Australia – certain measures concerning trademarks, geographical indications and other plain packaging requirements applicable to tobacco products and packaging, wt/ds435/r, wt/ds441/r, wt/ds458/r, wt/ds467/r.

Brazil – Measures affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres, wto, wt/ds332/ab/r, 3 December 2007.

Canada – Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical Products, wt/ds114/r (2000).

China – Measures Affecting Imports of Automobile Parts (wt/ds342/ab/r) 15 December 2008.

China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products, wt/ds363/ab/r, 21 December 2009.

China – Measures related to the Exportation of various Raw Materials – wt/ds394/ab/r, 2012.

Colombia – Indicative Prices and Restrictions on Ports of Entry, wt/ds366/r, 2009.

Dominican Republic – Measures affecting the importation and internal sale of cigarettes, wto, wt/ds302/ab/r, 25th April 2005.

European Communities – Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, wt/ds27/ab/r, 1997.

European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products, wt/ds135/ab/r, 12 March 2001.

European Communities – Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries, wt/ds246/ab/r, 7 April 2004.

European Communities – Protection of Trademarks and Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs, wt/ds290/r; 20th April 2005.

European Communities – Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal Products, wt/ds400 & 401/ab/r, paragraph 5.87, 18 June 2014.

India – Quantitative Restrictions on Imports of Agricultural, Textile and Industrial Products – wt/ds90/r, paragraphs 5.128 and 5.129, 1999.

India – Measures affecting the Automotive Sector, wt/ds146/ab/r; wt/ds175/ab/r, 19 March 2002.

India – Certain Measures Relating to Solar Cells and Solar Modules (wt/ds456/ab/r) 16 September 2016.

Japan – Trade in Semi-Conductors, bisd l/6309–35S/116, 24th March 1988.

Japan – Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages case, wt/ds8/ab/r, wt/ds10/ab/r and wt/ds11/ab/r, of 4th October 1996 and Korea – Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages case, wt/ds75/ab/r, wt/ds84/ab/r of 18th January 1999.

Korea – Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Some Dairy products, wt/ds98/ab/r, 14th December 1999.

Korea – Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef, wt/ds161/ab/r, 11 December 2000, wt/ds169/ab/r, 12 March 2001.

Mexico – Tax Measures on Soft Drinks and Other Beverages, wt/ds308/ab/r, 6 March 2006.

Russia – Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit, Panel Report wt/ds512/r, 5 April 2019.

Turkey – Restrictions on Imports of Textile and Clothing Products, ab decision wt/ds34/ab/r, 1999.

United States – Denial of Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment as to Non-Rubber Footwear from Brazil, ds18/r, adopted, b.i.s.d. 39S/128, 19 June 1992.

United States – Measures affecting Alcoholic and Malt Beverages, ds23/r, b.i.s.d. 39S/206. adopted 19 June 1992.

United States – Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline – Report of the Appellate Body (wt/ds2/ab/r), 29th April 1996.

United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, wt/ds58/ab/r, 12 October 1998.

United States – Measures affecting the cross-border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services, wto, wt/ds285/ab/r, 7th April 2005.

Betts v. Willimott, [1871] 6 l.r.Ch. 239, 245.

Adam v Burke, 84 U.S. 453 (1873).

Bloomer v. McQuewan, 14 How. 539.

Holiday v. Mattheson, 24 Fed. 185–1866 (c.c.s.d.n.y. 1885).

Boesch v. Graff 133 US 697 (1890).

E. Bement & Sons v National Harrow Co., 1Boesch86 U.S. 70, 91 (1902).

United States v Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241 (1942).

Sanofi S.A. v. Med-Tech Veterinarian Products Inc. 565 F. Supp. 931 (1983).

Jazz Photo Corp. V. International Trade Commission, 264 F. 3d 1094 (Fed. Cir. 2001), U.S. Supreme Court No. 01–1158, filed February 6, 2002.

Quanta Computer, Inc., et al. v. lg Electronics, Inc. (No. 06–937) 453 F. 3d 1364, reversed (Supreme Court, 9 June, 2008).

Monsanto Co. v. Bowman, 657 F.3d 1341 (Fed. circ. 2011) and Bowman v Monsanto Co., 133 S. Ct. 1761, 1766 (2013).

Impression Products Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc., 137 S Ct. 1523 (2017).

Brunswick Corp. v Orian Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (1969), 1 Mutai / Saishu 160, Osaka District Court, 9th June, 1969.

Tokyo District Court’s decision in bbs Wheels, Wa-No. 16565 of 1992.

Strix decision in bbs Wheels, Ne-No. 3272 of 1994.

Supreme Court of Japan decision in bbs Wheels, Wo-No. 1988 of 1997.

Stauffer Chemical Co. v Agricura Ltd. 1979 bp 168 (cp).

Strix Ltd. v. Maharaja Appliances Ltd. (2008) i.a. No. 7441 of 2008 in c.s. (os) No. 1206 of 2008 (India).

Kodak v Jumbo-Markt ag, 4C.24/1999/rnd, 7 December 1999.

Generics BV v Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd., rpc 801 (1997).

‘Karate’ of the German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) dated 14th December, 1999, Case No. x zr 61/98.

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal in trademark case, Smith & Nephew Inc. v Glen Oak Inc., (1996) 68 c.p.r. (3d) 153, before the Supreme Court of Canada in patent case, Eli Lilly and Co. v Novopharm Ltd. (1998), 80 c.p.r. (3d) 321 at 352.

Thailand Court Decision No. 16/2542 (1999).

Supreme Court of Thailand’s Decision No. 2817/2543 (2000).

Yu v. Court of Appeals, 217 scra 328–333 (1993).

U–Bix Corporation v. Ariancorp International Inc. ca – g.r. No. 41260, 1995.

Société Anonyme des Manufactures de Glaces v Tilghman’s Patent Sand Blast Company (1883) 25Ch. D1 (ca).

Dunlop v Longlife (1958) r.p.c. 473 and Goodyear v Lancashire Batteries (1958) l.r. 1 r.p. 22 at 35.

Beecham Group Ltd. v International Products Ltd., (1968) r.p.c. 129 and fsr 162.

United Wire Ltd. v Screen Repair Services (Scotland) and Others, House of Lords, 4 All E R 353 (2000).

GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission of the European Communities, Case No. T-168/01 [2006] e.c.r. ii-2969.

National Phonograph Co. of Australia v. Menck [1911] 28 r.p.c. 229.

Lever Brothers Co v United States of America, eta al., 877 F.2d 101 (d.c. Cir. 1989).

Lever Brothers Co v United States of America, eta al., 981 F. 2nd 1330 (d.c. Cir. 1993).

The hag case in EU Case C 10/89, sa cnl – sucal nv v hag gf ag.

Consten SaRL and Grundig GmbH v Commission of eec (1966), Case 56/64.

Consten S.à.R.L. snd Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v. Commission of the European Community, Joined cases Nos. 56/54 and 58/64, (1966) ecr 299.

GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission of the European Communities, Joined Case Nos. C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P, e.c.r. i-9291, 2009.

Usedsoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp, Case No. C 128/11, 3 c.m.l.r. 44, 2012.

Merck & Co. Inc. v Stephar BV and Petrus Stephanus Exier, Case No. 187/80, July 14, 1981.

Centrafarm BV v. Sterling Drug Inc., 87 Case No. 15/74, 31st October 1974 [1974] 2 cmlr 480, [1974].

Centrafarm BV v. Winthrop BV, Case 16/74, ecli:eu:c:1974:115.

Bayer AG v Commission of the European Communities, Joined Cases Nos. C-2/01P C-3/01P, (T-41/96) [2000] e.c.r. ii-3383; [2001] 4 c.m.l.r.

Polydor Limited and rso Records Incorporated v Harlequin Record Shops Ltd. and Simons Records Limited, Case 270/80 [1982], ecr 329.

Mag Instrument Inc. v California Trading Company Norway, Case E-2/97 [1997], efta Ct. Rep. 129.

Deutsche Grammophon Geselischaft mbH v Metro-sb Grossmarkte GmbH & Co. kg, Case No. 78/70, 1971 ecr 487, 1971 cmlr 631.

Parke, Davis and Co. v Probel, Reese, Beintema-Interpharm and Centrafarm, Gerechtshof’s-Gravenhage-Netherlands, Case 24/67, 1968, ecli:eu:c:1998:11.

Pharmon BV v Hoechst AG, Case No. 19/84, ecr 2281 (1985).

Merck & Co. Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd. and Merck Sharp & Dohme International Services bv v Primecrown Ltd., Ketan Himatlal Mehta, Bharat Himatlal Mehta and Necessity Supplies Ltd. and Beecham Groupp plc v Europharm of Worthing Ltd., Joined cases, C 267/95 and C 268/95, ecri 6285 (1996).

Silhouette International Schmied GmbH and Co. kg v. Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH, Case C-355/96, ecli:eu:c:1998:374.