List of Figures and Tables

In: School Space and its Occupation
Editors:
Scott Alterator
Search for other papers by Scott Alterator in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Craig Deed
Search for other papers by Craig Deed in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Free access
  FIGURES  
3.1. Individuality 30
3.2. Complexity 31
3.3. Democracy 32
3.4. Tradition 33
3.5. Technology 34
4.1. Seaside secondary college: The Hub. Refurbishment floor plan – annotated to identify purposeful activity settings. Image: Spowers Architects 56
5.1. One room school (image designed by Curtis J. Gibbs, New York, NY) 65
5.2. Common school building (image designed by Curtis J. Gibbs, New York, NY) 66
5.3. Standard finger plan (image designed by Curtis J. Gibbs, New York, NY) 67
5.4. View from teacher’s desk in a classroom that supports traditional ways of teaching and learning 70
5.5. St. Lawrence primary school using existing furniture, classroom organized to create activity settings where students have a choice of where they prefer to work (photograph by Places Created for Learning) 75
5.6. Primary school, Huddinge, Sweden (photograph by Places Created for Learning). This classroom was crafted to create activity settings or rooms-within rooms 76
5.7 Skapaskolan, Huddinge, Sweden (photograph by Places Created for Learning). This is a portable classroom where the furniture was arranged so that teachers had areas to support large group meetings, cooperative working groups, and independent work 76
5.8. Wamberal Public School plan (designed by EJE architecture, Newcastle, Australia & Places Created for Learning, Perth, Australia). Wamberal Public School has been designed to support 15 classrooms 81
5.9. Epping Public School (designed by GHD Woodhead, Sydney, Australia & Places Created for Learning, Perth, Australia).

Epping Public School has been planned with 22 classrooms spaces
81
5.10. Glomstaskolan (designed by Origo Arkitektgruppe, Sweden).

Glomstaskolan has been planned with approximately 46 classrooms spaces
82
6.1. Stimulus shelter. The shelter not only offers retreat for learners, but also activates the spaces around it, creating additional defined settings in which to learn 94
6.2. This image highlights the complexity within an early learning center. Children are provided with a variety of places in which to acquire self, social and spatial awareness 95
6.3. Legibility within the physical environment provides clear boundaries and pathways between activity areas, and is defined with rugs, and equipment to support specific activities 97
7.1. Articles by Stevenson (2011); Cook (2015) and Lewis (2015) 108
7.2. Conceptual model of the development of education over time (indicativeonly) 114
7.3. Conceptual model of the development of education facility design over time (indicative only) 115
7.4. Conceptual model of education+facility design, over time (indicative only) 116
9.1. Senior school schematic (ground floor re-design) 142
10.1. Schematic of case study site 161
11.1. The model of translational participation 174
12.1. School environment model(based on Owens & Valesky, 2007) 188
12.2. School of environmental studies, floorplan 191
12.3. Inter district down town school, floorplan (fourth floor) 193
13.1. The performance of the room (adapted from Wilson etal., n.d., p. 11) 213
13.2. PST/SKG analytical matrix 216
14.1. Postulated research model used in this research 227
14.2. Emergent model showing the relationship between factors of personalised learning and well-being 229
14.3. Student responses to the PLEQ (2011-2013) 231
14.4. Male responses to the PLEQ (2014) 235
14.5. Female responses to the PLEQ (2014) 236
14.6. Year 10 students’ responses to the PLEQ (2014) 237
  TABLES  
9.1. Complex interactions between natural and conventional affordances 147
10.1. Capturing interactions between natural and conventional affordances 164
  • Collapse
  • Expand