Introduction
Commercial sex has been an available and important part of Singapore’s economy and society since Sir Stamford Raffles—representative of the British East India Company (e.i.c.)—negotiated Singapore’s acquisition in 1819. Before this, it was a small Malaysian fishing village ruled by the Johor Sultanate and used by the Temmenggong, the sultan’s military leadership, as a personal getaway from politically tumultuous court life. The island retreat would certainly have included a population of slaves to attend to both the domestic and sexual needs of its residents.
1
Until the late eighteenth century, women were inconspicuous commodities in Southeast Asian slave markets, and native, Arab, and Chinese merchants sold them throughout ancient trading networks. Since at least the fourteenth century, the southern tip of the Malayan Peninsula was a vital artery of trade for merchants in Southeast Asia, which connected the eastern and western hemispheres. Stopping between the silver mines in Latin America and the spice and luxury markets in Asia, Spanish and Portuguese merchants traded with local chiefs for women in ports throughout the Philippines and along the Malayan coast to solidify business relationships in the late
Britain’s development of Singapore into an international entrepôt during the first half of the nineteenth century changed well-established trading patterns and brought both a demand for and supply of commercial sex to the island. Singapore’s development as a hub for British power in the latter half of the nineteenth century offered employment opportunities for millions of unattached male labourers from around the world; at the same time, the colony became a primary distribution centre for the trade in women and girls who provided these labourers with highly sought after domestic and sexual
Singapore’s separation from British authority and the establishment of an independent government and legislative code in 1959 once again brought local officials’ attention to the commercial sex trade. Then, a new surge of economic growth and prosperity between the 1960s and ‘80s initiated a transition in the market. An explosion of economic excess increased inequalities and initiated an expansion of Singapore’s sex industry. The country’s new government took what Jin Hui Ong, Director of Advanced Studies at the National University of Singapore, describes as a “puritanical approach” and attempted to push the sex industry out of the city. 6 This new administration created a campaign against “yellow culture” in order to expel all forms of vice. 7 Still, regardless of official policy, brothel owners, women, and law enforcement officers eventually negotiated unofficial systems of regulation and control in response to the realities of an entrenched trade that to this day remains intact.
This study examines the development of Singapore’s sex industry from 1600 to the present and by focusing on the precolonial, colonial, and postcolonial periods, explores the most important influences that inhibited and propelled its expansion. The island’s position as a strategic trading and military centre located between the Pacific and Indian Oceans has been the root of its political importance and caused the population to swell, which meant that over the years colonial officials, military commanders, and corporate investors were, and still are, keenly interested in local affairs and governance. In the past two centuries, colonization, war, and unprecedented economic growth drove waves of unattached male labourers, soldiers, seamen, and businessmen to take up temporary residence in Singapore. Simultaneously, women from around the world have voluntarily travelled, or were trafficked against their will, to supply
Historiography
While Southeast Asia is a relatively understudied region, there are a few important studies that demonstrate the critical connections between prostitution, the trade economy, and the implementation of political power in Singapore.
9
Until the last decades of the twentieth century, scholars working on Southeast Asian history had largely ignored the influence of women and gender on its past. Focused on the paths of emerging independent nations, the bulk of historical research about Southeast Asia sought primarily to describe developing nationalisms, and the influential men that drove these movements, which fuelled and shaped later independence movements. Women, as primary subjects of historical enquiry, did not enter the discourse until the late 1990s.
10
Since then, like most other fields of history, Southeast Asian scholars have begun
Selling Sex in Precolonial Singapore and Southeast Asia
The southern portion of the Malayan Peninsula connects the eastern and western hemispheres and has long been a vital artery of trade for merchants in Southeast Asia. Before British colonization at the end of the eighteenth century, the small island of Singapore, or “Singapura”, was merely a small fishing village and private retreat for Malay royalty and officials.
11
Long before the arrival of Europeans, women were an important commodity in Southeast Asian slave markets and sold by native, Arab, and Chinese merchants throughout trade networks that by the beginning of the seventeenth century encompassed the globe.
12
In the late seventeenth century, Spanish and Portuguese merchants travelling between the silver mines in Latin America and the spice and luxury markets in Asia began trading with local chiefs for women in ports throughout the Philippines and along the Malayan coast to solidify business relationships.
13
The Colonial Period
Although Europeans were well established in Southeast Asia by the beginning of the nineteenth century and had already explored a variety of intimate relationships with native women, it is unlikely that the small fishing village of
Established as a trading station, Singapore initially had very few female immigrants and colonial officials worried about the disproportionate ratio of men to women. An 1830 census revealed that there were only 4,121 women compared to 12,213 men in the colony.
24
Although the colonial government banned the slave trade in British territories, there is evidence that local authorities
Anthony Reid argues that the prohibition of slavery and slave trading in European centres “increased the traffic in many of these independent corners of Indonesia.” 27 Indeed, most of this new traffic consisted of women and girls imported to service the increasing male migrant labour force pouring into the region. Arab and Chinese merchants brought girls from China and South Asia who had either been sold outright, or whose poverty-stricken families had contracted their sexual labour for a specified period. In colonial Singapore, these women were often black-market commodities; some became the wives or concubines of wealthy merchants while many others did not. However, not all of the women working in the sex trade were forced or coerced. In some cases, women already working as prostitutes in other cities heard about Singapore’s prosperity and negotiated their own passage. 28 Although some women went to mining camps and plantations, most worked within the community in a variety of capacities and provided both domestic and sexual services to transient merchants, sailors, and soldiers accumulating in the growing international port.
The colony also functioned as a depot for large volumes of imported products and a stopping point for migrant labourers making their way in and out
There were a variety of women and positions within colonial Singapore’s sex industry. During the first few decades of Singapore’s development, the majority of prostitutes were Chinese, Indonesian and Malay women, and residents complained in local newspapers about prostitutes working in public; they did not complain about the existence of prostitution, just that prostitutes performed sexual acts in public spaces.
34
However, by the 1870s there was much more diversity among the prostitutes and most business was conducted in brothels. As scores of brothels profited from selling sex to this flood of immigrants, local merchants and traders made a killing by furnishing the women with essential commodities like fabric for dresses, perfumes, make-up, soaps, and liquor.
35
As the city grew, Chinese secret societies already in control of sophisticated underground networks of human traffickers imported a variety of women and girls—primarily Chinese—to satisfy the exploding population of male labour.
36
In fact, studies by scholars such as Philippa Levine and
Much of what we know about prostitution in Singapore after 1860 comes from Warren’s research on the Chinese Ah ku and Japanese Karayuki san who worked in the city’s sex industry during the height of British regulationism between 1864 and 1888 and the two world wars.
39
In addition to the Ah ku and Japanese Karayuki san, Warren’s work also provides important insight into Singapore’s commercial sex trade and describes the environments of its eastern and western sectors. The eastern district contained almost as many European prostitutes, and the “respectable colonial female population [was] living in nearby residential areas.”
40
Since the colonial government maintained a strict ban on British women working as prostitutes in its eastern colonies, most were poor women from central and eastern Europe, mainly from Hungary and Poland. There were some Russian Jewesses as well as a few
Until the latter half of the nineteenth century, Chinese women formed the largest portion of sex workers in Singapore. Internal conflict, expansion of external trade, poverty, and famine in China during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries initiated a flow of Chinese into Southeast Asia who quickly established themselves as merchants, shopkeepers, and plantation owners, which provided an external boost to the Chinese economy.
45
By the 1780s, there were at least 100,000 Chinese men working work in tin mines and on gambier plantations throughout Southeast Asia.
46
At the same time, Chinese law prohibited the emigration of married Chinese women, so the mines and plantations were filled with a multitude of unattached men and very few women. However, wealthy merchants, and the Secret Societies to which they
Japanese women started to arrive in Singapore during the 1860s, after Japan opened its port in Nagasaki to international trade and began sending coal to Southeast Asia. By the 1880s, many—if not most—ships leaving Nagasaki had women hidden on board.
51
Along with increased mobility, Bill Mihalopoulos explains that “the movement of young Japanese women into sex work occupations abroad was one spontaneous reaction by the rural poor to the radical social restructuring unfolding in Japan from 1850 onwards.”
52
In fact, food shortages, heavy taxation, and corveé systems strained the peasantry to such a desperate point that between 1865 and 1867 there were seventy-five peasant uprisings.
53
Poverty and famine pushed young girls to seek a living overseas at a time when expansion of exports established new connections between
According to government reports, in 1878 there were only two Japanese brothels open for business. However, by 1905, “37 years after the Meiji Restoration, and the year of the advent of the Russo-Japanese War”, there were 109 Japanese brothels and 633 Japanese prostitutes, or Karayuki san, registered in the colony.
55
In 1906, Tanaka Tokichi, the Japanese consul in Singapore, argued that thousands of women were pouring into the city; he estimated that approximately twenty women each week arrived from Moji, Kuchinotsu, and Kobe with the intention to work as prostitutes. Fleeing desperation and violence, Karayuki san used what Mihalopoulos described as “subterranean economies” to make their way out of Japan.
56
However, while some went with their parents’ permission (they likely received between 300 and 500 yen for a five-year contract), and with full knowledge that they would be working as prostitutes, Hane reminds us not to ignore the fact that many were, “sold into slavery or tricked into their situation through their sense of responsibility toward their poverty-stricken parents and siblings.”
57
In fact, the parents and procurers often prearranged the amount of money to be remitted to the family once the girls were sold and working. Local “procurers” (zegen), employment agencies, and third party brokers promised young girls “a better life overseas” and stability for their families.
58
In some cases, former prostitutes at the end of their contracts returned to Japan and visited villages describing the luxury and success that awaited them. Unfortunately, as Mihalopoulos asserts, “the journey from Japan to Hong Kong or Singapore transformed the women into a basic
Prostitution was a lucrative business in colonial Singapore, but not all brothels, or prostitutes for that matter, were the same. While Europeans generally visited the eastern side of the city, Chinese, Japanese, Malay, Indian, and Javanese men tended to frequent the western quarter. Serving a second-class clientele, these women also divided their services by ethnicity. As Warren explains, the Ah ku, Malay, and European prostitutes worked in “all-nationality” establishments, but Cantonese women accepted only Chinese clients. 61 However, the Karayuki san, who did not arrive in significant numbers until the 1880s, also accepted foreign patrons. Poverty and famine pushed some families to sell daughters they were unable to feed; at the same time, Singapore’s booming economy drew people from poor regions in search of prosperity. Clients looking for overnight stays with Chinese prostitutes visited the larger, cleaner, and better-decorated loh kui chai brothels; the cheaper brothels, or pau chai, were poorly ventilated, cramped, and dirty. The bigger houses had as many as seventeen to eighteen girls working in them. 62 The Ah ku lived in “two-, three-, or four-storied buildings with large numbers painted or affixed to the fanlights over the doors, with a red (or some other colour) lamp behind the number.” 63 The Karayuki san did not generally discriminate between clients; their primary goal was to make as much money as possible to send home to their families, who knew they were in Singapore doing sex work. Like the Ah ku, there were higher and lower grades of Japanese prostitutes; some took appointments and never left their lavish apartments, while others waited behind screens for clients and worked in dingy though less cramped conditions. 64
Chinese prostitutes in Singapore were generally ranked according to their financial relationship to the house; they were “sold”, “pawned”, or “voluntary.”
68
The kongchu or “sold” women were particularly helpless; the kwai po purchased them from traffickers, so they were considered property of the brothel. These women were in essence “the adopted daughters” of the brothel owner.
69
The house provided for the kongchu’s basic necessities but the kwai po retained all of their earnings. The pongnin, or those “pawned or hired to a house”, were prostitutes like the Karayuki san who were working off a debt.
70
Indentured for
As one of the easiest ways to accumulate capital before the turn of the century, brothel prostitution in Singapore funded many Japanese and Chinese businesses during this period; they played an important role in Singapore’s economic development.
72
Brothels made money from both prostitutes and their clients. Receiving well over what they initially paid for the women, brothel owners often sold girls after a few months of work and made money on the sale in addition to receiving a portion of her earnings. Warren explains that there would have been a daily profit of $1,650 if every Ah ku listed in the 550 houses registered in Singapore. Each worked “at the standard rate of $3” per night; this converts to approximately us$131, which would be $267 today.
73
Extrapolating that amount with the minimum of 288 days that he avers they worked, Warren contends that the profits from these prostitutes, “would have easily been over $475,200 a year”, which would have been a staggering $37,805,400 today.
74
The Japanese houses worked “24 hours a day, 7 days a week” and the average
Regulationism
In response to an epidemic of venereal diseases that began in the 1860s, the colonial government began legislative efforts to contain and regulate the commercial sex industry in the name of public health. The passage of Singapore’s local Contagious Disease Ordinance (cdo) in 1870 marked the beginning of Singapore’s enduring legislative struggle with the realities of a thriving commercial sex industry and the social, ethical, and political consequences of maintaining it. The colonial authorities had already created a system to catalogue the various brothels within their business registry in the 1850s. The cdo granted colonial officials the legal authority to interrogate, examine, and detain women known for or suspected of working as prostitutes. Initially, women and brothel owners throughout Singapore resisted and avoided the government’s system of examinations and detainment; but within a few years, incidences of disease diminished and prostitutes began going to their examinations voluntarily. 76 Moreover, officials noticed a levelling off in the opening of new brothels. Many argued that regulationism was noticeably successful in reducing incidences of syphilis and gonorrhoea and it gave officials the authority to offer assistance to victims who had been trafficked or were being abused. Still, there was overwhelming evidence showing that in parts of England and in some British colonies there were officials who misused the authority granted by the cd Acts to terrorize middle- and working-class women. 77 Consequently, anti-prostitution and anti-trafficking activists fought hard to abolish what they saw as a blatant exploitation of working women and girls, and in 1888 Parliament repealed the imperial cdo.
In 1912, public scandal about “white slavery” made popular by Mrs. Archibald MacKirdy and W.N. Willis’ book, The White Slave Market, resulted in intense scrutiny of Singapore’s extra-legal system, forced officials to address the illegal trade in women and girls more seriously, and motivated officials to push the commercial sex industry out of public view.
80
Anti-trafficking activists quickly took notice of Singapore’s “tolerated houses” and began a vitriolic public campaign for their abolition.
81
Exaggerating an already dismal situation, abolitionists offered up public descriptions of miserable, drug-addicted European women who had been stolen from their homes and were in need of rescue. Even though European women were the minority in Singapore, the campaign focused on the trade’s degradation of “white European daughters”. Social reformers used every avenue at their disposal to bring attention to the fact that British officials had allowed Singapore’s authorities to tolerate the system of brothels, which were notoriously responsible for the sexual exploitation of women and girls. The political pressure eventually forced the Colonial Office
In the late 1920s, an increasingly powerful nationalist movement and political tensions motivated the Japanese government to make efforts to have all its citizens removed from the city and sent back to Japan. With the help of the British Parliament, the Japanese Consul took steps to deport all Karayuki san from the colony. Although Japan had profited from their sexual labour for more than twenty years, Karayuki san were forced out of Singapore and went back to generally unwelcoming communities in Japan. Some Karayuki san protested and challenged the local government’s authority to force them out; others stayed due to outstanding debts or because they had a venereal disease, while others disappeared into the city and sold sex privately to earn a living. Those taken back to Japan were left on the docks with no financial assistance or means of support. With few economic options left open to them, some followed the Japanese army as they prepared to invade China; many committed suicide as a result of shame from discrimination and lack of opportunity. 83 Nonetheless, neither the efforts of the British authorities nor the Japanese government could completely eliminate the populations of Karayuki san working in Singapore’s sex market. Meanwhile, groups such as the Association for Moral and Social Hygiene continued to critique the tolerated system, which gained new support as venereal diseases spread rapidly during World War i. 84
Increased overhead costs, scrutiny from the local authorities, and the mass deportation of Japanese prostitutes also pushed many Ah ku underground and initiated a dramatic rise in clandestine prostitution in the city. The combination of high fees and taxes required to run a brothel forced many of the Chinese establishments to close.
85
At the same time, the removal of the Karayuki san encouraged more Eurasian, Malay, and Thai women to enter into Singapore’s now clandestine sex markets. As a result, many women went to work at coffee shops, teahouses, markets, laundry shops, and eating-houses, and offered
Consequently, rates of venereal infections in Singapore reached epidemic proportions and by the 1920s local authorities scrambled for ways to control it. Appealing to the Colonial Office, Singapore’s officials once again proposed a system of brothel regulation reminiscent of the 1870 Ordinances. However, changes in the political leadership and sentiment resulted in little support for state-sanctioned and controlled prostitution; seizing the opportunity, social reformers called attention to the epidemic and pushed for abolition. By 1927, officials attempted to eliminate “professional prostitution” in Singapore without actually prohibiting the practice, but by implementing a ban on the immigration of known prostitutes. 86 Additionally, authorities made brothels illegal and by 1930, Singapore’s notorious brothel districts were closed. Many women returned home to their countries, found jobs as servants, cooks, or washwomen, or married former clients. Others tried their luck in the underground market, since the act of selling sexual services was still legal in Singapore. 87
Postcolonial Singapore
The Second World War brought another influx of military battalions onto the island and generated a dramatic increase in the number of brothels, prostitutes, and yet another outbreak of venereal infections. This revitalization of the industry led Singapore’s authorities to once again rethink their policies on prostitution. Between 1930 and 1960, local officials changed their focus from abolition to containment in an effort to curb the spread of diseases and the abuse suffered by women working in illegal clubs and houses.
88
Underground brothel prostitution had survived, and by the time Singapore gained its independence from British rule in 1959 and formed an independent government in 1963, the old colonial red-light districts thrived and serviced men from around the world. Regulations against maintaining brothels, soliciting, and zoning
This change initiated an entirely new organizational structure in Singapore’s sex market. The elimination of secret societies did remove much of the coercion that existed in brothels, and the availability of other work made prostitution—at least for local women—more of a personal choice than a last resort. Nevertheless, an underground trade in trafficked women and girls still exists in Singapore and authorities have been only minimally successful at suppressing it. The economic boom that occurred between 1970 and 1990 created another surge in demand in Singapore’s commercial sex trade. A recession in the 1980s brought a new supply of unskilled Malay women unable to find factory or manufacturing work, and women from rural India migrated to Singapore with their children and worked as prostitutes trying to support their families. 89 In the urban centre, Chinese women are still the dominant ethnicity among Singapore’s commercial sex workers. However, as Ong’s research demonstrates, an increase in construction, the result of an explosion in tourism in the 1990s, drew in increasing numbers of Korean and Thai prostitutes who made money following the pool of single men working in construction and providing services at job sites. 90 Still, the primary centres are the “Designated Red-Light Areas”, where in the 1990s women earned between $7 and $120 per client for a variety of sexual services. 91
In spite of decades of legislation, there remains a teeming commercial sex market in Singapore. According to researchers Shyamala Nagaraj and Siti Rohani Yahya, since laws prohibit “the use of premises for prostitution, most legal establishments tend to observe the rules and to keep the business of commercial sex independent of their operations.”
92
Their study, “Prostitution in Malaysia”, examines Singapore’s sex industry extensively as a part of the Malayan peninsula and describes the development of the “sex sector”.
93
They illustrate the role Singapore’s sex sector plays as a central economic feature of the island. For example, the “freelancers” and “special workers” operate in dance halls,
This same study explains that commercial sex workers in Singapore are classified by either their means of procurement or their employment status. Using methods of procurement as categories, Singapore’s prostitutes work as “market prostitute[s] (at the lowest rung of the earnings ladder)” in the local markets; “streetwalker[s]” who are more mobile and advertise inconspicuously to avoid solicitation charges; “the employed commercial sex worker”, or those employed by an establishment rather than working independently; “massage parlor, bar or nightclub workers; the freelancers; and the special workers (social escorts).” 94 However, the “employment status”, and full- or part-time work are also important factors. Prostitutes in the “primitive labour market”, such as the streetwalkers and clandestine brothel workers who worked full-time, earned the least and were at the bottom of the hierarchy. 95 The “enterprise labour market” included women working at massage parlours, taverns, and lounges, and they generally worked part-time and had more autonomy in stipulating their prices and choosing clientele. 96 Finally, those who were “self-employed”, the call girls and special escorts, generally earned the most. Ranging in age from the early teens to seniors, many of these women according to Nagaraj and Yahya willingly entered prostitution, while others were sold or forced into the business by family members, spouses, or boyfriends. While the above categories are certainly problematic, they are descriptive categories that give us an idea of the ways sex workers have adapted to legislative prohibitions, while continuing to accommodate customer demands.
There are a few women in Singapore who are full-time employees, with “specified duties, leave and other employment benefits”, and whose sexual labour is contracted on the side. However, most prostitutes in Singapore work in brothels or as independent agents and, according to a 1992 study, averaged about us$28 per client and us$1,400 per month.
97
Still, there was a remarkable disparity between the highest earners, making us$11,200 per month, and the
There are still several local ordinances and acts that prohibit various aspects of the sex trade in Singapore, but the primary concern at the moment is the active movement of underage girls being trafficked into the market.
99
As of 2012, prostitution—the act of selling sexual intimacies—is not illegal; however, soliciting, running a brothel, and profiting from the earnings of someone else’s sexual labour are. In July of 2012, after a series of public scandals about underage prostitution, freelance journalist Paul Fitzpatrick wrote an article for the Singapore Business Review exposing the character of prostitution in Singapore today. Unknowingly, the journalist described what, for Singapore, had become a curiously familiar pattern. He reported that while they are not legal, the “police unofficially tolerate and monitor a limited number of brothels. Prostitutes in such establishments are required to undergo periodic health checks and must carry a health card.”
100
Other prostitutes, Fitzpatrick claimed, can
With such detailed descriptions of this underground and seemingly nefarious trade, it is important not to assume that all sex workers have been trafficked, coerced, or forced into the business. As mentioned frequently above, prostitution can be a lucrative business and Singapore’s growth and prosperity, along with the notoriety of its red-light districts, have drawn professional prostitutes from around the world for more than a century. The numbers of men passing through this international entrepôt have promised both security of employment and the potential for prosperity. Nonetheless, Singapore’s authorities have historically battled the illegal trade in women and girls who were unwillingly trafficked into Singapore’s brothels; smugglers have supplied young women and girls, either indentured or sold outright, in Singapore since the beginning of the nineteenth century in spite of local political and legal authorities’ efforts to stop it. In fact, an article in the Jakarta Globe claims that in 2008 officials tightened laws to combat human trafficking and Singapore’s authorities recently uncovered a ring of “vice syndicates” providing patrons with underage girls. 103 So, while prostitution itself is still legal in Singapore and there are many women voluntarily working in its booming sex industry, there is also still a thriving illicit trade to accommodate the unfulfilled demands of migrant consumers.
Conclusion
Singapore’s sex industry developed, expanded, and fluctuated according to historical waves of unattached merchants, labourers, soldiers, and businessmen
Unfortunately, the historical record contains very little information about the prostitutes themselves; save for a few diaries and oral histories from the latter half of the nineteenth century, their stories almost always emerge from court hearings and legal complaints made to the magistrate. As one might
Abdulla Munshi, The Hikayat Abdullah : An Annotated Translation, trans. A. H. Hill ( Kuala Lumpur, 1970), pp. 140–147; Carl Trocki, Singapore: Wealth, Power, and the Culture of Control (New York, 2006), pp. 21–47; Carl Trocki, Prince of Pirates: The Temenggongs and the Development of Johor and Singapore, 1784–1885 (Singapore, 1979), pp. 1–6; Barbara Watson Andaya, “Temporary Wife to Prostitute: Sexuality and Economic Change in Early Modern Southeast Asia”, Journal of Women’s History, 9 (1998), pp. 11–34, 13. Andaya’s description of society and the roles of women and slaves during this period in Southeast Asian society, supports this presumption. Moreover, during times of difficulty, slaves often chose to sell their bodies as an additional means to support their household (p. 14). While this type of behaviour was not likely exemplary for women and girls of the upper classes, contemporary Southeast Asian society did not see the choice of selling sexual services with the same negative moral judgement as their European colonizers.
For more on women in “early modern” Southeast Asia, see Barbara Watson-Andaya, Other Pasts: Women, Gender and History in Early Modern Southeast Asia (Honolulu, 2000). For more on early colonial concubinage in Southeast Asia, see Tamara Loos, “A History of Sex and the State in Southeast Asia: Class, Intimacy and Invisibility”, Citizenship Studies, 12 (2008), pp. 27–43.
Loos, “A History of Sex and the State in Southeast Asia”, pp. 31–37.
Ann Stoler, Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule (Berkeley, 2002), pp. 22–110; Jean Gilman-Taylor, The Social World of Batavia: Europeans and Eurasians in Colonial Indonesia (Madison, 1983), pp. 91–113.
James Francis Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki-San: Prostitution in Singapore 1870–1940 (Singapore, 2003), pp. 67–72.
Jin Hui Ong, “Singapore”, in Nanette Davis, (ed.), Prostitution: An International Handbook on Trends, Problems, and Policies (London, 1993), pp. 243–272, 246.
Ibid.
It is important to note that there have been, and still are, plenty of women voluntarily going to Singapore to work as prostitutes; but, it is difficult to tell if someone has voluntarily immigrated, or if recruiters or traffickers coerced or kidnapped them, took them against their will, and forced them—directly or indirectly—to prostitute themselves. As this chapter demonstrates, attempting to differentiate between the two has historically been a primary focus of anti-trafficking policies and governmental legislation in Singapore.
The following studies are some of the key works shaping our current understanding of prostitution in Singapore: Watson-Andaya, “Temporary Wives to Prostitute”; Anthony Reid, “The Decline of Slavery in Nineteenth Century Indonesia”, in Martin A. Klein, (ed.), Breaking the Chains: Slavery, Bondage, and Emancipation in Modern Africa and Asia (Madison, 1993), pp. 65–79; Ong, “Singapore”, pp. 243–272; Philippa Levine, Prostitution, Race and Politics: Policing Venereal Disease in the British Empire (New York, 2004), passim; Philip Howell, Geographies of Regulation: Policing Prostitution in Nineteenth Century Britain and the Empire (Cambridge, 2009), pp. 188–229; James Warren, Pirates, Prostitutes and Pullers: Explorations in the Ethno- and Social History of Southeast Asia (Crawley, Australia, 2008), pp. 220–309; Warren, Ah Ku and Karayuki-san, pp. 25–91; Loos, "A History of Sex and the State in Southeast Asia", pp. 27–43.
Watson-Andaya, Other Pasts, pp. 1–7.
Trocki, The Prince of Pirates, pp. 21–30.
Shawna Herzog, “Convenient Compromises: A History of Slavery and Abolition in the British East Indies, 1795–1841” (Unpublished Ph.D., Washington State University Department of History, 2013), pp. 136–179; Richard Allen, “Suppressing a Nefarious Traffic: Britain and the Abolition of Slave Trading in India and the Western Indian Ocean, 1770–1830”, The William and Mary Quarterly, 66 (2009), pp. 873–894; Richard B. Allen, “Satisfying the ‘Want for Laboring People’: European Slave Trading in the Indian Ocean, 1500–1850”, Journal of World History, 21 (2010), pp. 45–73.
For more on women in early modern Southeast Asia, see Andaya, Other Pasts, Chapters 4–7. Additional discussion of early colonial concubinage in Southeast Asia can be found in Loos, “A History of Sex and the State in Southeast Asia”, pp. 27–43.
Ibid., pp. 31–37.
Watson-Andaya, “Temporary Wives to Prostitute”, p. 13.
For a concise description of Dutch history in Southeast Asia, see Anthony Reid, Charting the Shape of Early Modern Southeast Asia (Chiang Mai, 1999), pp. 92–99, 155–179; Eric Tagliacozzo, Secret Trades, Porous Borders: Smuggling and States Along a Southeast Asian Frontier, 1865–1915 (New Haven, 2005), pp. 1–19, 28–47.
Gilman-Taylor, The Social World of Batavia, p. 99.
Stoler, Carnal Knowledge and Imperial, pp. 22–110; Gilman-Taylor, The Social World of Batavia, pp. 91–113.
Watson-Andaya, “Temporary Wives to Prostitute”, p. 11.
Andaya, Other Pasts, pp. 1–7.
Stoler’s Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power is the premier work on this subject. In her study, she clearly illustrates shifts in European ideology and imperial paranoia about colonial intimacies for fear of racial degeneration and compromises of imperial power relationships.
Linda Colley, Britons: Forging the Nation 1707–1837 (Yale, 1992), pp. 2–7.
Betty Joseph, Reading the East India Company, 1720–1840: Colonial Currencies of Gender (Chicago, 2004), pp. 100, 104–105; Karen Weierman, One Nation, One Blood : Interracial Marriage in American Fiction, Scandal, and Law, 1820–1870 (Amherst, 2005), pp. 45–48.
“Census”, Singapore Chronicle, 15 July 1830.
William Evans, Slave Trade (East India) Slavery in Ceylon: Copies or Abstracts of All Correspondence Between the Directors of the E.I.C. and the Company’s Government in India, Since the 1st Day of June 1827, on the Subject of Slavery in the Territories Under the Company’s Rule: Also Communications Relating to the Subject of Slavery in the Island of Ceylon (London, 1838), pp. 237–239.
Evans, Slave Trade (East India) Slavery in Ceylon, p. 306.
Reid, “Decline of Slavery in Indonesia”, p. 71.
Correspondence Respecting the Alleged Existence of Chinese Slavery in Hong Kong: Presented to Both Houses of Parliament by Command of her Majesty (London, 1882), pp. 37–49.
Carl Trocki’s Prince of Pirates and James Warren’s Ah ku and Karayuki-San both examine the development of Singapore’s labour market as well as the thriving economy within it, which attended to the needs of displaced workers passing through the international port.
I am deliberately invoking the language of Luise White’s work, The Comforts of Home (Chicago, 1990), pp. 6–37 to illustrate the vital function prostitutes performed in colonial society, as well as how various administrators reacted to and accommodated their presence.
Sir John Hobhouse, Slavery (East Indies): Return to an Order of the Honorable (The House of Commons, 22 April 1841), p. 111.
Hobhouse, Slavery (East Indies), p. 109.
The Straits Times, 17 October 1855, p. 1.
“Sobriety”, Singapore Chronicle, 23 June 1831.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki-San, pp. 32–36.
During this period, according to colonial records the British deemed “traffickers” to be those in the business of illegally purchasing, selling, and/or transporting people from one place to another. Evans, Returns: Slave Trade (East India), pp. 3–4. The label of “trafficker” automatically implied the illegal transportation of people across political borders and was associated with the slave trade. Beginning in the late nineteenth century, antislavery associations and women’s groups worked to prohibit regulated brothels within the British Empire and created a more inclusive and expansive definition of both perpetrator and victim. As Carina Rays’ research illustrates, by the beginning of the twentieth century, trafficking had become a much more specific legal concept which focused on underage girls who were forced, coerced, or manipulated under false pretences. A trafficker was anyone who assisted in the procurement or transportation of these girls for “immoral purposes or to gratify another person’s passions within and across national borders” (p. 102). In the late 1920s, the newly formed League of Nations took up the task of investigating the issue, and it added young boys to their scope of victims and by the late 1930s the definition included adult women trafficked across international borders. For more see: Carina Ray, “Sex Trafficking, Prostitution, and the law, in Colonial British West Africa, 1911–43”, in Benjamin Lawrence and Richard L. Roberts (eds), Trafficking in Slavery’s Wake: Law and the Experience of Women and Children in Africa (Athens, oh, 2012), pp. 101–120, 102–105. In the 1950s, the United Nations took up trafficking as an issue of human rights, but the Cold War complicated the enforcement of relatively vague international laws. A survey made by interpol in the 1970s brought the topic to the attention of the un again there have been consistent efforts to strengthen and enforce international anti-trafficking laws; Kathleen Barry, Female Sexual Slavery (New York, 1979), pp. 283–298. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, “Article 3, paragraph (a) of the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons defines Trafficking in Persons as the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labor or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs”; available at: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking/what-is-human-trafficking.html; last accessed 8 July 2017. For a complete history see: Anne T. Gallagher, The International Law of Human Trafficking (Cambridge, 2010), pp. xxiii–34.
The following works are dedicated to this argument: Levine, Prostitution, Race, and Politics and Howell, Geographies of Regulation.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 34.
According to Warren, “Ah ku” was a respectable term for Chinese prostitutes in colonial Singapore; a Karayuki san in Singapore referred to “women from the poorest sectors of society during the Mejii-Taisho periods who lived and worked abroad as prostitutes.” Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 3.
Ibid., p. 40.
Ibid.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 40. Of course, there are layers of gender construction and British perceptions of prostitution, orientalism, and imperial categorization at work here, but the image is nonetheless vivid. For more on British perceptions of commercial sex, as well as discussions about the role of gender and Empire, see: Judith Walkowitz, Prostitution and Victorian Society (Cambridge, 1980), pp. 1–48; Judith Walkowitz, City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late-Victorian London (Chicago, 1992), pp. 1–40; Anne McClintock, Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest (New York, 1995), pp. 236–257; Stoler, Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power, pp. 22–79; Philippa Levine, Gender and Empire (Oxford, 2004), pp. 14–46, 134–156; Tony Ballantyne and Antoinette Burton (eds), Bodies in Contact: Rethinking Encounter in World History (Durham [etc.], 2005), pp. 1–19, 125–142.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 88.
Ibid., p. 75.
Diana Lary, Chinese Migrations: The Movement of People, Goods, and Ideas over Four Millennia (Lanham, uk, 2012), pp. 92–94; Eric Tagliacozzo and Wen-Chin Chang (eds), Chinese Circulations: Capital, Commodities, and Networks in Southeast Asia (Durham, 2014), pp. 24–27; Barbara Watson-Andaya and Leonard Andaya, A History of Malaysia (London, 1982), pp. 94–97.
Trocki, Prince of Pirates, p. 4.
The following works discuss the importance and connections Chinese Secret Societies held within Southeast Asia: Andaya, A History of Malaysia, pp. 141–143; Trocki, Prince of Pirates, pp. 107–111; Tagliacozzo, Secret Trades, Porous Borders, p. 372.
Herzog, “Convenient Compromises”, pp. 30–35.
British National Archives, Colonial Office [hereafter co] /273/91/75, “Appendix N”, “Abstract of Return of Brothels and Prostitutes of Singapore”, in “Governor of Straits Settlements to the Colonial Office”, 24 February 1869, pp. 75–77.
Levine, Prostitution, Race, and Politics, p. 25.
Bill Mihalopoulos, “Ousting the ‘Prostitute’: Retelling the Story of the Karayuki–san”, Postcolonial Studies, 4 (2001), pp. 169–187, 173.
Ibid., p. 170.
Mikiso Hane, Peasants, Rebels, Women, and Outcasts: The Underside of Modern Japan (Oxford, 1982), p. 12.
Ibid., p. 23.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 47.
Mihalopoulos, “Ousting the ‘Prostitute’”, p. 177.
Ibid.; Hane, Peasants, Rebels, Women, and Outcasts, p. 207. According to Hane, the average monthly income for peasants in 1878 was 1 yen 75 sen (there are 100 sen in a yen), and the situation did not improve until after the Second World War (p. 21). An average textile worker earned between 13 and 20 sen per day and “superior workers” saw an increase from 9 yen 22 sen per year in 1875, to 17 yen and 69 sen in 1881. A family could have a two-story home built for around 100 yen (p. 176).
Mihalopoulos, “Ousting the ‘Prostitute’”, p. 175.
Ibid., p. 178.
Ibid., p. 177.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 42.
Ibid., p. 47.
Ibid., p. 49.
Ibid., p. 51.
Adam McKeown discusses the lives of indentured labour in Singapore in his chapter, “The Social Life of Chinese Labour”, in Eric Taggliacozzo and Wen-Chin Chang, (eds), Chinese Circulations: Capital, Commodities, and Networks in Southeast Asia (Durham, 2011), pp. 62–83, 75–78.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 55; McKeown, “The Social Life of Chinese Labour”, pp. 76–77.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 91.
Ibid., p. 52.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 52; Major, Slavery, Abolitionism and Empire in India, 1772–1843 (Liverpool, 2012), pp. 131–162.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, pp. 52–67; Levine, Prostitution, Race, and Politics, pp. 29–30.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 61. All references to dollars in Warren’s work refer to contemporary Straits dollars.
Ibid. All currency conversions were performed with the British National Archive’s currency converter available at: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/currency/default0.asp#mid; last accessed 8 July 2017.
Ibid., p. 63.
Yong Kiat Lee, “Prostitution and Venereal Disease in Early Singapore (1819–1889), Part ii”, Singapore Medical Journal, 21 (1980), pp. 781–791, 782.
For more on officials misusing authority granted by cd Acts, see Judith Walkowitz, Prostitution and Victorian Society, pp. 79–85.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, p. 147.
Ibid., p. 149.
Mrs. Archibald MacKirdy and W.N. Willis, The White Slave Trade (London, 1912). Warren discusses the impact this had on the British and Singaporean public: Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, pp. 151–158. For more on the reactions of the British public to regulationism, see: John F. Decker, Prostitution: Regulation and Control (New York, 1979); Paul McHugh, Prostitution and Victorian Social Reform (New York, 1980); Donald Thomas, The Victorian Underworld (New York, 1998).
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki San, pp. 154–156.
Ibid., p. 155.
Ibid., pp. 157–165; Warren, Pirates, Prostitutes, and Pullers, pp. 240–247.
Regulationism and the effects of its repeal were part of a long and protracted debate in British Parliament. For more on this, see: Levine, Prostitution, Race and Politics, pp. 37–145 and Howell, Geographies of Regulation, pp. 113–188.
Warren, Ah ku and Karayuki-San, p. 167.
Ibid., p. 175.
Ong, “Singapore”, p. 245.
Ibid., p. 246.
Shyamala Nagaraj and Siti Rohani Yahya, “Prostitution in Malaysia”, in Lin Lean Lim (ed.), The Sex Sector: the Economic and Social Bases of Prostitution in Southeast Asia (Geneva, 1998), pp. 67–99, 70–73.
Ong, “Singapore”, p. 257.
Ibid.
Nagaraj and Yahya, “Prostitution in Malaysia”, p. 76; the amounts in Nagaraj and Yahya’s study are given in contemporary us dollars.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Nagaraj and Yahya, “Prostitution in Malaysia”, p. 78.
Ibid., p. 79.
Ibid., p. 84.
Ibid.
Nagaraj and Yahya, “Prostitution in Malaysia”, p. 90.
Paul Fitzpatrick, “Into the Red Light: Prostitution in Singapore”, Singapore Business Review, 20 July 2012; available at: http://sbr.com.sg/leisure-entertainment/commentary/red-light-prostitution-in-singapore; last accessed 8 July 2017. The following articles describe two separate scandals about officials and public figures purchasing underage women for sexual services: Cheryl Ong and Jalelah Abu Baker, “In Singapore Clients will Face Charges if Prostitutes are Under the Age of 18”, Straits Times Indonesia, 13 February 2012, available at: http://jakartaglobe.id/archive/in-singapore-clients-will-face-charges-if-prostitutes-the-under-age-of-18/; last accessed 30 June 2017; Sanat Valilikappen and Andrea Tan, “Singapore Charges 48 in Underage Prostitution Scandal”, Bloomberg, 18 April 2012; available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-18/singapore-charges-48-in-underage-prostitution-scandal.html; last accessed 21 May 2012.
Fitzpatrick, “Into the Red Light: Prostitution in Singapore”.
Ibid.
Ong and Baker, “In Singapore Clients will Face Charges”.
Reid, “The Decline of Slavery in Indonesia”, p. 72.