List of Figures and Tables

In: Under Pressure
Editors:
Pedro N. Teixeira
Search for other papers by Pedro N. Teixeira in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Amélia Veiga
Search for other papers by Amélia Veiga in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maria J. Rosa
Search for other papers by Maria J. Rosa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
António Magalhães
Search for other papers by António Magalhães in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Free access
Figures
2.1 Comparative tertiary-level participation on the basis of the UNESCO gross enrolment ratio and the Clancy index, OECD countries, 2013 19
2.2 Level of education and interpersonal trust, OECD countries, 2015.Q. ‘Do you trust other people?’ Proportion (%) answering ‘yes’ 21
2.3 Level of education and political connectedness, OECD countries, 2015.Q. ‘Do you believe you have a say in government?’ Proportion (%) answering ‘yes’ 22
2.4 Investment in R&D as a proportion (%) of GDP, United States, United Kingdom, Germany, China, South Korea, India: 1991–2015. There are series breaks for India, with no data for 2012–2014 inclusive 24
2.5 Annual number of published science papers, United States, China, Germany, United Kingdom, South Korea: 2003–2016 26
3.1 Adaptive university structures (Sporn, 1999) 38
3.2 WU history: Becoming an entrepreneurial university 42
5.1 Career goals of junior researchers in ten years’ time (in %) 69
5.2 Personnel categories for junior researchers and tenure opportunity (in %, multiple responses) 70
6.1 Four types in the managerial-administrative relationships 85
8.1 Institutional evaluation procedure at TU Darmstadt 2017, 119
8.2 Current state of objectives implemented at TU Darmstadt, 120
9.1 Part capabilities of manifestation from Teece (2007) and Faix (2017) 132
9.2 Model of the innovativeness of HEIs 134
9.3 Expectancy theory adjusted for HEIs 137
10.1 Perceptions of academics regarding the drivers for the creation or edification of internal QA practices 153
10.2 Perceptions of academics regarding the cultures promoted by internal QA 154
10.3 Academics’ perceptions regarding internal QA effects 155
10.4 Academics perceptions regarding autonomy and professionalism 160
11.1 Schematic presentation of the regression models 179
12.1 Patterns of institutional adoption of differential tuition policies, 1991–92 to 2015–16 204
14.1 A conceptual model for the role of universities in innovative activity 241
14.2 An iceberg model of universities’ impact on regional innovation 245
Tables
2.1 Expansion in the number of world universities publishing more than 10,000, 500 and 1,200 journal papers over four years, 2006–2009 to 2013–2016 23
2.2 Leading universities in (1) Physical Sciences and Engineering and (2)Mathematics and Complex Computing, based on published papers in the top 10 per cent of their field by citation rate: 2012–2015 papers 27
5.1 Personnel development for junior researchers in Germany over time (values in %) 66
5.2 Percentage of people with permanent employment contracts at universities 73
9.1 Statistical key figures of HEIs 127
10.1 Sample’s characterisation 152
10.2 Academics’ perceptions of internal QA according to gender (results of Mann-Whitney tests) 156
10.3 Academics’ perceptions of QA according to the higher education sector (results of Mann-Whitney tests) 157 10.4 Academics’ perceptions of QA according to the performance of management functions (results of Mann-Whitney tests) 158
10.5 Academics’ perceptions of QA according to tenure/non-tenure (results of Mann-Whitney tests) 158
10.6 Academics’ perceptions of internal QA according to involvement in decision making processes (results of Kruskal-Wallis tests) 159
10.7 Correlations between QA drivers and the variables reflecting autonomy and professionalism (Spearman correlation coefficients) 162
10.8 Correlations between QA cultures and the variables reflecting autonomy and professionalism (Spearman correlation coefficients) 163
10.9 Correlations between QA effects and the variables reflecting autonomy and professionalism (Spearman correlation coefficients) 164
11.1 Correlation between different types of learning outcomes and grades in HE 177
11.2 The adjusted r2 of the models shown in Figure 11.1 181
11.3 Regression models 4a, 5a, 7a and 5b – results 182
11.4 Institutional effects on HE grades and change in institutional effects from model 4a to model 7a 186 12.1. Institutions adopting DT policies by year 200
12.2 Sample means by institutional differential tuition status, 1991–92 to 2015–16 205
12.3 Estimated odds ratios of differential tuition adoption 207
12.4 Estimated hazard rate of differential tuition adoption 208
13.1 Analysis of the institutional framework and mechanisms as well as organisational change processes of selected models of university engagement. (N = normative nature, C-C = cultural cognitive nature, R = regulative nature) 223
14.1 Various ways of how university outputs can become relevant for regional innovation 239
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Under Pressure

Higher Education Institutions Coping with Multiple Challenges

Series:  Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series, Volume: 11

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 46 11 4
PDF Views & Downloads 0 0 0