Chapter 7 Intimate Power

Intergenerational Cooperation and Conflicts in Childrearing among Urban Families

In: Chinese Families Upside Down: Intergenerational Dynamics and Neo-Familism in the Early 21st Century
Author:
Suowei Xiao
Search for other papers by Suowei Xiao in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open Access

Abstract

This chapter examines the cooperation and conflicts in the new pattern of intergenerational coalition of child-rearing among contemporary urban Chinese families. To raise the perfect child in the third generation, the mother acts as the powerful manager of the project, husband is responsible for fund raising, and grandparents provide most of the childcare service and are often are marginalized in family power relations. Differing from the institutionalized power structure in traditional Chinese families, this new pattern features a set of fluid, deinstitutionalized power relations that are conditioned by negotiations among family members and mediated by intergenerational intimacy.

1 Introduction

In Western societies, particularly the United States, the majority of grandparents follow a norm of noninterference in intergenerational relationships and do not assume a central role in caring for or rearing of their grandchildren (Cherlin and Furstenburg 1986). However, their involvement with grandchildren may increase when their adult children face difficulties, such as unemployment, bankruptcy, divorce, incarceration, or drug abuse (Gibson 2005). By contrast, in contemporary China it is a prevalent for grandparents to participate in the care of their grandchildren. According to a pooled 1991–2004 sample drawn from nine provinces as part of the China Health and Nutrition Survey, 45 percent of grandparents lived in the same household with their grandchild from birth to age 6. In families where three generations lived together, grandparents, especially grandmothers, played an extremely important caregiving role, spending as much time as the mothers in caring for preschool-aged children. Nonresidential grandparents also served as important alternative childcare providers. In 27 percent of the surveyed families, children were cared for in the paternal grandparents’ households and nearly 13 percent were cared for in the maternal grandparents’ households (Chen et al. 2011). Other large sample surveys in urban China indicate that more than one-half of the respondents received help with childrearing from their parents or in-laws (Goh and Kuczynski 2010; Ma et al. 2011).

China has a long history of grandparent involvement in the taking care of grandchildren. Historians note that in traditional Chinese society most young couples lived with the husband’s family when their children were born, and grandparents, as well as other female relatives, played an important role in the raising of the young children (Hsiung 2005). However, departing from the traditional image that old people simply enjoyed playing with the grandchildren, the contemporary intergenerational childrearing is more complicated. On the one hand, the grandparents’ participation in the raising of their grandchildren constitutes an important source of support for their adult children, helps to cultivate a close grandparent/grandchild relationship, and enhances the grandparents’ satisfaction in life (Goh and Kuczynski 2010). On the other hand, contradictions and conflicts regarding childrearing issues frequently occur between the grandparents and the parents. Due to differences in parenting styles and beliefs, the nurturing and educating of the grandchildren are likely to result in conflicts in the intergenerational parenting coalition (Goh and Kuczynski 2010, 2012; Luan 2009). Furthermore, grandparents and adult children often engage in delicate competition to establish intimate bonds with the children (Shen 2013). Several scholars have noted the tendency for grandparents to become “nannies” in the intergenerational parenting coalition, i.e., they assume the lion’s share of the housework and the childcare, while, at the same time, ceding their voice in family decision making (Goh and Kudznski 2010; Shen 2013).

These findings indicate that contemporary intergenerational parenting coalitions remain a traditional form of intergenerational cooperation, but the findings also reveal a new feature regarding intergenerational relations in general and the changing power relations among the generations in particular. By studying the intergenerational parenting coalition, this study seeks to address the following questions: In the contemporary intergenerational collaboration of childcare in urban China, what is the division of labor and the power relations among the family members? Is there an emerging pattern of intergenerational power relations and how is it challenged and maintained among family members? Based on an in-depth investigation into the intergeneration cooperation and conflicts in childrearing, this article seeks to deepen our understanding of power relations in intergenerational cooperation and assistance and to illuminate the intertwining of power and intimacy in the family.

This chapter draws on in-depth interviews and observations of parents and grandparents who collaborated in the raising of children. The analysis focuses on thirteen families residing in Beijing between 2010 and 2013. All of the parents in this study had a junior college degree or higher. The majority of the fathers held professional or managerial positions or ran their own business. Most mothers worked, or had worked in research, managerial, or administrative jobs, such as secretary or accounting.1 Their annual household income was no less than 150,000 yuan (about US $22,869). In only one family were the parents both born in Beijing; all the others had migrated to work in the city and had purchased private homes in Beijing. Twelve out of the thirteen children in the participating families had Beijing hukou (household registrations). Ten out of the thirteen children in the participating families were between the ages 3 and 6 years old, and the other three were school-aged (7 to 10 years old). Except for one family in which the grandparents lived separately and were not involved in childcare, all the other families had three generations living under the same roof for more than one year, with the grandparents providing childcare in varying forms on a daily basis.

I conducted multiple interviews that lasted between a total of three to six hours with all thirteen mothers, and one two-hour interview with two fathers respectively. I asked the parents to elaborate on their childrearing experiences since the birth of their child. Complementing the parent sample, eight grandparents who engaged in caring for their grandchildren were also interviewed. All of these grandparents lived in Beijing, were between the ages of 60 and 80, and had stable incomes at the time of the interview. In addition, I also visited the homes of seven of the participating families and joined three families on weekend trips, thus enabling me to observe the interactions among the various family members and to better understand the family dynamics. For reasons of confidentiality, all names used in this article are pseudonyms.

2 Intergenerational Cooperation in the Family in Reform-Era China

Intergenerational cooperation and reciprocity are important traditions in Chinese families. Culturally, familism is a value system that maintains and enhances the stability of Chinese society, of which the family is the basic unit. Family members and kin linked by blood ties have a natural and unique closeness, and they undertake unconditional and unlimited responsibilities and obligations of mutual care and support (Liu 2013). Since the market reforms, along with the nuclearization of the family and the prevalence of the independence of an adult son’s conjugal family from his natal family in terms of residence, property, and finance, parents and their adult children have shifted from intra-family to inter-family relations, and intergenerational relations have become the connection between the two nuclear families (Wang 2010). The tradition of mutual support and aid across generations has persisted; the parental family is closely connected with the adult children, constituting a new pattern of “[nuclear] families in [kin] networks” (Wang 2010; Ma et al. 2011). The existing literature on intergenerational cooperation and reciprocity focuses primarily on two dimensions, i.e., resource flows and cultural ethics.

First, in regard to resource flows, extensive attention has been paid to fairness and equity in intergenerational exchanges of economic, physical, and emotional means. Some researchers argue that the pattern of intergenerational cooperation and reciprocity is “reciprocal” or “feeding back” (fanbu), i.e., adult children maintain close reciprocal exchanges with their parents but tend to provide more economic resources and caregiving to their parents than the other way around (Xiong 1998; Xu 2011; Bian et al. 1998). Others point out that adult children, singletons in particular, receive extensive parental financial, emotional, and physical support, which may exceed the amount of support they provide to their parents. This is referred to metaphorically as “downstream grace” (en wangxia liu) or “tears dripping down” (yanlei wangxia liu) (He 2009; Ma et al. 2011; Liu 2005; Liu 2012; Shen 2013). In recent years, the increasing phenomenon of ken lao (i.e., adult children being dependent on their elderly parents for financial, physical, and other forms of support) and the tragic cases of children failing to properly provide for their rural elderly parents have aroused much debate on whether the equilibrium and fairness in the traditional “feeding back” model of intergenerational exchange has been altered (Guo 2001; He 2009; Liu 2012).

Second, regarding cultural ethics, the central issue concerns changes in the ethical foundations of intergenerational cooperation. Some scholars point out that traditional family ethics that emphasizes responsibility and obligations among family members has faded, and, under the veil of individualism, ideas are emerging that stress the subjectivity of the younger generation (Liu 2011; Kang 2012; Shen 2013; Yan 2003). Nevertheless, there is a difference in the two generations’ views of family ethics. Some studies find that members of the elder generation still have a firm sense of “responsibility-oriented ethics,” i.e., they fulfill their responsibilities and obligations toward their descendants, generously offering support and assistance to their children (and grandchildren) through various means and they attempt to lessen their children’s burdens in terms of providing elderly care and by being forgiving when their children do not “feed back” in a proper manner (Yang and He 2004). However, other scholars argue that despite the fact that the elder generations selflessly support their children, they no longer adhere to the notion of unlimited responsibilities and obligations (Liu 2013). There have also been debates concerning the younger generations’ notion of family ethics. Informed by individuation theories, one group of scholars argues that the family has become the pool of resources and means by which individuals achieve their personal goals, with the basis of intergenerational ties shifting from mutual obligations to individual desires, choices, and needs (Shen 2013; Yan 2003, 2012). Other studies challenge the above-mentioned view of the “individuation of the family,” arguing that emotional ties still predominate in nuclear families, while economic benefits outweigh family ethics in intergenerational relations (Tan 2010). The term “new familism” (xin jiating zhuyi) has been coined, referring to family notions held by the younger generation that seeks to accommodate both personal and family interests. It has been argued that adult children, despite a growing strong sense of individualism, value the family as a whole, and they are willing to maintain a mutually supportive relationship with their parents (Kang 2012).

To better understand the mechanism and process of intergenerational cooperation, another dimension of the power relations among generations is essential yet understudied in the existing literature. One exception is Shen’s study of urban families in Shanghai. This work finds that in families where three generations live under the same roof, young mothers are relieved from most of the housework and have more power in making decisions and arranging family affairs, while the grandparents relinquish their authority. Shen (2013) claims this is a reversal in the power relations of the parent-child axis. But Shen’s study examines power in intergenerational relations from a relatively static view, highlighting the shift in the relative position and status of the grandparents and parents in the family that result in changes in the resources, rights, responsibilities, and obligations of the two generations. However, as scholars of family studies have pointed out, family politics is a dynamic process, constantly negotiating interests and demands. Individuals seek a greater voice and respect in family affairs and tend to achieve their goals by accumulating moral capital and strategizing in terms of family politics (Wu 2009; Zheng and Yang 2003).

Viewing power as dynamic and flowing is illuminating for an understanding of power relations in the contemporary intergenerational parenting coalition. In the modern transition of Chinese families, the traditional patriarchal family power structure, relying on hierarchies of gender, generation, and age, has been challenged. On the one hand, the cultural and moral authority granted to parents through their status in the family has been weakened, the power of the younger generation is on the rise, and the women’s, especially the young women’s, status in the family has been enhanced (Ma et al. 2011; Shen et al. 2009; Wang 2009; Xiao 2002; Yang 2011). On the other hand, the institutionalized and well-defined hierarchy among family members has been loosened. The weakening of the institutionalized power structure allows room to negotiations among family members and produces more flexible and diversified power relations in the family (Wu 2009; Shen 2013; Yan 2012). In other words, in the traditional family where rules of seniority and hierarchy were strictly enforced, individual power was closely linked with one’s role and status in the family and little room was left for individual maneuvering. In contrast, in the modern family, with its relatively loose hierarchical structure, individuals have more space to maneuver to have a voice in family affairs. For instance, a recent study finds that many parents subsidize their children’s purchase of housing, either by taking initiatives or positively responding to their children’s requests, in order to establish a “negotiative intimacy” (xieshangshi qinmi guanxi) with their children (Zhong and Ho 2014). By willingly providing financial resources, parents capture the chance to take part in their children’s family affairs and to cultivate a relationship characterized by emotional exchange, respect, and close ties. This finding challenges the stereotypical image of parents being “the victim” and “the disadvantaged” as they sponsor their children’s real-estate and other financial pursuits.

Based on a close examination of the intergenerational parenting coalition, this article seeks to illuminate the characteristics of intergenerational power relations in contemporary China, highlighting both the general power structure and the dynamic process of exercising power. I argue that a new pattern whereby young mothers act as powerful “managers “ of the childrearing project, and grandparents serve primarily as caretakers who are marginalized in family power relations, has emerged with respect to both the division of labor and the power structure among generations in the intergenerational parenting coalition. However, patterns of intergenerational power relations are fluid rather than institutionalized, susceptible to negotiations and interactions among family members, and largely confined by the construction and maintenance of specific intimate relations between the parents and the grandparents.

I use the term “intimate power” to describe the particular features of the exercise of power in the intergenerational parenting coalition, highlighting the connection between intimate relations and power in the family. This concept includes the following three features. First, in the intergenerational collaboration, the establishment of an intimate relationship among family members is the premise for the exercise of power. Second, the individual exercise and negotiation of power is mediated by intimate relations among family members. Finally, as in the specific case of the intergenerational parenting coalition, grandparents forgo their negotiating authority and power so as to maintain mutual assistance and cooperation as well as to sustain emotional intimacy with their offspring.

Two main features of “intimate power” will be covered in the remainder of this chapter, the division of labor and power relations in the intergenerational parenting coalition, and intimate relations and the exercise of power in childrearing. Before we address these main themes, a brief discussion of the transition in childrearing in modern China is presented to help readers understand the background under which the contemporary intergenerational parenting coalition has been formed.

3 The Transition of Childrearing in Modern China

Chinese traditional childrearing was highly functionally oriented. The child’s main task was to learn to behave as a person, that is, to grow up into a socially recognized adult so as to honor his/her family and ancestors and to perpetuate the family line. Early child training was characterized by respecting one’s seniors and by being pragmatic, moral, and disciplined (Hsiung 2005). A common pattern in childcare was that mothers would nurture and fathers would educate. To be more specific, mothers were responsible for physiological care, i.e., bringing up the young in terms of daily feeding, dressing, and tenderness. They empathized with the bodily and emotional needs of their children and formed intimate bonds with their children. Fathers, in contrast, were responsible for sociocultural reproduction, assuming responsibility for the children’s moral and behavioral training as well as their intellectual skills. The affection between the father and the child was thus inhibited. Paternal grandparents and female relatives were also involved in the daily care of the children since most young couples were still living with the husband’s family when they had their first child (Fei 1998; Hsiung 2005).

The transition of Chinese society has brought enormous changes in childcare practices. During the pre-reform socialist era, children were regarded as the future of the nation rather than as the private property of the family. Attempts were made to collectively reorganize childcare. In the cities, public preschools and childcare facilities were established to alleviate the family’s childcare burdens. Although many women entered the labor force, the gender division of labor in the family still persisted. In general, urban women suffered the double burden of work and housework and they relied on kin networks for support in caregiving (Zuo and Jiang 2010).

With the market reforms we have witnessed a trend of marketization and privatization in childcare. With the decrease in public childcare facilities, families again assumed the primary, if not the sole, responsibility for the raising of their children. There has also been a proliferation of discussions on parenting. A parenting magazine, A Must Read for Parents (fumu bidu), which first appeared at the beginning of the 1980s, introduced a new concept of “parenting,” referring to those who adopt scientific methods to foster the healthy development of their children (Dong 2014). Furthermore, in recent years many popular readers on family education have proliferated. Informed by Western child-development psychology, such readers advocate good parenting that is characterized by being child-centered rather than adult-centered and by cultivating comprehensive qualities rather than being exam-oriented. These new views stress the importance of providing early education, engaging in emotional communications, and cultivating the child’s interests (Chen and Wang 2005). Such popular views of childrearing in the name of scientific parenting (kexue yuer) have been well received by young urban parents, especially the newly emerging middle-class families. Furthermore, due to the one-child policy and the intensified market competition since the reforms, many parents have high expectations of upward mobility for their only child, and thus they seriously invest in their child’s education (Lin 2009; Fong 2004). Along with the burgeoning markets for children’s education and consumption, childrearing has become a complicated project that involves extended roles for parents, schools, experts, and markets. First, the roles of the parents have been extended. Good parents are not only caretakers but also learners of parenting skills and consumers in the educational market. They actively acquire new knowledge and skills to perceive and respond to their children’s needs. They also attentively seek information about nutrition and education; choose desirable educational institutions, toys, books, and consumer products; and they arrange appropriate activities for their children.

Second, childrearing has become consumer-oriented and extremely expensive. Parents not only seek to facilitate their children’s development by purchasing professional educational services but also to cultivate class-coded lifestyles and tastes in their children through the adoption of consumption patterns. For example, among the families in my study, only one mother was able to send her son to a good public preschool, affiliated with the university where she taught, at an affordable price. All the other families chose to send their children to private preschools which cost an average of 2,500 yuan (about US $381) per month (varying from 1,800 yuan to 4,200 yuan), while the monthly wage for the working population in Beijing averaged at 4,672 yuan (about US $ 712) in 2011. Other educational expenses, such as early child-development programs, extracurricular activities, and private tutoring, totaled on average of over 1,500 yuan (about US $229) per month. Parents also paid attention to what their children ate and wore. Rather than simply feeding their children and keeping them warm, the parents chose clothing of good quality and expensive taste for their little ones. Some parents purchased organic food and fashionable outfits for their children on a regular basis. Social and leisure activities for children, such as birthday parties, vacation trips, and summer camps, have also become important household expenses.2

As childrearing becomes more complicated and expensive, families require more labor and money to provide “proper” care for their children. This care can be divided into different sets of tasks: mental work, such as learning, decision making, teaching, and playing; manual work, such as taking physical care of the children; and auxiliary work, such as cooking, washing clothes, and house cleaning.

4 Grandparents Take Care, Mothers Take Charge: The Division of Labor and Power Relations in Childrearing

Among the middle-class families I studied, a new pattern that I call “grandparents take care, mothers take charge” has emerged regarding the division of labor in the intergenerational parenting coalition. In this pattern, the mothers become the manager of the childrearing project, taking full charge and assuming the responsibilities for sociocultural rearing, whereas the grandparents become helpers and engage in the physical care but lack authority in terms of the childrearing practices. Fathers concentrate on earning money to facilitate their children’s development, but they are largely absent from everyday childcare practices. However, they do participate in decision making via their connections with the mothers. This pattern points to the power relations among family members in the parenting coalition. However, young mothers do not have the institutionalized symbolic and moral resources to ensure their supervisory role and authority in childcare practices. There is much room for negotiation among family members, who strategize to change or to maintain the particular power relations in the family. In this sense, power relations in the intergenerational parenting coalition are flexible and diversified. The story of the Wang family provides an excellent example.

4.1 A Story of the Wang Family

Meimei Wang was a 4-year-old girl. Since her birth her grandparents on both sides rotated to help take care of her. Meimei’s maternal grandmother came to help until she was 8 months and then her paternal grandparents took over. After Meimei went to preschool at the age of 2.5, her maternal grandparents returned since the paternal grandparents were no longer able to provide childcare due to deteriorating health conditions. But because they had another daughter who also needed childcare help, the old couple had to separate, with each one staying with one daughter’s family and then rotating on a regular basis. They made it clear to their daughters that if they were needed, they would be happy to help but they would not insist on providing help.

At the time of the research, Meimei’s grandfather, Grandpa Lin, was living with his daughter’s family. Every morning he was the first one to get up, prepare breakfast for the family, and then send Meimei to preschool at 8:00 a.m. He then did the grocery shopping, cleaned the apartment, and washed the clothes. At noon, Grandpa Lin fixed himself a quick lunch, took a nap, and then started preparing dinner and snacks for Meimei. At about 5:00 p.m. he picked up Meimei from preschool. When he cooked dinner for the family, he kept an eye on Meimei as she would play in the living room. Usually Grandpa Lin would wait until everyone had returned home to eat dinner. But if the young couple was unable to return home until very late, he and Meimei would eat alone. After dinner, if his daughter was home, he would go out for a walk; if his daughter had not yet returned home, he would skip his daily exercise.

With the help of the grandparents, Meimei’s mother, Yang, earned her PhD and completed a two-year postdoc appointment. She then took a teaching position at a small private college even though she had other job offers. The young couple made this decision collectively after deliberate discussion. Working in a small college did not earn much, but due to its flexible schedule, two one-month breaks, and lower demands for research and publications, compared to that of large research universities, Yang would be able to devote more time to take care of her family.

Yang read extensively on topics related to childrearing, such as the Parenting Encyclopedia, A Good Mother Is More Important than a Good Teacher, Capturing Children’s Sensitive Periods, and Effective Parent Training. She also followed childrearing information and discussions on online forums and attended lectures by education professionals. She stated that she was not very concerned about practical things, such as her daughter’s future career; her top priority was to “teach her daughter how to be a good person; other things, such as learning knowledge, would come later.”

When Meimei was a preschooler, Yang focused on nurturing Meimei’s emotional stability and cultivating her communication skills. For instance, when Meimei was fussy and began to cry, Yang would not cajole or scold her; instead, she would hold her gently and then try to reason with her until she calmed down. Sometimes Meimei was fussy for quite a while and Yang had to make a great effort to remain patient. When Yang was disciplining Meimei, the grandparents normally would keep silent and leave them alone. However, Yang’s mother was short-tempered and would try to “help” discipline the child in ways with which Yang did not agree, such as using mandatory language or intimidating the child. Yang could not help but complain about this to her mother and she would often ask her mother to leave the room.

On most days Yang returned home before 6:00 p.m. and ate dinner with the family. After dinner, she spent time with her daughter, playing games, singing songs, drawing pictures, reading books, or together visiting the neighbors. At 9:00 p.m. Yang helped Meimei get ready for bed by brushing her teeth, washing her face, and reading her bedtime stories. When Meimei was 1 year old, Yang began to arrange outdoor activities for the family on weekends. The parents would take Meimei to parks, museums, swimming pools, organic farms, and so on. The grandparent(s) sometimes joined them on the weekend activities. Yang had to make considerable effort in advance to arrange these outings, checking the venue, getting directions, checking the weather and other details, and informing her husband about the arrangements.

Ever since her birth, Yang was concerned about finding a good preschool for Meimei. Over the course of several years she sought out information from Web sites and online forums as well as from neighbors and friends. When Meimei was 1 year old, Yang was already well-informed about all the preschools within a five-mile radius of their residence. When Meimei was about 2 years old, Yang began contacting several preschools in which she was interested. She attended more than ten orientation meetings organized by various organizations and she personally visited six preschools. Her top choice was a private preschool because the principal’s vision of education resonated with her own. She took her husband, Mr. Wang, on the campus visit, and both were quite satisfied with the facilities and the teachers. However, the high expense of 3,600 yuan (about US $549) per month made her hesitate.3 Mr. Wang helped her make up her mind by saying, “You won’t be able to get a good education by choosing a cheap school.”

After Meimei turned 2 years old, Yang signed her up for art, dance, and English classes. Meimei liked to paint, so Yang sent her to an art class recommended by the neighbors. Meimei attended dance classes because Yang liked to dance and she found that Meimei had a good sense of rhythm. Yang also sent Meimei to English classes because the children of most of her neighbors and friends who had children of Meimei’s age were also learning English. Mr. Wang was enthusiastic about his daughter learning English at an early age, but it was Yang who called the English-training centers for information and audited three different classes with Meimei. Yang did not expect her daughter to be an artist or a professional dancer in the future; rather, these classes made good use of her daughter’s time by learning useful skills and cultivating good taste. The total cost of the art, dance, and language classes as well as preschool totaled over 6,000 yuan (about US $915) per month, far exceeding Yang’s salary.

Fortunately, Mr. Wang made a good salary. After working for consulting companies for over ten years, he was earning more than 200,000 yuan (about US $30,492) annually, which he attributed to his hard work, including his regularly working overtime and taking business trips. During Meimei’s first year of life, he was working on a project in another city and only returned home every two weeks. Yang commented, “At that time, I could not count on him [to take care of the baby]. He had changed her diaper only once or twice and he recorded it because he thought it was interesting. But if I asked him to do it [change the diaper] every day, no way!” Mr. Wang later began to resent the fact that his job kept him away from his family and so he found a new job that allowed him to work in Beijing most of the time, taking only one or two short business trips each month. Although he was able to return home every day, Mr. Wang still had little time to spend with Meimei. On the few days that he finished work early, he arrived home at about 8:00 p.m. He would play with Meimei after dinner, doing somersaults or carrying her on his neck. “They are just like friends,” Yang commented. Father and daughter would have fun for about half an hour until it was time for Meimei to go to bed. However, on most nights Meimei was already asleep when her father returned home.

Although Yang had some complaints, she was generally satisfied with her husband for being the primary breadwinner for the family and making an effort to be a good father. Mr. Wang did not have much face-to-face interaction with Meimei, but his wife kept him informed, and he regularly talked to Meimei over the phone when he was away on business trips. When it came to important decisions, such as choosing a preschool or leisure activities, Mr. Wang would be involved, sharing thoughts, providing suggestions, and even making the final decision when his wife had hesitations. During the past year, due to the influence of Grandpa Lin, Mr. Wang’s available time had improved: he tried not to work on weekends, joining the family for outdoor activities or taking Meimei to different classes. He even spent several weekends preparing for a school play with other parents, which would be performed for all the children in Meimei’s preschool on International Children’s Day.

4.2 The Division of Labor in Childrearing

In terms of the intergenerational division of labor in childrearing, the case of the Wang family is typical among the families I studied. As the manager of the childrearing project, the young mother usually engages in three main responsibilities.

First, the primary responsibility of the mother involves making plans and decisions for her child’s development, from selecting educational institutions to arranging daily activities, including choosing a preschool, early childhood education programs, and leisure activities; making arrangements for weekends and holidays; and shopping for food, clothes, and toys that are age-appropriate for her child. To be able to make good decisions, the mother has to invest enormous time and effort in collecting and analyzing relevant information, surfing the Internet, reading books, talking with other mothers, and consulting experts as well as taking field trips.

The second responsibility of the mother is to educate and train the child in terms of intellectual development and the building of a good character. To stimulate the child’s intellectual development, mothers engage in various activities such as reading to the child, assessing and cultivating the child’s talents, and developing and maintaining relationships with preschools and training centers. Furthermore, mothers are also concerned about building good character and habits in their children. Modern ideals of child development emphasize self-discipline, emotional management, communication skills, and adaptive habits. Training to instill these characteristics is integrated into the process of daily caretaking. To achieve these goals, mothers not only discipline the child, setting rules and regulating the child’s behavior, but they also monitor others, usually the grandparents, who are taking part in the family childcare.

The third responsibility involves take partial care of the child’s daily life. The extent to which mothers personally care for the physical needs of the child varies, affected by the demands of the mother’s paid work, the health condition of the other caregivers (the grandparents in particular), and, most importantly, the mother’s perceptions of whether certain activities are important to her child’s development. Like Yang, most mothers I interviewed bathed their child and put them to bed on their own because they believed that taking part in these activities helped to build intimate bonds between mother and child.

Grandparents are responsible for taking bodily care of the child and for performing household chores, such as doing the grocery shopping, cooking, cleaning the house, washing the clothes, and taking the grandchildren to school and bringing them back home. In some families, grandparents have additional tasks, such as preparing special meals for the children and feeding them, bathing them, and putting them to sleep. For instance, Niuniu was a three-year girl. For the first three years of her life, she had been primarily tended to by her grandma since her mother took business trips on a regular basis. Her mother had reduced the number such trips in order to spend more time with her daughter. Each night, Niuniu was allowed to choose whether she would sleep with her grandparents or with her parents; with whomever Niuniu chose to sleep was responsible for the “getting-reading-for-sleep” routine (such as brushing her teeth, giving her a bath, and reading her a bedtime story) as well as helping her to get dressed the next morning.

Grandparents also serve as a childrearing safety net for the parents. The division of labor between the mother and the grandparents is defined, but it is not strictly enforced. Most of the time, to accommodate the mother’s work schedule, the grandparents willingly undertake more tasks than are originally “assigned” to them to ensure that the grandchild is well cared for. For instance, in the Wang family it was usually Yang who played with Meimei after dinner; however, if Yang did not return home from work on time, the grandparents would automatically “work” overtime to play with Meimei.

Departing from the traditional image of an authoritative figure in the family, fathers in this study have shifted from being their children’s disciplinarians to being their children’s playmates, spending quality time and having fun together. Serving as a playmate is an important characteristic of the “new father,” a paternal ideal that has emerged in recent years. Unlike the authoritative father figure, the “new father” is more involved in childrearing and engages in face-to-face interactions and emotional communications with his child (Wang 2014; Lamb 2000). However, among the interviewed families, fathers had limited time to spend with their children. Only two of the thirteen fathers spent more than an hour with their children on weekdays; quality time between father and child primarily occurred on weekends or holidays. Not all fathers were like Mr. Wang who reserved his weekends for his family; quite a few of the fathers placed a priority on their work and would only join the other family members on weekend activities when they did not have to work overtime.

In addition to serving as playmates, fathers also act as backup or supplementary helpers in times of emergency. For example, the fathers would attend parent-teacher meetings when the mothers were unavailable, take a sick child to the hospital, or discipline the children for difficult issues (usually upon the mother’s insistence). These situations occur only occasionally, in contrast to the daily routine of providing childcare and imposing discipline that are performed by the mothers and grandparents. When it comes to important decisions regarding the children’s education, such as choosing a kindergarten or selecting a program to cultivate talent, many fathers become involved by offering their thoughts. That said, the mothers discuss the situation with the fathers and solicit their opinions. If the couple cannot reach agreement, however, it is usually the mother who has the final say.4

Largely absent from providing daily care for their children, the fathers’ main responsibility is to provide financial resources for the expensive child-development plans that the mothers make. Most of my respondents were working parents and both made significant financial contributions to the family. However, many families tended to follow the traditional conceptions of the gender division of labor in the family whereby the man serves as the primary breadwinner. Driven by the high cost of modern childrearing, the role of the father is highlighted by his financial provisions for his child’s development, which to some extent rationalizes his absence from the child’s daily life.5

4.3 Intergenerational Power Relations

The story of the Wang family also illuminates a particular power relationship between the parents and grandparents in the intergenerational parenting coalition, i.e., young mothers taking charge and grandparents being marginalized in decision making regarding childcare. As the manager of the childrearing project, young mothers are in charge of decision making, from those decisions related to their child’s formal education to arrangements for the child’s daily activities. In addition, mothers enjoy more discursive power. On matters such as providing proper care and training as well as cultivating the child’s talents, the mother’s opinion shapes how things should be perceived and handled. This is often rationalized by their better knowledge of scientific parenting. As a result, the mother assumes the role of supervising the other family members and she intervenes when the latter handle the child in an “inappropriate” way. As illustrated in the case of the Wang family, when Yang’s mother attempted to discipline the child, Yang asked her to stay away. In other families, it was not unusual for mothers to monitor the behavior of other family members. For instance, one mother made a no-smoking rule at home for the sake of her child’s health; her husband had to go outside if he wanted to smoke. Another mother of a 2-year-old boy felt it was a bad habit to hold her son and rock him to sleep and she believed that his grandmother should no longer do this. The 2-year-old screamed and cried for hours when the mother attempted to put him to sleep.. Out of empathy, the grandmother interceded; the mother criticized her, “Letting him be [without proper training] is to spoil the child.”

Fathers partially participate in decisions about childrearing, especially when the decisions focus on important matters in their child’s development. However, unlike the traditional authoritative figure in the family, fathers are more of a participant and a counselor in the decision-making process rather than being the primary decision maker. Fathers have the right to be informed and share their opinions. However, their opinions matter only if their wives buy into them. For instance, although Mr. Wang had suggested that Meimei participate in a weekend English class, it worked out only because Yang had agreed with the idea that it was important for their daughter to learn English at an early age. The few fathers who actively learn scientific methods of childrearing, however, are usually more influential in terms of how the child should be raised.

In contrast to young mothers, grandparents generally lack power in the decision-making process and they are muted in discussions about child-rearing issues. In most families, the grandparents do not participate in decisions related to their grandchildren’s formal education. In the Wang family, for instance, Yang never consulted the grandparents when she was selecting a preschool or any programs to cultivate Meimei’s talents. In her view, the grandparents were neither interested in nor knowledgeable about these issues. In other families, however, the grandparents may express their opinions but their opinions are rarely considered. For instance, one grandmother objected to her daughter’s idea of sending the child to talent-cultivating classes because she believed they were not worth the money. Her daughter offered several reasons why the classes were important, and the grandmother, although not convinced, no longer argued about it.

Grandparents normally take charge of the household chores that they perform, such as choosing what to cook for the family for dinner. In order to ensure that everyone eats well, many grandparents will solicit opinions from other family members. One grandmother told me that she would ask her daughter and son-in-law every night what they would like to eat the following day and she found it easier to make a decision if they gave her a definite answer.

However, providing proper care for the grandchildren is likely to lead to disagreements between the parents and the grandparents. The “old” experiences of the grandparents are different from “new” methods the young mothers have learned. Taking clothing as an example, the grandparents were often concerned that the child would become cold if he/she did not wear enough, whereas the mothers believed that wearing too much would cause them to feel cold. Young mothers are more likely to win such arguments since they are supported by scientific evidence. Some grandparents learned to ask for the opinions of the parents when they took care of their grandchildren. For example, Grandma Luo, a woman in her late 50s, helped to take care of her 2-year-old granddaughter. As the weather was becoming warmer, she considered putting a thinner coat on her granddaughter. She then checked with her daughter, “Should I change to another coat for the child? If you think it is okay, I will do that; if you believe it is still too cold, I will wait.”

In the rare cases when the grandparents are able to prove that their “old” experiences are more effective than the new methods, they tend to obtain some authority and autonomy in taking care of the grandchildren. For instance, the paternal grandmother of 5-year-old Xuanxuan had some previous training in traditional Chinese medicine. When Xuanxuan had a fever, she used indigenous methods, i.e., mixing white spirits, spring onions, and Chinese medicines, and then wiping Xuanxuan’s arms and legs with the mixture to help reduce the fever. Xuanxuan’s mother was initially suspicious; however, the grandmother’s method worked and was more time- and money-saving than taking Xuanxuan to the hospital. Xuanxuan’s grandmother was later given authority to take care of Xuanxuan whenever he had a fever.

4.4 A Sociocultural Explanation of Intergenerational Power Relations in Childrearing

Several sociocultural factors contribute to the emergence of the pattern of “grandparents-take-care-and-mothers-take-charge” in the division of labor and power relations in the intergenerational parenting coalition. These factors include the changing discourses on parenting, intergenerational social mobility, and transformation of the family structure. The emergence of modern scientific methods of parenting, the development of the education industry, and the increasing costs of childrearing all led to a revolution in the ways families raise their children. The old experiences of the grandparents may not fit well with the new conditions of child development in contemporary society and thus are useless at the operational level. In addition, popular discourses on scientific parenting, often drawing on various and sometimes divergent theories of child development and parenting skills, foreground their superiority over the traditional ways of childcare, thus further devaluing the grandparents’ experiences in childrearing at a symbolic level. Among the interviewed families, young parents often perceived the grandparents’ understanding of raising a child as outdated, defective, or even misleading, as illustrated by a quote by one mother:

When we were little kids, our parents did not know much about parenting. After the family ate together, adults would go about their own business and we children would simply play on our own. There was no such concept as “family education. “My family was living in the countryside then and my parents had not had much education. … Nowadays, things are very different, and the grandparents’ old experiences from a long time ago are no longer useful.

Some grandparents admitted that they were “out of date.” Grandma Wang, for example, lived with her son’s family and helped to take care of her grandson. She dressed and prepared food for the child every day, but it was her daughter-in-law who decided what the child should wear and eat. Grandma Wang explained, “This [arrangement] is good because it won’t cause any conflicts [between me and my daughter-in-law]. Everything is better and more modernized now. We are outdated and cannot keep up with the new things. We need to take it easy, otherwise it does no good.”

The fact that older people are losing their authority in terms of how to raise their grandchildren illuminates the features of what Margaret Mead calls the “prefigurative culture” era (Mead 1970). Furthermore, intergenerational social and spatial mobility have inverted the positions of the grandparents and their adult children in the family. Among the interviewed middle-class families, most of the young parents had achieved upward social mobility through education. They were better-educated, had more income, and a higher social status, and were thus regarded as more knowledgeable and capable than their parents. They also had more financial, social, and cultural resources that enabled them to make better arrangements for their children. All these factors gave them more authority and power in the family. Among all the families that I studied, there was only one exception in terms of intergenerational upward mobility. In that case, the grandfather was a retired high-ranking military officer who was receiving a high pension, and his son and daughter-in-law were university professors. However, after the former military division commander moved to Beijing in order to take care of his grandson, the rich social and cultural resources he used to enjoy in his hometown were largely compromised because of the move.

In terms of family structure, most grandparents leave their own homes and move into their children’s homes in order to take better care of their grandchildren.6 The newly formed intergenerational family is an extension of the nuclear family of the young parents. The distinction between the parents as “masters” and the grandparents as guests/helpers is clear. The fact that young mothers are positioned at the center of power in the intergenerational parenting coalition is attributed to two factors associated with the family dynamics. The young mother serves as the mistress of the family and assumes responsibility for all domestic affairs. In addition, handling the important affairs related to the child’s development renders the young mother the de facto power and authority in terms of making decisions and arrangements for the children.7

5 Intimate Power: Intergenerational Intimacy and the Exercise of Power in the Family

In the previous section, I illustrate that in the intergenerational parenting coalition young mothers have more power in decision making and in the discourse on childrearing affairs. Nevertheless, young mothers do not have institutionalized symbolic and moral resources to ensure their authority, and it is not guaranteed that all other family members, especially the grandparents, will comply with the decisions and arrangements that these mothers make for their children. This is a form of uninstitutionalized intergenerational power that leaves room for competition and negotiation within the family, i.e., family members may strategize either to change or to maintain their status in the family. Within this flexible power structure, the maintenance of power relations in the intergenerational parenting coalition is intertwined with the specific pattern of intimacy established between the parents and the grandparents. The young mothers’ exercise of power in terms of parenting largely depends on whether the grandparents put up with their marginal status and are willing to make compromises for the sake of maintaining desirable intergenerational intimate relations.

5.1 Grandparents: Tolerance and Expectations of Intergenerational Intimacy

The main reason why young parents live with the grandparents is that they need help in childcare; their main concern is the development of the children. The grandparents, however, regard helping to raise the grandchildren as a part of intergenerational cooperation. Through such intergenerational cooperation, they hope to maintain continuing mutual assistance in family affairs and emotional bonds with their offspring. When addressing the reasons why they were willing to help with the childcare, most grandparents emphasized the joy of “raising a child.” For instance, Grandma Zhang, an old lady in her early 60s who was helping her son with childcare, stated: “We old people enjoy staying with the little ones. This gives us something to occupy [our minds]. My neighbors [an elderly couple] just live alone by themselves. Their son and other children all live apart. Life is rather boring for them.”

It is also important for the grandparents to sustain mutual support with their children. They perceive looking after the grandchildren as a way of helping their children, and they expect to receive assistance from their children when they are too old or too sick to take care of themselves, as mentioned in the following by Grandma Zhang:

Jobs nowadays are highly demanding and competitive for our children. … We are still healthy; we do not have serious health problems and we are able to take care of ourselves. We should support our children. We do more for them now and then in the future when we are ill, we can count on them [for support].

Grandparents do not seek equality in intergenerational exchanges. Rather, they hope to sustain ongoing reciprocity with their children. They are well aware of the fact that the payback from their children will be delayed and will depend on ongoing positive interactions with their offspring. As Grandma Wang, a local Beijing native who had moved with her husband into their son’s apartment to take care of their grandchild, said: “If we have a good relationship with our children, they will stay around [to take care of us] in the future.” She and her husband had reached an agreement:

The two of us realized a long time ago that we would stay out of our children’s business since there is definitely a generation gap between us. If we express our opinions about their business, they won’t listen to us. It will do nothing but upset us. It is better for us to keep our mouths shut. Whatever they say, we will just listen and not argue. Even if [we believe] what they are doing is wrong when they discipline him [the grandson], we will remain silent. Too much quarreling does not make for a good life.

Grandma Wang also regarded not arguing with the younger generation as a way of showing tolerance and understanding: “She [her daughter-in-law] is still young and immature. She easily becomes anxious and makes a fuss. On occasion, when we make some comments, she realizes that she made a mistake and then she is more careful in the future. But other times, she simply ignores our suggestions.” This quote indicates that the reason why grandparents choose to concede when disagreements come up with their children is not because they accept the authority of their children but because they want to maintain a peaceful relationship that will be beneficial to the entire family.

The grandparents also want to be respected by their children. They desire an intergenerational relationship that includes feelings of intimacy among family members who care about one another and a sense of dignity and status within the family. For instance, Grandma Liu, another grandparent/childcare helper whom I interviewed, took seriously any greetings and expressions of care from her son and daughter-in-law. She said: “We old people do not want money from them. We want kind words. For instance, when they return home, they will say, ‘Oh mom, you are still up. What did you eat today?’8 It is as simple as that.” Like many grandparents who in the interviews recalled the moments when their children expressed concern for them, Grandma Liu happily shared one such moment. One day her son-in-law noticed that the old couple planned to fix a simple lunch of noodles. He went out and bought some porridge, Chinese pancakes, and two dishes for them. “I felt very content,” Grandma Liu commented.

Respect and understanding from the younger generation are important to the grandparents. For Grandma Wang, filial piety meant forming an equal relationship with her children and not picking on one another. She said:

What is filial piety? It means [the younger generation] does not talk back when I say something, whether I am right or wrong. I am old, a bit slow, and I have a bad memory, so please keep silent even if I am wrong and do not talk back. If there is some disagreement between us, pretend to agree with me. I serve you food, drink, and take care of your daily life, so do not be fussy and create conflicts. I do not pick on you, so do not pick on me.

However, as discussed in the previous section, in many families young mothers often interfered with the grandparents when they took care of their grandchildren. This not only constituted a direct challenge to the face/dignity of the grandparents but also negatively affected the intergenerational relationship of mutual understanding and tolerance that the grandparents expected. As a result, rather than being cooperative, the grandparents often turned to the grandchildren to build an emotional alliance in an attempt to challenge the maternal power.

Many young mothers whom I interviewed mentioned that the grandparents often undermined their efforts to discipline their child. Many grandparents would intervene to protect a child who was being punished by the mother for not obeying. For instance, Jingjing’s mom, who had an ma in art studies from a British university, did not allow her son to eat sweets on a regular basis because she believed they were bad for his health. Five-year-old Jingjing was well-behaved when his mom was present, but his mom later discovered his little secret:

This child is so clever; he discovered early on when he should go to his grandparents and when he should go to his parents. He goes to his grandpa for candies and roasted sunflower seeds because his grandpa will give him whatever he wants. He very much likes candies and chocolates. I later found out that he was able to sneak a few treats every day. But he did not know to throw away the candy wrapper and he instead left them in a drawer. One day I happened to open the drawer and was astonished to find a full drawer of candy wrappers. I asked my mom (who was taking care of him) about it, and then she admitted to me that she would give the child one piece each day.

Apart from indulging the grandchildren by acquiescing to their demands, some grandparents also try to defend their grandchildren against the parents. The following is an example offered by a young mother who was “defeated” by a “grandparent-grandson-alliance.” Because her 4-year-old son would throw his toys everywhere, the young mother asked him to put them back in the toy box. Her son refused to do so and started to cry. Seeing him being unreasonable and acting out, the mother decided to discipline him. The paternal grandfather jumped in, cuddled his grandson, and said, “It’s OK! Grandpa will help you clean up!” In a similar manner, other mothers reported, many children have learned to seek protection from their grandparents, crying out for their help when they are being disciplined or punished by their parents.

In the contemporary intergenerational parenting coalition, mothers who are responsible for the sociocultural rearing of the child tend to train their children according to social demands or according to ideas from modern parenting theories. In contrast, grandparents, who are in charge of satisfying the physiological needs of the children, are prone to take the children’s standpoint and empathize with them, offering emotional support when they [the children] are being disciplined (Fei 1998). However, children are little agents who are good at catching the discrepancies between their various caretakers and finding space for negotiation and manipulation (Goh and Kuczynski 2009). By acquiescing and providing defense and protection, grandparents form alliances with their grandchildren, thus undermining the power of the young mothers. The grandparents highly value their relationships with their grandchildren. In my interviews many grandparents offered examples of their close relations with their grandchildren or expressed regret that “the child is still closer to his/her mom.”

5.2 Managing Intergenerational Intimacy and the Maintenance of Maternal Power

The alliance between grandparents and grandchildren may hinder the mothers’ child-development plans and impair the mothers’ “managerial” position in childrearing. Aware of the problem, some mothers work on their relationships with the grandparents. Specifically, they attempt to maintain their leadership in parenting by meeting the grandparents’ expectations for intimate family relations. In the following, Qing provides a good example.

Qing was a mother of Yuanyuan, a 3-year-old girl. Qing worked in a travel service company as an assistant director and her husband was a vice president of a communications company. When Yuanyuan was eight months old, Qing’s in-laws, who had been living in a northern town, moved in with them to help take care of Yuanyuan. The grandmother attended to Yuanyuan’s daily needs, and the grandfather took care of the household chores, preparing food for the family and cleaning the apartment. With the help of her in-laws, Qing was able on occasion to watch a movie online or to enjoy tea with friends. For the sake of Yuanyuan’s development, Qing believed it was necessary to “educate” her in-laws how to modernize their perceptions and behavior. Given the numerous disparities between her and her in-laws regarding how to raise a child, she prioritized her demands, stressing those that were the most important to her. For instance, she turned a blind eye when the grandparents insisted on feeding Yuanyuan rather than having Yuanyuan feed herself, as Qing preferred. When it came to issues associated with the child’s psychological development, however, Qing was rather strict and persistent. For instance, when Yuanyuan fell down, the grandparents were not allowed to comfort her by blaming the floor (such as saying “It was the fault of the floor that our baby got hurt”) since Qing felt that this represented an act of misattribution. Most importantly, she did not want the grandparents to intervene when she was disciplining her daughter. She said, “I will continue to reason with them and not give up. But I won’t say ‘It is absolutely wrong for you to do this’ or ‘You can never do that.’ Quarrelling with them or confronting them is not helpful to family relations. After all, we are all living under the same roof.”

Qing paid close attention to the needs of her in-laws. Her mother-in-law had rather large feet and had difficulty finding comfortable shoes at affordable prices. When Qing went to London on a business trip, she bought five pairs of Clark shoes for her mother in-law. Qing also joined the grandparents in conversations about their relatives, although she personally found such conversations to be boring. She generously offered help when her husband’s relatives needed it; for example, she helped arrange the wedding when one of his cousins got married and she housed another cousin when he came to Beijing for a visa interview. She commented with humor: “We are the ‘reception office in Beijing’ [for his relatives].”

Taking advantage of her job, Qing arranged several vacation trips for the entire family. She put her mother-in-law in business class to reduce her air sickness, and she made detailed schedules to ensure that everyone enjoyed themselves without becoming exhausted. She was quite content with her arrangements, and said, “Last time when we were in Singapore, my father-in-law [a ccp member] said that he had never enjoyed such good things when following the party, but now he is able to enjoy himself by following his son. … My mother-in-law corrected him that it was not his son but rather his daughter-in-law who had made the arrangements.”

When Qing was disciplining her child, her mother-in-law gradually agreed to stay out of the way in her own room. However, her father-in-law, who was used to his role as the head of the household, continued to intervene, which sometimes ended in an open conflict. Qing said:

I said to the grandparents: ‘If you disagree with me, we can discuss it after Yuanyuan falls asleep. We should not argue about it in front of her. We can have a family meeting to talk about our disagreements.’ But this was really difficult for them [the grandparents]. Sometimes he [the grandfather] acted out on the spot, and I became annoyed and argued with him directly. [I have to admit that] conflicts did exist, but there was no way to avoid them.

However, after these conflicts Qing usually approached her father-in-law and apologized. She gradually managed to persuade him to leave their apartment when she was disciplining her child. She explained:

I am living with this family, so sometimes I have to be resigned to this situation. I am not idealistic. I am not a princess. There are certain things I have to accept. Why should I initiate reconciliation with my father-in-law? It makes no sense to argue about who is wrong. Just say what you have to say. After all, he is an old man. I should respect him simply because of his seniority. Even if he is acting ignorant or stubborn, he cleans the apartment and prepares meals for us each night, right?

Qing is strategic when dealing with her relationship with her in-laws. She made it clear that she did not want to be a housewife and that she wanted time and space of her own. Therefore, she required help from her in-laws. Although she might not spontaneously feel close to her in-laws, Qing treated them as family. In her words, “If I do not regard them [the grandparents] as family, how uncomfortable I will feel at home!” Thus “I do and say whatever I should.”

Qing’s management of the intimate relations with her in-laws includes the following: First, by buying clothing for her in-laws, taking them on family trips, and taking care of her husband’s relatives, Qing is properly expressing her care and mindfulness toward her in-laws, and she is making them feel proud in front of other relatives, which in turn wins her a good reputation as being filial. Second, she partially yielded to her in-laws, giving them some autonomy when they took care of her child. Third, in dealing with conflicts with her in-laws she adopted certain strategies, such as making ritualized apologies and holding family meetings. In so doing, she is showing her in-laws respect and giving them the right to express their opinions on certain family affairs. Finally, by making arrangements for the entire family that not only satisfied but actually exceeded her in-law’s expectations, she delicately is able to present herself as capable and sophisticated in managing family affairs. Because of these efforts, Qing earned recognition and appreciation from her in-laws and enhanced her status within the family. Positive interactions were thereby established and maintained across the generations, the grandparents received respect and care, and, in turn, they were more willing to trust and to be tolerant of their daughter-in-law.

5.3 Weak Intergenerational Bonds and the Intergenerational Struggle for Power

An intimate relationship based on mutual understanding and consideration, which is crucial to the intergenerational parenting coalition, is difficult to establish, especially in families where the coalition is formed between young mothers and in-laws who did not have strong emotional connections before living together. During the initial stage, conflicts often occur between the young mother and her in-laws due to differences in lifestyle, habits, and even in their respective ways of speaking. To avoid conflicts, some families adopt a distancing approach. With a lack of intimate bonds across the generations, young mothers may encounter more challenges in managing the childcare, as revealed in the case of Xuanxuan’s family.

When Xuanxuan was one month old, his paternal grandparents moved from their home in southern China to help take care of the baby. At the time of the interview, the grandparents had already been caring for Xuanxuan for more than five years. Xuanxuan’s mother, Rong, described her relationship with her in-laws as being “polite but distant.” When she was staying at home during her maternity leave, there were some arguments with her mother-in-law on minor issues, which gave her the impression that “it does not work for the two of us to spend every moment together.” She thus decided to minimize the number of interactions with her in-laws in order to avoid open conflicts. Therefore, she went to her office every day and stayed as long as possible, despite the fact that her job offered her the opportunity of working from home. In contrast, the grandparents were busy in her home, cooking, washing, cleaning, and so on. Rong was fully in charge of arranging talent-cultivating classes and extracurricular activities for Xuanxuan, and the grandparents seldom asked about these activities. When it came to Xuanxuan’s birthday parties, weekend activities, and vacation trips that the parents organized, the elderly couple rarely participated.

Although Rong was free from performing any household chores, she often felt suppressed at home. She did not have many dinner-table conversations with her in-laws and she had little say about those affairs that her mother-in-law handled. For instance, Rong thought that a big dinner with a lot of meat and fish was delicious but unhealthy. She suggested that her in-laws cook less, but her in-laws ignored her requests. When at home, she also felt that she was under the surveillance of her mother-in-law, which made her feel rather uncomfortable. One time, after she took some fruit out of the refrigerator for her son, her mother in-law called out, “The door is not tightly closed!” These encounters sometimes ended up in confrontations between the two women, which further contributed Rong’s strategy of minimizing her interactions with her in-laws.

With the help of the grandparents, Xuanxuan grew up to be healthy, tall, and strong. Rong appreciated her in-laws for their childcare skills, but she found it difficult to discipline Xuanxuan at the home. If Xuanxuan was unwilling to follow her directions, he would simply “turn a deaf ear and refuse to listen.” Rong did not consider herself to be strict; rather, she believed in the power of encouragement. However, once in a while when she attempted to discipline Xuanxuan after he misbehaved, he would quickly find shelter with his grandparents. For example, on one occasion when at bedtime Xuanxuan said he was hungry, Rong believed that this was simply a ploy for his not having to go to bed, so she ignored him. However, the grandmother immediately went to the kitchen and provided him with some treats. As another example, Xuanxuan always asked for new toys, which Rong believed was a bad habit. She made an agreement with him that they would not buy any new toys for him for a period of one month since they had already bought him several toys. However, when, on the following day, Xuanxuan went out with his grandpa, he returned home with several new toys.

Rong tried to communicate with her in-laws, typically by announcing at the dinner table her agreement with Xuanxuan over some issue. For instance, “I bought quite a few things for Xuanxuan today, and we agreed that he should not get any new toys for the next month. Grandma and grandpa, please do not buy any new toys for him. But this strategy did not work well at all. So Rong resorted to keeping Xuanxuan out of the house for as long as possible, since she had found it impossible to discipline him in the home. She sometimes felt helpless because her home gradually became “just a place to sleep in.”

In Xuanxuan’s family, his mother and grandparents maintained a relationship in which they were functionally cooperative but emotionally distant. This helped buffer any open conflicts between them.9 However, it prevented the possibility of establishing any intimate relations whereby his mother and grandparents would be able to empathize and communicate with one another. In this “polite but distant” intergenerational relationship, the grandparents found it difficult to feel that they were receiving any care or empathy from their daughter in-law, and there was a lack of any emotional bonding between them. Since the buffering effect of intergenerational intimacy was missing, the grandparents tended to apply the principle of unity of responsibility and power. They did not intervene in family affairs in which they were not involved, but by constantly contributing to the family, they accumulated some moral capital,10 which they converted into total control over their housework. In addition, the grandparents turned to their grandson to build an emotional alliance. By fulfilling their grandson’s demands, they consolidated the grandparent-grandson ties that served to maintain their status in the family.

6 Conclusion

Drawing on in-depth interviews and ethnographic data from urban middle-class families, I argue that the building of an intergenerational parenting coalition is a family strategy adopted by urban families in order to cope with the privatization and marketization of childcare in contemporary China. With the family division of labor by gender and generation, a pattern of “grandparents-take-care-and-mothers-take-charge” has emerged in the organization of childcare. Young mothers act as managers of the childrearing project. Equipped with scientific parenting methods, they tend to take the lead in decision making and in the discourses on childcare, making plans for child development and engaging in social rearing, such as the intellectual cultivation and character building of the child. In contrast, the grandparents join the family to provide childcare. They perform a large amount of housework and remain in charge of the physiological rearing of the child, but they are marginalized in terms of family decision making. The rise of this particular pattern of power relations is associated with modern parenting ideologies, intergenerational social mobility, and the shift in family structure.

I further argue that this is a set of fluid, uninstitutionalized power relations modified by affection and interactions among family members. In the intergenerational parenting coalition, young mothers are more concerned about the outcome of their child’s development, whereas the grandparents tend to value the maintenance of intimate intergenerational ties, which consist of not only duty-based exchange and assistance but also positive affection and interactions between the generations. In order to maintain desirable intimate intergenerational relations, the grandparents learn to be tolerant, to make concessions, and to yield their authority, thus facilitating the exercise of power by the young mothers. However, when intimate intergenerational relations cannot be established or sustained, the grandparents tend to make fewer concessions and to dilute the power of the young mothers by building an emotional alliance with their grandchildren. I thus use the term “intimate power” to characterize the exercise of power in the intergenerational parenting coalition. Iargue that intimate intergenerational relations constitute the premise behind maternal power in the intergenerational parenting coalition, mediating the individual negotiation of power in the family. The term “intimate power” highlights the specific feature of power relations in the family, whereby individual dignity and interpersonal intimacy are intertwined, creating tensions and requiring coordination among family members.

Scholars have discussed the dynamics between intimacy and power in the family. For instance, Wu (2009) points out that “family life is a combination of affection and politics.” Familial love is the beginning and the end of family politics; however, the latter does not follow the logic of the former. The principle of family politics is that everyone seeks more power in family life, or at least seeks to be respected by other family members, thus creating a fundamental tension between affection and politics. Wu focuses on this tension in his examination of cases of suicide that end any family relations. In contrast, the present study looks into ongoing intergenerational collaboration, despite the existence of conflicts, thereby better illustrating the coordination of affection and power. I argue that in the process of intergenerational collaboration individuals may hesitate to seek more power in decision making and in the discourse on family affairs so as to maintain a desirable intimate relationship. Maintaining a satisfying intimate relationship constitutes an important goal of family life and to a certain extent compensates for the impairment of power.

A number of scholars have noted an “intimate turn” in intergenerational relationships in contemporary China. With the establishment of the urban pension and medical insurance systems, the elderly are demanding less financial support from their children but more communication, trust, and empathy (Evans 2010; Wang 2012). Norms of filial piety have been redefined by relinquishing unconditional obedience and submission from the junior to the senior generations, thus paving the way to intergenerational intimacy (Yan 2016). Parents are willing to offer financial assistance in order to develop “negotiatory intimacy” with their children (Zhong and Ho 2014), or to yield their authority or power in the process of childcare so as to maintain desirable and sustainable intimate intergenerational ties, as illustrated in this article.

By analyzing the dimension of power in the intergenerational parenting coalition, this study further elucidates the tendency for an inversion in the power hierarchy between the parent and an adult child in intergenerational collaboration. To some extent, the inversion is associated with the fact that the adult child has a higher socioeconomic status than his/her parents. However, the formation, development, and modification of patterns of power in the intergenerational parenting coalition largely depend on the cultivation of intimate bonds among the parents and the adult child. Highlighting these intimate bonds sheds light on the importance of bringing in individual agency regarding the conception and pursuit of family life in studies of intergenerational relations, and thus better informs the logic of practice in collaboration across generations. Future research is needed to unpack the ways in which intimate relations affect family members’ pursuit of respect and justice in other forms of intergenerational exchanges and collaborations.

1

Among the mothers, four were not employed at the time of the interviews, but only one did not plan to find a job in the near future. The remaining three were all considering freelance jobs in education, training or consulting, which would allow them to work at the same time that they were taking care of their children.

2

Large-scale surveys have validated the pattern of increasing expenses/consumption of childrearing. A large-scale ten-city survey finds that families with children between the ages of 3 and 6 spend an average of 1,454.92 yuan (about $222) per month on preschool education. In high-income families (with monthly incomes of 10,000 yuan or more), the expenses for preschool education total 2583.7 yuan (about $394) per month, or about 18.17 percent of the family income (Liu and Song 2013). Xu (2004) finds that families in Shanghai spend more on their children than on their parents. In families with children between the ages of birth to 16 years old, the annual cost of raising a child is between 13,000 yuan (about $1983) and 19,000 yuan (about $2896), accounting for 39–51 percent of total household expenses. The higher the family income, the more they spend on their child.

3

The cost increases annually. At the time of the interview, it had reached 4,200 yuan (≈$640) per month.

4

However, a small number of fathers were more involved in decision making. For instance, Xinxin’s father read extensively about childrearing in books or online, and he shared that information with his wife. This couple also regularly discussed issues related to Xinxin’s upbringing, although normally it was the mother who handled such issues. Xinxin’s father explained, “We have much in common regarding our ideas about childrearing. I am more logical, and she is more emotional. Normally, I tell her what to do and she will do it.”

5

In a number of the interviews mothers mentioned that they had complicated feelings about the fact that their husbands “did not mind spending money on the child.” On the one hand, they complained that their husbands simply spent money but did not know how to provide good guidance for the child. On the other hand, only when the fathers did not mind spending money were the mothers able to effectively implement their child-development plans.

6

It is common among migrant families for the grandparents to leave their hometowns to live with their children in the city (Beijing). Even among Beijing families, some grandparents relocate to live together with their children in order to provide convenient childcare.

7

In traditional families women held de facto power to make important family decisions because they were responsible for performing housework and taking care of the family members, but their husbands, who symbolized the head of the family, would give formal approval for their decisions (Li 2010). Departing from the fact that women exercise power implicitly in traditional families, the mothers interviewed for this study had explicit power in decision making, and in most cases, they only involved their husbands in discussions or simply informed them about their decisions.

8

This is a common greeting among Chinese people, which is similar to “How was your day?”

9

Undoubtedly, managing a relationship that is “friendly but distance” is an active attempt to maintain some intergenerational intimacy, a way of avoiding an unsatisfactory intergenerational relationship.

10

“Moral capital” is a term coined by anthropologist Fei Wu to explain family politics. It refers to the behavior and status of an individual that is considered beneficial to the entire family. Wu argues that in family politics or power games, moral capital is an important factor that determines the winner (Wu 2009, 48).

References

  • Bian, Fuqin, John R. Logan, and Yanjie Bian. 1998. “Intergenerational Relations in Urban China: Proximity, Contact, and Help to Parents.” Demography, 35(1): 115124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Feinian, Guangya Liu, and Christine A. Mair. 2011. “Intergenerational Ties in Context: Grandparents Caring for Grandchildren in China.” Social Forces, 90 (2): 571594. Accessed August 13, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Jianxiang and Yufu Wang (eds.). 2005. 《他们影响了一亿家庭——中国当 代最著名的十大家庭教育主张》 (They Have Influenced 100 Million Families: The Ten Most Popular Theories of Parenting in Contemporary China). Beijing: Beijing Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cherlin, Andrew J., and Frank F. Furstenberg. 1986. The New American Grandparent: A Place in the Family, A Life Apart. New York: Basic Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dong, Yige. 2014. “The Discovery of Parenthood: Science, Gender, and Class in Childrearing Literature during 1980’s China.” Paper presented at the Association for Asian Studies Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, March 2730.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans, Harriet. 2010. “The Gender of Communication: Changing Expectations of Mothers and Daughters in Urban China.” The China Quarterly, no. 204: 9801000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fei, Xiaotong. 1998. 《乡土中国 生育制度》 (From the Soil and Fertility System) .Beijing: Peking University Press.

  • Fong, Vanessa L. 2004. Only Hope: Coming of Age Under China’s One-child Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Gibson, Priscilla A. 2005. “Intergenerational Parenting From the Perspective of African American Grandmothers.” Family Relations, 54(2): 280297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goh, Esther C.L. and Leon Kuczynski. 2009. “Agency and Power of Single Children in Multi-Generational Families in Urban Xiamen, China.” Culture & Psychology, 15(4): 506532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goh, Esther C.L. 2010. “‘Only Children’ and Their Coalition of Parents: Considering Grandparents and Parents as Joint Caregivers in Urban Xiamen, China.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(4): 221231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goh, Esther C.L. 2012. “‘She is Too Young for These Chores’: Is Housework Taking a Back Seat in Urban Chinese Childhood?” Children and Society, 28(4): 280291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guo, Yuhua. 2001. “代际关系中的公平逻辑及其变迁” (The Logic of Equality and Its Transformation in Intergenerational Relations: A Case Study of Elderly Support in Rural Hebei). 《中国学术》 (China Academics), no. 4: 221254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • He, Xuefeng. 2009. “农村带机关系论:兼论代际关系的价值基础” (On Intergenerational Relationships in Rural China: The Ethical Foundation of Intergenerational Relations). 《社会科学研究》(Social Science Research), no. 5: 8492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hsiung, Ping-chen. 2005. A Tender Voyage: Children and Childhood in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Kang, Lan. 2012. “代差与代同:新家庭主义价值的兴起” (Differences and Similarities between Generations: The Emergence of Values of New Familism). 《青年研 究》(Youth Studies), no. 3: 2129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lamb, Michael E. 2000. “The History of Research on Father Involvement.” Marriage and Family Review, 29 (2–3): 2342.

  • Li, Xia. 2010. 《娘家与婆家:华北农村妇女的生活空间和后台权力》(Ningjia and Pojia: Women’s Living Space and Backstage Power in a North China Village). Beijing: Social Science Academic Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, Guangjiang. 2009. 《国家、独生子女、儿童观:对北京市儿童生活的调查研究》 (Nation, Single Child, and the Views of Children: Survey Research on the Life of Children in Beijing Municipality). Beijing: Xinhua Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Guili. 2005. “眼泪为什么往下流? 转型期家庭代际关系倾斜问题探析” (Why Are the Aged Suffering? Analysis of Changes in Family Generational Relations). 《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 (Journal of Nanchang University: Humanities and Social Sciences), no. 6: 18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Wenrong. 2011. “家庭价值的变迁和延续——来自四个维度的经验证据” (Continuing and Changing Family Values: Empirical Evidence from Four Dimensions). 《社会科学》(Journal of Social Sciences), no. 10: 7889.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Wenrong. 2012 . “孝道衰落?成年子女支持父母的观念、行为及其影响因素” (Has Filial Piety Declined? Attitudes, Behavior, and Factors Influencing the Support of Old Parents). 《青年研究》(Youth Studies), no. 2: 2232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Wenrong. 2013. “当代家庭代际支持观念与群体差异——兼论反馈模式的 文化基础变迁” (The Group Difference of Attitudes toward Intergenerational Support in Contemporary Families: Discussion on the Changes in the Cultural Basis of the Feedback Model). 《当代青年研究》(Contemporary Youth Research), no. 3: 512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Yan, and Yanping Song. 2013. “中国城市3–6岁儿童家庭学前教育消费支出水平调查” (Survey on Family Expenditures for the Pre-school Education of 3–6=Year-Old Children in Urban Families in Our Country). 《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 (Journal of Huazhong Normal University: Humanities and Social Sciences), no. 1: 155160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luan, Liyun. 2009. “变迁中的中国家庭与儿童看护的社会学考察” (A Sociological Investigation of Families and Childcare in Transitional China). 《湖北社会科学》 (Hubei Social Science), no. 8: 5052.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ma, Chunhua, Jinqun Shi, Yinhe Li, Zhenyu Wang, and Can Tang. 2011. “中国城市家庭变迁的趋势和最新发现” (Family Changes in Urban Areas of China: Main Trends and Latest Findings). 《社会学研究》(Sociological Studies), no. 2: 182216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mead, Margaret. 1970. Culture and Commitment: A Study of the Generation Gap. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.

  • Shen, Conglin, Dongshan Li, and Feng Zhao. 2009. 《变迁中的城乡家庭》 (Urban and Rural Families in Transitional China). Chongqing: Chongqing University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shen, Yifei. 2013. 《个体家庭iFamily:中国城市现代化进程中的个体、家庭与国家》 (Individual Family (iFamily): Individual, Family and Nation in the Process of Modernization in Urban China) .Shanghai: sdx Joint Publishing Company.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tan, Tongxue. 2010. 《桥村有道:转型乡村的道德权力与社会结构》(Qiao Cun You Dao: Moral Authority and Social Structure in Rural China during the Transition). Beijing: sdx Joint Publishing Company.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Xiangxian. 2014. “关于欧美建构新型父职的评述” (A Review of the Construction of New Fatherhood in Euro-American Countries). 《晋阳学刊》(Academic Journal of Jinyang) , no. 3: 7781.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Yuesheng. 2009. “制度变革、社会转型与中国家庭变动———以农村经 验为基础的分析” (Institutional Reform, Social Transition, and Family Change in China: An Analysis of Evidence from Rural Areas). 《开放时代》(Open Times) , no. 3: 97114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Yuesheng. 2010. “个体家庭、网络家庭和亲属圈家庭分析——历史与现实 相结合的视角” (Individual Family, Network Family, and Kinship Circle Family: From the Combined Perspective of History and Reality). 《开放时代》(Open Times) , no. 4: 8399.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Yuesheng. 2012. “城乡养老中的家庭代际关系研究——以2010年七省区调查数 据为基础” (Intergenerational Relations in Elderly Support in Rural and Urban China: Evidence from a 2010 Survey of Seven Provinces). 《开放时代》(Open Times), no. 2: 102121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, Fei. 2009. 《浮生取义:对华北某县自杀现象的文化解读》 (For Justice: A Cultural Interpretation of Suicide in a North China County) .Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xiao, Dong. 2002. “最后一代传统婆婆?” (The Last Generation of Traditional Mothers-in-Law). 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) , no. 3: 7991.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xiong, Yuegen. 1998. “中国城市家庭的代际关系与老人照顾” (Intergenerational Relations and Elderly Care in Chinese Urban Families). 《中国人口科学》(Chinese Journal of Population Science) , no. 6: 1521.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, Anqi. 2004. “孩子的经济成本: 转型期的结构变化和优化” (The Financial Cost of Childrearing: Structural Change and Optimization in the Social Transition). 《青年研究》(Youth Studies), no. 12: 18, 35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, Qin. 2011. “农村老年人家庭代际交往调查” (A Study of Intergenerational Interactions Among Elderly People in Rural China). 《南京人口管理干部学院学报》(Journal of Nanjing College for Population Programme Management) , no. 1: 510.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yan, Yunxiang. 2003. Private Life under Socialism: Love, Intimacy, and Family Change in a Chinese Village, 1949–1999. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yan, Yunxiang. 2012. 《中国社会的个体化》(The Individualization of Chinese Society). Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yan, Yunxiang. 2016. “Intergenerational Intimacy and Descending Familism in Rural North China.” American Anthropologist, 118 (2): 244257.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang, Shanhua. 2011. “中国当代城市家庭变迁与家庭凝聚力” (Changes Among Urban Families in Contemporary China and Family Cohesion). 《北京大学学 报(哲学社会科学版)》(Journal of Peking University: Philosophy and Social Sciences), no. 2: 150158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang, Shanhua and Changmei He. 2004. “责任伦理与城市居民的家庭养老” (The Ethics of Responsibility and Family Support in Beijing: An Analysis Based on Data from a 1999 Survey on the Demands of the Aged in Beijing). 《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 (Journal of Peking University: Philosophy and Social Sciences), no. 1: 7184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zheng, Dandan and Shanhua Yang. 2003. “夫妻关系定势与权力策略” (Marital Relations Formulary and Power Tactics). 《社会学研究》(Sociological Studies), no. 4: 96105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhong, Xiaohui and Sik Ying Ho. 2014. “协商式亲密关系:独生子女父母对家 庭关系和孝道的期待” (Negotiative Intimacy: Expectations of Family Relationships and Filial Piety Among Only-child Parents). 《开放时代》(Open Times), no. 1: 155175, 7, 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zuo, Jiping and Yongping Jiang. 2010. 《社会转型中城镇妇女的工作与家庭》 (Work and Family of Urban Women during the Transitional Period) .Beijing: Cotemporary China Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Bian, Fuqin, John R. Logan, and Yanjie Bian. 1998. “Intergenerational Relations in Urban China: Proximity, Contact, and Help to Parents.” Demography, 35(1): 115124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Feinian, Guangya Liu, and Christine A. Mair. 2011. “Intergenerational Ties in Context: Grandparents Caring for Grandchildren in China.” Social Forces, 90 (2): 571594. Accessed August 13, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Jianxiang and Yufu Wang (eds.). 2005. 《他们影响了一亿家庭——中国当 代最著名的十大家庭教育主张》 (They Have Influenced 100 Million Families: The Ten Most Popular Theories of Parenting in Contemporary China). Beijing: Beijing Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cherlin, Andrew J., and Frank F. Furstenberg. 1986. The New American Grandparent: A Place in the Family, A Life Apart. New York: Basic Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dong, Yige. 2014. “The Discovery of Parenthood: Science, Gender, and Class in Childrearing Literature during 1980’s China.” Paper presented at the Association for Asian Studies Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, March 2730.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans, Harriet. 2010. “The Gender of Communication: Changing Expectations of Mothers and Daughters in Urban China.” The China Quarterly, no. 204: 9801000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fei, Xiaotong. 1998. 《乡土中国 生育制度》 (From the Soil and Fertility System) .Beijing: Peking University Press.

  • Fong, Vanessa L. 2004. Only Hope: Coming of Age Under China’s One-child Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Gibson, Priscilla A. 2005. “Intergenerational Parenting From the Perspective of African American Grandmothers.” Family Relations, 54(2): 280297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goh, Esther C.L. and Leon Kuczynski. 2009. “Agency and Power of Single Children in Multi-Generational Families in Urban Xiamen, China.” Culture & Psychology, 15(4): 506532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goh, Esther C.L. 2010. “‘Only Children’ and Their Coalition of Parents: Considering Grandparents and Parents as Joint Caregivers in Urban Xiamen, China.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(4): 221231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goh, Esther C.L. 2012. “‘She is Too Young for These Chores’: Is Housework Taking a Back Seat in Urban Chinese Childhood?” Children and Society, 28(4): 280291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guo, Yuhua. 2001. “代际关系中的公平逻辑及其变迁” (The Logic of Equality and Its Transformation in Intergenerational Relations: A Case Study of Elderly Support in Rural Hebei). 《中国学术》 (China Academics), no. 4: 221254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • He, Xuefeng. 2009. “农村带机关系论:兼论代际关系的价值基础” (On Intergenerational Relationships in Rural China: The Ethical Foundation of Intergenerational Relations). 《社会科学研究》(Social Science Research), no. 5: 8492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hsiung, Ping-chen. 2005. A Tender Voyage: Children and Childhood in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Kang, Lan. 2012. “代差与代同:新家庭主义价值的兴起” (Differences and Similarities between Generations: The Emergence of Values of New Familism). 《青年研 究》(Youth Studies), no. 3: 2129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lamb, Michael E. 2000. “The History of Research on Father Involvement.” Marriage and Family Review, 29 (2–3): 2342.

  • Li, Xia. 2010. 《娘家与婆家:华北农村妇女的生活空间和后台权力》(Ningjia and Pojia: Women’s Living Space and Backstage Power in a North China Village). Beijing: Social Science Academic Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, Guangjiang. 2009. 《国家、独生子女、儿童观:对北京市儿童生活的调查研究》 (Nation, Single Child, and the Views of Children: Survey Research on the Life of Children in Beijing Municipality). Beijing: Xinhua Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Guili. 2005. “眼泪为什么往下流? 转型期家庭代际关系倾斜问题探析” (Why Are the Aged Suffering? Analysis of Changes in Family Generational Relations). 《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 (Journal of Nanchang University: Humanities and Social Sciences), no. 6: 18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Wenrong. 2011. “家庭价值的变迁和延续——来自四个维度的经验证据” (Continuing and Changing Family Values: Empirical Evidence from Four Dimensions). 《社会科学》(Journal of Social Sciences), no. 10: 7889.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Wenrong. 2012 . “孝道衰落?成年子女支持父母的观念、行为及其影响因素” (Has Filial Piety Declined? Attitudes, Behavior, and Factors Influencing the Support of Old Parents). 《青年研究》(Youth Studies), no. 2: 2232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Wenrong. 2013. “当代家庭代际支持观念与群体差异——兼论反馈模式的 文化基础变迁” (The Group Difference of Attitudes toward Intergenerational Support in Contemporary Families: Discussion on the Changes in the Cultural Basis of the Feedback Model). 《当代青年研究》(Contemporary Youth Research), no. 3: 512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Yan, and Yanping Song. 2013. “中国城市3–6岁儿童家庭学前教育消费支出水平调查” (Survey on Family Expenditures for the Pre-school Education of 3–6=Year-Old Children in Urban Families in Our Country). 《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 (Journal of Huazhong Normal University: Humanities and Social Sciences), no. 1: 155160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luan, Liyun. 2009. “变迁中的中国家庭与儿童看护的社会学考察” (A Sociological Investigation of Families and Childcare in Transitional China). 《湖北社会科学》 (Hubei Social Science), no. 8: 5052.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ma, Chunhua, Jinqun Shi, Yinhe Li, Zhenyu Wang, and Can Tang. 2011. “中国城市家庭变迁的趋势和最新发现” (Family Changes in Urban Areas of China: Main Trends and Latest Findings). 《社会学研究》(Sociological Studies), no. 2: 182216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mead, Margaret. 1970. Culture and Commitment: A Study of the Generation Gap. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.

  • Shen, Conglin, Dongshan Li, and Feng Zhao. 2009. 《变迁中的城乡家庭》 (Urban and Rural Families in Transitional China). Chongqing: Chongqing University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shen, Yifei. 2013. 《个体家庭iFamily:中国城市现代化进程中的个体、家庭与国家》 (Individual Family (iFamily): Individual, Family and Nation in the Process of Modernization in Urban China) .Shanghai: sdx Joint Publishing Company.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tan, Tongxue. 2010. 《桥村有道:转型乡村的道德权力与社会结构》(Qiao Cun You Dao: Moral Authority and Social Structure in Rural China during the Transition). Beijing: sdx Joint Publishing Company.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Xiangxian. 2014. “关于欧美建构新型父职的评述” (A Review of the Construction of New Fatherhood in Euro-American Countries). 《晋阳学刊》(Academic Journal of Jinyang) , no. 3: 7781.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Yuesheng. 2009. “制度变革、社会转型与中国家庭变动———以农村经 验为基础的分析” (Institutional Reform, Social Transition, and Family Change in China: An Analysis of Evidence from Rural Areas). 《开放时代》(Open Times) , no. 3: 97114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Yuesheng. 2010. “个体家庭、网络家庭和亲属圈家庭分析——历史与现实 相结合的视角” (Individual Family, Network Family, and Kinship Circle Family: From the Combined Perspective of History and Reality). 《开放时代》(Open Times) , no. 4: 8399.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Yuesheng. 2012. “城乡养老中的家庭代际关系研究——以2010年七省区调查数 据为基础” (Intergenerational Relations in Elderly Support in Rural and Urban China: Evidence from a 2010 Survey of Seven Provinces). 《开放时代》(Open Times), no. 2: 102121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, Fei. 2009. 《浮生取义:对华北某县自杀现象的文化解读》 (For Justice: A Cultural Interpretation of Suicide in a North China County) .Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xiao, Dong. 2002. “最后一代传统婆婆?” (The Last Generation of Traditional Mothers-in-Law). 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) , no. 3: 7991.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xiong, Yuegen. 1998. “中国城市家庭的代际关系与老人照顾” (Intergenerational Relations and Elderly Care in Chinese Urban Families). 《中国人口科学》(Chinese Journal of Population Science) , no. 6: 1521.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, Anqi. 2004. “孩子的经济成本: 转型期的结构变化和优化” (The Financial Cost of Childrearing: Structural Change and Optimization in the Social Transition). 《青年研究》(Youth Studies), no. 12: 18, 35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, Qin. 2011. “农村老年人家庭代际交往调查” (A Study of Intergenerational Interactions Among Elderly People in Rural China). 《南京人口管理干部学院学报》(Journal of Nanjing College for Population Programme Management) , no. 1: 510.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yan, Yunxiang. 2003. Private Life under Socialism: Love, Intimacy, and Family Change in a Chinese Village, 1949–1999. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yan, Yunxiang. 2012. 《中国社会的个体化》(The Individualization of Chinese Society). Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yan, Yunxiang. 2016. “Intergenerational Intimacy and Descending Familism in Rural North China.” American Anthropologist, 118 (2): 244257.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang, Shanhua. 2011. “中国当代城市家庭变迁与家庭凝聚力” (Changes Among Urban Families in Contemporary China and Family Cohesion). 《北京大学学 报(哲学社会科学版)》(Journal of Peking University: Philosophy and Social Sciences), no. 2: 150158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang, Shanhua and Changmei He. 2004. “责任伦理与城市居民的家庭养老” (The Ethics of Responsibility and Family Support in Beijing: An Analysis Based on Data from a 1999 Survey on the Demands of the Aged in Beijing). 《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 (Journal of Peking University: Philosophy and Social Sciences), no. 1: 7184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zheng, Dandan and Shanhua Yang. 2003. “夫妻关系定势与权力策略” (Marital Relations Formulary and Power Tactics). 《社会学研究》(Sociological Studies), no. 4: 96105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhong, Xiaohui and Sik Ying Ho. 2014. “协商式亲密关系:独生子女父母对家 庭关系和孝道的期待” (Negotiative Intimacy: Expectations of Family Relationships and Filial Piety Among Only-child Parents). 《开放时代》(Open Times), no. 1: 155175, 7, 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zuo, Jiping and Yongping Jiang. 2010. 《社会转型中城镇妇女的工作与家庭》 (Work and Family of Urban Women during the Transitional Period) .Beijing: Cotemporary China Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics