1 The Language and Its Speakers
The Aragusuku dialect (hereafter Aragusuku) is an areal variety of the Miyako language spoken in the southeastern area of Miyako Island in the southern Ryukyus (Figure 5.1). The main characteristics are the “fricative vowel” (e.g., [ks̞ks̞] ‘listen’), the presence of three reflexive markers (differentiated according to person, number and case), a double-nominative construction that is sensitive to the possessive relationship between the two subject NPs (e.g., karjaa miinudu kagimunu ‘As for him, (his) eyes are beautiful’), etc.
Figure 5.1
Map of Ryukyuan (Shimoji 2010: 3) and Aragusuku
Few previous studies have focused on the southeastern area of Miyako, much less on the Aragusuku dialect. Besides three relevant papers on particular topics (Inagaki 1966 on accent, Tabira 2018 on modification, Takahashi 2018 on case marking), the author’s MA thesis (Wang 2019a) provides a preliminary description, but many issues are left unresolved. This chapter is a considerably revised version enriched by up-to-date data and analyses.1
Miyako Ryukyuan is identified as a definitively endangered language by UNESCO (2009) due to aging speakers, multilingualism and low vitality. Aragusuku speakers are generally over 60 years of age, despite a lack of appropriate statistics. Adults under 60 generally have difficulty mastering the Aragusuku dialect, let alone youngsters who are familiar with standard Japanese education. Furthermore, even the older speakers are bilinguals, and Standard Japanese has became their primary language of communication with family members and the younger generations.
2 Phonology
Aragusuku phonology is characterized by the existence of the “fricative vowel” (e.g., pžtu [ps̞tu] ‘person’, bžda [bz̞da] ‘low, short’), which possesses the properties of both vowels and consonants. In the present section, § 2.1 is devoted to the inventory of phonemes, § 2.2 to the syllable structure and phonotactics, and § 2.3 to morae. The following § 2.4 and § 2.5 address the word-level prosody and intonation respectively. Please refer to Wang (2019a) for more information.
2.1 Phoneme Inventory
Based on the criteria shown in Table 5.1, the Aragusuku dialect has six vowels, sixteen consonants, and two glides.
Table 5.1
Criteria for phoneme classification
Phonemes |
Temporary obstruction of the air stream |
Able to be syllabic |
---|---|---|
Vowels |
− |
+ |
Consonants |
+ |
± |
Glides |
− |
− |
As shown in Table 5.1, consonants are distinguished by the fact that they are the only segments that obstruct the airstream during pronunciation. Next, vowels and glides differ in their ability to be syllabic: vowels are always syllabic, while glides can never be syllabic.
2.1.1 Vowels
The Aragusuku dialect has a six-vowel system: /a [a], i [i], u [u], ɨ [ɨ], (e [e~ɛ], o [o])/. /e/ and /o/, which are parenthesized, occur mostly in Japanese loanwords (e.g., eego ‘English’, otoo ‘father’).
Table 5.2
Vowels
Front |
Central |
Back |
|
---|---|---|---|
High |
i [i] |
ɨ [ɨ] |
u [u] |
Mid |
(e [e~ɛ]) |
(o [o]) |
|
Low |
a [a] |
Unlike other vowels, /ɨ/ is analyzed as a vowel which is inserted by morphophonological rule (e.g., //pus// → /pusɨ/ [pusɨ] ‘star’). The reasons for this are as follows. Firstly, /ɨ/ has restricted occurrence. It can not appear word-initially and can occur only after the fricatives /f,s,c,z/ (e.g., fɨsa [fɨsa] ‘grass’, sɨta [sɨta] ‘tongue’, cɨna [tsɨna] ‘cord’, zɨmigi [dzɨmiɡi] ‘wonderful’), pronounced as [ɨ]. The second reason lies in the morphophonological rule concerning vowel-initial clitics. Take the topic marker ⸗a for example. The realized forms differ when ⸗a attaches to nouns with different syllable structures.
(135) The vowel-initial clitic ⸗a is realized as
a. /Ca/ when attaching to nouns which end with a consonant
(e.g., //kam⸗a// (god⸗top) → /kamma/).
b. /ja/ when attaching to nouns which end with long vowels or diphthongs
(e.g., //mii⸗a//(eye⸗top) → /miija/; //kui⸗a// (voice⸗top) → /kuija/).
c. /a/ elsewhere
(e.g., //mipana⸗a// (face⸗top) → /mipanaa/).
If we regard /ɨ/ as a normal vowel existing in both deep and surface structures, based on the rule shown in (135c), ⸗a should be realized as /⸗a/ when the preceding noun ends with /ɨ/. However, //pusɨ⸗a// (star⸗top) is not realized as */pusɨa/. Instead, we get the form /pussa/, just like the cases of consonant-final nouns. This indicates that /ɨ/ does not exist in the deep structure and it is better to analyze it as the result of insertion to avoid some consonant sequences or word-final consonants.
Vowels except /ɨ/ can occur in lengthened form, without significant difference in phonetic quality.
There are three diphthongs in Aragusuku, all beginning with a non-front vowel: /ui/, /ai/ and /au/ (e.g., kui ‘voice’, mai ‘front’, au ‘blue’). /iu/, /ia/ are not counted as diphthong, because they are observed only in the process of suffixation or clitic adding and obligatorily realized as [ju] and [ja] respectively.
2.1.2 Consonants and Glides
There are sixteen consonant phonemes (Table 5.3). They are further divided into two groups: obstruents /p, t, k, b, d, g, f, s, c, z, h/ and resonants /m, v, ž, n, r/. Obstruents and resonants are different in two ways. Firstly, obstruents have the voiced-voiceless distinction, while resonants do not. Secondly, obstruents cannot stand in the coda slots of word-final syllables, while resonants can (e.g., kam ‘god’, pav ‘snake’, paž ‘fly’, kan ‘crab’, tur ‘take’).
I analyze the “fricative vowel” as a resonant (/ž/) based on the following characteristics. /ž/ can stand in the V slot only when the onset is /p, b, m, k, g/ (e.g., pžtu [ps̞tu] ‘person’, bžda [bz̞da] ‘low, short’, mžcjaaž [mz̞tɕaːz̞] ‘three people’, kžkž [ks̞ks̞] ‘listen’, pagž [paɡz̞] ‘leg’).2
Table 5.3
Consonants
Labial |
Labiodental |
Alveolar |
Postalveolar |
Velar |
Glottal |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obstruents |
Stops |
Voiceless |
p [p] |
t [t] |
k [k] |
|||
Voiced |
b [b] |
d [d] |
g [ɡ] |
|||||
Fricatives |
Voiceless |
f [f] |
s [s~ɕ] |
c [ts~tɕ] |
(h [h]) |
|||
Voiced |
z [dz~dʑ] |
|||||||
Resonants |
Approximants |
v [v~ʋ] |
ž [s̞~z̞~z] |
|||||
Nasals |
m [m] |
n [n~ŋ~ɴ] |
||||||
Flaps |
r [ɾ] |
Note that /h/ is observed only in loanwords (e.g., Hanako ‘Ms. Hanako (person’s name)’). Geminates occur only in the cases of voiceless fricatives and resonants (e.g., ffa ‘child’, ssam ‘louse’, cca (the hearsay particle), mma ‘mom’, vva (2.sg), žžu ‘fish’, nna ‘shellfish’).
Glides /w/ and /j/ are both restricted in occurrence. /j/ occurs only before /a/, /u/, and /o/ (e.g., jaa ‘house’, junai ‘midnight’, joomunu ‘weak’). Whereas /w/ is restricted to occurring before /a/ (e.g., waa ‘pig’) in a limited number of words. Furthermore, when after a consonant, /j/ shows no restrictions, while /w/ can follow only the consonants /k/ and /g/ and generally in such cases a fusion rule applies (e.g., /kwaasɨ/[kwaːsɨ] or [koːsɨ] ‘sweets’, /satagwaasɨ/[sataɡwaːsɨ] or [satagoːsɨ] ‘sugar sweets’).
2.2 Syllable Structure and Phonotactics
Root words have a syllable structure of ((Ri) Ri) ((Ci)Ci(G)) V1 (V2) (Ccoda), where R represents only word-initial resonants, C the consonants (both obstruents and resonants), G the glides and V the vowels. The parenthesized elements are optional (Table 5.4).
Table 5.4
Syllables structure and mora
(Sesqui-syllable) |
Regular syllables |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#((Ri) |
Ri) |
((Ci) |
Ci |
(G)) |
V1 |
(V2) |
(Ccoda) |
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
Note that the sesquisyllable is only found word-initially. It can be filled only with a single resonant sound (e.g., m.cɨ ‘road’) or its geminates (e.g., mm.cɨ ‘six’). However, I yet know of no words that include /r/ or /rr/ in their sesqui-syllables. The restriction of slots are as follow (Table 5.5).
Table 5.5
Restrictions of slots
SESQUI |
(Ri) Ri |
Resonant only (Note that RiRi must be a sequence of identical resonants) |
REGULAR |
Conset |
SINGLE ONSET: All consonants or glides; |
GEMINATE ONSET: CiCi must be the sequence of identical resonants or voiceless obstruents |
||
G |
Glide(s) only (Note that when G slot is filled, the former Conset slot rejects glides) |
|
V1 |
All vowels, |
|
or /ž/ only if the single onset is filled with one of /p,b,k,g,m/ |
||
V2 |
Identical vowel with V1, |
|
or the latter part of a permitted diphthong (/i/ or /u/ when V1 is /a/; /u/ when V2 is /i/) |
||
Ccoda |
WORD FINAL: Resonant only; |
|
ELSEWHERE: Voiceless obstruents or resonants |
Note that the coda slot may be filled with a voiceless obstruent (pronounced as [ʔ]) only when it is in word-medial position. In this case, the onset of the following syllable must be an identical obstruent (e.g., bap.pai [baʔpai] ‘do something wrong’; kakat.tan [kakaʔtaɴ] ‘didn’t write’; kakžk.ka [kaks̞ʔka] ‘If somebody writes’; bas.sɨtar [baʔsɨtaː]; kakžtarc.ca [kaks̞taːʔtsa] ‘(I heard that she) wrote’).
Moreover, Aragusuku rejects vowel strings made up of three or more vowels. To avoid such strings, two strategies are employed: (A) the insertion of /j/ (e.g., //mii⸗a// (eye⸗top) → /miija/ [miːja]), (B) vowel deletion (e.g., //mii-i// (watch-seq) → /mii/ [miː]).
2.3 Mora
In addition to “syllable”, the phonological unit “mora” is primarily involved when describing the prosody of the Aragusuku dialect. The corresponding relationship between syllables and morae is illustrated in Table 5.4.
2.4 Word-Level Prosody
Table 5.6
Word-level prosody
Tonal class |
Examples |
Meaning |
In isolation |
⸗nom⸗foc |
⸗abl |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monosyllabic |
A |
paa |
‘leaf’ |
HL |
LHHH |
LHHH |
B |
paa |
‘tooth’ |
HL |
LHHH |
LHHH |
|
B |
nom |
‘chisel’ |
HL |
LHHH |
LHHH |
|
C |
nom |
‘flea’ |
HL |
LHHH |
LHHH |
|
Disyllabic |
A |
kata |
‘shape’ |
LH |
LHHH |
LHHH |
B |
kata |
‘shoulder’ |
LH |
LHHH |
LHHH |
|
C |
kata |
‘grasshopper’ |
LH |
LHHH |
LHHH |
It is reported by Inagaki (1966) that Aragusuku shows the ‘n+1 pattern’ of pitch accent; that is, where for words consisting of n syllables, there are n+1 accent patterns. To put it specifically, for monosyllable words (n=1), there are two patterns: the initial accent (where the falling accent is assigned to the first syllable) and the unaccented pattern (the one that has no falling accent but only a raising one between the first and the second syllable); for disyllabic words (n=2), there are three patterns: the initial accent, the penultimate accent (where the falling accent is assigned to the second syllable) and the unaccented pattern.
However, based on the author’s research, pitch contrasts are not observed: when pronounced in isolation, monosyllabic words are observed always with the falling pith contour (that is, the initial accent), while when followed by clitics there is no fall in pitch (the unaccented pattern). On the other hand, disyllabic words have no falling accent (the unaccented pattern). In Table 5.6, the tonal classes are historical classes based on Igarashi (2017), and H/L is indicated for every mora. The question of whether there is an accentual distinction with longer suffixes requires further research.
2.5 Intonation
There are two basic intonation patterns in Aragusuku: the falling intonation and the rising intonation. The former can be found in declarative, imperative, and prohibitive sentences. The latter, on the other hand, is employed in all interrogative sentences (both content interrogatives and polarity interrogatives), whether with or without final interrogative particles (to be specific, ⸗rjaa/⸗ga for content interrogatives, and ⸗na for polarity interrogatives). It is worth noting that native speakers consider rising intonation to be a feature which distinguishes Aragusuku from neighboring dialects.
3 Descriptive Units
3.1 Morphological Units
3.1.1 Word, Clitic and Affix
Table 5.7
Word, clitic and affix (applicable: Y; not applicable: N)
Morphological criteria |
Word |
Clitic |
Affix |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
A. |
It can be utterance independently |
Y |
N |
N |
B. |
It can attach only to the stem of a particular kind of part-of-speech |
N |
N |
Y |
In Aragusuku, “word”, “clitic” and “affix” are distinguished by two morphological criteria: (A) utterance independency, (B) degree of selection to the host. As shown in Table 5.7, based on criterion (A), the word is the only unit that can be uttered by itself. Next, criterion (B) is employed to distinguish clitics and affixes: clitics can attach to several kinds of word-class elements, while affixes, as internal elements of words, can attach only to the stem of a particular kind of part-of-speech.
3.1.2 Root and Stem
A root bears the lexical meaning of the word and it is the part that cannot further be reduced morphologically. A stem, on the other hand, is what remains after removing all inflectional suffixes. A stem may comprise a root (e.g., mii- in /mii-tar/ (watch-pst) ‘watched’), a compound root (e.g., mii+pazɨmi in /mii+pazɨmi-tar/ (//mii+pazmi-tar//) (watch+start-pst) ‘started to watch’), or a combination of derivational suffixes (e.g., mii-sɨmi-tar (//mii-smi-tar//) (watch-caus-pst) ‘make (someone) watch’).
3.1.3 Word Classes
Aragusuku has eight major word classes: The noun functions as the head of noun phrases (NPs). The verb is the only word class that inflects. The adjective refers to the reduplicated form derived from property concept (hereafter, PC) roots, with the root-final vowel lengthened in the first half of the word (e.g., kagii~kagi (red~cute) ‘cute’). Adnominals can only function as the modifier of an NP with no particular dependency marking (e.g., kanu in kanu hun ‘that book’). Interjections can be uttered independently and are generally embedded under the quotative marker ⸗tti. Conjunctions are restricted to sentence-initial position, serving as the juncture between the preceding and the following classes. Particles always stand phrase- or clause-finally, adding information about case, mood and so on. Words that do not belong to the above word classes are all classified as adverbs.
3.2 Grammatical Relations
In the present description, three grammatical roles are distinguished: intransitive subject (S), transitive subject (A) and transitive object (O; DO for direct object and IO for indirect object). For greater clarity, S is the only argument of an intransitive sentence, marked by the nominative case markers ⸗ga/⸗nu (tuž ‘bird’ in (136)).
(136)
tužnu
tubjuu.
tuž⸗nu
tub-i+ur-∅.
bird⸗nom
fly-thm+prog-npst
‘A bird (S) is flying.’
A is the argument marked by the nominative case marker ⸗ga/⸗nu (maju ‘cat’ in (137)), while DO refers to that marked by the accusative case marker ⸗u (jumuru ‘mouse’ in (137)) in a transitive sentence. When there is an IO, it is marked by the dative marker ⸗n or the allative marker ⸗nkai (see (138)).
(137)
majunu
jumuruu
fautaa.
maju⸗nu
jumuru⸗u
faw-tar
cat⸗nom
mouse⸗acc
eat-pst
‘A cat (A) ate a mouse (O).’
(138)
baga
hunnu
Hanakondu/Hanakonkaidu
turasɨtaa.
ba⸗ga
hun⸗nu
Hanako⸗n⸗du/Hanako⸗nkai⸗du
turas-tar.
ba⸗nom
hun⸗acc
Hanako⸗dat⸗foc/Hanako⸗all⸗foc
pass-pst
‘I (A) passed the book (DO) to Hanako (IO).’
4 Nominals
4.1 Personal Pronouns
Aragusuku has a pronominal system which distinguishes the first-person (the speaker) and the second-person (the addressee). It lacks special pronoun forms to express the third-person (all others). Instead, the demonstratives kuri/ uri/ kari are used referring to both animate and non-animate entities. kuri/ uri/ kari will be described in § 8.1, together with other forms derived from the demonstrative roots ku-/ u-/ ka-.
Table 5.8
Pronouns
1 |
2 |
||
---|---|---|---|
sg |
ba⸗; banu; ban |
vva |
|
pl |
general |
ban-taa |
vva-taa |
inclusive only |
duu-taa |
- |
Two numbers are distinguished, singular and plural. The plural affix -taa is used to indicate the plural for both persons. For second-person pronouns, there are vva for singular, and vva-taa for plural.
However, the forms of the first-person pronoun are more complicated. As shown in Table 5.8, there are three allomorphs for the first-person singular: ba⸗, banu, and ban. The three variants cannot be derived through transparent phonological rules. Which form is used depends on the clitics that follow (specifically, ba⸗ co-occurs only with the nominative markers ⸗ga/⸗nu, genitive ⸗ga/⸗nu and the topic marker ⸗a (e.g., ba⸗ga (1.sg⸗nom/⸗gen), ba⸗a [bajaː] (1.sg⸗top))). banu co-occurs with accusative ⸗u and the dative marker ⸗n (e.g., banu⸗u (1.sg⸗acc), banu⸗n (1.sg⸗dat)). ban, the unmarked form, is used elsewhere (e.g., ban⸗kara (1.sg⸗abl), ban⸗nkai (1.sg⸗all)).
As for the plural counterpart, there are two kinds of first-person plural: ban-taa (consisting of first-person singular ban and the plural suffix -taa) and duu-taa (consisting of reflexive duu (§ 4.2) and the plural suffix -taa). Examples (139) and (140) illustrate the contrast between inclusive and exclusive plurals respectively. In the case of inclusive reference, both ban-taa and duu-taa can be used, while in the case of exclusive reference, only ban-taa is acceptable.
(139) (Mrs. A took me to her girlfriends’ party. I didn’t know anyone but her. After a while, Mrs. A whispered to me)
kamariidu
uudara.
bantaaja/duutaaja
sadarii
ikadi.
kamar-i-i⸗du
ur-∅⸗dara
ban-taa⸗a/duu-taa⸗a
sadarii
ik-a-di.
feel.bored-thm-seq⸗foc
prog-npst⸗sfp
1-pl⸗top/1-pl.incl⸗top
ahead
go-thm-int
‘Feel bored? Let us (Mrs. A, the speaker, and I, the addressee) leave first.’
(140) (Mrs. A was telling me about the episode between her and her husband Mr. A, who was absent at that time.)
bantaaja/*duutaaja
kanu
tukjaanna,
funindu
nuurjuutaasugadu,
unu
tukjaa
ssattansuga.
ban-taa⸗a/*duu-taa⸗a
kanu
tukjaa⸗n⸗na
funi⸗n⸗du
nuur-i-i+ur-tar⸗suga⸗du
unu
tuki⸗a
ss-a-ttan⸗suga
1-pl⸗top/1-pl.incl⸗top
that
time⸗dat⸗top
boat⸗dat⸗foc
aboard-thm+prog-pst⸗cnc⸗foc
that
time⸗top
know-thm-neg.pst⸗cnc
‘We (Mrs. A, the speaker, and Mr. A, her husband) were in the same boat at that time, but we didn’t know it at that time.’
4.2 Reflexives
Table 5.9
The distinction of the functions of these forms (applicable: Y; not applicable: N)
Relevant factors |
una |
duu |
nara |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
A. |
distributive plural only |
Y |
N |
N |
B. |
with restrictions on the person of the referent |
N |
N |
Y |
C. |
with restrictions on the case marking |
Y |
N |
Y |
Aragusuku has three forms to indicate ‘oneself’, una, duu, and nara, all of which are called reflexives in this chapter. The distribution of these three forms is captured by the three factors summarized in Table 5.9.
Factor (A) distinguishes una from the other forms. The form una can only refer to plural referents, expressing the distributive plural (Quirk et al. 1985) meaning of ‘for each one respectively’. una⸗ga jumi (refl⸗gen dream), for example, can only mean ‘(different) dreams of each individual’. In contrast, duu and nara refer to singular referents. For plural referents, the corresponding plural forms duu-taa, nara-taa (pl) are used, with no restriction on their meanings. For instance, duu⸗ga jumi, nara⸗ga jumi can be understood as both ‘(different) dreams of each individual’ and ‘(the same) dream for everyone’. Factors (B) and (C) place additional constraints on nara. As shown in Table 5.9, nara is used only when it refers to a third-person referent whose case must be nominative ⸗ga, accusative ⸗u, genitive ⸗ga, dative ⸗n, allative ⸗nkai or ablative ⸗kara. Since there are no restrictions on duu, it can be used under any circumstances, and that of course includes the circumstances where nara can be used. In such cases, nara is preferred, because it leads to an unambiguous reference in person. Further details are available in Wang (2021).
Plurality marking is obligatory. -taa is used after reflexives, forming duu-taa and nara-taa.3
4.3 Lexical Nouns
Lexical nouns may precede the diminutive suffix -gama and plural suffixes -taa/ -nukja. When the noun is followed by several suffixes, the order is Noun stem (-pl) (-dim) (e.g., ffa -nukja -gama ‘(cute) children’).
The diminutive suffix -gama generally implies the smallness of the referent (e.g., jubi-gama ‘the pinky finger’), an affectionate quality (e.g., ffa-gama ‘the child (with affection)’), as well as contempt towards the referent (e.g., vva-gama ‘you (with contempt)’).
There are two suffixes which mark plurality marking, -taa and -nukja, and these are obligatory for pronouns but optional for lexical nouns. They may co-occur with different kinds of noun phrases (Table 5.10; “Y” means “applicable”; “N” means “not applicable”).
Table 5.10
Plural affixes
Pronouns |
Person |
Address |
Demonstratives |
Human |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
interrogative tau |
nouns |
nouns |
|||
-taa |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
-nukja |
N |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
4.4 Numerals
Numerals in Aragusuku behave like nouns. They may occur in the main part of a noun phrase acting in a pronominal way (e.g., futaaž⸗ga (two.people⸗nom) ‘two people’). They may also be found as a modifier in a noun phrase, functioning as an adnominal and limiting the quantity of the noun (e.g., futaaž⸗ga pžtu⸗nu (two.people⸗gen people⸗nom) ‘two people’).
Table 5.11
Numerals
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cardinal/ Age |
pitii-cɨ |
futaa-cɨ |
mžž-cɨ |
juu-cɨ |
icɨ-cɨ |
mm-cɨ |
nana-cɨ |
jaa-cɨ |
kukunu-cɨ |
tuu |
People |
taukjaa |
futaaž |
mžcjaaž |
jutaaž |
icɨ⸗nu pžtu |
mm⸗nu pžtu |
nana⸗nu pžtu |
jaa⸗nu pžtu |
kuku⸗nu pžtu |
tuu⸗nu pžtu |
Animal |
pžtu-kara |
futaa-kara |
mžž-kara |
juu-kara |
icɨ-kara |
mm-kara |
nana-kara |
jaa-kara |
kukunu-kara |
tuu-kara |
Aragusuku has an impoverished numeral system which can count only up to ten. When the amount is in excess of ten, native speakers tend to use the adjective jamakasa ‘many’. For more precise reference, Standard Japanese numerals are used. The cardinal numerals and their derivative forms are given in Table 5.11. When counting more than five people, the form ‘cardinal numeral⸗gen people’ is used. To count animals, the suffix -kara is utilized, no matter the size of the animal. Except for shellfish, for which the suffix -kuu is used instead.
5 Verbs
Verbal stems in Aragusuku can be divided into three classes: (A) vowel-final stems, (B) consonant-final stems and (C) irregular stems. All vowel-final stems end in the vowel /i/. Consonant-final stems are observed to end in /p, b, k, g, f, ff, vv, s, ss, c, žž, m, mm, n, r, w/. Unlike the other verb classes, when followed by certain suffixes, the thematic vowel -a- or -i- is required between the stem and inflectional suffixes (the choice of -a- or -i- depends on the inflectional suffix). There are two irregular verb stems: the light-verb ‘do’ (ssuu-, sii-, as-) and ‘come’ (k-, kuu-, kisi-). Each has three stem-variants that cannot be derived by morphological rules.
Aragusuku verbs may be divided into two categories: independent verbs and dependent verbs (the terminology and criteria below are based on Pellard 2012). They differ in both their code property and their behavioral property. Independent verbs are inflected for tense (past or non-past), polarity (unmarked positive or marked negative), and mood (indicative, intentional or imperative), while dependent verbs cannot take the full range of inflections. Secondly, independent verbs are fully autonomous and can function as the head of an independent clause in both simple and complex sentences. In contrast, the dependent verbs, in most cases, cannot function as the head of an independent clause.
5.1 Inflectional Morphology
Verbs inflect for tense, polarity and mood in independent clauses, while they inflect for polarity and conjunctional relationships in the dependent clauses. The inflectional paradigms for the three verb classes are given in Table 5.12 (B indicates the basic stem, E-a the expanded stem requiring the thematic vowel -a-, and E-i the expanded stem requiring the thematic vowel -i-).4
Table 5.12
Examples of verb inflection
Vowel-final |
Consonant-final |
Irregular |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Examples |
‘watch’ |
‘write’ |
‘do’ |
‘come’ |
|
B stem |
mii- |
kak- |
sii-, ssuu- |
k-, kuu- |
|
E-a stem |
- |
kak-a- |
sii- |
kuu- |
|
E-i stem |
- |
kak-i- |
ssuu- |
kisi- |
|
INDEPENDENT VERBS |
|||||
Affirmative mood, Non-past tense, Positive polarity |
B |
mii-∅ |
kak-∅ |
sii-∅ |
k-∅ |
Affirmative mood, Non-past tense, Negative polarity |
E-a |
mii-n |
kak-a-n |
ssuu-n |
kuu-n |
Affirmative mood, Past tense, Positive polarity |
B |
mii-tar |
kak-tar |
sii-tar |
k-tar |
Affirmative mood, Past tense, Negative polarity |
E-a |
mii-ttan |
kak-a-ttan |
ssuu-ttan |
kuu-ttan |
Intentional mood, Positive polarity |
E-a |
mii-di |
kak-a-di |
ssuu-di |
kuu-di |
Intentional mood, Negative polarity |
E-a |
mii-daan |
kak-a-daan |
ssuu-daan |
kuu-daan |
Imperative mood, Positive polarity |
B |
mii-ru |
kak-i |
sii-ru/ ssuu |
kuu |
Imperative mood, Negative polarity |
B |
mii-na |
kak-na |
sii-na |
k-na |
DEPENDENT VERBS |
|||||
Simultaneous ‘while’ |
B |
mii-ccjaan/ mii-gacnjaan |
kak-ccjaan/ kak-gacnjaan |
sii-ccjaan/ sii-gacnjaan |
k-ccjaan/ ̌k-gacnjaan |
B |
mii-kaa |
kak-kaa |
sii-kaa |
k-kaa |
|
Conditional ‘if’ |
E-i |
mii-ruba |
kak-i-ruba |
sii-ruba |
kisi-ruba |
Causal ‘because’ |
E-i |
mii-ba |
kak-i-ba |
sii-ba |
kisi-ba |
E-i |
(//mii-i//→)mii |
kak-i-i |
sii-i |
kisi-i |
|
Sequential |
B |
mii-tti |
kak-tti |
sii-tti |
kisi-tti |
Exemplifying ‘for example’ |
E-i |
mii-ttja |
kak-i-ttja |
sii-ttja |
kisi-ttja |
Purposive ‘in order to’ |
B |
mii-ga |
kak-ga |
sii-ga |
k-ga |
Negative sequential |
E-a |
mii-dana |
kak-a-dana |
ssuu-dana |
kuu-dana |
Negative conditional ‘unless’ |
E-a |
mii-dakara |
kak-a-dakara |
ssuu-dakara |
kuu-dakara |
5.2 Derivational Morphology
Verb stems may be extended by adding derivational suffixes to verb nuclei: the causative markers -sɨmi-/-asɨ- (mii-sɨmi- (//mii-smi-//) ‘to make someone see’, kak-asɨ- (//kak-as-//) ‘to make someone write’),5 the passive/potential marker -rari- (mii-rari- ‘to be seen’), the polite marker -samac- (mii-samac- ‘see (with respect))’. The derivational suffixes attach to the verb in a specific order. When these three suffixes are all added, the order is Nucleus-Causative-Passive/Potential-Polite (e.g., mii-sɨmi-rari-samac- ‘to be made to see (with respect)’).
6 Adjectival Expressions
There are three types of adjectival expressions in Aragusuku: the reduplicated type, the verbalized type and the dummy-head compound type. All are derived from property concept (Thompson 1988: 168) roots (below, PC roots).
The reduplicated type is derived from full reduplication of the PC root, with the final vowel of the first part lengthened (e.g., takaa~taka (red~tall) ‘tall’, aparagii~aparagi (red~good-looking) ‘good-looking’, and so forth). This is the only type recognized as the distinct class “adjective” in Aragusuku, since it can function as the complement of an intransitive predicate of existential verbs (§ 10.2), and as a modifier within an NP (§ 9.2).
The verbalized type is the form in which the verbalizing suffix -kar- attaches to the PC root (e.g., taka-kar-), inflecting like a lexical verb (e.g., taka-kar-∅ (tall-vlz-npst) ‘be tall’; taka-kar-tar (tall-vlz-pst) ‘was tall’). For this reason, I classify this type as a verb form. Similar to other lexical verbs, it can function as an intransitive predicate, and as a relative clause. Semantically, the verbalized type is often used in a comparative context. For example, taka-kar-∅ implies a comparison between two people or things, and the one marked with nominative ⸗ga/⸗nu is taller (141). The negative expression of this type uses the suffix -f- (e.g., taka-f-∅⸗a njaa-n ‘be not tall’; see § 11.5).
(141)
(kanu
pžtujužža,)
baga
takakaa.
(kanu
pžtu⸗južža,)
ba⸗ga
taka-kar-∅
(that
person⸗comp,)
1.sg⸗nom
tall-vlz-npst
‘(Compared to that person,) I am taller.’
The dummy-head compound type is a compound form made up of the PC root and munu (e.g., taka+munu (tall+dhd) ‘tall’). It can only occur in the predicate, functioning as the complement of a copular-verb predicate as other nouns do. Since munu is a dummy noun meaning ‘thing, person’, taka+munu can also indicate ‘tall things, tall person’ where is a “the lexical-head compound”. In this case, munu literally indicates ‘thing, person’ and can be used as a normal noun in a range of syntactic positions. I therefore regard the dummy-headed compound and the lexical-headed compound as two different forms and only the dummy-headed compound is recognized as an adjectival expression. The semantic difference between the reduplicated type and the dummy-headed compound type should be investigated further.
7 Class-Changing Derivations
7.1 Nominalizations
In Aragusuku, there are two strategies for verb nominalization: by zero marking (-∅) (142), and compounding by adding the noun jaa (143) or formal nouns kutu, munu (e.g., fau+kutu ‘eating’, fau+munu ‘food’).
(142)
faunu
sɨgama.
faw-∅⸗nu
occupation
eat-nlz⸗nom
occupation
‘Eating is (my) occupation.’
(143)
jamsijaa
jam+sii+jaa
be.ill+do+home
‘People who tend to get sick.’
For the the nominalization of adjectives, the suffix -sa is used (upu-sa ‘size’, taka-sa ‘height’).
7.2 Adjectivizations
Aragusuku uses reduplication to indicate adjectivization. However, this is limited to nouns that imply properties, such as ffa ‘child’ (ffaa~ffa ‘childish’) and avva (avvaa~avva ‘greasy’).
8 Demonstratives and Interrogatives
8.1 Demonstratives
There are three demonstrative roots, ku-, u-, ka-. They function as different word classes by taking the derivational affixes -(r)i, -ma, -nu. When functioning as pronouns, plural marking is obligatory. To express manner, only the derived form of the ka-root and the other special root a- are observed. In other words, the derivational affix -ncii does not attach to give *kucii, *ucii. The origin of the special root a- requires more research.
Table 5.13
Demonstrative root and derived forms
Proximate |
Mesial |
Distal |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Demonstrative Pronouns |
sg |
kuri |
uri |
kari |
pl |
kuri-taa/ |
uri-taa/ |
kari-taa/ |
|
kuri-nukja |
uri-nukja |
kari-nukja |
||
Demonstrative noun for location |
kuma |
uma |
kama |
|
Demonstrative noun for manner |
kancii |
ancii |
ancii |
|
Demonstrative adnominal |
kunu |
unu |
kanu |
8.2 Interrogatives and Indefinites
The list of interrogatives is given in Table 5.14. Note that, apart from the basic interrogative words, there are two derived adverbs nau⸗tti ‘why’ (derived from nau ‘what’) and naubasi⸗nu ‘what kind of’ (derived from naubasi ‘how’). These interrogatives relate to the regular word classes, for instance, icɨ is an adverb; tau, nau are pronouns, etc. For interrogative pronouns, plural marking is optional, and is only used when the speaker wants to emphasize the plural amount. As is evident from the table, the suffix -gara attaches to the interrogatives to form the corresponding indefinite forms.
Table 5.14
Interrogatives
Interrogatives |
Meanings |
Indefinites |
Meanings |
---|---|---|---|
tau |
‘who’ |
tau-gara |
‘someone’ |
nau |
‘what’ |
nau-gara |
‘something’ |
nza |
‘where’ |
nza-gara |
‘somewhere’ |
icɨ |
‘when’ |
icɨ-gara |
‘sometime’ |
ifu(cɨ) |
‘how many/how much’ |
ifucɨ-gara |
‘some’ |
nau⸗tti |
‘why’ |
nautti-gara |
‘for some reason’ |
nzi |
‘which’ |
- |
- |
naubasi |
‘how’ |
naukuru |
‘in some way’ |
naubasi⸗nu |
‘what kind of’ |
- |
- |
9 Argument Phrase
Argument phrases precede the predicate. The argument phrase is structured as ‘modifier head⸗postposition’ where the postposition is added to specify the case or other information (e.g., takaa~taka⸗nu kii⸗nu (red~tall⸗gen tree⸗nom) ‘a tall tree’).
9.1 The Head
Any kind of noun can be the head of an argument phrase. In general, the head can be optionally modified. However, modifiers are necessary when the formal nouns kutu, munu function as head.
9.2 The Modifier
Modifiers always precede the head in Aragusuku. Nouns (or noun phrases), adjectives, adnominals, and relative clauses may function as modifiers.
If a noun phrase functions as a modifier, the genitive marker ⸗ga/⸗nu is required (e.g., mjaaku⸗nu pžtu ‘Miyako’s people’, ffu+zata⸗nu kwaasɨ ‘sweets made from brown sugar’). Compounding can be employed to express a similar meaning (e.g., mjaaku+pžtu (Miyako+people), ffu+zata+kwaasɨ (black+sugar+sweet)).
When the modifier is an adjective, similar to the case of an NP modifier, the genitive marker ⸗ga/⸗nu is also required, attaching to the modifier (kagii~kagi⸗nu pžtu ‘cute person’). Similar to noun modifiers, compounding can be an alternative strategy (kagi+pžtu). In this case, instead of the reduplicated form, the root functions as the first element of the compound.
As shown in § 4.4, adnominals can also be a modifier (e.g., kunu hun ‘this book’).
Relative clauses may also be a modifier of an NP. They always come directly before the NPs they modify. The relative-clause verb inflects for tense when functioning as a modifier (e.g., hunnu kakž pžtu ‘people who writes books’, hunnu kakžtaa pžtu ‘people who wrote books’). Note that when a modifier ends with an intransitive verb, there are two forms observed: the relative clause with the progressive aspect (juu-form in Tabira 2018; (144a)) and the nominalized form followed by the genitive marker (iinu-form in Tabira 2018; (144b)). These two differ in meaning. According to Tabira (2018), the former is used to express a progressive action, while the latter tends to be used when expressing occupations or characteristics.
(144) Relative clause as a modifier:
a.
budurjuu
pžtu
budur-i+ur-∅
pžtu
dance-thm+prog-npst
person
‘the person who is dancing’
b.
buduriinu
pžtu
budur-i-i⸗nu
pžtu
dance-thm-seq⸗gen
person
‘the dancer’
9.3 Case and Other Role Marking
Case markers indicate the semantic or logical relationship between the nouns or nominal elements that they follow and other parts of the clause. Aragusuku has a case system comprising ten case markers. The list of case particles is given below.
Table 5.15
Case particles
Case |
Particle |
Functions |
---|---|---|
Nominative |
⸗ga/⸗nu |
S or A |
Genitive |
⸗ga/⸗nu |
possessor, modifier |
Accusative |
⸗u |
O |
Dative |
⸗n |
location, recipient, passive agent |
Allative |
⸗nkai |
direct, recipient, passive agent |
Ablative |
⸗kara |
source, path |
Instrumental |
⸗sii |
instrument |
Associative |
⸗tu |
accompaniment |
Limitative |
⸗gami |
spatial or temporal limit |
Comparative |
⸗južža |
standard of comparison |
It is worth mentioning that the nominative and genitive are isomorphic, ⸗ga/⸗nu. As with other Miyakoan languages (Shimoji 2010, etc.), these two alternate according to the animacy of the S or A noun phrase, as shown in Table 5.16.
Table 5.16
⸗ga/⸗nu
Pronouns |
Nouns (proper, kinship/social status) |
Numerals |
Others |
||
⸗ga |
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |
||
<<< |
<<< |
<<< |
⸗nu |
10 Predicate Phrase
As in most languages, the predicate phrase is the core of a clause in the Aragusuku dialect, and it is the verb that functions as the head. However, based on the choice of verb, I make a clear division between two types of predicate phrase: the general-verbal predicate phrase (§ 10.1) and the copular-verbal predicate phrase (§ 10.2).
10.1 General-Verbal Predication
In a general-verbal predicate phrase, any verb can function as the predicate head. It is composed of one verb phrase (VP) and, if required, its complement. It may further be divided into two types: the simplex predicate (145a). and the complex predicate. A simplex verb predicate phrase contains a single verb root, whereas a complex predicate consists of two verb roots. Complex predicates can be further subdivided into compound-verb predicates (145b), auxiliary-verb predicates (145c) and light-verb predicates (145d).
(145) a. (complement) simplex verb
e.g., mii-tar (watch-pst) ‘watched’
b. (complement) verb root1 (+verb root2)
e.g., mii+pazɨmi-tar (//mii+pazmi-tar// (watch+start-pst)) ‘started to watch’
c. (complement) verb root (auxiliary-verb)
e.g., mii ur-∅ (watch prog-npst) ‘(be) watching’
d. (complement) verb root (light-verb)
e.g., mii⸗a sii-tar (watch⸗top do-pst) ‘watched’
10.2 Copular-Verbal Predication
Copular-verbal predicate phrases can be divided into two types: one comprising a NP (the NP-type) and one comprising an adjective (the Adj-type). In the case of the NP-type, the copular-verb (j)ar- functions as the head, bearing the inflection for tense, mood and polarity. (j)ar- is the realization in positive polarity (146a), while /ar/ is used in negation (146b)). Note that (j)ar is obligatorily omitted in non-past tense, affirmative mood and positive polarity sentences (147).
(146) (j)ar-:
a.
Tarooja
siitu
jaataa.
Taroo⸗a
siitu
jar-tar
Taroo⸗top
student
cop-pst
‘Taroo was a student.’
b.
Tarooja
siitu
aran.
Taroo⸗a
siitu
ar-n
Taroo⸗top
student
cop-neg
‘Taroo is not a student.’
(147) Omission:
Tarooja
siitu.
Taroo⸗a
siitu
Taroo⸗top
student
‘Taroo is a student.’
In the case of the Adj-type, the copular-verbs ur- (positive, animate), ar- (positive, inanimate) and njaa-n (negative) function as the head. Omission of ur-, ar- occurs optionally in the non-past tense, affirmative mood and positive polarity (148) (149). However, when the focus marker is attached to an adjective, this omission never occurs (150) (151).
(148)
Tarooja
takaataka
(uu).
Taroo⸗a
takaa~taka
(ur-∅)
Taroo⸗top
red~taka
(cop-npst)
‘Taroo is tall.’
(149)
kunu
kiija
takaataka
(aa).
kunu
kii⸗a
takaa~taka
(ar-∅)
this
tree⸗top
red~taka
(cop-npst)
‘This tree is tall.’
(150)
Tarooja
takaatakadu
uu.
Taroo⸗a
takaa~taka⸗du
ur-∅
Taroo⸗top
red~taka⸗foc
cop-npst
‘Taroo is tall.’
(151)
kunu
kiija
takaatakadu
aa.
kunu
kii⸗a
takaa~taka⸗du
ar-∅
this
tree⸗top
red~taka⸗foc
cop-npst
‘This tree is tall.’
As for negation, the head verb switches from ur- to njaa- (152). In this case, the adjective complement no longer reduplicates. Instead, the verbalization marker -f- and the topic marker ⸗a are required.
(152)
Tarooja
takaffa
njaan.
Taroo⸗a
taka-f-∅⸗a
njaa-n
Taroo⸗top
tall-vlz-npst⸗top
cop.neg-npst
‘Taroo is not tall.’
11 The Simple Sentence
In the Aragusuku dialect, the basic word order is SV/AOV.
(153) SV:
baga
barautaa.
ba⸗ga
baraw-tar
1.sg⸗nom
laugh-pst
‘I laughed.’
(154) AOV:
baga
sibaiju
miitaa.
ba⸗ga
sibai⸗u
mii-tar
1.sg⸗nom
play⸗acc
watch-pst
‘I watched a play.’
11.1 Sentence Type
The different sentence types of Aragusuku, the declarative sentence (see (153) (154)), the interrogative sentence and the imperative sentence, are illustrated below.
Interrogatives can be divided into content interrogatives and polarity interrogatives. The interrogative clitics ⸗rjaa/⸗ga are optionally added to the end of content interrogatives while ⸗na is optionally added to polarity interrogatives. An interrogative is always accompanied by a rising intonation, regardless of the type of interrogative and the appearance of clitics (§ 2.5).
(155) Content interrogative:
vvaga
miitaa
sibaija
naurjaa/nauga?
vva⸗ga
mii-tar
sibai⸗a
nau⸗rjaa/nau⸗ga
2.sg⸗nom
watch-pst
play⸗top
what⸗sfp/what⸗sfp
‘What is the play you watched?’
(156) Polarity interrogative:
vvaa
aca
ikadina?
vva⸗a
aca
ik-a-di⸗na
2.sg⸗top
tomorrow
go-thm-int⸗sfp
‘Will you go tomorrow?’
Imperatives are expressed using inflectional affixes, with -ru/-i used6 for imperatives and -na for prohibition (§ 5.1).
(157) a. Imperative:
sibaiju
miiru.
sibai⸗u
mii-ru
play⸗acc
watch-imp
‘Watch the play!’
b. Prohibition:
sibaiju
miina.
sibai⸗u
mii-na
play⸗acc
watch-proh
‘Do not watch the play!’
11.2 Alignment
Aragusuku dialect has a nominative-accusative case alignment system, with the S or A marked with ⸗ga/⸗nu, and the object (O) marked with ⸗u obligatorily in most circumstances. However, though case-particle ellipsis rarely occurs, it is observed only in invitational sentences (e.g., cjaa(ju) numga cii ‘Let’s go for a cup of tea’; Takahashi 2018).
11.3 Possession
Aragusuku uses three constructions to indicate possession or part-whole relationships: (a) using the genitive marker ⸗ga/⸗nu; (b) using an existential verb ar-/ur- ‘to be, exist’; (c) using the double-nominative constructions.
Regardless of inalienability, a noun phrase of possession is formed by using the genitive marker ⸗ga/⸗nu between the possessor and the possessed (Inalienable: ba⸗ga tii (1.sg⸗gen hand) ‘my hand’; Alienable: ba⸗ga hun (1.sg⸗gen book) ‘my book’). As explained in § 9.3, the choice between ⸗ga or ⸗nu depends on the possessor’s animacy.
Using an existential sentence is another strategy. In this construction, the possessor is generally marked with the dative case ⸗n and the topic marker ⸗a, or just with the topic marker ⸗a (⸗n can be omitted optionally). The possessed, on the other hand, is marked with the nominative case ⸗ga/⸗nu. The choice between the existential verbs ar-/ur- depends on the animacy of the possessed. ur- is generally selected when the possessed is a living creature, either a human being or an animal. In other cases, ar- is used. However, there are exceptions. Both ur- and ar- are acceptable in some cases, where the possessed is a kinship noun or a word meaning ‘friend’ (dusɨ or agu).
(158)
banna/bajaa
ututunudu
uu/aa.
ban⸗n⸗a/ba⸗a
ututu⸗nu⸗du
ur-∅/ar-∅
1.sg⸗dat⸗top/1.sg⸗top
younger.brother (sister)⸗nom⸗foc
exist-NPST/exist-NPST
‘I have (a) younger brother/younger sister.’
A third strategy is the double-nominative construction (hereafter, DSC) with a non-verbal predicate. In the DSC, the possessor is marked with the topic marker ⸗a and the possessed with the nominative marker ⸗ga/⸗nu.
(159)
a.
bajaa
miinudu
upumunu.
ba⸗a
mii⸗nu⸗du
upu+munu
1.sg⸗top
eyes⸗nom⸗foc
big+dhd
‘(literally) I, eyes are big.’
b.
*bajaa
jaanudu
upumunu.
ba⸗a
jaa⸗nu⸗du
upu+munu
1.sg⸗top
house⸗nom⸗foc
big+dhd
‘(literally) I, house is big.’
As shown in (159), the DSC strategy applies in restricted circumstances. According to my research, the use of the DSC is relevant to the Possession Cline (Body part > Attribute > Clothing > Kin > Pet animal > Product > Others; Tsunoda 1991, 1995, 2009). Generally, Aragusuku allows the use of the DSC only when the possessed is part of a ‘body part’ or ‘attribute’ (Table 5.17). More information is available in Wang (2019b), Wang and Shimoji (2020).
Table 5.17
The use of the DSC (applicable: Y; not applicable: N)
Body part |
Attribute |
Clothing |
Kin |
Pet animal |
(Real) product |
Others |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inherent |
Derived |
||||||
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
11.4 Valency Changing
There are two strategies that can be used to change the valency of a verb: the causative derivation which increases valency, and the passive derivation which decreases valency.
11.4.1 Causative
Adding the causative suffix -sɨmi- (//-smi-//)/ -asɨ- (//-as-//) (§ 5.2)7 to a verb increases the number of participants by adding a causer.
(160)
a.
Tarooga
ututuudu
budurasɨtaa.
Taroo⸗ga
ututu⸗u⸗du
budur-as-tar
Taroo⸗nom
younger.brother⸗acc⸗foc
dance-caus-pst
‘Taroo (causer) made his younger brother (causee) dance.’ (Intransitive verb)
b.
Tarooga
Hanakon
Zirooju
kurusasɨtaa.
Taroo⸗ga
Hanako⸗n
Ziroo⸗u
kurus-as-tar
Taroo⸗nom
Hanako⸗dat
Ziroo⸗acc
kill-caus-pst
‘Taroo (causer) made Hanako (causee) kill Ziroo (patient).’ (Transitive verb)
11.4.2 Passive
The passive derivation (§ 5.2) reduces the valency of a verb by the demoting of the passive agent. In a passive construction, the patient is marked with the nominative, while the agent, which is omitted in most situations, will be marked with the dative. As shown in (161c), the passive of intransitive verbs is unacceptable when the verb is a meteorological verb. “Y” means “grammatical”; “N” means “unacceptable”.
(161) a. Intransitive verb: N
*Zirooga
amin
ffaritaa.
Ziroo⸗ga
ami⸗n
ff-rari-tar
Ziroo⸗nom
rainfall⸗dat
rain-pass-pst
‘Ziroo (patient) was affected by rainfall (agent).’
b. Intransitive verb: Y
Hanakoo
annan
sɨnarii,
kanasɨmunu.
Hanako⸗a
anna⸗n
sn-rari-i,
kanas+munu
Hanako⸗top
mother⸗dat
pass.away-pass-seq,
pitiful+dhd
‘Hanako (patient)’s mother (agent) died and she is pitiful.’
c. Transitive verb: Y
Zirooga
(Hanakon)
kurusaritaa.
Ziroo⸗ga
(Hanako⸗n)
kurus-rari-tar
Ziroo⸗nom
Hanako⸗dat
kill-pass-pst
‘Ziroo (patient) was killed by Hanako (agent).’
11.5 Polarity
Only the negative polarity is marked. Negation is primarily expressed by attaching the negative inflectional affix to the verbal stem (§ 5.1).
(162) a. General-Verbal predication:
Tarooja
miin.
Taroo⸗a
mii-n
Taroo⸗top
watch-neg
‘Taroo does not watch.’
b. Nominal-Comprising predication:
Tarooja
siitu
aran.
Taroo⸗a
siitu
ar-a-n
Taroo⸗top
student
cop-thm-neg
‘Taroo is not a student.’
c. Adjectival-Comprising predication:
Tarooja
upuffa
njaan.
Taroo⸗a
upu-f-∅⸗a
njaa-n
Taroo⸗top
big-vlz-npst⸗top
cop.neg-npst
‘Taroo is not big.’
11.6 TAM
Tense is expressed using inflectional affixes. Please refer to § 5.1 for further details.
Aspect is indicated primarily by auxiliary-verbs: ur- (progressive), ar- (resultative), njaa-n (perfect), uk- (prospective), mii- (experiential). In addition, the full reduplication of a verb root is used to express a habitual event (e.g., mii~mii ‘(habitually) watch’).
Modality is expressed by the inflection of verbs (intentional: -di, -daan, imperative: -ru, -i, prohibitive: -na (refer to § 5.1)), sentence-final particles (low certainty ⸗dara, ⸗jaa, non-subject focus ⸗doo, confirmative ⸗ira, self-question ⸗bjaa), or a combination of both.
11.7 Information Structure and Its Formal Encoding
In the Aragusuku dialect, the topic is marked with the topic marker ⸗a (⸗uba for the accusative topic). The focus is specified by the focus particle ⸗du (⸗ga for content interrogative focus). It may precede any word class (Noun: after the case markers; e.g., maju⸗nu⸗du (cat⸗nom⸗foc); Adj: e.g., kagii~kagi⸗du (red~cute⸗foc); Verb: after the sequential form; e.g., kak-i-i⸗du (write-thm-seq⸗foc)).
12 The Complex Sentence
12.1 Clause Combining Strategies
12.1.1 Coordination
Two independent clauses are linked by the concessive particle ⸗suga, expressing a contradictory conjunction.
(163)
pudunu
takamunusuga(du)
turarain.
pudu⸗nu
taka+munu⸗suga(⸗du)
tur-ra(r)i-n
body⸗nom
tall+dhd⸗but(⸗foc)
take.off-pot-neg
‘I am tall but cannot (reach and) take it off.’
12.1.2 Subordination
Subordination is represented by the inflection of dependent verbs (§ 5.1), typically using the focus marker ⸗du. Below is an example of causal subordination.
(164)
aminu
ffjuuriba(du),
sanau
mucii
piri.
ami⸗nu
ff-i+ur-i-ba(⸗du),
sana⸗u
muc-i-i
pir-i.
rainfall⸗nom
rain-thm+prog-thm-csl(⸗foc),
umbrella⸗acc
take-thm-seq
leave-imp
‘Because it is raining, take an umbrella!’
12.2 Quotatives
The quotative clause is marked with the quotative marker ⸗tti.
(165)
ujaga
faitti
ažžtaa.
uja⸗ga
faw-i⸗tti
ažž-tar.
father⸗nom
eat-imp⸗qt
say-pst
‘Father said ‘Eat!’.’
12.3 Insubordination
Like other variants of Miyako (Pellard 2012), three types of insubordination are observed. See below for sample examples.
(166) a. From concessive to permissive:
karjaa
kuujaamai
(zaumunu).
kari⸗a
kuu-jaamai
zau+munu.
3.sg⸗top
come-cnc
good+dhd
‘I don’t care if he comes.’
b. From negative conditional to debitive:
karjaa
ukidakara
(naran).
kari⸗a
uki-dakara
nar-a-n.
3.sg⸗top
get.up-neg.seq
become-thm-neg
‘He has to get up.’
c. From narrative to past:
kjuuja
fauttikara
kisii.
kjuu⸗a
faw-tti⸗kara
kis-i-i
3.sg⸗top
eat-seq⸗abl
come-thm-seq
‘I’ ve been here since I ate today.’
12.4 Clause-Chaining Structure
The clause-chaining structure is frequently used in monologues. It is realized using the sequential inflected form of verbs (e.g., paz-i-i, kis-i-i, kanz-i-i in (167)). In this construction, subjects can be the same or different.
(167)
oziija
naraga
kisjuu
kžnnu
paziidu,
bantaaga
urjuu
kisii,
nukumurjuu
kanzii
nivvtaa.
ozii⸗a
nara⸗ga
kis-i+ur-∅
kžn⸗nu
paz-i-i⸗du,
ban-taa⸗ga
uri⸗u
kis-i-i,
nukumuri⸗u
kanzi-i
nivv-tar.
grandfather⸗top
refl⸗gen
wear-thm+prog-npst
kimono⸗acc
take.off-thm-seq⸗foc
1.sg-pl⸗nom
that⸗acc
wear-thm-seq,
warmth⸗acc
feel-seq
sleep-pst
‘Grandfather took off the kimono he was wearing, and we put that on, and slept in the warmth.’
Appendix: Childhood Memories
(168)
nginu
panasɨsugadu,
bantaaja
pukazɨman
ikii,
nusɨmii
kisjuusaiga,
bantaaja
sɨmanu
ižjaanu,
kamaga
basanažpuka,
kanu,
toomorokosinukjaamaidu
arjuutaajuu.
ngi⸗nu
panasɨ⸗suga⸗du,
ban-taa⸗a
puka+sma⸗n
ik-i-i,
nusm-i-i
kis-i+ur-∅⸗saiga,
ban-taa⸗a
sma⸗nu
iž+jaa⸗nu,
kama⸗ga
basanaž⸗puka,
kanu,
toomorokosi-nukjaa⸗mai⸗du
ar-i+ur-tar⸗juu.
similar⸗gen
story⸗cnc⸗foc
1-pl⸗top
outside+island⸗dat
go-thm-seq,
steal-thm-seq
endo-thm+prog-npst⸗sfp,
1-pl⸗top
island⸗gen
west+home⸗gen,
there⸗nom
banana⸗other,
uh,
corn-pl⸗adt⸗foc
exist-thm+prog-pst⸗sfp.
‘It’s kind of a similar story. We went to another island and stole (from them). We (went to) a field over on the west side of the island, there were bananas, uh, corn as well.’
(169)
mmna,
junai,
mata,
kjuunu
juuja
faugamatatti
zjunbjaa
sii,
mmiimai
uutaapazɨ.
mmna,
junai,
mata,
kjuu⸗nu
juu⸗a
faw-gamata⸗tti
zjunbi⸗a
sii,
mm-i-i⸗mai
ur-tar⸗paz.
all,
evening,
again,
today⸗gen
evening⸗top
eat-plan.to⸗qt
prepare⸗acc
do.seq,
be.ripened-thm-seq⸗adt
prog-pst⸗lctn.
‘(We were) going to eat them all tonight. They will be ripe (at that time).’
(170)
faa(di)tti
uribadu,
tumikaa,
njaan!
faw-a(-di)⸗tti
ur-i-ba⸗du,
tumi-kaa,
njaa-n!
eat-thm(⸗int)⸗qt
prog-thm-csl⸗foc,
look.for-cnd,
no.exist-npst!
‘Going to eat them, we looked for them, but there was nothing!’
Acknowledgements
The current chapter is supported by JSPS KAKENHI (19J20288). The author would like to thank all who contributed to this study. My thanks go to Mrs. TN, Mr. TM and other consultants for their precious time and patience. Also, I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. Aleksandra Jarosz, Dr. Natsuko Nakagawa, Dr. Wayne Lawrence, and Dr. Yuko Urabe for their valuable review comments. Last but not least, I would like to deeply thank my advisor Prof. Michinori Shimoji for his warm instruction throughout the whole research process.
For more information about the fieldwork and methodology, please refer to Wang (2019a) and Wang (forthcoming).
Please refer to Wang (forthcoming) for further details.
Note that I distinguish the reflexive duu-taa from the first-person inclusive plural pronoun duu-taa. The reasons for this are as follows. Firstly, they differ with regard to the presence of an antecedent: duu-taa, as the first-person inclusive plural pronoun, has no antecedent, whereas the reflexive almost always co-occurs with an antecedent. Secondly, they differ in what they refer to. As a personal pronoun, duu-taa can only refer to the first-person inclusive plural, while as a reflexive pronoun, it can refer to any person, which is determined by the antecedent.
Please refer to Wang (forthcoming) for further details on the full process of inflection, where several morphophonological rules are applied.
Which causative affix is used depends on the verb class. -sɨmi co-occurs with vowel-final verbs and the irregular verb forms sii ‘do’ and kuu ‘come’. On the other hand, -asɨ is the counterpart for consonant-final verbs and kisi ‘come’.
Which imperative affix is used depends on the verb-stem class. -ru co-occurs with vowel-final verbs and sii ‘do’, whereas -i is used with consonant-final verbs.
-sɨmi- is used with vowel-final verbs while -asɨ- is used with consonant-final verbs.
Bibliography
Igarashi, Yosuke (2017) Ryūkyūgo akusento tyōsahyō 160 [Ryukyuan accent questionnaire 160: 160 survey words for the initial investigation of Ryukyuan dialectal accent systems]. Paper presented at Hitotsubashi University, May 30th.
Inagaki, Masayuki (1966) Ryūkyū Miyakojima akusento no kenkyū [Research on the accentuation of Miyako Island, Ryukyuan]. The Bulletin of Tsuru Bunka Daigaku, 3: 257–275.
Pellard, Thomas (2009) Ōgami: Éléments de description d’un parler du Sud des Ryūkyū. PhD dissertation, École des hautes études en sciences sociales.
Pellard, Thomas (2012) Converbs and their desubordination in Ogami Ryukyuan. Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan, 142: 95–117.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik (1985) A Comprehensive grammar of the English Language. Longman.
Shimoji, Michinori (2008) A Grammar of Irabu, a Southern Ryukyuan Language. PhD dissertation, Australian National University (published as Shimoji 2017).
Shimoji, Michinori (2010) Ryukyuan languages: An introduction. In Shimoji, Michinori, and Thomas Pellard. (eds.) An introduction to Ryukyuan Languages, 1–13. Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
Shimoji, Michinori (2017) A Grammar of Irabu: A Southern Ryukyuan Language, Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.
Tabira, Kaoru (2018) Minami Ryūkyū Miyakogo Aragusuku hōgen no rentai syūsyoku kōzō [The ‘rentai’ modifying structure in the Aragusuku dialect of Miyako Ryukyuan]. Bachelor’s thesis, Kyushu University.
Takahashi, Masataka (2018) Minami Ryūkyū Miyakogo Aragusuku hōgenno kēsumākingu [The case marking in the Aragusuku dialect of Miyako Ryukyuan]. Bachelor’s thesis, Kyushu University.
UNESCO (2009) Interactive atlas of the world’s languages in danger, https://ich.unesco.org/en/interactive-atlas-00206 (accessed 18 January 2021).
Wang, Danning (2019a) Minami Ryūkyū Miyakogo Gusukubechō Aragusuku hōgen no bunpōgaisetsu [A sketch grammar of the Aragusuku dialect of Miyako Ryukyuan]. Master’s thesis, Kyushu University.
Wang, Danning (2019b) Minami Ryūkyū Miyakojima Kyūgusukubechoo Aragusuku hōgen ni okeru nijuu shugobun to shoyūkēsha [The double-subject construction and the possession cline in Aragusuku dialect, Miyako Island, KyuuGusukube, Southern Ryukyuan]. Paper presented at the meeting of the 159th Linguistic Society of Japan, Nagoya Gakuin University, Japan.
Wang, Danning (2021) Minami Ryūkyū Miyakojima Aragusuku hōgen ni okeru saikidaimēshi [Reflexive nouns in Aragusuku Miyakoan, Ryukyuan]. Studies in the Japanese Language, 17(2): 1–18.
Wang, Danning (forthcoming) Minami Ryūkyū Miyakogo Aragusuku hōgen ni okeru dōshi kētairon [Verb morphology in Aragusuku Miyakoan, Ryukyuan]. Ryuukyuuno Hoogen 45.
Wang, Danning and Michinori Shimoji (2020) The double-subject construction in East Asian Languages restricted to the possessive type: A typological survey. Paper presented at the meeting of the 1st CELEA, online.