Author:
Anqi Wang
Search for other papers by Anqi Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open Access

Bibliography

Monographs and Books

  • Adams CK and Trent WP, A History of the United States (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1903).

  • Amerasinghe CF, Local Remedies in International Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2004).

  • Arthur N, A Concise History of the Law of Nations (1st edn, Macmillan 1947).

  • Bottini G (ed), ‘Admissibility in International Investment Law’, Admissibility of Shareholder Claims under Investment Treaties (Cambridge University Press 2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brownlie I, Principles of Public International Law (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2008).

  • Collins D, An Introduction to International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2017).

  • Cheng B, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Digitally printed 1st pbk version, Cambridge University Press 2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Curzon G, Multilateral Commercial Diplomacy: The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and Its Impact on National Commercial Policies and Techniques (Michael Joseph ed, 1965).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dolzer R, Bilateral Investment Treaties (M Nijhoff 1995).

  • Dolzer R and Myers T, ‘After Tecmed: Most-Favored-Nation Clauses in Investment Protection Agreements’ (2004) 19 icsid Review 49.

  • Dolzer R and Schreuer C, Principles of International Investment Law (Second edition, Oxford University Press 2012).

  • Dugan CF and others, Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2012).

  • Fellmeth AX and Horwitz M, Guide to Latin in International Law (Oxford University Press 2009).

  • Fontanelli F, Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Investment Arbitration (brill 2018).

  • Gardiner RK, Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press 2008).

  • Gazzini T, Interpretation of International Investment Treaties (First Edition, Hart Publishing 2016).

  • Gilpin R and Gilpin JM, The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton University Press 1987).

  • Graham EM, Fighting the Wrong Enemy: Antiglobal Activists and Multinational Enterprises (Institute for International Economics 2000).

  • Gribnau HLM (ed), Legal Protection against Discriminatory Tax Legislation: The Struggle for Equality in European Tax Law (Kluwer Law International 2003).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hanink DM, The International Economy: A Geographical Perspective (J Wiley 1994).

  • Hawkins HC, Commercial Treaties and Agreements: Principles and Practice (Rinehart 1951).

  • Hoekman BM and Kostecki MM, The Political Economy of the World Trading System: Thewtoand Beyond (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2001).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jackson JH, The World Trade Organization: Constitution and Jurisprudence (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1998).

  • Jones G, Multinationals and Global Capitalism: From the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press 2005).

  • Jorun B, Treaty Shopping in International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2016).

  • Lord M, The Law of Treaties (Oxford University Press 1986).

  • Mantilla Blanco S, Full Protection and Security in International Investment Law (Springer International Publishing 2019).

  • Marboe I, Calculation of Compensation and Damages in International Investment Law (Second edition, Oxford University Press 2017).

  • McDougal MS and others, The Interpretation of International Agreements and World Public Order: Principles of Content and Procedure (M Nijhoff Publishers 1994).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell AD, Sornarajah M and Voon T (eds), Good Faith and International Economic Law (First edition, Oxford University Press 2015).

  • Moore JB, A Digest of International Law, vol 5 (United States Government Printing Office 1906).

  • Nafziger EW, The Economics of Developing Countries (3rd ed, Prentice Hall 1997).

  • Neal L, Cameron RE and Cameron RE, A Concise Economic History of the World: From Paleolithic Times to the Present (5th edn, Oxford University Press 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newcombe AP and Paradell L, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2009).

  • Oppenheim L and others, Oppenheim’s International Law . Vol. 1: Peace (9th ed, Longman 1996).

  • Reinisch A and Schreuer C, International Protection of Investments: The Substantive Standards (1st edn, Cambridge University Press 2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roe T, Happold M and Dingemans J, Settlement of Investment Disputes under the Energy Charter Treaty (Cambridge University Press 2011).

  • Salacuse JW, The Law of Investment Treaties (Second edition, Oxford University Press 2015).

  • Sasse JP, An Economic Analysis of Bilateral Investment Treaties (Gabler 2011).

  • Schill S, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2009).

  • Schreuer C, Consent to Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2008).

  • Schreuer C, TheicsidConvention: A Commentary: A Commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (Cambridge Univ Press 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schreuer C and Weiniger M, A Doctrine of Precedent? (Oxford University Press 2008).

  • Sharmin T, Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals: Implications for the Developing Countries (Springer 2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shea DR, The Calvo Clause (ned-New edition, University of Minnesota Press 1955).

  • Sinclair SI, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Melland Schill Monographs in International Law 1984).

  • Sornarajah M, The International Law on Foreign Investment (4th edn, Cambridge University Press 2017).

  • Steingruber AM, Consent in International Arbitration (1st ed, Oxford University Press 2012).

  • Subedi SP, International Investment Law: Reconciling Policy and Principle (Fourth edition, Hart Publishing 2020).

  • Suleimenova M, mfnStandard as Substantive Treatment (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG 2019).

  • Synder RC, The Most-Favored-Nation Clause: An Analysis with Particular Reference to Recent Treaty Practice and Tariffs (King’s Crown Press 1948).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Damme I, Treaty Interpretation by thewtoAppellate Body (Oxford University Press 2009).

  • Vandevelde KJ, Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy, and Interpretation (Oxford University Press 2010).

  • Viner J, International Economics (Glencoe, iii, Free Press 1951).

  • Viñuales JE and Langer MJ, ‘Foreign Investment in Latin America: Between Love and Hatred’ in Claude Auroi and Aline Helg, Latin America 1810–2010 (Imperial College Press 2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Waibel M, ‘International Investment Law and Treaty Interpretation’ in Rainer Hofmann and Christian J Tams (eds), International Investment Law and General International Law (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co kg 2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang G, International Investment Law: A Chinese Perspective (1st edn, Routledge 2014).

  • Weeramantry JR, Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration (1st ed, Oxford University Press 2012).

  • Wilson RR, US Commercial Treaties and International Law (Hauser Press 1960).

Articles, Contributions to Compilations, Working Papers, and Reports (All Online Materials Last Accessed 20 April 2022)

  • Accominotti O and Flandreau M, ‘Bilateral Treaties and the Most-Favored-Nation Clause: The Myth of Trade Liberalization in the Nineteenth Century’ (2008) 60 World Politics 147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Acconci P, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment’, The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Peter T Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, Christoph Schreuer, Oxford University Press 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alvarez GA and Park WW, ‘The New Face of Investment Arbitration: nafta Chapter 11’ (2003) 28 Yale Journal of International Law 3.

  • Andreeva Y, ‘Interpreting Consent to Arbitration as a Unilateral Act of State: A Case Against Conventions’ (2011) 27 Arbitration International 129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ‘Analysis: Heemsen v. Venezuela Tribunal Refused to Find Jurisdiction on the Basis of an mfn Clause, and Held That German-Venezuela bit Does Not Cover Dual Nationals with Citizenship of the Host State’ (Investment Arbitration Reporter, 22 November 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ascensio H, ‘Abuse of Process in International Investment Arbitration’ (2014) 13 Chinese Journal of International Law 763.

  • Agrawal K, ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Developing History’ (2016) 7 Jindal Global Law Review 175.

  • Baldwin R, ‘21st Century Regionalism: Filling the Gap between 21st Century Trade and 20th Century Trade Rules’ (2011) World Trade Organization, Economic Research and Statistics Division 39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bairoch P and Burke S, ‘European Trade Policy, 1815–1914’ in Peter Mathias and Sidney Pollard (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of Europe from the Decline of the Roman Empire: The Industrial Economies: The Development of Economic and Social Policies, vol 8 (Cambridge University Press 1989).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Banifatemi Y, ‘The Emerging Jurisprudence on the Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in Investment Arbitration,’ in Andrea K Bjorklund, Ian A. Laird, Sergey Ripinsky (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issuesiii (biicl, 2009) 241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Batifort S and Heath JB, ‘The New Debate on the Interpretation of mfn Clauses in Investment Treaties: Putting the Brakes on Multilateralization’ (2018) 111 American Journal of International Law 873.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bemis SF, ‘A Diplomatic History of the United States. Pp. Xii, 881.’ (1936) New York: Henry Holt & Co.

  • Bhala R, ‘The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law (Part One of a Trilogy)’ 14 American University International Law Review 845.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bianchi A, ‘Textual Interpretation and (International) Law Reading: The Myth of (in)Determinacy and the Genealogy of Meaning’ in Pieter HF Bekker, Rudolf Dolzer and Michael Waibel (eds), Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy (Cambridge University Press 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bjorklund AK, ‘Private Rights and Public International Law: Why Competition Among International Economic Law Tribunals Is Not Working’ (2008) 59 Hastings Law Journal 64.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blyschak PM, ‘State Consent, Investor Interests and the Future of Investment Arbitration: Reanalyzing the Jurisdiction of Investor-State Tribunals in Hard Cases.’ (2009) 9 Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law 99.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bonnitcha J and Brewin S, ‘Compensation Under Investment Treaties’ (2020) iisd Best Practices Series 44.

  • Brabandere ED, ‘“Importing” Consent to icsid Arbitration? A Critical Appraisal of the Decision of the icsid Arbitral Tribunal In’ 8.

  • Brauch MD, ‘Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Investment Law’ (2017) 33 International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brower CN and Steven LA, ‘Who Then Should Judge? Developing the International Rule of Law under nafta Chapter 11’ 2 Chicago Journal of International Law 193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brower ii CH, ‘Investor-State Disputes under nafta: The Empire Strikes Back’ (2001) 40 Colombia Journal of Transnational Law 43.

  • Brower ii CH, ‘Mitsubishi, Investor-State Arbitration, and the Law of State Immunity’ (2005) 20 American University International Law Review 907.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burgess M, ‘The World Bank – the East Asian Miracle’ (1995) 18 Asian Studies Review 147.

  • Caron DD and Shirlow E, ‘Most Favoured Nation Treatment – Substantive Protection in Investment Law’ (2015) King’s College London Law School Research Paper No. 2015–23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chalamish E, ‘The Future of Bilateral Investment Treaties: A de Facto Multilateral Agreement?’ (2009) 34 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen A, ‘Queries to the Recent icsid Decision on Jurisdiction Upon the Case of Tza Yap Shum v. Republic of Peru: Should China–Peru bit 1994 Be Applied to Hong Kong sar Under the “One Country, Two Systems” Policy?’ in An Chen (ed), The Voice from China: Anchenon International Economic Law (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chinen MA, ‘The Standard of Compensation for Takings’ (2016) 25 Minnesota Journal of International Law 335.

  • Chukwumerije O, ‘Interpreting Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses in Investment Treaty Arbitrations’ (2007) 8 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 597.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cole T, ‘The Boundaries of Most Favored Nation Treatment in International Investment Law’ (2012) 33 Michigan Journal of International Law 537.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Commission J, ‘Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration-A Citation Analysis of a Developing Jurisprudence’ (2007) 24 129.

  • Coutain B, ‘The Unconditional Most-Favored-Nation Clause and the Maintenance of the Liberal Trade Regime in the Postwar 1870s’ (2009) 63 International Organization 139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coyle JF, ‘The Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation in the Modem Era’ (2012) 51 Colombia Journal of Transnational Law.

  • Crawford J, ‘The ilc’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 874.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crawford J-A and Kotschwar B, ‘Investment Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements: Evolution and Current Trends’ (2018) wto Staff Working Paper ersd-2018-14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • D’Amato A, ‘Good faith’,in Rudolf. Bernhardt (ed), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (1984) 7, 107.

  • De Brabandere E, ‘“Good Faith,” “Abuse of Process” and the Initiation of Investment Treaty Claims’ (2012) 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 609.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Brabandere E, ‘Importing Consent to icsid Arbitration? A Critical Appraisal of Garanti Koza v. Turkmenistan’ (2014) 5 Investment Treaty News (itn), iisd.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Delamue GR, icsid Arbitration Proceedings: Practical Aspects’ (1985) 5 Pace Law Review 28.

  • Delaney J, ‘The Use of mfn Clauses in icsid Arbitrations’ (2009) 21 National Law School of India Review 125.

  • Dolzer R and Myers T, ‘After Tecmed: Most-Favored-Nation Clauses in Investment Protection Agreements’ (2004) 19 icsid Review 49.

  • Douglas Z, ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2004) 74 British Yearbook of International Law 151.

  • Douglas Z, ‘The mfn Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’ (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 97.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dumberry P, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: A Guide tonaftaCase Law on Article 1105 (Kluwer Law International 2013).

  • Dumberry P, ‘Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Become a Rule of Customary International Law?’ (2016) 8 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dumberry P, ‘Shopping for a Better Deal: The Use of mfn Clauses to Get “Better” Fair and Equitable Treatment Protection’ (2016) 1 Arbitration International.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dumberry P, ‘The Importation of the fet Standard through mfn Clauses: An Empirical Study of bits’ (2016) 32 icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dumberry P, ‘The Importation of “Better” Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Protection Through mfn Clauses: An Analysis of nafta Article 1103”’ (2017) 1 Transnational Dispute Management (tdm).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Egli G, ‘Don’t Get Bit: Addressing icsid’s Inconsistent Application of Most-Favored-Nation Clauses to Dispute Resolution Provisions Comment’ (2006) 34 Pepperdine Law Review 1045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eliasson N, ‘Investor-State Arbitration and Chinese Investors Recent Developments in Light of the Decision on Jurisdiction in the Case Mr. Tza Yap Shum v. the Republic of Peru’ (2009) 2 Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fauchald OK, ‘The Legal Reasoning of icsid Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 301.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Faya Rodriguez A, ‘The Most-Favored-Nation Clause in International Investment: Agreements A Tool for Treaty Shopping?’ (2008) 25 Journal of International Arbitration 89.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fietta S, ‘Most Favoured Nation Treatment and Dispute Resolution under Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Turning Point?’ (2005) 8 International Arbitration Law Review 131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Figueiredo RC de, ‘Evolving Meaning: The Interpretation of Investment Treaties and Temporal Variations’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fitzmaurice, GG, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–4: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’ (1957) 33 British Yearbook of International Law 203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foster AT, ‘Some Aspects of the Commercial Treaty Program of the United States – Past and Present’ (1946) 11 Law and Contemporary Problems 647.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fox H, ‘States and the Undertaking to Arbitrate’ (1988) 37 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1.

  • Gaffney JP, ‘Abuse of Process in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2010) 11 Journal of World Investment & Trade 515.

  • Gaillard E, ‘Abuse of Process in International Arbitration’ (2017) 32 icsid Review 17.

  • Garcia-Mora MR, ‘The Calvo Clause in Latin American Constitutions and International Law’ (1950) 33 Marquette Law Review 16.

  • Gazzini T and Tanzi A, ‘Handle with Care: Umbrella Clauses and mfn Treatment in Investment Arbitration’ (2013) 14 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 978.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giorgio S, ‘Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection’ Vol 269, in: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grigera Naón HA, ‘The Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Private Parties’ (2000) 1 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 59.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guillaume G, ‘The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators’ (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5.

  • Guzman A, ‘Why ldcs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (1998) 38 Virginia Journal of International Law 639.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hanotiau B, ‘Consent to Arbitration: Do We Share a Common Vision?’ (2011) 27 Arbitration International 539.

  • Hornbeck SK, ‘The Most-Favored-Nation Clause’ (1909) 3 The American Journal of International Law 797.

  • Huiping C, ‘The Expansion of Jurisdiction by icsid Tribunals: Approaches, Reasons and Damages’ (2011) 12 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 671.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • iisd, iisd Best Practices Series: The Most-Favoured-Nation Clause in Investment Treaties: The Most-Favoured-Nation Clause in Investment Treaties’ (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses with Commentaries’, (1978) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol ii:2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Law Commission (ilc), Second Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties, United Nations General Assembly a/cn.4/671.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Irwin DA, ‘Multilateral and Bilateral Trade Policies in the World Trading System: An Historical Perspective’ in Arvind Panagariya and Jaime De Melo (eds), New Dimensions in Regional Integration (Cambridge University Press 1993).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ishikawa T, ‘Keeping Interpretation in Investment Treaty Arbitration ’on Track’: The Role of States Parties’ (2014) 11 Transnational Dispute Management (tdm) 115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jiménez De Aréchaga E, ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century (Volume 159) Collected Courses of the Hague Academy Intl L 1’.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joubin-Bret A, ‘Admission and Establishment in the Context of Investment Protection*’ in August Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jr HW, ‘Modern Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation’ (1958) 42 Minnesota Law Review. 1491.

  • Kalnina I, ‘White Industries v. The Republic of India: A Tale of Treaty Shopping and Second Chances’ (2012) 9 Transnational Dispute Management (tdm).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kamil Yasseen M, ‘L’interprétation Des Traités d’après La Convention de Vienne Sur Le Droit Des Traités (Volume 151)’ (1976) Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaufmann-Kohler G, ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?: The 2006 Freshfields Lecture’ (2007) 23 Arbitration International 357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaufmann-Kohler G, ‘Interpretive Powers of the Free Trade Commission and the Rule of Law’ in Emmanuel Gaillard and Frédéric Bachand (eds), Fifteen Years ofnaftaChapter 11 Arbitration (JurisNet, llc 2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klabbers J, ‘International Legal Histories: The Declining Importance of Travaux Préparatoires in Treaty Interpretation?’ (2003) 50 Netherlands International Law Review 267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kline JM and Ludema RD, ‘Building a Multilateral Framework for Investment : Comparing the Development of Trade and Investment Accords’ (1997) 6 Transnational Corporations.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kotzur M, ‘Good Faith (Bona Fides)’ (2009) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.

  • Kurtz J, ‘The Most Favoured Nation Standard and Foreign Investment: An Uneasy Fit?’ (2005) 5 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 861.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kurtz J, ‘The Delicate Extension of Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment to Foreign Investors: Maffezini v. Kingdom of Spain’ in Todd Weiler (ed), International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from theicsid,nafta, bilateral treaties and customary international law.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Law Commission of India, ‘Analysis of the 2015 Draft Model Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty’ (Report No. 260, August 2015)’.

  • League of Nations, ‘Report and Proceedings of the World Economic Conference, Vol 1 (League of Nations 1927) Document C.20.M.14.1929.ii’.

  • Lim CL, ‘Is the Umbrella Clause Not Just Another Treaty Clause?’ in CL Lim (ed), Alternative Visions of the International Law on Foreign Investment: Essays in Honour of Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah (Cambridge University Press 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Linderfalk U, ‘Is the Hierarchical Structure of Article 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention Real or Not? Interpreting the Rules of Interpretation’ (2007) 54 Netherlands International Law Review 133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Magntorn J, ‘Most Favoured Nation Clauses in EU Trade Agreements: One More Hurdle for UK Negotiators’ (2018) UK Trade Policy Observatory Briefing Paper 25.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matiation S, ‘Arbitration with Two Twists: Loewen v. United States and Free Trade Commission Intervention in nafta Chapter 11 Disputes’ (2003) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 451.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maupin JA, mfn-Based Jurisdiction in Investor-State Arbitration: Is There Any Hope for a Consistent Approach?’ (2011) 14 Journal of International Economic Law 157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mbengue MM, ‘Rules of Interpretation (Article 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties)’ (2016) 31 icsid Review 388.

  • McLachlan C, ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’ (2008) 57 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 361.

  • Merrills JG, ‘Two Approaches to Treaty Interpretation’ (1971) 4 The Australian Year Book of International Law 55.

  • Michael EC and Losari JJ, ‘Which Is to Be the Master? Extra-Arbitral Interpretative Procedures for iias’ in Jean E Kalicki and Anna Joubin-Bret (eds), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System (Brill | Nijhoff 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mortenson JD, ‘The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History?’ (2013) 107 The American Journal of International Law 780.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Myers DP, Charles G and Malloy WM, ‘Treaties, Conventions, International Acts, Protocols and Agreements between the United States of America and Other Powers, 1776–1909.’ United States Government Printing Office 1910.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newcombe A, ‘Canada’s New Model Foreign Investment Protection Agreement’ (2005) 1 Transnational Dispute Management, tdm.

  • oecd, ‘National Treatment for Foreign-Controlled Enterprises, Including Adhering Country Exceptions to National Treatment’.

  • oecd, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law’ (oecd2004) oecd Working Papers on International Investment wp 2004/02.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orrego Vicuna F, ‘Reports of Maffezini’s Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated’ (2012) 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 299.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paparinskis M, ‘mfn Clauses and Substantive Treatment: A Law of Treaties Perspective of the “Conventional Wisdom”’ (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law (Unbound) 49.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paulsson J, ‘Arbitration Without Privity’ (1995) 10 icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 232.

  • Paulsson J, ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility’ (2005) Global Reflection on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution 601.

  • Pauwelyn J and Elsig M, ‘The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations Across International Tribunals’ in Jeffery C Dunoff and Mark A Pollack (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations : The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press 2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pérez-Aznar F, ‘The Use of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses to Import Substantive Treaty Provisions in International Investment Agreements’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law 777.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Polanco Lazo R, ‘The No of Tokyo Revisited: Or How Developed Countries Learned to Start Worrying and Love the Calvo Doctrine’ (2015) 30 icsid Review 172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Polanco R, The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes: Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? (1st edn, Cambridge University Press 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Potestà M, ‘The Interpretation of Consent to icsid Arbitration Contained in Domestic Investment Laws’ (2011) 27 Arbitration International 149.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radi Y, ‘The Application of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause to the Dispute Settlement Provisions of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Domesticating the “Trojan Horse”’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radović R, ‘Between Rights and Remedies: The Access to Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Substantive Right of Foreign Investors’ (2019) 10 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinert S and Fredona R, ‘Merchants and the Origins of Capitalism’ (2017) Harvard Business School bgie Unit Working Paper No. 18021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinhold S, ‘Good Faith in International Law’ (2013) 2 ucl Jurisprudence Review 40.

  • Reinisch A, ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility in International Investment Law’ (2017) 16 The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reisman WM, ‘The Breakdown of the Control Mechanism in icsid Arbitration’ (1989) 1989 Duke Law Journal 739.

  • Robbins J, ‘The Emergence Of Positive Obligations In Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2006) 13 University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review 72.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roberts A, ‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States104 The American Journal of International Law 47.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rubins N and Nazarov A, ‘Investment Treaties and the Russian Federation: Baiting the Bear?’ (2008) 9 Business Law International 100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rubins N, ‘The Arbitral Innovations of Recent U.S. Free Trade Agreements: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back’ (2003) International Business Law Journal 865.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Salacuse JW, ‘bit by bit: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries’ (1990) 24 The International Lawyer 655.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schill SW, ‘Maffezini v. Plama: Reflections on the Jurisprudential Schism in the Application of Most-Favored-Nation Clauses to Matters of Dispute Settlement’ in Meg Kinnear and others (eds), Building international investment law: the first 50 years oficsid (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schill SW, ‘mfn Clauses as Bilateral Commitments to Multilateralism: A Reply to Simon Batifort and J. Benton Heath’ (2017) 111 American Journal of International Law 914.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schill SW and Bray HL, ‘Good Faith Limitations on Protected Investments and Corporate Structuring’ in Andrew D Mitchell, M Sornarajah and Tania Voon (eds), Good Faith and International Economic Law (Oxford University Press 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schreuer C, ‘Calvo’s Grandchildren: The Return of Local Remedies in Investment Arbitration’ (2005) 4 The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schreuer C, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’ (2005) 6 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 32.

  • Schreuer C, ‘Diversity And Harmonization Of Treaty Interpretation In Investment Arbitration’ in Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Olufemi Elias and Panos Merkouris (eds), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on (Brill | Nijhoff 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwarzenberger G, ‘The Most-Favoured-Nation Standard in British State Practice’ (1945) 22 British Yearbook on International Law 96.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Setser VG, ‘Did Americans Originate the Conditional Most-Favored-Nation Clause?’ (1933) 5 The Journal of Modern History 319.

  • Shen W, ‘The Good, the Bad or the Ugly? A Critique of the Decision on Jurisdiction and Competence in Tza Yap Shum v. The Republic of Peru’ (2011) 10 Chinese Journal of International Law 55.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shenkin TS, ‘Trade-Related Investment Measures in Bilateral Investment Treaties and the Gatt: Moving Toward a Multilateral Investment Treaty Comment’ (1993) 55 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 541.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sinclair AC, ‘The Origins of the Umbrella Clause in the International Law of Investment Protection’ (2014) 20 Arbitration International 411.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith RF, ‘Latin America, The United States and the European Powers, 1830–1930’ in Leslie Bethell (ed), The Cambridge History of Latin America: Volume 4: c.1870 to 1930, vol 4 (Cambridge University Press 1986).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Söderlund C and Burova E, ‘Is There Such a Thing as Admissibility in Investment Arbitration?’ (2018) 33 icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sohn LB and Baxter RR, ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to the Economic Interests of Aliens: ii. Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens’ (1961) 55 American Journal of International Law 545.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stefan K, ‘The International Law Commission and role of subsequent practice as a means of interpretation under Articles 31 and 32 vclt’ (2018) Zoom-in 46 Questions of International Law Journal 5–18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stern B, icsid Arbitration and the State’s Increasingly Remote Consent: Apropos the Maffezini Case’ in Steve Charnovitz, Debra P Steger and Peter Van den Bossche (eds), Law in the Service of Human Dignity (1st edn, Cambridge University Press 2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Teitelbaum R, ‘Who’s Afraid of Maffezini? Recent Developments in the Interpretation of Most Favored Nation Clauses’ (2005) 22 Journal of International Arbitration 225.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas JC, ‘Investor-State Arbitration under nafta Chapter 11’ (2000) 37 Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international 99.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thulasidhass P, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law: Ascertaining the Limits through Interpretative Principles’ (2015) 7 Amsterdam Law Forum 3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Titi C, ‘The Timing of Treaty Party Interpretations’ (2020) ejil: Talk!.

  • Titi C, The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Revisited), International and Comparative Law Research Center 2022.

  • Titi C, ‘The Evolution of Substantive Investment Protections in Recent Trade and Investment Treaties’ (2018) Inter-American Development Bank (idb) & International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ictsd) – rta Exchange Think Piece.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tschofen F, ‘Multilateral Approaches to the Treatment of Foreign Investment’ (1992) 7 icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • unctad, ‘International Investment Instruments: A Compendium’ vol xiv unctad/dite/ 4 (1996).

  • unctad, ‘World Investment Report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D’ (United Nations 2005).

  • unctad, ‘World Investment Report 2010: Investing in a Low-Carbon Economy’ (United Nations 2010).

  • unctad, Word Investment Report 2015: Reforming International Investment Governance (United Nations 2015).

  • unctad, 1 iia Issues Note: Taking Stock of iia Reform, unctad/web/diae/pcb/2016/1 (2016).

  • unctad (ed), Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment: A Sequel (United Nations 2010).

  • unctad, ‘Recent Developments in International Investment Agreements’ iia Monitor No. 2 (2005). unctad/web/ite/iit/2005/1.

  • unctad, ‘The Changing iia Landscape: New Treaties and Recent Policy Developments’ iia Issues Note No. 1, 2020. unctad/diae/pcb/inf/2020/4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations, ‘Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Documents of the Second Part of the Seventeenth Session and of the Eighteenth Session Including the Reports of the Commission to the General Assembly’ (1967) Vol ii a/cn.4/ser. A/1966/Add. 1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Court of Justice, ‘Competence of Assembly Regarding Admission to the United Nations (Advisory Opinion) [1950] icj Rep 4’.

  • Ustor E, ‘First Report on the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause, Special Rapporteur’, Vol ii Yearbook of the International Law Commission, (1969).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Valasek MJ and Menard EA, ‘Impregilo SpA v Argentine Republic and Hochtief ag v The Argentine Republic: Making Sense of Dissents: The Jurisprudence Inconstante of the mfn Clause’ (2012) 27 icsid Review 21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Valenti M, ‘The Most Favoured Nation Clause in bits as a Basis for Jurisdiction in Foreign Investor – Host State Arbitration’ (2008) 24 Arbitration International 447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Valenti M, ‘The Scope of an Investment Treaty Dispute Resolution Clause: It Is Not Just a Question of Interpretation’ (2013) 29 Arbitration International 243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Damme I, ‘Treaty Interpretation by the wto Appellate Body’(2010) 21 The European Journal of International Law 3 620.

  • Vandevelde KJ, ‘The bit Program: A Fifteen-Year Appraisal’ (1988) 82 Proceedings of the asil Annual Meeting 532.

  • Vandevelde KJ, ‘Sustainable Liberalism and the International Investment Regime’ (1998) 19 Michigan Journal of International Law 373.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vandevelde KJ, ‘A Brief History of International Investment Agreements’ in Karl p. Sauvant and Lisa Sachs (eds), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows (Oxford University Press 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vandevelde KJ, ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Mid-1990s.’ unctad/ite/iit/7 (United Nations 1998).

  • Verloren van Themaat P, The Changing Structure of International Economic Law: A Contribution of Legal History, of Comparative Law, and of General Legal Theory to the Debate on a New International Economic Order (Nijhoff: tmc Asser Institute 1981).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vesel S, ‘Clearing a Path Through a Tangled Jurisprudence: Most-Favored-Nation Clauses and Dispute Settlement Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2007) 32 Yale Journal of International Law.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Waibel M, ‘Demystifying the Art of Interpretation’ (2011) 22 European Journal of International Law 571.

  • Waibel M, ‘Investment Arbitration: Jurisdiction and Admissibility’ (2014) University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 9/2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wälde TW and Kolo A, ‘Coverage of Taxation Under Modern Investment Treaties’ in Peter Muchlinski, Ortino Federico and Christoph Schreuer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang G, ‘Consent in Investor-State Arbitration: A Critical Analysis’ (2014) 13 Chinese Journal of International Law 335.

  • Wang H and Wang L, ‘China’s Bilateral Investment Treaties’ in Julien Chaisse, Leïla Choukroune and Sufian Jusoh (eds), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Springer Singapore 2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • wto, The gatt Years: From Havana to Marrakesh: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact4_e.htm.

  • Yee WP, ‘Protecting Parties’ Reasonable Expectations: A General Principle of Good Faith’ (2001) 1 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Youngquist EV, ‘United States Commercial Treaties: Their Role in Foreign Economic Policy’ (1967) 2 Studies in L aw and Economic Development 72.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zelikow P, Cameron MA and Tomlin BW, ‘The Making of nafta: How the Deal Was Done’ (2001) 80 Foreign Affairs 176.

  • Ziegler A, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation (mfn) Treatment’ in Reinisch August (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ziegler AR, ‘Is the mfn Principle in International Investment Law Ripe for Multilateralization or Codification?’ in Andrea K Bjorklund and August Reinisch (eds), International Investment Law and Soft Law (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand