1 The Language and Its Speakers
Shiraho is spoken in Shiraho village on Ishigaki Island, which is located in the southernmost islands of the Ryukyu archipelago. While Shiraho village has a population of about 1,600, the number of speakers of Shiraho is under 100. This is because the majority of speakers are over seventy years of age. Community members in their fifties and sixties seem to have passive language knowledge of Shiraho, but the situation among younger generations is not known.
Shiraho belongs to Yaeyaman, which is a sub-branch of Macro-Yaeyaman, within the Southern Ryukyuan languages (Pellard 2015). The language-internal genealogical classification of Yaeyaman is the subject of discussion, but according to Lawrence (2000), Shiraho and Hateruma diverged from other Yaeyaman dialects at an early stage. This genealogical relationship with Hateruma is due to the twice forced migration from Hateruma Island in 1710 and 1771.
There are previous works focused on Shiraho written in Japanese. Notable works are Nakagawa et al. (2016), which is the first grammar sketch of Shiraho, and Ryūkyū Hōgen Kenkyū Club (2006), which gives a vocabulary list. This chapter gives a grammatical overview of Shiraho with new data collected in my fieldwork. This paper is also a grammar sketch, but diverges from Nakagawa et al. (2016) in terms of (i) updated analysis of simple sentences, and (ii) giving basic description of complex sentences. There are descriptive studies on other Yaeyaman dialects: Aso (2020) for Hateruma, Harada (2015) for Kuroshima, and Izuyama (2003) for Miyara. Lawrence (2011) describes Southern Ryukyuan, focusing on the data from the Hatoma dialect.
2 Phonology
2.1 Inventory of Phonemes
Shiraho has six vowels (/i, e, a, o, u, ɨ/). The vowel /e/ is realized as [je] optionally in syllable-initial position (e.g., [jema]~[ema] /ema/ ‘the Yaeyama region’). The vowel /ɨ/ only follows /s/, /z/, and /c/ (e.g., [amisɨna] /amisɨna/ ‘sugar cane’, [mizɨ] /mizɨ/ ‘water’, [kuːnatsɨju] /kuunacɨyu/ ‘Wishing for a good harvest in the coming year’). Shiraho seems to make a distinction between long and short vowels (e.g., [tu̥r̥u] /turu/ ‘bird’ vs. [tuːruː] /tuuruu/ ‘lamp’), but sometimes the distinction becomes blurred (e.g., [pitu]~[pituː] /pitu/ ‘people’). Diphthongs are descending diphthongs (e.g., /baima/ ‘1pl.excl’, /kui/ ‘voice’, /yoi/ ‘celebration’) and two ascending diphthongs (e.g., /muanu/ ‘(x) does not think’ and /uencyu/ ‘mouse’).
Shiraho has fifteen consonants (/p, b, t, d, k, g, c, s, z, f, h, m, n̥, n, r/) and two glides (/w, y/). As with other Yaeyaman dialects, aspiration is prominent in Shiraho. Aspiration occurs where the word starts with a voiceless obstruent. Because of aspiration, following vowels and sonorant consonants (i.e., /n, m, r/) are devoiced (e.g., [sɨ̥n̥u] /sɨnu/ ‘yesterday’, [tu̥r̥u] /turu/ ‘bird’), but this is not a phonologically distinctive feature. However, the voiceless nasal dental consonant /n̥/ and voiced consonant /n/ contrast in the word-initial position (e.g., [n̥da] /n̥da/ ‘why’ and [nda] /nda/ ‘appear (infinitive form)’). The consonant /h/ has allophones according to which vowel follows it: [ç] before the vowel /i/, [ɸ] before the vowel /u/, and [h] in elsewhere. In intervocalic position, /h/ sometimes becomes voiced or drops (e.g., [araɸu]~[araɦu]~[arau] /arahu/ ‘wash’). The consonant /f/ always appears as geminate (e.g., [ɸɸa] /ffa/ ‘saddle’, [nuɸɸi] /nuffi/ ‘sleep (imperative form)’). It may be possible to analyze [ɸɸ] as /hh/, but I do not adopt this analysis. The consonant /c/ is the voiceless affricate [ts]. The consonant /r/ is pronounced as [ɾ].
2.2 Syllable Structure and Phonotactics
The syllable structure in Shiraho is (#(C1) C2) (G) V1 (V2) (C3).1 There is an obligatory vowel (V1), but other slots are optional. C1 can be filled by /s/, /f/, /m/, and /n/ only in word initial position (e.g., /ssu/ ‘cut’, /ffu/ ‘fall’, /mma/ ‘horse’, and /nta/ ‘mud’). When /n/ fills C1, it becomes a homorganic nasal with C2 (e.g., [nta] /nta/ ‘mud’ vs. [ŋgo] /ngo/ ‘go’). The /G/ slot is filled by /w/ or /y/. /w/ precedes only /a/. While other Yaeyaman dialects have sequences like [kʷaː] /kwaa/ ‘pedal’ (Funauki dialect (Urabe 2018), Shiraho has labialized consonants only in [mikkʷa] /mikkwa/ ‘blind person’. /y/ follows /p, b, c, s, z, k/ and palatalizes the preceding consonant. /y/ precedes only /u, o, a/. V2 can be occupied by /i/, /e/, /a/, or a vowel that is identical to V1. C3 can be filled by a voiceless obstruent in word-medial position and /n/ in word-medial and -final positions. In word-medial position, geminate consonants consist of C3 and C2 of the onset of the next syllable. C3 is always the same as C2 in the following syllable (e.g., /sip.pe/ (C2VC3.C2V) ‘much’).
2.3 Mora
Regarding syllable structure, V1, V2, C1, C3 each carry a mora (e.g., suu (CV1V2/ 2 morae) ‘tide’, ffa (C1C2V1/ 2 morae) ‘saddle’, kan (C2V1C3/ 2 morae) ‘crab’). In this schema, it is expected that the syllable in Shiraho can carry a maximum of four morae, but this is not attested.
2.4 Word-Level Prosody
Shiraho has a three-pattern pitch accent system that is determined lexically (Nakagawa and Celik 2019). The accent patterns are shown in figures 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4. Falling-1 is a steep falling pattern in which pitch falls around the second syllable. Falling-2 is a slightly falling pattern in which the pitch falls around the second syllable, but the degree of fall in pitch is lower than Falling-1. The level pattern keeps a high pitch.
According to Nakagawa and Celik (2019), the falling-2 and level patterns are in complementary distribution; words with the falling-2 pattern have an initial voiced consonant, and words with the level pattern begin with a vowel or voiceless consonant.
In compound nouns, the tonal pattern is determined by that of the first constituent.
(171) a. Falling-1: /nisi+kaci/ ‘north wind’ (F1+F1), /mizi+maffa/ ‘water pillow’ (F1+F2), /mizɨ+uki/ ‘water bucket’ (F1+L),
b. Falling-2: /yamatu+pitu/ ‘Japanese’ (F2+F1), /macci+yama/ ‘pine-clad hill’ (F2+F2), /macci+kii/ ‘pine tree’ (F2+L),
c. Level: /pari+sigutu/ ‘needle work’ (L+F1), /aba+nabi/ ‘oil pan’ (L+F2), /kii+usi/ ‘mill made from wood’ (L+L),
2.5 Intonation
Intonation in Shiraho distinguishes sentence types: a rising intonation in polar questions, falling in content questions, falling sharply in imperatives, and flat in declaratives. Examples of each sentence type are shown in § 11.1. Intonation changes depending on whether the sentence is with or without final particles. For example, the intonation falls sharply in imperatives (e.g., tupi! ‘Fry!’), but not when ⸗ba is attached to imperative form (e.g., tupiba! ‘Fry!’).
3 Descriptive Units
3.1 Morphological Units
In this paper, I distinguish three morphological units: word, affix, and clitic. The word has a fixed order within it, so root and affixes are arranged in order. For example, within lexical nouns the diminutive suffix -ntama and the plural suffix -nda are arranged in the order root-diminutive-plural (e.g., maya-ntama-nda (cat-dim-pl) ‘kittens’). Affixes and clitics differ in their distribution. While an affix is included within a word, a clitic is attached to a phrase. For example, ⸗obi (only) is attached to a verbal phrase, not a single word.
(172)
miri
hiiruobi
mir-i
hiir-u⸗obi
look-inf
ben-npst⸗only
‘(S/he) just takes care of me.’
In Shiraho, suffixes and enclitics are abundant, but prefixes and proclitics are rare. bii- ‘male’ and mii- ‘female’ are the only prefixes found in Shiraho (e.g., bii-turu ‘a cock’).2 No proclitics are found. As with other Japonic languages, suffixes abound in Shiraho.
3.2 Word Class
Shiraho distinguishes six word classes based on syntactic and morphological criteria. Nouns fill the head of the NP. Verb inflects for tense and mood and fills the predicate of the clause. Adjectives take adjectivalizer suffixes -har-/-sar-/-har- and are accompanied by a negative verb to encode negation. Adverbs modify verbal predicates. Adnominals can only be the modifier of an NP. Particles are always attached to phrases and clauses.
3.3 Grammatical Relations
Subject is marked with the nominative marker ⸗nu and tends to be topicalized with the topic marker ⸗ya in narrative data. The object appears without markers, but is marked with ⸗yu or ⸗ba in narrative converbal clauses. The indirect object is marked with the dative marker ⸗go. In (173), the subject (okkan ‘mother’) is marked with ⸗nu and the object (kee ‘gruel’) is not overtly marked.
(173)
bainu
okkannu
meenu
ii
kee
takitayoo …
bai⸗nu
okkan⸗nu
mee⸗nu
ii
kee
tak-ita⸗yoo
1pl.excl⸗gen
mother⸗nom
rice⸗gen
meal
gruel
boil-seq⸗sfp
‘Our mother cooked rice.’
Shiraho has a S(X)OV and modifier-head word order. It has a nominative-accusative alignment system. Nominative is marked with ⸗nu and accusative is without markers basically and is marked with ⸗yu or ⸗ba depending on the clause type. Occasionally intransitive subjects are marked with ⸗yu or ⸗ba. The same behavior of ⸗yu and ⸗ba is reported in the literature on other dialects (e.g., Harada (2015)), but details are unclear.
4 Nominals
Nominals include personal and reflexive pronouns (§ 4.1), lexical nouns (§ 4.2), numeral nouns (§ 4.3), and demonstrative nouns (§ 8.1).
4.1 Pronouns
The personal pronouns are summarized in Table 6.1. The first- and second-person singular have alternative forms depending on the case marking. baa/ daa are the forms for the nominative/genitive (see (187a) and (199a)), while banu/danu appear in other circumstances.
Table 6.1
Pronouns
sg |
pl |
|
---|---|---|
First |
baa/banu |
excl: baima, banda/incl: beema |
Second |
daa/danu |
deema |
Third |
usita |
usitanda |
Plural forms do not have alternative forms based on grammatical relations as their singular counterparts do. The first-person plural distinguishes between inclusive and exclusive. baima is the basic exclusive form and banda is rarely used.
(174)
a.
beema
keera.
beema
keer-a
1pl.incl
return-vol
‘Let’s go home.’
b.
baima
pitegiya
deema
piteginka
gumahadaraa.
baima
pitegi⸗ya
deema
pitegi⸗nka
guma-ha⸗daraa
1pl.excl
field⸗top
2sg
field⸗comp
small-adj⸗sfp
‘Our field is smaller than yours.’
c.
unu
iiya
bandadu
kaki
sikeru.
unu
ii⸗ya
banda⸗du
kak-i
sik-er-u
this
picture⸗top
1pl.excl⸗foc
write-inf
put-prf-npst
‘This picture is what we drew.’
The third-person pronouns usita (singular) and usita-nda (plural) refer to a person or people who is/are neither the speaker nor the addressee. While speakers of Shiraho used this form in our elicitation sessions, these forms never appeared in narrative and conversation data. In narrative and conversational data, the demonstrative pronouns (kuri and uri) are used to refer to non-participants.
(175)
a.
usitasi
sungara.
usita⸗si
s-u-n⸗gara
3⸗ins
do-npst-ind⸗conj
‘S/he will do it by himself/herself.’
b.
usitandanu
sungara.
usita-nda⸗nu
s-u-n⸗gara
3-pl⸗nom
do-npst-ind⸗conj
‘They will do it.’
The reflexive pronoun, which takes the subject NP as its antecedent, is duu. This pronoun is derived from duu ‘body’.
(176)
tarooya
duunu
pitegi
duusi
keesero.
taroo⸗ya
duu⸗nu
pitegi
duu⸗si
kees-er-∅-o
Taroo⸗top
refl⸗gen
field
refl⸗ins
cultivate-prog-npst-ind
‘Taroo (proper name) is cultivating his field by himself.’
4.2 Lexical Nouns
Lexical nouns take suffixes: the diminutive suffix -ntama, the plural suffix -nda, and the location suffix -nta. The diminutive suffix refers to a young child and small animals (e.g., yarabi-ntama ‘a child’, maya-ntama ‘a kitty’). The plural suffix -nda denotes associative plural with proper nouns (e.g., hanako-nda ‘Hanako and others’) and additive plural with other human, animal, and non-animate nouns (e.g., sara-nda ‘dishes’). The location suffix -nta is attached to directional nouns (e.g., me-nta ‘the front side’, nisya-nta ‘the north side’).
4.3 Numerals
Numerals consist of a numeral root and classifier suffix. Shiraho has the native set shared among Japonic languages up to ten and uses Sino-Japanese roots to count months (e.g., ici-gacu ‘January’) or for higher numbers. Classifier suffixes take on different forms depending on what is counted. So far five classifiers have been identified: -ci for general nouns, -gara for non-human animate nouns, -tari for humans, -giburi for buildings, and -siki for months. Table 6.2 shows a list of numeral roots and word forms to count general nouns and human beings.
Table 6.2
Numerals
One |
Two |
Three |
Four |
Five |
Six |
Seven |
Eight |
Nine |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roots |
piti- |
huta- |
mii- |
yuu- |
ici- |
nn- |
nana- |
yaa- |
kukunu- |
General |
piti-ci |
huta-ci |
mii-ci |
yuu-ci |
ici-ci |
nn-ci |
nana-ci |
yaa-ci |
kukunu-ci |
Human |
pituri |
hutari |
mi-tari |
yu-tari |
5 Verbs
5.1 Inflectional Morphology
Tables 6.3 and 6.4 show the inflectional paradigm and types of stem-ending phonemes respectively. Table 6.3 shows inflectional paradigm of finite verbs. Table 6.4 lists verb stems with different phonemes which are found in Shiraho. Parenthesized forms are unattested, but expected based on the forms of other verbs.
Table 6.3
The inflectional paradigm of finite verbs
Class 1 |
Class 2 |
Class 3 |
|
---|---|---|---|
(e.g., tur- ‘take’) |
(e.g., ugi-/ugir- ‘awaken’) |
(k- ‘come’) |
|
npst |
tur-u |
ugir-u |
k-u |
neg npst |
tur-an-u |
ugir-an-u/ug-un-u |
k-un-u |
pst |
tur-u-ta |
ugir-u-ta/ugi-ta |
k-u-ta |
neg pst |
tur-an-a-tta |
ugir-an-a-tta |
k-un-a-tta |
npst-ind |
tur-u-n |
ugir-u-n |
k-u-n |
pst-ind |
(tur-u-ta-n) |
(ugi-ta-n) |
k-u-ta-n |
npst-ind |
tur-∅-o |
ugir-∅-o |
k-∅-o |
pst-ind |
(tur-u-tar-o) |
(ugi-tar-o) |
k-u-tar-o |
vol |
tur-a |
ug-a |
k-a |
imp |
tur-i |
ugir-i |
k-u |
proh |
tur-una |
ugir-una |
k-una |
As shown in Table 6.3, finite endings include tense (non-past -u,-∅ / past -ta), indicative (-n/-o), volitional (-a), imperative (-i/-u), and prohibitive (-una). -∅ is postulated in non-past indicative forms because there is a contrast between the past with an overt tense suffix (e.g., kutaro) and the non-past (e.g., ko). While indicatives are marked for tense and polarity, the other forms are not. Verbal stems in Shiraho are divided into three types based on (i) the availability of stem alternation (only class 2), (ii) negative suffix -an (class 1, optionally class 2) versus -un (class 3, optionally class 2), and (iii) imperative suffix -i (classes 1 and 2)/-u (only class 3). Class 3 contains only k- ‘come’. Class 1 includes verbs which show regular inflection. Class 2 verbs are basically those that end in a final -i or -e (e.g., kee-/keer- ‘return’).
Class 2 stems are gradually taking an r-ending stem. For example, mi- ‘look’ historically belonged to class 2, but it has changed into the r-ending stem mir- and now belongs to class 1 in Shiraho.
Table 6.4
Inflectional paradigm of class 1 and 2 verb roots with different final phonemes
npst |
neg npst |
pst |
vol |
imp |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mu- ‘think’ |
mu-u |
mu-an-u |
mu-u-ta |
mu-a |
mu-i |
|
[moːnu] |
|
[moː] |
||
ha- ‘eat’ |
ha-u |
ha-an-u |
ha-u-ta |
ha-a |
ha-i |
[hoː] |
|
[hoːta] |
|
[heː] |
|
tup- ‘fly’ |
tup-u |
tup-an-u |
(tup-u-ta) |
tup-a |
tup-i |
yub- ‘call’ |
yub-u |
yub-an-u |
(yub-u-ta) |
yub-a |
yub-i |
nuff- ‘sleep’ |
nuff-u |
nuff-an-u |
nuff-u-ta |
nuff-a |
nuff-i |
yum- ‘read’ |
yum-u |
yum-an-u |
yum-u-ta |
yum-a |
yum-i |
tat- ‘stand’ |
tac-u |
tat-an-u |
(tac-u-ta) |
tat-a |
tac-i |
muc- ‘take’ |
muc-u |
muc-an-u |
(muc-u-ta) |
muc-a |
muc-i |
ss- ‘wear’ |
ss-u |
ss-an-u |
ss-u-ta |
ss-a |
ss-i |
en- ‘say’ |
en-u |
en-an-u |
en-ta |
en-a |
en-i |
mir- ‘look’ |
mir-u |
mir-an-u |
mir-u-ta |
mir-a |
mir-i |
kak- ‘write’ |
kak-u |
kak-an-u |
kak-u-ta |
kak-a |
kak-i |
ng- ‘go’ |
ng-u |
ng-an-u |
ng-u-ta |
ng-a |
ng-i |
ndah- ‘push’ |
ndah-u |
(ndah-an-u) |
ndah-u-ta |
ndah-a |
ndah-i |
ugi-/ugir- ‘awaken’ |
ugir-u |
ugir-an-u |
ugi-ta |
ug-a |
ugir-i |
Additionally, verbs have non-finite ending forms. So far four converb forms have been identified: sequential converb -ita/-ata, conditional converb -(u)cyaa, causal converb -ikii, and simultaneous converb -ici (see § 12.1.2). The conditional, causal, and sequential converbs inflect for polarity. The simultaneous converb always takes an affirmative form. Infinitive forms ending in -i/-a function as a constituent of compounds (yum-i+kak-i (read-inf+write-inf) ‘reading and writing’, § 7.1) and as a narrative converb (§ 12.2).
5.2 Derivational Morphology
There are four suffixes which form new verbal stems: two causative suffixes, -ah and -sim/-simir, the passive/potential suffix -ar/-arir, and the aspect suffix -er/-ar. These suffixes derive a new stem from the verbal root with the order verbal root-(caus)-(pass)-(asp) (e.g., num-ah-ar-atta (drink-caus-pass-seq) ‘be made to drink’, nogor-ar-er-ta (survive-cap-prf-pst) ‘was able to survive’).
5.3 Existential, Stative and Copula
Existential verbs denote the existence of the subject NP and are differentiated by the animacy of the subject NP. Copular verbs are used in equative constructions. The inflectional paradigm of existential, stative, and copular verbs is shown in Table 6.5. Parenthesized forms are unattested, but expected based on the forms of other verbs. The non-animate existential verb has suppletive form neen- for negation. /r/ often assimilates to [t] when the past tense suffix follows and drops when indicative suffix -n follows. These are similar to the inflectional paradigm of tur- in Table 6.3, but with some differences: bur- has the alternative stem bu- for the non-past and past tense. The non-past tense suffix -∅ appears in indicative forms.
Table 6.5
Existential, stative and copula inflection
bur-/bu- |
ar- |
neen- |
yar- |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
exist (animate) |
exist (non-animate) |
negative stative |
copula |
|
npst |
bu-u/bur-u |
ar-u |
yar-u |
|
neg-npst |
bur-an-u |
neen-u |
ar-an-u |
|
pst |
bu-ta |
at-ta/ar-u-ta |
yat-ta |
|
neg-pst |
bur-an-atta |
neen-a-tta |
ar-an-atta-n |
|
npst-ind |
bu-∅-n |
ar-u-n/a-∅-n |
yar-u-n |
|
neg-npst-ind |
neen-u-n |
|||
pst-ind |
(bu-ta-n) |
(at-ta-n/ar-u-ta-n) |
||
npst-ind |
bur-∅-o |
ar-∅-o |
yar-∅-o |
|
neg-npst-ind |
neen-∅-o |
|||
pst-ind |
(bu-tar-o) |
(at-tar-o/ar-u-tar-o) |
yat-tar-o |
6 Adjectival Expressions
In Shiraho, roots denoting property concepts cannot function as a grammatical word on their own. They require suffixation, reduplication, compounding, or the presence of the copular verb. In this section, ‘inflectional adjectives’ refer to adjectival stems that consist of a root and an adjectivalizer. The copular verb must accompany non-inflectional adjectives.
6.1 Inflectional Adjectives
Inflectional adjectives consist of a property concept root, adjectivalizer (-har/-sar/-syar), and inflectional suffixes. Inflectional adjectives share their inflectional paradigm with the existential verb ar-, as is shown in Table 6.6. This is because inflectional adjectives are derived using the nominalizer *-sa and the existential verb ar- (Karimata 2015). The three adjectivalizers -har-/-sar-/-syar- are allomorphs, and the choice between them is determined by the final vowel of the preceding root: -sya after i- or e-, -sa after a long vowel, and -ha elsewhere. /r/ assimilates to [t] when the past suffix follows and drops in the non-past forms or in indicative -n forms.
Table 6.6
Inflectional adjectives
aca-har- (hot) |
mi-syar- (good) |
pee-sar- (fast) |
cf. ar- (existential verb) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
npst |
aca-ha |
mi-sya |
pee-sa |
ar-u |
pst |
aca-hat-ta |
mi-syat-ta |
pee-sat-ta |
at-ta/ar-u-ta |
npst-ind |
aca-har-∅-n |
mi-syar-∅-n |
pee-sar-∅-n |
ar-u-n/a-∅-n |
pst-ind |
aca-hat-ta-n |
mi-syat-ta-n |
pee-sat-ta-n |
(at-ta-n) |
npst-ind |
aca-har-∅-o |
mi-syar-∅-o |
pee-sar-∅-o |
ar-∅-o |
pst-ind |
(aca-hat-tar-o) |
mi-syat-tar-o |
pee-sat-tar-o |
(at-tar-o) |
Inflectional adjectives and verbs differ in how negation is expressed. While verbs express negation through suffixation, inflectional adjectives are accompanied by the negative stative verb neen- (see § 11.5). Inflectional adjectives have attributive (177a) and predicative functions (177b).
(177)
a.
bagaharu
munu
baga-har-u
people
young-adj-npst
people
‘Young people’
b.
inagandu
tuusarikii …
inaga⸗n⸗du
tuu-sar-ikii
sea⸗nom⸗foc
far-adj-csl
‘Because the sea is far from here, …’
6.2 Non-inflectional Adjectives
Almost all adjectives belong to the inflectional category, and there is only one root that can be categorized as a non-inflectional adjective: magi ‘big’. This root behaves like a noun, i.e., it takes the copular verb to function as the predicate (178a). In attributive function, there are two ways in which magi functions as a modifier of the head of NP: (i) reduplication plus genitive ⸗nu (178b) and (ii) compounding (e.g., magi+paci (big+pot) ‘a big pot’).
(178)
a.
tanabura
mata
magi
arungara …
tanabura
mata
magi
ar-u-n⸗gara
mud.snail
also
big
exist-npst-ind⸗conj
‘Mud snails are big, so …’
b.
magimaginu
munu
magi~magi⸗nu
munu
big~red⸗gen
thing
‘big one’
7 Class-Changing Derivations
7.1 Nominalization
Nominalization occurs through suffixation. Verbs take infinitive suffixes -i (classes 1, 3) or -a (class 2). Nominalized verbs are found in compound nouns (e.g., asa+nuff-i (morning+sleep-inf) ‘oversleeping’, yum-i+kak-i (read-inf+write-inf) ‘reading and writing’). In the case of adjectives, root + adjectivalizer -ha/-sa/-sya function as nouns to nominalize adjectives (e.g., acaha ‘heat, warmth’). Adjectival roots may comprise a part of compound nouns (e.g., buu+zara ‘large plate’).
7.2 Verbalization
There is no way to derive verbs from nouns and adjectives by affixation. For this function, there is a light verb construction in which nouns appear with the light verb s- (do) as in (179).
(179)
suu
pisucyaa
mata
asarago
sii …
suu
pis-ucyaa
mata
asarago
s-i
tide
ebb-cond
again
clamming
do-inf
‘When the tide is on the ebb, (we) go clamming, and …’
7.3 Adjectivalization
There are four suffixes which derive adjectives from verbs: -igisyar- ‘seem to do’ (toor-igisyar-∅-o ‘seems to fall down’), -yassar- ‘easy to do’ (sike-jassa ‘easy to use’), -ingurisyar- ‘difficult to do’ (e.g., en-ingurisya ‘difficult to say’), and -bohar-/bahar- ‘want to do’ (e.g., ibi-bahar-∅-o (plant-des-npst-ind) ‘want(s) to plant’). Inflectional morphology of these suffixes is the same with the inflectional adjectives (§ 6.1). There is no way to derive adjectives from nouns.
8 Demonstratives and Interrogatives
8.1 Demonstratives
Demonstratives are summarized in Table 6.7. Shiraho has three series: the ku-series referring to proximate, the ka-series for distal, and the u-series. While the distinction between the ku- and ka- series is clear, the distinction between u- and the others is unclear in their deictic-pronoun usage. The same lack of clarity in the function of the u-series is reported not only on the literature of other Yaeyaman dialects, but also in the literature on other Ryukyuan languages (Uchima 1984). In addition to the demonstrative kuma/uma/kama locatives in Table 6.7, there is another locative series moo, n, and ha. The difference between the two series of demonstrative locatives is unclear.
Table 6.7
Demonstratives
ku-series |
u-series |
ka-series |
|
---|---|---|---|
Things or person |
kuri |
uri |
kari |
Adnominal |
kunu |
unu |
kanu |
Location |
kuma |
uma |
kama |
8.2 Interrogatives and Indefinites
Table 6.8 summarizes interrogatives and indefinites in Shiraho. The number interrogative uu- is a bound morpheme which has to attach to a classifier (see § 4.3). Indefinite forms of number and reason interrogative are lacking in my data.
Table 6.8
Interrogative morphemes
Thing |
Person |
Place |
Time |
Number |
Reason |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interrogatives |
nuu |
taa/taima |
zaa |
ici |
uu- |
n̥da |
‘what’ |
‘who(sg/pl)’ |
‘where’ |
‘when’ |
‘how many’ |
‘why’ |
|
Indefinites |
nundara |
tandara |
zandara |
icika |
||
‘somewhat’ |
‘someone’ |
‘somewhere’ |
‘someday’ |
9 Noun Phrase
Noun phrases behave as arguments of the predicate in the clause. A noun phrase obligatorily has a head and may optionally have a modifier. The head is occupied by pronouns, demonstratives, lexical nouns, numerals, or formal nouns (§ 9.1). The modifier is filled by NP with a genitive marker, an adnominal, or adnominal clauses (§ 9.2).
9.1 The Head
The head is filled with lexical nouns (180a), numerals (180b), and formal nouns (180c). Formal nouns have abstract meanings, and fill the head of NPs. They have to be accompanied by one or more modifiers. So far, seven formal nouns have been identified in Shiraho: basu ‘time’, kami ‘period’, kutu ‘thing’, munu ‘thing’, kata ‘place’, tami ‘purpose’, and kuti ‘manner’.
(180)
a.
uwanu
suuyoo
saikoo
mmahattaro.
uwa⸗nu
suu⸗yoo
saikoo
mma-ha-ttar-o
pig⸗gen
soup⸗sfp
best
tasty-adj-pst-ind
‘Pork soup was the best.’
b.
hutarigo
ssabomuniba
narahu
kutoo …
hutari⸗go
ssabo+muni⸗ba
narah-u
kutu⸗ya
two⸗dat
Shiraho+langauge⸗acc
teach-npst
thing⸗top
‘To teach Shiraho to both of you’
c.
unu
panayu
ibiru
katayu
kimira.
unu
pana⸗yu
ibir-u
kata⸗yu
kimir-a
this
flower⸗acc
plant-npst
place⸗acc
decide-vol
‘Let’s decide where we plant this flower.’
9.2 The Modifier
The modifier slot of an NP can be occupied by an NP with the genitive marker ⸗nu (181), an adnominal, or an adnominal clause (182). With regard to the genitive NP, the semantic relation between the modifier and the head ranges widely. However, unlike other Japonic languages, Shiraho modifiers cannot express an appositional relation (181b).
(181)
a.
ssabunu
hikoozyoo
ssabu⸗nu
hikoozyoo
Shiraho⸗gen
airport
‘Shiraho Airport’
b.
sinsiinu
maa
sinsii⸗nu
maa
teacher⸗gen
grandchild
‘OK The teacher’s grandchild / *The grandchild who teaches in a school’
An adnominal can only occur in the modifier slot. The members of this category are few: yunu ‘same’ (e.g., yunu munu ‘the same thing’), yana ‘unpleasant’ (e.g., yana kutu ‘an unpleasant thing’), and demonstrative adnominals (§ 8.1). An adnominal clause precedes its head. Adnominal clauses can be relative clauses (182a), where the head noun corresponds to an argument or adjunct position inside the clause, or as a non-relative clause (182b), in which the head noun is not interpreted as an argument or adjunct. The head noun can correspond to the subject (182a) or object in the relative clause.
(182)
a.
boorago
nguta
pitu
boora⸗go
ng-u-ta
pitu
Mt.Hoora⸗dat
go-thm-pst
person
‘A person who went to Mt. Hoora’
b.
tamunu
bareru
utu
sikarirusaa.
tamunu
bar-er-u
utu
sik-arir-u⸗saa
fire.wood
split-prog-npst
sound
hear-cap-npst⸗sfp
‘I hear the sound of chopping firewood.’
9.3 Case and Other Role Marking
9.3.1 Case Marking
Table 6.9 lists the case markers in Shiraho. S, A, O in Table 6.9 refer to the Subject of intransitive verb, Agent of a transitive verb, and Object of a transitive verb respectively. The nominative/genitive marker ⸗nu attaches to demonstratives, proper names, human, animal, and non-animate nouns (see § 4.1 about personal pronouns). The accusative markers ⸗yu and ⸗ba attach to the object of transitive verbs, mainly in subordinate clauses. Of the three allative markers, ⸗kaci and ⸗gaci have restrictions on the nouns to which they attach: ⸗kaci only attaches to isasu ‘Ishigaki city’ and ⸗gaci only to hii ‘house’. ⸗ci is the general allative marker attaches to other nouns.
Table 6.9
Case markers
Marking |
Label |
Main roles |
---|---|---|
⸗nu |
Nominative/Genitive |
S, A, and genitive function |
⸗yu/⸗ba |
Accusative |
O, (S) |
⸗go |
Dative |
recipient, beneficiary, destination |
⸗na |
Locative |
location, time |
⸗ci/⸗kaci/⸗gaci |
Allative |
direction |
⸗si |
Instrumental |
instrument |
⸗gara |
Ablative |
a point of departure, path, moving means |
⸗yakka |
Comparative |
standard of comparison |
⸗tu |
Comitative |
addition, companion |
⸗madi |
Terminative |
destination |
9.4 Other Marking
Shiraho employs a topic marker, a focus marker, and limiters. These attach to NP or NPs with a case marker. The topic marker and the focus marker will be discussed in § 11.7. The limiter markers indicate addition (183a–183b), limitation (183c–183d), and approximation (183e). The addition markers ⸗yun and ⸗n are differentiated in terms of their distribution. ⸗yun attaches only to subjects and objects (183a), while ⸗n attaches to arguments including subjects and objects (187b), to adjuncts, and to non-nominal phrases (214).
(183) a. Addition (⸗yun)
enpicuyun
arun?
enpicu⸗yun
ar-u-n
pencil⸗add
exist-npst-ind
‘Are there pencils too?’
b. Addition (⸗n)
urigon
hiriba.
uri⸗go⸗n
hir-i⸗ba
this⸗dat⸗add
give-imp⸗sfp
‘Please give (it) to him/her too.’
c. Limitation (⸗obi)
yuruobee
meenu
ii.
yuru⸗obi⸗ya
mee⸗nu
ii
night⸗only⸗top
rice⸗gen
meal
‘(We ate) rice only at night.’
d. Limitation (⸗kaasi)
naciya
amikaasi
ffi.
naci⸗ya
ami⸗kaasi
ff-i
summer⸗top
rain⸗only
fall-inf
‘It rained all summer.’
e. Approximation (⸗bagara)
teegee
icizikanbagara
kakaren.
teegee
icizikan⸗bagara
kakar-er-∅-n
usually
one.hour⸗about
cost-prf-npst-ind
‘It usually takes about one hour.’
10 Predicate Phrase
10.1 Verbal Predication
The verbal predicate consists of one lexical verb and optionally an auxiliary verb. The minimal verbal predicate consists of only one lexical verb carrying the inflection by itself as in (184a). When the predicate is a compound comprising verb stems, the last constituent carries the inflection as in (184b). In the case of the auxiliary construction, the auxiliary verb carries the inflection as in (184c).
(184)
a.
kurumayu
usiba.
kuruma⸗yu
us-i⸗ba
car⸗acc
push-imp⸗sfp
‘Push the car!’
b.
kiiyu
usitoosi.
kii⸗yu
us-i+toos-i
tree⸗acc
push-inf+knock.down-imp
‘Push down the tree!’
c.
kagonda
amidu
oru.
kago-nda
am-i⸗du
or-u
basket-pl
knit-inf⸗foc
prog.hon-npst
‘(A superior) is knitting baskets.’
Table 6.10 shows the list of auxiliary verbs in Shiraho. Examples of aspectual auxiliaries will be given in § 11.6.
Table 6.10
Auxiliary verbs
Stem |
Lexical meaning |
|
---|---|---|
Progressive |
bir- |
‘sit’ |
Habitual |
arag- |
‘walk’ |
Perfect |
sitir- |
‘throw’ |
Perfect |
neen- |
‘not exist’ |
Experimental |
mir- |
‘look’ |
Preparation |
sik- |
‘put’ |
Honorific or Honorific Progressive |
or- |
‘exist (honorific)’ |
Benefactive |
hi-/hir- |
‘give’ |
The honorific auxiliary verb or- must be used when the subject should be shown respect. Basically, the honorific verb is mandatory when the subject is older than the speaker.
(185)
daa
okanda
ici
nii
san
sii
wakaroorunteni …
daa
okan-nda
ici
nii
san
sii
wakar-i+or-u-n⸗teni
2sg
mother-pl
one
two
three
four
know-inf+hon-npst-ind⸗quot
‘Mothers, do you know (numeric characters like) one, two, three and four?’
The benefactive auxiliary hi-/hir- indicates that the subject of the clause provides benefit to others by the subject’s action as in (186).
(186)
ututugo
yumi
hiyan.
ututu⸗go
yum-i
hi-ar-∅-n
younger.brother⸗dat
read-inf
ben-prf-npst
‘(I’ve) read (a book) to (my) younger brother.’
10.2 Non-verbal Predication
The nominal predicate consists of NP and the copular verb ya-. The copular verb does not appear when the predicate is non-past, affirmative, non-focused, and in the main clause (187a). (187b) is an example where the copular verb appears in order to encode past tense.
(187)
a.
uree
baa
utamadoo.
uri⸗ya
baa
utama⸗doo
this⸗top
1sg
child⸗sfp
‘S/he is my child.’
b.
urin
hoo
munu
yattaro.
uri⸗n
ha-u
munu
yar-tar-o
that⸗add
eat-npst
thing
cop-pst-ind
‘That was also food.’
11 The Simple Sentence
11.1 Sentence Types (Declarative, Interrogative, Imperative)
There are three main sentence types in Shiraho: declarative, interrogative, and imperative. Interrogative sentences are divided into content questions that include an interrogative word and polar questions that are marked by rising intonation. Imperative sentences take the imperative form of verbs as the predicate.
(188) a. Declarative sentence
sunu
ssitadu
gakkugo
haruta.
sunu
ss-ita⸗du
gakku⸗go
har-u-ta
kimono
wear-seq⸗foc
school⸗dat
go-thm-pst
‘I wore a kimono and went to the school.’
b. Interrogative sentence (polar question)
isasukacidu
nguu?
isasu⸗kaci⸗du
ng-u
Ishigaki⸗all⸗foc
go-npst
‘Will you go to Ishigaki city?’
c. Interrogative sentence (content question)
ure
nuudu
wakaru?
uri⸗ya
nuu⸗du
wakar-u
that⸗top
what⸗foc
understand-npst
‘Do you know what that is?’
d. Imperative sentence
pii
huki!
pii
huk-i
pii
blow-imp
‘Blow the whistle!’
11.2 Alignment
Shiraho has a nominative-accusative alignment system. The agent of a transitive verb and the subject of an intransitive verb are marked with the same marker ⸗nu (nom), but the patient of the transitive verb appears as a bare noun, or with ⸗yu or ⸗ba.
(189)
bainu
okkannu
meenu
ii
kee
takitayoo …
bai⸗nu
okkan⸗nu
mee⸗nu
ii
kee
tak-ita⸗yoo
1pl.excl⸗gen
mother⸗nom
rice⸗gen
meal
gruel
boil-seq⸗sfp
‘Our mother cooked rice.’
(190)
turunu
tupero.
turu⸗nu
tup-er-∅-o
bird⸗nom
fly-prog-npst-ind
‘A bird is flying.’
As is reported in the literature on other Yaeyaman dialects, ⸗yu is occasionally attached to the subject of an intransitive verbs. What factor determines this behavior of ⸗yu is unclear.
(191)
panyu
nda
kii …
pan⸗yu
nd-a
k-ii
bread⸗acc
appear-inf
come-inf
‘Bread appeared (in the market), and …’
11.3 Possession
The possessive relation is basically expressed by the genitive marker ⸗nu regardless of alienability (e.g., taroo⸗nu huci ‘Taroo’s mouth’ (inalienable) vs. taroo⸗nu nii ‘Taroo’s baggage’ (alienable)). Shiraho has predicative possession as in (192) in which the possessor NP and the possessed NP function respectively as the subject and the direct object of the verb muc- ‘have’.
(192)
utamaya
butu
mucidaru.
utama⸗ya
butu
muc-i⸗du+ar-u
child⸗top
husband
have-inf⸗foc+exist-npst
‘My child has a husband.’
11.4 Valency Changing
Shiraho has two types of valency-changing operations. One is the causative construction, in which the causer functions as the subject. The marking of the causee varies depending on whether the verb is transitive or intransitive. In the case of a transitive verb (193a), the causee is marked with the dative case marker ⸗go. In the case of an intransitive verb (193b), the causee is marked with the accusative case marker ⸗yu.
(193)
a.
utamago
asayu
turahaa/
turasimira.
utama⸗go
asa⸗yu
{tur-ah-a/
tur-asimir-a}
child⸗dat
sea.lettuce⸗acc
{catch-caus-vol/
catch-caus-vol}
‘Let’s make my child gather sea lettuce.’
b.
unu
urigara
mmayu
tupahiyooteni …
unu
uri⸗gara
mma⸗yu
tup-ah-i⸗yoo⸗teni
fl
that⸗abl
horse⸗acc
jump-caus-imp⸗sfp⸗quot
‘Then, let (your) horse jump.’
The other valency-changing operation is the passive construction, in which the agent is marked with the dative and the patient functions as the subject. Passivization in Shiraho, and most of Yaeyaman dialects except for the Hatoma dialect (Lawrence 2011), applies only to transitive verbs, not also to intransitive verbs as in Standard Japanese.
(194)
banciruyu
tandarago
turaran.
banciru⸗yu
tandara⸗go
tur-ar-a-∅-n
guava⸗acc
someone⸗dat
take-pass-prf-npst-ind
‘My guava has been stolen by someone.’
11.5 Polarity
Negative polarity is marked overtly, but the affirmative is not. In order to express negation, verbs take the negative suffix -an/-un (195a). In the case of the non-animate existential verb, the suppletive verb neen- is used to encode negation (see (222)). neen- is used to express negation when the adjectival predicate (195b). In the case of nominal predicates, the copular verb takes the negative suffix (195c).
(195)
a.
moonu
mmaya
pitu
keranoo.
moo⸗nu
mma⸗ya
pitu
ker-an-∅-o
here⸗gen
horse⸗top
people
kick-neg-npst-ind
‘The horse belonging to this house does not kick people.’
b.
uriya
maaha
neenu.
uri⸗ya
maa-ha
neen-u
that⸗top
tasty-adj
neg.sta-npst
‘That is not tasty.’
c.
baa
sinsiiya
aranattan.
baa
sinsii⸗ya
ar-an-a-tta-n
1sg
teacher⸗top
cop-neg-thm-pst-ind
‘I was not a teacher.’
11.6 TAM
11.6.1 Tense
Shiraho has a non-past /past tense system, which is expressed using verbal inflection (-u/-∅ for non-past (196a) and -ta for past (196b)). Some Yaeyaman varieties have a distinction of remoteness in the past, but Shiraho does not.
(196)
a.
amikaasi
ffudoraa.
ami⸗kaasi
ff-u⸗doraa
rain⸗only
fall-npst⸗sfp
‘It’s just raining.’
b.
sunoo
ami
ffutan.
sunu⸗ya
ami
ff-u-ta-n
yesterday⸗top
rain
fall-thm-pst-ind
‘Yesterday it rained.’
11.6.2 Aspect
Grammatical aspect is encoded by the verbal suffixes -ar (for class 2 verbs)/-er (for class 1 or 3 verbs) or the auxiliary verbs listed in Table 6.10. The grammatical aspect suffixes -ar/-er can be interpreted as either progressive (197a) or perfect aspect (see (174c)). The progressive and perfect interpretations are distinguished by associated pitch patterns: progressive by steep falling and resultative by high pitch (see Davis and Lau (2015) for a detailed discussion of a similar phenomenon in Miyara Yaeyaman). The progressive verb bir- is more restricted in its distribution than the aspectual suffixes. It always takes the aspectual suffix -er in my database.
(197)
a.
mana
yuudu
tureroo.
mana
yuu⸗du
tur-er-∅-o
now
fish⸗foc
catch-prog-npst-ind
‘Now I am catching fish.’
b.
n̥dadu
nagi
bireba?
n̥da⸗du
nag-i
bir-er-∅⸗ba
why⸗foc
cry-inf
sit-prog-npst⸗sfp
‘Why are you crying?’
arag- denotes habitual aspect, and in my data its subject is always an animate noun.
(198)
piroma
nuffi
aragun?
piroma
nuff-i
arag-u-n
daytime
sleep-inf
hab-npst-ind
‘Do you sleep all the day?’
The perfect auxiliary verb neen- indicates that the speaker has regretted what happened. sitir- also encodes perfect and always follows transitive verbs which express a direct effect on the patient.
(199)
a.
baa
basuka
neenu.
baa
basuk-a
neen-u
1sg
forget-inf
neg.sta-npst
‘I have forgotten.’
b.
kii
buttagahi
sitiriba!
k-i
buttag-ah-i
sitir-i⸗ba
kick-inf
roll-caus-inf
throw.away-imp⸗sfp
‘Kick it over!’
11.6.3 Mood
Mood is encoded in verbal inflection, and there is an abundance of sentence-final particles which encode modality: ⸗haci for presumptive, ⸗cyo for hearsay.
(200) Imperative
piteginu
husayu
turi!
pitegi⸗nu
husa⸗yu
tur-i
field⸗gen
grass⸗acc
weed-imp
‘Weed the garden!’
(201) Prohabitive
gumahanu
kanya
turunaa!
guma-ha⸗nu
kan⸗ya
tur-unaa
small-adn⸗gen
crab⸗top
take-proh
‘Do not catch small crabs!’
(202) Volitional
piteginu
husayu
turaa.
pitegi⸗nu
husa⸗yu
tur-a
field⸗gen
grass⸗acc
weed-vol
‘Let’s weed the field.’
(203) Presumptive
accaya
pareruhaci.
acca⸗ya
par-er-u⸗haci
tomorrow⸗top
clear-prf-npst⸗probably
‘It should be going to clear up tomorrow.’
(204) Hearsay
duunu
kurumasi
haruncyoo.
duu⸗nu
kuruma⸗si
har-u-n⸗cyoo
refl⸗gen
car⸗ins
go-npst-ind⸗hsy
‘He’s apparently going to go by car.’
11.7 Information Structure and Its Formal Encodings
Topic and focus are marked by ⸗ya and ⸗du respectively. The topic marker ⸗ya is in a paradigmatic relationship with the nominative and accusative markers. It follows other case markers when they co-occur (e.g., yama⸗go⸗ya (mountain⸗dat⸗top) ‘to (a/the) mountain’). The focus marker ⸗du follows all case markers, and attaches to the leftmost constituent of the focus domain (Davis 2013). It denotes contrastive and information focus (Shimoji 2018). These markers are attached not only to NPs, but also non-nominal phrases (e.g., (206a) and (229)). Shiraho does not have a cleft construction which functions as a focus construction in Japanese, Northern Ryukyuan, and some Yaeyaman dialects (e.g., Lawrence (2011)).
(205)
baa
sikeru
munuya
bandu
katazikiru.
baa
sik-er-u
munu⸗ya
ban⸗du
katazikir-u
1sg
use-prf-adn
thing⸗top
1sg⸗foc
put.away-npst
‘It’s me that puts away what I used.’
12 The Complex Sentence
12.1 Clause-Combining Strategies
There are two clause-combining strategies: coordination and subordination. Subordinate clauses are divided into three types: relative clauses (§ 9.2), adverbial clauses (§ 12.1.2), and complement clauses (§ 12.1.3).
12.1.1 Coordinate Clauses
Clauses are combined using conjunctive particles: ⸗siga (adversative, (206a)) or ⸗gara (resultative, (206b)). Verbs in the coordinate clauses inflect separately for polarity, tense, or indicative mood.
(206)
a.
kurumayu
usitasigadu
uganattan.
kuruma⸗yu
usi-ta⸗siga⸗du
ug-an-atta-n
car⸗acc
push-pst⸗conj⸗foc
move-neg-pst-ind
‘(I) pushed a car, but it did not move.’
b.
daa
pii
keehanakidu
yaseeya
kugararukawa.
daa
pii
keeh-an-aki⸗du
yasee⸗ya
kugarar-u⸗kawa
2sg
fire
put.out-neg-csl⸗foc
vegetable⸗top
be.burned-pass-npst⸗sfp
‘Because you have not put out the fire, the vegetables are burned.’
12.1.2 Adverbial Clauses
There are four types of adverbial clauses shown in (207)–(210). The predicate in an adverbial clause is marked by one of several converbs, not by finite verbs encoding tense or mood.
(207) Conditional clause
sunu
pisucyaa
mata
kainda
asumarikii …
su⸗nu
pis-ucyaa
mata
kai-nda
asumar-ikii
tide⸗nom
ebb-cond
fl
shell-pl
gather-csl
‘When tide ebbed, (we went to sea and) gathered shellfish, so …’
(208) Causal clause
daa
pii
keehanakidu
yaseeya
kugararukawa.
daa
pii
keeh-ana-ki⸗du
yasee⸗ya
kugarar-u⸗kawa
2sg
fire
put.out-neg-csl⸗foc
vegetable⸗top
be.burned-pass-npst⸗sfp
‘Because you have not put out the fire, the vegetables are burned.’
(209) Sequential clause
mma
nurita
huca
kari
ngirugarayoo.
mma
nur-ita
huca
kar-i
ngir-u⸗gara⸗yoo
horse
ride-seq
grass
mow-inf
go-npst⸗conj⸗sfp
‘(I) get on a horse, go, and mow the grass.’
(210) Simultaneous clause
sunu
ssicidu
gakkugo
aragi …
sunu
ss-ici⸗du
gakku⸗go
arag-i
kimono
wear-sim⸗foc
school⸗dat
walk-inf
‘While wearing a kimono, (I) went to a school …’
12.1.3 Complement Clauses (Quotatives)
Complement clauses are clauses that function as an argument in main clauses. Basically, they function as the argument of speech act verbs and cognitive verbs. They are introduced by ⸗ti (quot) in (211), ⸗teni (quot) in (212), ⸗yu (polar-question particle) in (213), and ⸗gasa (content-question particle) in (214).
(211)
duunu
kurumasi
harunti
eneru.
duu⸗nu
kuruma⸗si
har-u-n⸗ti
en-er-u
refl⸗gen
car⸗ins
go-npst-ind⸗quot
say-prog-npst
‘He is saying that he’ll go in his car.’
(212)
yuu
turu
pituya
icimantenidu
eno.
yuu
tur-u
pitu⸗ya
iciman⸗teni⸗du
en-∅-o
fish
catch-npst
person⸗top
Itoman⸗quot⸗foc
say-npst-ind
‘(We) call a man who serves as a fisherman ‘Itoman’ (in Shiraho).’
(213)
uridu
sɨkara
narutayu
wakaranusiga …
uri⸗du
sɨkara
nar-u-ta⸗yu
wakar-an-u⸗siga
this⸗foc
power
become-thm-pst⸗q
understand-neg-npst⸗conj
‘(I) don’t know if it helped, but …’
(214)
zaanadu
mizɨ
arungasan
wakaranu.
zaa⸗na⸗du
mizɨ
ar-u-n⸗gasa⸗n
wakar-an-u
where⸗loc⸗foc
water
exist-npst-ind⸗q⸗add
know-neg-npst
‘I do not know where water issues from.’
12.2 Clause-Chaining Structure
Clause-chaining is marked by narrative converbs formed with the infinitive suffix -i/-a or sequential converbs formed with the sequential suffix -ta.
(215)
ngomadi
higara
kuruma
sikita
ngo
kuruma
uratta
mata
arag-i
mata
kuruman
tukumadi
aragii
kii …
n⸗go⸗madi
hii⸗gara
kuruma
sik-ita
n⸗go
kuruma
ur-atta
mata
arag-i
mata
kuruma⸗nu
tuku⸗madi
arag-i
k-i
there⸗lim
house⸗abl
car
park-seq
there⸗dat
car
get.off-seq
and
walk-inf
and
car⸗gen
place⸗lim
walk-inf
come-inf
‘And then, I went there from my house, parked my car, got out of my car, and started walking. And I went back to the car, and …’
12.3 Insubordination
In Shiraho, coordinate clauses, causal converb clauses, and narrative converb clauses appear as independent clauses. Coordinate clauses with ⸗gara and causal converb clauses are used to explain reasons. Narrative converbs can behave as predicates of the main clause and encode past tense, as is found in other Ryukyuan languages (Pellard 2012). Narrative converbs are used in interrogative sentences or in argument/sentence focus sentences as in (216).
(216)
a.
daadu
kaki?
daa⸗du
kak-i
2sg⸗foc
write-inf
‘Did you write (this)?’
b.
bandu
kaki.
ban⸗du
kak-i
1sg⸗foc
write-inf
‘It’s me who wrote this.’
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank my native speaker consultants and Dr. Natsuko Nakagawa, who shared her fieldwork recordings. I also thank Ms. Danning Wang, Dr. Natsuko Nakagawa, Mr. Matthew Topping, Prof. Bernard Comrie, and reviewers who gave me important comments.
Appendix: Sample Text
This text is about the diet of Shiraho people around 80 years ago. The speaker was born in Shiraho and has been living there continuously except for some breaks due to work. Because of food shortages, they ate snails, leaves, and the like by gathering from rice fields.
(217)
ssabuya
gumaguma
siirenu
katacumuree
sitami.
ssabu⸗ya
guma~guma
siir-e-∅-nu
⟨katacumuri⟩⸗ya
sitami
Shiraho⸗top
small~red
do-prog-npst-adn
snail⸗top
snail
‘In Shiraho, small snails are (called) sitami.’
(218)
sitami
sitamito
iu.
sitami
sitami⸗⟨to⟩
⟨iu⟩
snail
snail⸗quot
say
‘Sitami, (we) call snails sitami.’
(219)
ita
taana
buru
munuwa
mata
tanabura.
ita
taa⸗na
bur-u
munu⸗⟨wa⟩
mata
tanabura
then
rice.field⸗loc
exist-npst
thing⸗top
also
mud.snail
‘Then, what is in a rice field is mud snails.’
(220)
taana
mata
magimaginu
munu
buta.
taa⸗na
mata
magi~magi⸗nu
munu
bu-ta
rice.field⸗loc
also
big~red⸗gen
thing
exist-pst
‘There are big shells in rice fields.’
(221)
uree
urin
hoo
munu
yattaro.
uri⸗ya
uri⸗n
ha-u
munu
yar-tar-o
this⸗top
this⸗add
eat-npst
thing
cop-pst-ind
‘That was … that was also food.’
(222)
sitamiyun
agai
gumahanu
kamiya
unu
mugasyee⸗ya
tanpakusicutencyaa
nuun
neenu.
sitami⸗yun
agai
guma-ha⸗nu
kami⸗ya
unu
mugasi⸗ya
⟨tanpakusicu⟩⸗ti+en-cya
nuu⸗n
neen-u
snail⸗add
fl
small-adj⸗gen
time⸗top
this
past⸗top
protein⸗quot+say-cond
what⸗add
neg.sta-npst
‘Snails are … in my childhood, in the past, there was no so-called protein.’
(223)
hucanu
paaobidu
herora.
huca⸗nu
paa⸗obi⸗du
h-er-∅-o⸗ra
grass⸗gen
leaf⸗only⸗foc
eat-prf-npst-ind⸗sfp
‘We ate only leaves.’
(224)
unu
sitamin
pisi
kii
urin
bagahi
hee.
unu
sitami⸗n
pis-i
k-ii
uri⸗n
bagah-i
ha-i
this
snail⸗add
pick-inf
come-inf
this⸗add
cook-inf
eat-inf
‘We gathered those snails and went home and ate them.’
(225)
tacci
ngucyaa
kondo
mata
tanabura.
ta⸗cci
ng-ucyaa
⟨kondo⟩
mata
tanabura
rice.field⸗top
go-cond
next
also
mud.snail
‘When I would go to a rice field, then (I found) mud snails.’
(226)
agai
tanabura
mata
magi
arungara
urin
pisii.
agai
tanabura
mata
magi
ar-u-n⸗gara
uri⸗n
pis-i
fl
mud.snail
also
big
cop-npst-ind⸗cond
that⸗add
pick-inf
‘Mud snails are (also) big, so I would also gather those.’
(227)
mana
tago
ngucya
tanaburan
miraruno.
mana
ta⸗go
ng-ucya
tanabura⸗n
mir-ar-un-∅-o
now
rice.field⸗dat
go-cond
mud.snail⸗add
see-cap-neg-npst-ind
‘Now when (we) go to rice fields, (we) can’t see mud snails.’
(228)
sitamin
tukiduki
bainu
minagana
bun.
sitami⸗n
tukiduki
bai⸗nu
minaga⸗na
bu-∅-n
snail⸗add
sometimes
my.house⸗gen
garden⸗loc
exist-npst-ind
‘There are sometimes snails in my garden (now).’
(229)
sitami.
isiga
manaya
ureeyaa
heeya
sanutoyona.
sitami
isiga
mana⸗ya
uree⸗yaa
ha-i⸗ya
s-an-u⸗toyona
snail
but
now⸗top
this⸗top
eat-inf⸗top
do-neg-npst⸗sfp
‘Snails. But (we) do not eat them now.’
C: consonant, G, glide, V: vowel.
There may be more prefixes in Shiraho, but they are not found in my database. See Miyagi et al. (2003) which listed prefixes in the Sika dialect (e.g., maa- ‘genuine’).
Bibliography
Aso, Reiko (2020) Minami ryūkyū Yaeyama go Hateruma hōgen no bumpō [A grammar of Hateruma, a Southern Ryukyuan language]. PhD dissertation, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Davis, Chripstopher and Tyler Lau (2015) Tense, Aspect, and Mood in Miyara Yaeyaman. In Heinrich, Patrick, Shinsho Miyara, and Michinori Shimoji (eds.) Handbook of the Ryukyuan Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 253–297.
Davis, Christopher (2013) Surface position and focus domain of the Ryukyuan focus particle du: Evidence from Miyara Yaeyaman. International Journal of Okinawan Studies, 4(1): 29–49.
Harada, Soichiro (2015) Minami ryūkyū Yaeyama Kuroshima hōgen no bumpō [A grammar of Kuroshima, a Southern Ryukyuan language]. PhD dissertation, Osaka University.
Izuyama, Atsuko (ed.) (2003) Studies on Luchuan Grammar. Osaka: Osaka Gakuin University.
Karimata, Shigehisa (2015) Ryukyuan languages: A grammar overview. In Heinrich, Patrick, Shinsho Miyara, and Michinori Shimoji (eds.) Handbook of the Ryukyuan Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 113–140.
Lawrence, Wayne P. (2000) Yaeyama hōgen no hōgen kukaku ni tsuite [On the classification of the Yaeyama dialects]. In Ishigaki, Shigeru (ed.) Commemorative collection for Miyanaga Masamori. Okinawa: Hirugi Publisher, 547–559.
Lawrence, Wayne P. (2011) Southern Ryukyuan. In Tranter, Nicholas (ed.) The languages of Japan and Korea. London: Routledge, 381–411.
Miyagi, Shinyū, Shin-ichi Kajiku, and Eikichi Hateruma (2003) Ishigaki Hōgen jiten [A Dictionary of the Ishigaki dialect]. Okinawa: Okinawa Times.
Nakagawa, Natsuko and Kenan Celik (2019) Ryūkyū Yaeyama Shiraho hōgen no akusento taikē wa sankē de atte nikē de wa nai [The Shiraho dialect of Yaeyama Ryukyuan has a three-, not two-, pattern accent system]. In Society of Japanese Linguistics (ed.) Proceedings of the Spring Conference of the Society of Japanese Linguistics, 89–96.
Nakagawa, Natsuko, Tyler Lau, and Yukinori Takubo (2016) Yaeyama go Shiraho hōgen no bumpō gaisetsu [A grammar sketch of the Shiraho dialect, Yaeyama Ryukyuan]. In Karimata, Shigehisa (ed.) Ryukyuan Languages Descriptive Grammar ii. Okinawa: Study Group of Ryukyuan Languages, 1–60.
Pellard, Thomas (2012) Converbs and their desubordination in Ogami Ryukyuan. Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan, (142): 95–117.
Pellard, Thomas (2015) The Linguistic archeology of the Ryukyu Islands. In Heinrich, Patrick, Shinsho Miyara, and Michinori Shimoji (eds.) Handbook of the Ryukyuan Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 13–37.
Ryūkyū Hōgen Kenkyū Club (ed.) (2006) Ishigaki Shiraho hōgen no onin taikē to rizumu akusento teki kōzō [The phonological system and accent structure of the Shiraho dialect, Ishigaki island]. Okinawa: Ryūkyū Hōgen Kenkyū Club.
Shimoji, Michinori (2018) Information structure, focus, and focus-marking hierarchies in Ryukyuan languages. Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan, 154: 85–121.
Uchima, Chokujin (1984) Ryūkyū hōgen bumpō no kenkyū [The Study of the Ryukyuan Grammar]. Tokyo: Kasama shoin.
Urabe, Yuko (2018) Minami ryūkyū Yaeyama go Iriomotejima Funauki hōgen no bumpō gaisetsu [A sketch grammar of the Funauki dialect of Yaeyaman]. Master’s thesis, Kyushu University.