Browse results
International legal disputes require an adjudicator to apply the law. In a world where municipal law penetrates the international legal system, adjudicators frequently must take account of municipal law to do their job properly. This course looks at how adjudicators carry out this task, how going forward they might manage the boundaries between international and municipal law, and how the choices they make affect the relevance and resilience of the international legal system in the contemporary world.
Rafael Casado Raigón, La contribution des juridictions internationales au développement du droit de la mer
Ce cours, version écrite et étendue du cours donné par l’auteur à l’Académie de droit international de La Haye durant l’été 2022, est consacré aux contributions des juridictions internationales (notamment, la CPJI, la CIJ, le TIDM et les tribunaux d’arbitrage interétatique) au développement du droit de la mer depuis la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle. L’étude se compose de cinq parties, consacrées, respectivement, à la liberté de la haute mer (chapitre I), aux espaces maritimes soumis à la pleine souveraineté de l’Etat côtier (chapitres II et III), aux espaces maritimes dans lesquels les Etats côtiers exercent certains droits souverains ou une juridiction limitée (chapitres IV et V), au régime des îles (chapitre VI) et au droit de la délimitation des espaces maritimes (chapitre VII).
International legal disputes require an adjudicator to apply the law. In a world where municipal law penetrates the international legal system, adjudicators frequently must take account of municipal law to do their job properly. This course looks at how adjudicators carry out this task, how going forward they might manage the boundaries between international and municipal law, and how the choices they make affect the relevance and resilience of the international legal system in the contemporary world.
Rafael Casado Raigón, La contribution des juridictions internationales au développement du droit de la mer
Ce cours, version écrite et étendue du cours donné par l’auteur à l’Académie de droit international de La Haye durant l’été 2022, est consacré aux contributions des juridictions internationales (notamment, la CPJI, la CIJ, le TIDM et les tribunaux d’arbitrage interétatique) au développement du droit de la mer depuis la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle. L’étude se compose de cinq parties, consacrées, respectivement, à la liberté de la haute mer (chapitre I), aux espaces maritimes soumis à la pleine souveraineté de l’Etat côtier (chapitres II et III), aux espaces maritimes dans lesquels les Etats côtiers exercent certains droits souverains ou une juridiction limitée (chapitres IV et V), au régime des îles (chapitre VI) et au droit de la délimitation des espaces maritimes (chapitre VII).
Blockchain is the first global mechanism for the transfer and storage of value. Despite being conceived as an alternative to state and law, the technology and its use cases raise many legal questions, most notably, regarding jurisdiction and applicable law with respect to transactions and assets recorded on the blockchain. The issue is complex given the decentralised nature of the network. In this volume, academics and practitioners from various countries try to provide detailed answers to these questions as they relate to crypto-assets, cryptocurrencies, crypto derivatives, stablecoins, Central Bank Digital Currencies and Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs), as well as specific transactions and issues, such as property rights, secured transactions, smart contracts and bankruptcy. With specific chapters on national approaches (Germany, Japan, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, United States), the volume explores the need and possibility for legal harmonisation of these issues through global fora, such as the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) UNIDROIT.
Blockchain is the first global mechanism for the transfer and storage of value. Despite being conceived as an alternative to state and law, the technology and its use cases raise many legal questions, most notably, regarding jurisdiction and applicable law with respect to transactions and assets recorded on the blockchain. The issue is complex given the decentralised nature of the network. In this volume, academics and practitioners from various countries try to provide detailed answers to these questions as they relate to crypto-assets, cryptocurrencies, crypto derivatives, stablecoins, Central Bank Digital Currencies and Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs), as well as specific transactions and issues, such as property rights, secured transactions, smart contracts and bankruptcy. With specific chapters on national approaches (Germany, Japan, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, United States), the volume explores the need and possibility for legal harmonisation of these issues through global fora, such as the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) UNIDROIT.
Each unique volume is a valuable resource for anyone involved in investor-state and international commercial arbitration and mediation, including arbitrators, mediators, advocates, scholars, government officials, international institutions, educators, and students.
The series published an average of one volume per year over the last 5 years.
However, the authors argue, these reforms are insufficient to resolve the domestic political challenges that investor state arbitration faces. Only political solutions that justify for broad populations the international flow of capital and the independent resolution of disputes arising therefrom can preserve the institution of investor state arbitration. Absent the more equitable distribution of the benefits associated with the international flow of capital, political support for investor state arbitration will remain tenuous, notwithstanding the significant de-escalatory benefits investor state arbitration offers.
However, the authors argue, these reforms are insufficient to resolve the domestic political challenges that investor state arbitration faces. Only political solutions that justify for broad populations the international flow of capital and the independent resolution of disputes arising therefrom can preserve the institution of investor state arbitration. Absent the more equitable distribution of the benefits associated with the international flow of capital, political support for investor state arbitration will remain tenuous, notwithstanding the significant de-escalatory benefits investor state arbitration offers.