produce a fog of sensations through which one might perceive everyday life and urban experience within the varied cities of the late antique world. The work encourages a positive evaluation of late antique culture from its heartland, and its most prosperous cities, from say the Gaza known to Choricius and his classmate Bishop Marcian, or the Emessa known to Symeon the Fool, rather than from the crumbling towns of 5th c. Britain or 6th c. Italy. These cities were places of admirable amenity, where the classical city reached its most sophisticated, at the level of pedestrian street experience, still serving the ordinary citizen. From this, the author has felt the need to identify something more than rupture, discontinuity, and reinvention in late antique life and point to substantial strands of authentic untroubled continuity with the classical past. He sees a transmission of classical culture in its syncretic Hellenistic form, from the Near East to Constantinople. It is this strand of culture, not that of Athens, which forms the great thread of classical continuity, the culture of Antioch and Alexandria, and of their schools and as much as their urban design. Attempts to reinvent classical culture with a refoundationalist emphasis on Archaic and classical Aegean roots, so popular in modern Europe, therefore risk cutting themselves from the mainstream of the Hellenistic world, in which Greek culture met Judaism in Syria, and Buddhism in Bactria, and where buildings and cities were developed on a far greater scale. The place of Christianity within this hybrid culture, seems neither incoherent nor dominant, a development in which voices of contradiction were balanced by those of incorporation and learning.

For the less philosophically inclined, the work draws on both a pile of textual sources and of archaeological reports. It is hoped that the information contained within the first volume will help both to contextualise ancient texts and assist in the writing of historical fiction about the period. The second volume may serve as a reference point for identifying elements of late antique urban features, such as sidewalks and market stalls, which for too long have been passed over. Quite how much of its method will be adopted remains to be seen: the direction of research excavations is a famously individualistic endeavour, related in some ways to performance theatre, the stuff of summer holidays. Furthermore, the patient, is, after all, dead, so let us not worry about it too much. That said, this book offers an exemplar for anyone seeking to make archaeological discoveries ‘count’ in reconstructing late antique society. It addresses thorny questions about phasing and dating which inevitably arise from using the reports of others, with very varied levels of interest in late antiquity and very varied methods. It tries also to show how important it is to build contrasting cases when evaluating historical propositions. Two seemingly contradictory tendencies can be true at the same time. Late Antiquity can be a time of continuity and rupture, of co-existence and conflict, all at the same time. One must resist the temptation to make a case around a rhetorical core which serves the political interests of the present, although some biases must be expected and are always worth admitting.

In: Public Space in the Late Antique City (2 vols.)
Author: Luke Lavan

Abstract

This book presents a synthesis on a long-neglected aspect of Late Antiquity (A.D. 284–650): the development of civic public space in Mediterranean urban centres, often ignored in favour of new church buildings or luxurious private houses. It examines the material and human environment at the heart of the late antique city: the architectural, artefactual, and behavioural nature of those areas where people could not avoid interacting with each other: the squares, streets, shops, and markets pf the late antique city. The work is largely descriptive in content, intended to support a programme of artistic visualisation, as much as to provide material for reflection. It systematically addresses the physical appearance of buildings, people, and material culture found in each settings, and how they were bound together in human actions, both ritualised and everyday, under the headings of political, social, economic, and religious behaviours. Temporality and cultural aspects of urban experience are also explored in a less systematic manner. For each architectural space and each built structure within it, an attempt is made to provide a standardised discussion of chronological frequency, regional distribution, plan size, height, distinctive materials, decoration, sculptural ornament, urban setting, and function. Within each chapter, questions are asked about the distinctiveness of architecture and behaviour, and the causes of change.

Most of the detail on specific sites is contained within the appendices, which form an integral part of the work. Here methodology is explained and sites are given the same treatment according to a standard set of principles, notably in terms of their dating. A great number of original observations are made in this section, which take the notices beyond summaries of previous work. On occasion, some sites are discussed in greater length within the main text, disturbing the structure outlined above, where detailed knowledge of them seems more appropriate. Conversely, where data is overwhelming in scale, as it is for statues, a broad discussion of themes takes precedence over a presentation of facts. This is justified due to their accessibility, in an Oxford online database. A thematic discussion, with selected discussion of data is also introduced in the treatment of street architecture, for the discussion of encroachment, and for the planning of street grids. The sources for individual chapters, are evaluated briefly at the start of each section. Urban spaces are split unevenly into a three-part treatment of streets (architecture, processions, everyday life) and fora / agorai (4th–5th c., 6th–7th c.), except for markets and shops where single chapter is maintained. Some treatment of socio-political aspects of churches is found in the latter agorai chapter. Nonetheless, all sections cohere.

The conclusions contain thematic discussions of chronological and regional variation, focusing, respectively, on the axiom of continuity versus change, and on defining the limits of the late antique urban koine, whilst also seeking to evaluate the character of public space in the now-obscured city of Constantinople. The significance of the findings to the nature of late antique society is evaluated, for political, social, religious, commercial, and cultural aspects, and the impact of the Church on civic life is discussed in detail. Finally, the significance of public space to contemporary views of late antiquity is explored, with a consideration of the modern political matrices which influence our vision. The study is illustrated by around 170 figures, including urban plans, comparative monument plans, facade sections, and colour photographs of selected sites. The first volume is complemented by tables of architectural measurements and site distribution maps, with an index. The second volume contains a gazetteer of ceramic forms with reference to dating ranges attributed to them in standard manuals and works of reference currently in use.

In terms of the content, readers will find a detailed discussion of the nature of monumental streets in the period, both in terms of their fine architectural elements and ornaments and more mundane elements such as sidewalks and road paving, alongside a comprehensive discussion of the architecture of fora / agorai and shops, where fountains and fixtures are described alongside colonnades and hemispherical malls. The attention paid to the commonest elements of urban life, deliveries of goods to sewers, is designed to give one a comprehensive urban portrait, that is as much bottom-up as it is top-down. Although some textual bias towards the lives of the wealth is admitted, a light is shone towards the habits of stall-holders, beggars, children, wherever this is possible. Stress is placed on the great amenity of the late antique city, accessible without charge to the ordinary citizen, and the survival of complex urban regulation, certainly under the ‘notables’ in the 6th c. East. This, alongside evidence for inter-communal religious coexistence in public life, is seen as being a distinctive feature of urban life in the period, where Christianisation was both slow and subtle, supporting or ignoring, rather than overturning the classical city, which continued in many ways to resemble the form it had in the classical and Hellenistic period. This is nowhere more obvious than in the Aegean region where a distinctively Greek regional urban identity can be seen in the building projects of the 6th c. A.D. as much as the 4th c.

Perhaps the most significant conclusion of the work, is that the Great city of Constantinople, the capital of Greek world, showed a strong affinity to the urbanism of contemporary Syria / Levant rather than to the Aegean and Asia Minor. The extent to which is reflected Balkan urban patterns is less clear, although it did so in materials. Its other major affinity is with Rome, most obvious in terms of its public plazas. Other notable observations, made by accident rather than design, include the identification of a severe recession in public works, not in the 4th c., the supposed time of a ‘decline of the curia’, but rather in the middle years of the 5th c., when construction only continued on public space in Rome and Constantinople. In the West, streets and fora were covered by beaten earth or worse, whereas, in the East, repairs simply stopped, although surfaces remained clean. The late 5th c. is marked by a clear recovery, but rather than being spread evenly across all types of, city as they were in the 4th c., secular building works are now concentrated in larger cities with smaller places dropping out of the classical urban orbit. There is some slight evidence of a recovery in public space in the West, starting before the reconquest and not confined to areas that Justinian’s armies occupied. A few previously undetected urban habits are identified, such as a western tendency to repave only a portion of very wide streets, in the 4th c., and an eastern desire to monumentalise minor streets that were too narrow for conventional porticoes and sidewalks, perhaps inspired by architectural solutions to the very narrow streets of central Constantinople.

The purpose of the work is, however, not merely analytical, but to produce a fog of sensations through which one might perceive everyday life and urban experience within the varied cities of the late antique world. The work encourages a positive evaluation of late antique culture from its heartland, and its most prosperous cities, from say the Gaza known to Choricius and his classmate Bishop Marcian, or the Emessa known to Symeon the Fool, rather than from the crumbling towns of 5th c. Britain or 6th c. Italy. These cities were places of admirable amenity, where the classical city reached its most sophisticated, at the level of pedestrian street experience, still serving the ordinary citizen. From this, the author has felt the need to identify something more than rupture, discontinuity, and reinvention in late antique life and point to substantial strands of authentic untroubled continuity with the classical past. He sees a transmission of classical culture in its syncretic Hellenistic form, from the Near East to Constantinople. It is this strand of culture, not that of Athens, which forms the great thread of classical continuity, the culture of Antioch and Alexandria, and of their schools and as much as their urban design. Attempts to reinvent classical culture with a refoundationalist emphasis on Archaic and classical Aegean roots, so popular in modern Europe, therefore risk cutting themselves from the mainstream of the Hellenistic world, in which Greek culture met Judaism in Syria, and Buddhism in Bactria, and where buildings and cities were developed on a far greater scale. The place of Christianity within this hybrid culture, seems neither incoherent nor dominant, a development in which voices of contradiction were balanced by those of incorporation and learning.

For the less philosophically inclined, the work draws on both a pile of textual sources and of archaeological reports. It is hoped that the information contained within the first volume will help both to contextualise ancient texts and assist in the writing of historical fiction about the period. The second volume may serve as a reference point for identifying elements of late antique urban features, such as sidewalks and market stalls, which for too long have been passed over. Quite how much of its method will be adopted remains to be seen: the direction of research excavations is a famously individualistic endeavour, related in some ways to performance theatre, the stuff of summer holidays. Furthermore, the patient, is, after all, dead, so let us not worry about it too much. That said, this book offers an exemplar for anyone seeking to make archaeological discoveries ‘count’ in reconstructing late antique society. It addresses thorny questions about phasing and dating which inevitably arise from using the reports of others, with very varied levels of interest in late antiquity and very varied methods. It tries also to show how important it is to build contrasting cases when evaluating historical propositions. Two seemingly contradictory tendencies can be true at the same time. Late Antiquity can be a time of continuity and rupture, of co-existence and conflict, all at the same time. One must resist the temptation to make a case around a rhetorical core which serves the political interests of the present, although some biases must be expected and are always worth admitting.

In: Public Space in the Late Antique City (2 vols.)
Author: Luke Lavan

Abstract

This book presents a synthesis on a long-neglected aspect of Late Antiquity (A.D. 284–650): the development of civic public space in Mediterranean urban centres, often ignored in favour of new church buildings or luxurious private houses. It examines the material and human environment at the heart of the late antique city: the architectural, artefactual, and behavioural nature of those areas where people could not avoid interacting with each other: the squares, streets, shops, and markets pf the late antique city. The work is largely descriptive in content, intended to support a programme of artistic visualisation, as much as to provide material for reflection. It systematically addresses the physical appearance of buildings, people, and material culture found in each settings, and how they were bound together in human actions, both ritualised and everyday, under the headings of political, social, economic, and religious behaviours. Temporality and cultural aspects of urban experience are also explored in a less systematic manner. For each architectural space and each built structure within it, an attempt is made to provide a standardised discussion of chronological frequency, regional distribution, plan size, height, distinctive materials, decoration, sculptural ornament, urban setting, and function. Within each chapter, questions are asked about the distinctiveness of architecture and behaviour, and the causes of change.

Most of the detail on specific sites is contained within the appendices, which form an integral part of the work. Here methodology is explained and sites are given the same treatment according to a standard set of principles, notably in terms of their dating. A great number of original observations are made in this section, which take the notices beyond summaries of previous work. On occasion, some sites are discussed in greater length within the main text, disturbing the structure outlined above, where detailed knowledge of them seems more appropriate. Conversely, where data is overwhelming in scale, as it is for statues, a broad discussion of themes takes precedence over a presentation of facts. This is justified due to their accessibility, in an Oxford online database. A thematic discussion, with selected discussion of data is also introduced in the treatment of street architecture, for the discussion of encroachment, and for the planning of street grids. The sources for individual chapters, are evaluated briefly at the start of each section. Urban spaces are split unevenly into a three-part treatment of streets (architecture, processions, everyday life) and fora / agorai (4th–5th c., 6th–7th c.), except for markets and shops where single chapter is maintained. Some treatment of socio-political aspects of churches is found in the latter agorai chapter. Nonetheless, all sections cohere.

The conclusions contain thematic discussions of chronological and regional variation, focusing, respectively, on the axiom of continuity versus change, and on defining the limits of the late antique urban koine, whilst also seeking to evaluate the character of public space in the now-obscured city of Constantinople. The significance of the findings to the nature of late antique society is evaluated, for political, social, religious, commercial, and cultural aspects, and the impact of the Church on civic life is discussed in detail. Finally, the significance of public space to contemporary views of late antiquity is explored, with a consideration of the modern political matrices which influence our vision. The study is illustrated by around 170 figures, including urban plans, comparative monument plans, facade sections, and colour photographs of selected sites. The first volume is complemented by tables of architectural measurements and site distribution maps, with an index. The second volume contains a gazetteer of ceramic forms with reference to dating ranges attributed to them in standard manuals and works of reference currently in use.

In terms of the content, readers will find a detailed discussion of the nature of monumental streets in the period, both in terms of their fine architectural elements and ornaments and more mundane elements such as sidewalks and road paving, alongside a comprehensive discussion of the architecture of fora / agorai and shops, where fountains and fixtures are described alongside colonnades and hemispherical malls. The attention paid to the commonest elements of urban life, deliveries of goods to sewers, is designed to give one a comprehensive urban portrait, that is as much bottom-up as it is top-down. Although some textual bias towards the lives of the wealth is admitted, a light is shone towards the habits of stall-holders, beggars, children, wherever this is possible. Stress is placed on the great amenity of the late antique city, accessible without charge to the ordinary citizen, and the survival of complex urban regulation, certainly under the ‘notables’ in the 6th c. East. This, alongside evidence for inter-communal religious coexistence in public life, is seen as being a distinctive feature of urban life in the period, where Christianisation was both slow and subtle, supporting or ignoring, rather than overturning the classical city, which continued in many ways to resemble the form it had in the classical and Hellenistic period. This is nowhere more obvious than in the Aegean region where a distinctively Greek regional urban identity can be seen in the building projects of the 6th c. A.D. as much as the 4th c.

Perhaps the most significant conclusion of the work, is that the Great city of Constantinople, the capital of Greek world, showed a strong affinity to the urbanism of contemporary Syria / Levant rather than to the Aegean and Asia Minor. The extent to which is reflected Balkan urban patterns is less clear, although it did so in materials. Its other major affinity is with Rome, most obvious in terms of its public plazas. Other notable observations, made by accident rather than design, include the identification of a severe recession in public works, not in the 4th c., the supposed time of a ‘decline of the curia’, but rather in the middle years of the 5th c., when construction only continued on public space in Rome and Constantinople. In the West, streets and fora were covered by beaten earth or worse, whereas, in the East, repairs simply stopped, although surfaces remained clean. The late 5th c. is marked by a clear recovery, but rather than being spread evenly across all types of, city as they were in the 4th c., secular building works are now concentrated in larger cities with smaller places dropping out of the classical urban orbit. There is some slight evidence of a recovery in public space in the West, starting before the reconquest and not confined to areas that Justinian’s armies occupied. A few previously undetected urban habits are identified, such as a western tendency to repave only a portion of very wide streets, in the 4th c., and an eastern desire to monumentalise minor streets that were too narrow for conventional porticoes and sidewalks, perhaps inspired by architectural solutions to the very narrow streets of central Constantinople.

The purpose of the work is, however, not merely analytical, but to produce a fog of sensations through which one might perceive everyday life and urban experience within the varied cities of the late antique world. The work encourages a positive evaluation of late antique culture from its heartland, and its most prosperous cities, from say the Gaza known to Choricius and his classmate Bishop Marcian, or the Emessa known to Symeon the Fool, rather than from the crumbling towns of 5th c. Britain or 6th c. Italy. These cities were places of admirable amenity, where the classical city reached its most sophisticated, at the level of pedestrian street experience, still serving the ordinary citizen. From this, the author has felt the need to identify something more than rupture, discontinuity, and reinvention in late antique life and point to substantial strands of authentic untroubled continuity with the classical past. He sees a transmission of classical culture in its syncretic Hellenistic form, from the Near East to Constantinople. It is this strand of culture, not that of Athens, which forms the great thread of classical continuity, the culture of Antioch and Alexandria, and of their schools and as much as their urban design. Attempts to reinvent classical culture with a refoundationalist emphasis on Archaic and classical Aegean roots, so popular in modern Europe, therefore risk cutting themselves from the mainstream of the Hellenistic world, in which Greek culture met Judaism in Syria, and Buddhism in Bactria, and where buildings and cities were developed on a far greater scale. The place of Christianity within this hybrid culture, seems neither incoherent nor dominant, a development in which voices of contradiction were balanced by those of incorporation and learning.

For the less philosophically inclined, the work draws on both a pile of textual sources and of archaeological reports. It is hoped that the information contained within the first volume will help both to contextualise ancient texts and assist in the writing of historical fiction about the period. The second volume may serve as a reference point for identifying elements of late antique urban features, such as sidewalks and market stalls, which for too long have been passed over. Quite how much of its method will be adopted remains to be seen: the direction of research excavations is a famously individualistic endeavour, related in some ways to performance theatre, the stuff of summer holidays. Furthermore, the patient, is, after all, dead, so let us not worry about it too much. That said, this book offers an exemplar for anyone seeking to make archaeological discoveries ‘count’ in reconstructing late antique society. It addresses thorny questions about phasing and dating which inevitably arise from using the reports of others, with very varied levels of interest in late antiquity and very varied methods. It tries also to show how important it is to build contrasting cases when evaluating historical propositions. Two seemingly contradictory tendencies can be true at the same time. Late Antiquity can be a time of continuity and rupture, of co-existence and conflict, all at the same time. One must resist the temptation to make a case around a rhetorical core which serves the political interests of the present, although some biases must be expected and are always worth admitting.

In: Public Space in the Late Antique City (2 vols.)
Author: Luke Lavan

Abstract

This book presents a synthesis on a long-neglected aspect of Late Antiquity (A.D. 284–650): the development of civic public space in Mediterranean urban centres, often ignored in favour of new church buildings or luxurious private houses. It examines the material and human environment at the heart of the late antique city: the architectural, artefactual, and behavioural nature of those areas where people could not avoid interacting with each other: the squares, streets, shops, and markets pf the late antique city. The work is largely descriptive in content, intended to support a programme of artistic visualisation, as much as to provide material for reflection. It systematically addresses the physical appearance of buildings, people, and material culture found in each settings, and how they were bound together in human actions, both ritualised and everyday, under the headings of political, social, economic, and religious behaviours. Temporality and cultural aspects of urban experience are also explored in a less systematic manner. For each architectural space and each built structure within it, an attempt is made to provide a standardised discussion of chronological frequency, regional distribution, plan size, height, distinctive materials, decoration, sculptural ornament, urban setting, and function. Within each chapter, questions are asked about the distinctiveness of architecture and behaviour, and the causes of change.

Most of the detail on specific sites is contained within the appendices, which form an integral part of the work. Here methodology is explained and sites are given the same treatment according to a standard set of principles, notably in terms of their dating. A great number of original observations are made in this section, which take the notices beyond summaries of previous work. On occasion, some sites are discussed in greater length within the main text, disturbing the structure outlined above, where detailed knowledge of them seems more appropriate. Conversely, where data is overwhelming in scale, as it is for statues, a broad discussion of themes takes precedence over a presentation of facts. This is justified due to their accessibility, in an Oxford online database. A thematic discussion, with selected discussion of data is also introduced in the treatment of street architecture, for the discussion of encroachment, and for the planning of street grids. The sources for individual chapters, are evaluated briefly at the start of each section. Urban spaces are split unevenly into a three-part treatment of streets (architecture, processions, everyday life) and fora / agorai (4th–5th c., 6th–7th c.), except for markets and shops where single chapter is maintained. Some treatment of socio-political aspects of churches is found in the latter agorai chapter. Nonetheless, all sections cohere.

The conclusions contain thematic discussions of chronological and regional variation, focusing, respectively, on the axiom of continuity versus change, and on defining the limits of the late antique urban koine, whilst also seeking to evaluate the character of public space in the now-obscured city of Constantinople. The significance of the findings to the nature of late antique society is evaluated, for political, social, religious, commercial, and cultural aspects, and the impact of the Church on civic life is discussed in detail. Finally, the significance of public space to contemporary views of late antiquity is explored, with a consideration of the modern political matrices which influence our vision. The study is illustrated by around 170 figures, including urban plans, comparative monument plans, facade sections, and colour photographs of selected sites. The first volume is complemented by tables of architectural measurements and site distribution maps, with an index. The second volume contains a gazetteer of ceramic forms with reference to dating ranges attributed to them in standard manuals and works of reference currently in use.

In terms of the content, readers will find a detailed discussion of the nature of monumental streets in the period, both in terms of their fine architectural elements and ornaments and more mundane elements such as sidewalks and road paving, alongside a comprehensive discussion of the architecture of fora / agorai and shops, where fountains and fixtures are described alongside colonnades and hemispherical malls. The attention paid to the commonest elements of urban life, deliveries of goods to sewers, is designed to give one a comprehensive urban portrait, that is as much bottom-up as it is top-down. Although some textual bias towards the lives of the wealth is admitted, a light is shone towards the habits of stall-holders, beggars, children, wherever this is possible. Stress is placed on the great amenity of the late antique city, accessible without charge to the ordinary citizen, and the survival of complex urban regulation, certainly under the ‘notables’ in the 6th c. East. This, alongside evidence for inter-communal religious coexistence in public life, is seen as being a distinctive feature of urban life in the period, where Christianisation was both slow and subtle, supporting or ignoring, rather than overturning the classical city, which continued in many ways to resemble the form it had in the classical and Hellenistic period. This is nowhere more obvious than in the Aegean region where a distinctively Greek regional urban identity can be seen in the building projects of the 6th c. A.D. as much as the 4th c.

Perhaps the most significant conclusion of the work, is that the Great city of Constantinople, the capital of Greek world, showed a strong affinity to the urbanism of contemporary Syria / Levant rather than to the Aegean and Asia Minor. The extent to which is reflected Balkan urban patterns is less clear, although it did so in materials. Its other major affinity is with Rome, most obvious in terms of its public plazas. Other notable observations, made by accident rather than design, include the identification of a severe recession in public works, not in the 4th c., the supposed time of a ‘decline of the curia’, but rather in the middle years of the 5th c., when construction only continued on public space in Rome and Constantinople. In the West, streets and fora were covered by beaten earth or worse, whereas, in the East, repairs simply stopped, although surfaces remained clean. The late 5th c. is marked by a clear recovery, but rather than being spread evenly across all types of, city as they were in the 4th c., secular building works are now concentrated in larger cities with smaller places dropping out of the classical urban orbit. There is some slight evidence of a recovery in public space in the West, starting before the reconquest and not confined to areas that Justinian’s armies occupied. A few previously undetected urban habits are identified, such as a western tendency to repave only a portion of very wide streets, in the 4th c., and an eastern desire to monumentalise minor streets that were too narrow for conventional porticoes and sidewalks, perhaps inspired by architectural solutions to the very narrow streets of central Constantinople.

The purpose of the work is, however, not merely analytical, but to produce a fog of sensations through which one might perceive everyday life and urban experience within the varied cities of the late antique world. The work encourages a positive evaluation of late antique culture from its heartland, and its most prosperous cities, from say the Gaza known to Choricius and his classmate Bishop Marcian, or the Emessa known to Symeon the Fool, rather than from the crumbling towns of 5th c. Britain or 6th c. Italy. These cities were places of admirable amenity, where the classical city reached its most sophisticated, at the level of pedestrian street experience, still serving the ordinary citizen. From this, the author has felt the need to identify something more than rupture, discontinuity, and reinvention in late antique life and point to substantial strands of authentic untroubled continuity with the classical past. He sees a transmission of classical culture in its syncretic Hellenistic form, from the Near East to Constantinople. It is this strand of culture, not that of Athens, which forms the great thread of classical continuity, the culture of Antioch and Alexandria, and of their schools and as much as their urban design. Attempts to reinvent classical culture with a refoundationalist emphasis on Archaic and classical Aegean roots, so popular in modern Europe, therefore risk cutting themselves from the mainstream of the Hellenistic world, in which Greek culture met Judaism in Syria, and Buddhism in Bactria, and where buildings and cities were developed on a far greater scale. The place of Christianity within this hybrid culture, seems neither incoherent nor dominant, a development in which voices of contradiction were balanced by those of incorporation and learning.

For the less philosophically inclined, the work draws on both a pile of textual sources and of archaeological reports. It is hoped that the information contained within the first volume will help both to contextualise ancient texts and assist in the writing of historical fiction about the period. The second volume may serve as a reference point for identifying elements of late antique urban features, such as sidewalks and market stalls, which for too long have been passed over. Quite how much of its method will be adopted remains to be seen: the direction of research excavations is a famously individualistic endeavour, related in some ways to performance theatre, the stuff of summer holidays. Furthermore, the patient, is, after all, dead, so let us not worry about it too much. That said, this book offers an exemplar for anyone seeking to make archaeological discoveries ‘count’ in reconstructing late antique society. It addresses thorny questions about phasing and dating which inevitably arise from using the reports of others, with very varied levels of interest in late antiquity and very varied methods. It tries also to show how important it is to build contrasting cases when evaluating historical propositions. Two seemingly contradictory tendencies can be true at the same time. Late Antiquity can be a time of continuity and rupture, of co-existence and conflict, all at the same time. One must resist the temptation to make a case around a rhetorical core which serves the political interests of the present, although some biases must be expected and are always worth admitting.

In: Public Space in the Late Antique City (2 vols.)
Author: Luke Lavan

Abstract

This book presents a synthesis on a long-neglected aspect of Late Antiquity (A.D. 284–650): the development of civic public space in Mediterranean urban centres, often ignored in favour of new church buildings or luxurious private houses. It examines the material and human environment at the heart of the late antique city: the architectural, artefactual, and behavioural nature of those areas where people could not avoid interacting with each other: the squares, streets, shops, and markets pf the late antique city. The work is largely descriptive in content, intended to support a programme of artistic visualisation, as much as to provide material for reflection. It systematically addresses the physical appearance of buildings, people, and material culture found in each settings, and how they were bound together in human actions, both ritualised and everyday, under the headings of political, social, economic, and religious behaviours. Temporality and cultural aspects of urban experience are also explored in a less systematic manner. For each architectural space and each built structure within it, an attempt is made to provide a standardised discussion of chronological frequency, regional distribution, plan size, height, distinctive materials, decoration, sculptural ornament, urban setting, and function. Within each chapter, questions are asked about the distinctiveness of architecture and behaviour, and the causes of change.

Most of the detail on specific sites is contained within the appendices, which form an integral part of the work. Here methodology is explained and sites are given the same treatment according to a standard set of principles, notably in terms of their dating. A great number of original observations are made in this section, which take the notices beyond summaries of previous work. On occasion, some sites are discussed in greater length within the main text, disturbing the structure outlined above, where detailed knowledge of them seems more appropriate. Conversely, where data is overwhelming in scale, as it is for statues, a broad discussion of themes takes precedence over a presentation of facts. This is justified due to their accessibility, in an Oxford online database. A thematic discussion, with selected discussion of data is also introduced in the treatment of street architecture, for the discussion of encroachment, and for the planning of street grids. The sources for individual chapters, are evaluated briefly at the start of each section. Urban spaces are split unevenly into a three-part treatment of streets (architecture, processions, everyday life) and fora / agorai (4th–5th c., 6th–7th c.), except for markets and shops where single chapter is maintained. Some treatment of socio-political aspects of churches is found in the latter agorai chapter. Nonetheless, all sections cohere.

The conclusions contain thematic discussions of chronological and regional variation, focusing, respectively, on the axiom of continuity versus change, and on defining the limits of the late antique urban koine, whilst also seeking to evaluate the character of public space in the now-obscured city of Constantinople. The significance of the findings to the nature of late antique society is evaluated, for political, social, religious, commercial, and cultural aspects, and the impact of the Church on civic life is discussed in detail. Finally, the significance of public space to contemporary views of late antiquity is explored, with a consideration of the modern political matrices which influence our vision. The study is illustrated by around 170 figures, including urban plans, comparative monument plans, facade sections, and colour photographs of selected sites. The first volume is complemented by tables of architectural measurements and site distribution maps, with an index. The second volume contains a gazetteer of ceramic forms with reference to dating ranges attributed to them in standard manuals and works of reference currently in use.

In terms of the content, readers will find a detailed discussion of the nature of monumental streets in the period, both in terms of their fine architectural elements and ornaments and more mundane elements such as sidewalks and road paving, alongside a comprehensive discussion of the architecture of fora / agorai and shops, where fountains and fixtures are described alongside colonnades and hemispherical malls. The attention paid to the commonest elements of urban life, deliveries of goods to sewers, is designed to give one a comprehensive urban portrait, that is as much bottom-up as it is top-down. Although some textual bias towards the lives of the wealth is admitted, a light is shone towards the habits of stall-holders, beggars, children, wherever this is possible. Stress is placed on the great amenity of the late antique city, accessible without charge to the ordinary citizen, and the survival of complex urban regulation, certainly under the ‘notables’ in the 6th c. East. This, alongside evidence for inter-communal religious coexistence in public life, is seen as being a distinctive feature of urban life in the period, where Christianisation was both slow and subtle, supporting or ignoring, rather than overturning the classical city, which continued in many ways to resemble the form it had in the classical and Hellenistic period. This is nowhere more obvious than in the Aegean region where a distinctively Greek regional urban identity can be seen in the building projects of the 6th c. A.D. as much as the 4th c.

Perhaps the most significant conclusion of the work, is that the Great city of Constantinople, the capital of Greek world, showed a strong affinity to the urbanism of contemporary Syria / Levant rather than to the Aegean and Asia Minor. The extent to which is reflected Balkan urban patterns is less clear, although it did so in materials. Its other major affinity is with Rome, most obvious in terms of its public plazas. Other notable observations, made by accident rather than design, include the identification of a severe recession in public works, not in the 4th c., the supposed time of a ‘decline of the curia’, but rather in the middle years of the 5th c., when construction only continued on public space in Rome and Constantinople. In the West, streets and fora were covered by beaten earth or worse, whereas, in the East, repairs simply stopped, although surfaces remained clean. The late 5th c. is marked by a clear recovery, but rather than being spread evenly across all types of, city as they were in the 4th c., secular building works are now concentrated in larger cities with smaller places dropping out of the classical urban orbit. There is some slight evidence of a recovery in public space in the West, starting before the reconquest and not confined to areas that Justinian’s armies occupied. A few previously undetected urban habits are identified, such as a western tendency to repave only a portion of very wide streets, in the 4th c., and an eastern desire to monumentalise minor streets that were too narrow for conventional porticoes and sidewalks, perhaps inspired by architectural solutions to the very narrow streets of central Constantinople.

The purpose of the work is, however, not merely analytical, but to produce a fog of sensations through which one might perceive everyday life and urban experience within the varied cities of the late antique world. The work encourages a positive evaluation of late antique culture from its heartland, and its most prosperous cities, from say the Gaza known to Choricius and his classmate Bishop Marcian, or the Emessa known to Symeon the Fool, rather than from the crumbling towns of 5th c. Britain or 6th c. Italy. These cities were places of admirable amenity, where the classical city reached its most sophisticated, at the level of pedestrian street experience, still serving the ordinary citizen. From this, the author has felt the need to identify something more than rupture, discontinuity, and reinvention in late antique life and point to substantial strands of authentic untroubled continuity with the classical past. He sees a transmission of classical culture in its syncretic Hellenistic form, from the Near East to Constantinople. It is this strand of culture, not that of Athens, which forms the great thread of classical continuity, the culture of Antioch and Alexandria, and of their schools and as much as their urban design. Attempts to reinvent classical culture with a refoundationalist emphasis on Archaic and classical Aegean roots, so popular in modern Europe, therefore risk cutting themselves from the mainstream of the Hellenistic world, in which Greek culture met Judaism in Syria, and Buddhism in Bactria, and where buildings and cities were developed on a far greater scale. The place of Christianity within this hybrid culture, seems neither incoherent nor dominant, a development in which voices of contradiction were balanced by those of incorporation and learning.

For the less philosophically inclined, the work draws on both a pile of textual sources and of archaeological reports. It is hoped that the information contained within the first volume will help both to contextualise ancient texts and assist in the writing of historical fiction about the period. The second volume may serve as a reference point for identifying elements of late antique urban features, such as sidewalks and market stalls, which for too long have been passed over. Quite how much of its method will be adopted remains to be seen: the direction of research excavations is a famously individualistic endeavour, related in some ways to performance theatre, the stuff of summer holidays. Furthermore, the patient, is, after all, dead, so let us not worry about it too much. That said, this book offers an exemplar for anyone seeking to make archaeological discoveries ‘count’ in reconstructing late antique society. It addresses thorny questions about phasing and dating which inevitably arise from using the reports of others, with very varied levels of interest in late antiquity and very varied methods. It tries also to show how important it is to build contrasting cases when evaluating historical propositions. Two seemingly contradictory tendencies can be true at the same time. Late Antiquity can be a time of continuity and rupture, of co-existence and conflict, all at the same time. One must resist the temptation to make a case around a rhetorical core which serves the political interests of the present, although some biases must be expected and are always worth admitting.

In: Public Space in the Late Antique City (2 vols.)
Author: Luke Lavan

Abstract

This book presents a synthesis on a long-neglected aspect of Late Antiquity (A.D. 284–650): the development of civic public space in Mediterranean urban centres, often ignored in favour of new church buildings or luxurious private houses. It examines the material and human environment at the heart of the late antique city: the architectural, artefactual, and behavioural nature of those areas where people could not avoid interacting with each other: the squares, streets, shops, and markets pf the late antique city. The work is largely descriptive in content, intended to support a programme of artistic visualisation, as much as to provide material for reflection. It systematically addresses the physical appearance of buildings, people, and material culture found in each settings, and how they were bound together in human actions, both ritualised and everyday, under the headings of political, social, economic, and religious behaviours. Temporality and cultural aspects of urban experience are also explored in a less systematic manner. For each architectural space and each built structure within it, an attempt is made to provide a standardised discussion of chronological frequency, regional distribution, plan size, height, distinctive materials, decoration, sculptural ornament, urban setting, and function. Within each chapter, questions are asked about the distinctiveness of architecture and behaviour, and the causes of change.

Most of the detail on specific sites is contained within the appendices, which form an integral part of the work. Here methodology is explained and sites are given the same treatment according to a standard set of principles, notably in terms of their dating. A great number of original observations are made in this section, which take the notices beyond summaries of previous work. On occasion, some sites are discussed in greater length within the main text, disturbing the structure outlined above, where detailed knowledge of them seems more appropriate. Conversely, where data is overwhelming in scale, as it is for statues, a broad discussion of themes takes precedence over a presentation of facts. This is justified due to their accessibility, in an Oxford online database. A thematic discussion, with selected discussion of data is also introduced in the treatment of street architecture, for the discussion of encroachment, and for the planning of street grids. The sources for individual chapters, are evaluated briefly at the start of each section. Urban spaces are split unevenly into a three-part treatment of streets (architecture, processions, everyday life) and fora / agorai (4th–5th c., 6th–7th c.), except for markets and shops where single chapter is maintained. Some treatment of socio-political aspects of churches is found in the latter agorai chapter. Nonetheless, all sections cohere.

The conclusions contain thematic discussions of chronological and regional variation, focusing, respectively, on the axiom of continuity versus change, and on defining the limits of the late antique urban koine, whilst also seeking to evaluate the character of public space in the now-obscured city of Constantinople. The significance of the findings to the nature of late antique society is evaluated, for political, social, religious, commercial, and cultural aspects, and the impact of the Church on civic life is discussed in detail. Finally, the significance of public space to contemporary views of late antiquity is explored, with a consideration of the modern political matrices which influence our vision. The study is illustrated by around 170 figures, including urban plans, comparative monument plans, facade sections, and colour photographs of selected sites. The first volume is complemented by tables of architectural measurements and site distribution maps, with an index. The second volume contains a gazetteer of ceramic forms with reference to dating ranges attributed to them in standard manuals and works of reference currently in use.

In terms of the content, readers will find a detailed discussion of the nature of monumental streets in the period, both in terms of their fine architectural elements and ornaments and more mundane elements such as sidewalks and road paving, alongside a comprehensive discussion of the architecture of fora / agorai and shops, where fountains and fixtures are described alongside colonnades and hemispherical malls. The attention paid to the commonest elements of urban life, deliveries of goods to sewers, is designed to give one a comprehensive urban portrait, that is as much bottom-up as it is top-down. Although some textual bias towards the lives of the wealth is admitted, a light is shone towards the habits of stall-holders, beggars, children, wherever this is possible. Stress is placed on the great amenity of the late antique city, accessible without charge to the ordinary citizen, and the survival of complex urban regulation, certainly under the ‘notables’ in the 6th c. East. This, alongside evidence for inter-communal religious coexistence in public life, is seen as being a distinctive feature of urban life in the period, where Christianisation was both slow and subtle, supporting or ignoring, rather than overturning the classical city, which continued in many ways to resemble the form it had in the classical and Hellenistic period. This is nowhere more obvious than in the Aegean region where a distinctively Greek regional urban identity can be seen in the building projects of the 6th c. A.D. as much as the 4th c.

Perhaps the most significant conclusion of the work, is that the Great city of Constantinople, the capital of Greek world, showed a strong affinity to the urbanism of contemporary Syria / Levant rather than to the Aegean and Asia Minor. The extent to which is reflected Balkan urban patterns is less clear, although it did so in materials. Its other major affinity is with Rome, most obvious in terms of its public plazas. Other notable observations, made by accident rather than design, include the identification of a severe recession in public works, not in the 4th c., the supposed time of a ‘decline of the curia’, but rather in the middle years of the 5th c., when construction only continued on public space in Rome and Constantinople. In the West, streets and fora were covered by beaten earth or worse, whereas, in the East, repairs simply stopped, although surfaces remained clean. The late 5th c. is marked by a clear recovery, but rather than being spread evenly across all types of, city as they were in the 4th c., secular building works are now concentrated in larger cities with smaller places dropping out of the classical urban orbit. There is some slight evidence of a recovery in public space in the West, starting before the reconquest and not confined to areas that Justinian’s armies occupied. A few previously undetected urban habits are identified, such as a western tendency to repave only a portion of very wide streets, in the 4th c., and an eastern desire to monumentalise minor streets that were too narrow for conventional porticoes and sidewalks, perhaps inspired by architectural solutions to the very narrow streets of central Constantinople.

The purpose of the work is, however, not merely analytical, but to produce a fog of sensations through which one might perceive everyday life and urban experience within the varied cities of the late antique world. The work encourages a positive evaluation of late antique culture from its heartland, and its most prosperous cities, from say the Gaza known to Choricius and his classmate Bishop Marcian, or the Emessa known to Symeon the Fool, rather than from the crumbling towns of 5th c. Britain or 6th c. Italy. These cities were places of admirable amenity, where the classical city reached its most sophisticated, at the level of pedestrian street experience, still serving the ordinary citizen. From this, the author has felt the need to identify something more than rupture, discontinuity, and reinvention in late antique life and point to substantial strands of authentic untroubled continuity with the classical past. He sees a transmission of classical culture in its syncretic Hellenistic form, from the Near East to Constantinople. It is this strand of culture, not that of Athens, which forms the great thread of classical continuity, the culture of Antioch and Alexandria, and of their schools and as much as their urban design. Attempts to reinvent classical culture with a refoundationalist emphasis on Archaic and classical Aegean roots, so popular in modern Europe, therefore risk cutting themselves from the mainstream of the Hellenistic world, in which Greek culture met Judaism in Syria, and Buddhism in Bactria, and where buildings and cities were developed on a far greater scale. The place of Christianity within this hybrid culture, seems neither incoherent nor dominant, a development in which voices of contradiction were balanced by those of incorporation and learning.

For the less philosophically inclined, the work draws on both a pile of textual sources and of archaeological reports. It is hoped that the information contained within the first volume will help both to contextualise ancient texts and assist in the writing of historical fiction about the period. The second volume may serve as a reference point for identifying elements of late antique urban features, such as sidewalks and market stalls, which for too long have been passed over. Quite how much of its method will be adopted remains to be seen: the direction of research excavations is a famously individualistic endeavour, related in some ways to performance theatre, the stuff of summer holidays. Furthermore, the patient, is, after all, dead, so let us not worry about it too much. That said, this book offers an exemplar for anyone seeking to make archaeological discoveries ‘count’ in reconstructing late antique society. It addresses thorny questions about phasing and dating which inevitably arise from using the reports of others, with very varied levels of interest in late antiquity and very varied methods. It tries also to show how important it is to build contrasting cases when evaluating historical propositions. Two seemingly contradictory tendencies can be true at the same time. Late Antiquity can be a time of continuity and rupture, of co-existence and conflict, all at the same time. One must resist the temptation to make a case around a rhetorical core which serves the political interests of the present, although some biases must be expected and are always worth admitting.

In: Public Space in the Late Antique City (2 vols.)