South–South Cooperation

In: Humanitarianism: Keywords
Author:
Salla Turunen
Search for other papers by Salla Turunen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open Access

The United Nations Office for South–South Cooperation (UNOSSC) defines South–South cooperation in its broadest sense as political, economic, social, cultural, environmental, and/or technical collaboration in the forms of knowledge, skills, expertise, and/or resource sharing between countries in the Global South. It can involve one or more of the so-called “developing countries” and the cooperation can occur on bilateral, regional, intraregional, or interregional basis (Lengyel and Malacalza 2011; UNOSSC 2018).

The word “South” in South-South cooperation refers to an arguably contested term of Global South, which broadly refers to the regions of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Oceania. The term generally excludes Europe and North America, signifying geopolitical difference and global and historical relations of power (Dados and Connell 2012).

Historically, the forms and modalities of South–South cooperation vary contextually to a high degree. Some milestones of broad South–South cooperation include the Bandung Conference of 1955 and the First Session of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development in 1964 and the following Buenos Aires Plan of Action in 1978. Furthermore, countries of the Global South have significantly increased their participation and leadership in humanitarian action and peacekeeping missions in the 20th century (Amar 2013).

The role of non-traditional (new or re-emerging) actors in the wider spectrum of development cooperation has expanded in the last two decades, increasingly diversifying and challenging traditional approaches to development assistance and humanitarianism (De Renzio and Seifert 2014; Pickup 2018). For example, some South–South cooperation providers reject the labels of “donor” and “recipient” countries, and rather focus on mutually beneficial peer relationship with partner countries and emphasize the exchange of technical skills (Zimmermann and Smith 2011). South–South cooperation can be seen as creating a new developmental narrative that contests the traditional conditionality-given narrative, which focuses on advancing the donors’ ideological interests. Notable Southern donors such as China and India tend to refuse to enter into donor arrangements so they do not interfere with other states’ sovereign affairs (Mawdsley 2012). The general focus of South–South aid is in non-tied autonomous development, where strategic priorities are shaped by the countries at the receiving end (Quadir 2013).

Criticism of South–South cooperation cautions against generalizations and assumptions of ubiquitous and unanimous approaches of solidarity between the Global Southern states, and questions the acritical use of the notion of “Global South” itself. The diversity of the countries of the Global South, in addition to their different relative positions in international relations, requires contextual analysis of the cooperation (Pacitto and Fiddian-Qasmiyeh 2013). Humanitarian and development aid provided by the Global South has been fragmented owing to the lack of national aid strategies and clear organizational structures to coordinate, manage, monitor, and evaluate new and existing aid programs and needs (Quadir 2013). Further, some scholars argue that the South–South cooperation paradigm faces similar challenges to its North–South counterpart, as both are characterized by involving countries’ heterogenic policies, institutional arrangements, and engagements in international initiatives and forums (De Renzio and Seifert 2014).

References

  • Amar, P. ed. (2013) Global South to the Rescue: Emerging Humanitarian Superpowers and Globalizing Rescue Industries. Routledge.

  • Dados, N. , Connell, R. (2012) The Global South. Contexts, 11(1): 1213.

  • De Renzio, P. , Seifert, J. (2014) South–South Cooperation and the Future of Development Assistance: Mapping Actors and Options. Third World Quarterly, 35(10): 18601875.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lengyel, M. , Malacalza, B. (2011) What Do We Talk When We Talk About South–South Cooperation? The Construction of a Concept from Empirical Basis. IPSAECPR Joint Conference, São Paulo.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mawdsley, E. (2012) The Changing Geographies of Foreign Aid and Development Cooperation: Contributions from Gift Theory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(2): 256272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pacitto, J. , Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2013) Writing the “Other” into Humanitarian Discourse: Framing Theory and Practice in South–South Humanitarian Responses to Forced Displacement. RSC Working Paper Series, 93.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pickup, M. (2018) Evaluating Brazilian South–South Cooperation in Haiti. Third World Quarterly, 39(10): 19411961.

  • Quadir, F. (2013) Rising Donors and the New Narrative of “South–South” Cooperation: What Prospects for Changing the Landscape of Development Assistance Programmes? Third World Quarterly, 34(2): 321333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UNOSSC (United Nations Office for South–South Cooperation) (2018) About South–South and Triangular Cooperation. https://www.unsouthsouth.org/about/about-sstc/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zimmermann, F. , Smith, K. (2011) More Actors, More Money, More Ideas for International Development Co-Operation. Journal of International Development, 23: 722738.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 185 72 5
PDF Views & Downloads 138 43 1