Table of Cases

In: Investments in Conflict Zones
Editors:
Tobias Ackermann
Search for other papers by Tobias Ackermann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Sebastian Wuschka
Search for other papers by Sebastian Wuschka in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Free access

    Permanent Court of International Justice

  • Acquisition of Polish Nationality (Advisory Opinion) [1923] pcij Series B no 7 43n112

  • Brazilian Loans (France v Brazil) [1929] pcij Series A no 21 123n62

  • Certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia (Germany v Poland) [1925] pcij Series A no 6 231n131

  • Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria (Belgium v Bulgaria) [1939] pcij Ser A/B no 77 237n175

  • Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland) (Merits) [1928] pcij Series A no 17 216, 216–217n38

  • Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v Norway) [1933] pcij Rep Series A/B No 53 68n72

  • Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v UK) [1924] pcij Series A no 2 230, 230n126, 232, 232n141, 234

  • Phosphates in Morocco (Italy v France) [1938] pcij Series A/B no 74 237, 237n174

  • Serbian Loans (France v Yugoslavia) [1929] pcij Series A no 20 122, 122n62

  • SS ‘Wimbledon’ (Great Britain et al v German) [1923] pcij Series A no 1 37n79

  • Status of Eastern Carelia (Advisory Opinion) [1923] pcij Rep Series B no 5 187n70

    International Court of Justice

  • Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo (Advisory Opinion) [2010] icj Rep 403 350n231, 396n22, 432n11

  • Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo (Advisory Opinion, Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade) [2010] icj Rep 523 226n92

  • Aegean Sea Continental Shelf Case (Greece v Turkey) [1978] icj Rep 3 185n58

  • Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v drc) (Merits) [2010] icj Rep 639 40n93

  • Applicability of the Obligation to Arbitrate under Section 21 of the United Nations Headquarters Agreement of 26 June 1947 (Advisory Opinion) [1988] icj Rep 12 231, 231–232n138, 445n62, 445n66

  • Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro) [2007] icj Rep 43 443n51, 443n53, 443n55, 446n72

  • Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v Russia) (Preliminary Objections) [2019] <www.icj-cij.org/en/case/166> accessed 12 May 2020 213n18

  • Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v Russia) (Separate Opinion of President Owada) [2011] icj Rep 170 231n134

  • Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v Russia) (Joint Dissenting Opinion of President Owada, Judges Simma, Abraham, and Donoghue and Judge ad hoc Gaja) [2011] icj Rep 142 232n137

  • Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v Russia) [2011] icj Rep 70 191n97, 232n138

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (drc v Uganda) (Provisional Measures, Order of 1 July 2000, Separate Opinion of Judge Oda) [2000] icj Rep 131 249n15

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v Uganda) [2005] icj Rep 168 , 27n 37, 35, 434, 434n21, 445, 445n64, 449n83

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v Uganda) (Separate Opinion of Judge Kooijmans [2005] icj Rep 306 434n17, 434, 434nn23–26

  • Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) (DRC v Rwanda) [2006] icj Rep 6 236n168

  • Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v USA) (Judgment) [2004] icj Rep 12 31n58

  • Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co, Ltd (Belgium v Spain) (2nd Phase) [1970] icj Rep 3 40n93

  • Case Concerning the Northern Cameroons (Cameroon v UK) [1963] icj Rep 15 230–232n143, 234n156

  • Case Concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v Thailand) [1962] icj Rep 6 401n38

  • Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia) (Preliminary Objections) [1992] icj Rep 240 350n230

  • Certain Property (Liechtenstein v Germany) [2005] icj Rep 6 224n128

  • Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v France) (Merits) [2008] icj Rep 1 70n84

  • Corfu Channel (UK v Albania) (Merits) [1949] icj Rep 18 46–47n122

  • Corfu Channel (UK v Albania) (Merits, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Azevedo) [1949] icj Rep 78 121n52

  • East Timor (Portugal v Australia) [1995] icj Rep 90 187n70, 228, 228n105, 236n168, 366n15, 369n52, 371n63

  • Elettronica Sicula SpA (elsi) (USA v Italy) (Oral Arguments) [1987] iii icj Pleadings 1 78n115

  • Elettronica Sicula SpA (elsi) (USA v Italy) (Counter-Memorial of Italy) [1988] ii icj Pleadings 1 78n115

  • Elettronica Sicula SpA (elsi) (USA v Italy) (Rejoinder of Italy) [1988] ii icj Pleadings 417 78n115

  • Elettronica Sicula SpA (elsi) (USA v Italy) (Judgment) [1989] icj Rep 15 34n67, 40n93, 94, 94n58, 114n12

  • Fisheries Jurisdiction (Germany v Iceland) (Jurisdiction) [1973] icj Rep 49 55n9, 332n97

  • Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) [1997] icj Rep 7 32n63, 129, 129–130n105, 332n97, 398n25

  • Haya de la Torre (Colombia v Peru) [1951] icj Rep 71 366n41

  • Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana v Namibia) [1999] icj Rep 1045 55n9

  • Land and Maritime Boundary (Cameroon v Nigeria) (Preliminary Objections) [1998] icj Rep 275 232–233n153, 236n168

  • Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (Advisory Opinion) [1971] icj Rep 16 11n30, 55n9, 257, 257n69, 328–329n73, 340n148, 344n185, 360n9, 363n23, 366–367n45, 376n88

  • Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion) [2004] icj Rep 136 11n30, 27n37, 165n152, 323n30, 343–344n182, 361n14, 361n16, 361n18, 396n22

  • Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 (Advisory Opinion) [2019] <www.icj-cij.org/en/case/169/advisory-opinions> accessed 21 January 2020 361n16, 366–367n38

  • Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion) [1996] icj Rep 226 24n21, 323n30

  • Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v Ukraine) [2009] icj Rep 61 375nn85–86

  • Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v Kenya) (Preliminary Objections) [2017] icj Rep 3 210n5, 212n13

  • Maritime Delimitations and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v Bahrain) [2001] icj Rep 40 375nn85–86

  • Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v USA) (Merits) [1986] icj Rep 14 141n15, 344n182, 444n59, 446n71

  • Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v USA) (Memorial of Nicaragua) [1985] iv icj Pleadings 1 78n115

  • Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v France, UK, and USA) (Preliminary Question) [1954] icj Rep 19 4, 4n25, 11n104, 193, 228, 228n104, 350n229

  • Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v Nicaragua) [2009] icj Rep 213 325n45

  • North Sea Continental Shelf (Germany v Denmark, Germany v Netherlands) [1969] icj Rep 3 43n112, 182n36, 375n87

  • North Sea Continental Shelf (Germany v Denmark, Germany v Netherlands) (Separate Opinion of Judge Ammoun) [1969] icj Rep 101 119n37

  • Obligations Concerning Negotiations Relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v UK) (Preliminary Objections, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Crawford) [2016] icj Rep 1093 194n111

  • Oil Platforms (Iran v USA) (Merits) [2003] icj Rep 161 70, 70n82, 325n41

  • Oil Platforms (Iran v USA) (Merits, Separate Opinion of Judge Higgins) [2003] icj Rep 225 38n87

  • Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libya v UK) (Preliminary Objections) [1998] icj Rep 9 236n168

  • Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libya v USA) (Preliminary Objections) [1998] icj Rep 115 334n102

  • Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v India) (Preliminary Objections) [1957] icj Rep 125 36n76, 237n175

  • Rights of Nationals of the United States of America in Morocco (France v USA) [1952] icj Rep 176 231n131

  • South West Africa (Ethiopia v South Africa, Liberia v South Africa) (Preliminary Objections) [1962] icj Rep 319 231, 231–232n142

  • South West Africa (Ethiopia v South Africa, Liberia v South Africa) (Preliminary Objections, Joined Dissenting Opinion of Judges Spender and Fitzmaurice) [1962] icj Rep 465 232n144, 234n157

  • South West Africa (Ethiopia v South Africa, Liberia v South Africa) (Preliminary Objections, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Morelli) [1962] icj Rep 564 232n144, 234n157

  • Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v Colombia) [2012] icj Rep 624 182n36, 375nn85–87

  • United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (USA v Iran) (Provisional Measures) [1979] icj Rep 7 236, 236n167

  • United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (USA v Iran) (Oral Arguments on the Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures) [1979] icj Pleadings 13 78n115

  • United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (USA v Iran) (Oral Arguments) [1980] icj Pleadings 249 78n115

  • United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (USA v Iran) [1980] icj Rep 3 37n79, 232n143, 234n156, 236

  • Western Sahara (Advisory Opinion) [1975] icj Rep 12 359, 359n6, 372, 372nn65–66

    International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

  • Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/ Myanmar) (Judgment) [2012] itlos Rep 4 180n27

  • Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/ Myanmar) (Merits) [2012] itlos Rep 169 180n26

  • Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire) (Provisional Measures, Written Statement of Ghana) [2015] <www.itlos.org/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-23/case-no-23-provisional-measures/> accessed 12 May 2020 215n26

  • Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire) (Provisional Measures, Order of 25 April 2015) [2015] itlos Rep 146 177n9, 212n11, 215n26, 215–216n32

  • Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire) (Counter Memorial of Côte d’Ivoire) [2016] <www.itlos.org/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-23/> accessed 12 May 2020 215n27, 215n30

  • Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire) (Reply of Ghana) [2016] <www.itlos.org/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-23/> accessed 13 May 2020 215n30

  • Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire) (Rejoinder of Côte d’Ivoire) [2016] <www.itlos.org/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-23/> accessed 12 May 2020 213n15

  • Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire) (Merits) [2017] itlos Rep 4 177n9, 201n152, 213n15, 216n31

  • M/V “Norstar” (Panama v Italy) (Preliminary Objections) [2016] <www.itlos.org/en/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-25/> 193n106

  • M/V “Saiga” (No 2) Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v Guinea) [1999] itlos Rep 10 334n102

  • MOX Plant (Ireland v UK) (Provisional Measures) [2001] itlos Rep 95 185n60

  • Southern Blue Fin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v Japan, Australia v Japan) (Provisional Measures) (Order of 27 August 1999) [1999] itlos Rep 280 232n140

    Inter-State Arbitrations, Mixed Arbitrations, and Claims Commissions

  • Administrative Decision No VII (The Vinland Case), US–Germany Mixed Claims Commission (25 May 1925) 7 riaa 203 63n48

  • American Electric and Manufacturing Co (Concession), US–Venezuela Mixed Claims Commission (1903) 9 riaa 306 63n47

  • Arbitration under the Timor Sea Treaty (Timor-Leste v Australia), pca Case no 2013–16 210n5, 215n24

  • Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago (2006) 45 ilm 800 248n13

  • Bembelista Case (Netherlands/Venezuela) (1903) 10 riaa 717 21n10, 63n46

  • Bolívar Railway Co Case (UK/Venezuela) (1903) 9 riaa 445 25n23

  • Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (Mauritius v UK), pca Case no 2011-03, Award (18 March 2015) 182n37, 195n122, 195n124, 235, 235n161

  • Company General of the Orinoco Case (France/Venezuela) (1905) 10 riaa 184 130n106

  • Dame Franz (France) v Germany (1922) 1 ilr 169 125n79

  • Deserters of Casablanca (France v Germany) (1909) 3 ajil 755 322

  • Delagoa Bay Railway Arbitration (Great Britain and USA v Portugal) (1898) 2 Moore Int’l Arb 1865 98nn80–82

  • Dispute Concerning Coastal State Rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait (Ukraine v Russia), pca Case no 2017-06, Award on Preliminary Objections (21 February 2020) 182n37, 192n103, 195n122, 195n124, 213n18

  • Eastern Extension, Australasia and China Telegraph Co, Ltd (Great Britain) v USA, (1923) 6 riaa 112 62n43

  • Ecuador v USA, pca Case no 2012–5, Expert Opinion on the Construction of Article vii of Christian Tomuschat (24 April 2012) 231n135

  • Ecuador v USA, pca Case no 2012–5, Expert Opinion with Respect to Jurisdiction of W Michael Reisman (24 April 2012) 231n135, 350n235

  • Ecuador v USA, pca Case no 2012–5, Memorial on Objections to Jurisdiction of the USA (25 April 2012) 231–232n138

  • Ecuador v USA, pca Case no 2012–5, Expert Opinion of Alain Pellet (23 May 2012) 232n138, 234n158

  • Georges Pinson (France) v Mexico (1928) 5 riaa 327 248n12

  • Island of Palmas (Netherlands v USA) (1928) ii riaa 829 141, 141n20, 149n43

  • Italy v Cuba, Interim Award (15 March 2005) 227

  • Italy v Cuba, Final Award (15 January 2008) 227

  • Larsen v Hawaiian Kingdom, pca Case no 1999-01, Award (5 February 2001) 123, 123n64, 131, 131n112, 193n109

  • Loss of Property in Ethiopia Owned by Non-ResidentsEritrea’s Claim 24 (Ethiopia v Eritrea), Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission, Partial Award (19 December 2005) 26 riaa 429 59n23

  • Ottoman Empire Lighthouses Concession (Greece v France) (1956) 12 riaa 155 120n46

  • Pious Fund Case (USA v Mexico) (1902) 9 riaa 1 228n112

  • Rainbow Warrior (New Zealand v France) (1990) 82 ilr 499 119n39, 122n61, 129n96

  • Sambiaggio Case (Italy/Venezuela) (1903) 10 riaa 499 25n26

  • South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v China), pca Case no 2013–19, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility (29 October 2015) 181n28, 193n106, 195n124, 199, 199n149, 209n4, 232, 232–233n154, 235, 235n162, 235nn164–165

  • South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v China), pca Case no 2013–19, Award (12 July 2016) 181n29, 181n31, 181n34

  • Spanish Zone of Morocco (Great Britain v Spain) (1925) 2 riaa 615, 2 ilr 157 4, 4nn17–18, 21n10, 25n25, 63, 63n52, 95, 95n62, 120, 120–121n53, 476n90

  • The Dunn Case (Chile/UK) (1895) 21n10

  • Timor Sea Conciliation (Timor-Leste v Australia), pca Case no 2016-10, Decision on Competence (19 September 2016) 210n5

  • Tinoco Arbitration (Great Britain v Costa Rica) (1923) 1 riaa 369 251n26, 255, 255–256

  • Trail Smelter (USA v Canada) (1941) 3 riaa 1905 101n104, 228n112

  • William Hardman (Great Britain) v US (1913) 6 riaa 25 61

  • Wipperman Case (USA/Venezuela) (1887) 3 Moore Int’l Arb 3039 120

    Court of Justice of the European Union

  • C–104/16 P Front Polisario II [2016] ecli:eu:C:2016:973 359, 365, 371–372, 376, 378

  • C–162/96 Racke [1998] ecr i-3655, 3 cmlr 219 112n7, 332nn96–97, 364nn26–27, 372n69

  • C–181/73 Haegeman [1974] ecr 449 364–365n28

  • C–266/16 Western Sahara Campaign [2018] ecli:eu:C:2018:118 359n5, 374

  • C–266/16 Western Sahara Campaign, Opinion by Advocate-General Wathelet [2018] ecli:eu:C:2018:1 374–375

  • C–284/16 Achmea [2018] ecli:eu:C:2018:158 282, 381n105

  • C–363/18 Organisation juive europénne [2019] ecli:eu:C:2019:954 364n25

  • C-386/08 Firma Brita GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen [2010] ecr-i-01289 166n161, 170n186

  • C-420/07 Meletis Apostolides v David Charles Orams and Linda Elizabeth Orams [2009] ecr-i-03571 160n116

  • Opinion 1/17 [2019] ecli:eu:C:2019:341 381n106

  • T–512/12 Front Polisario I [2015] ecli:eu:T:2015:953 359, 365, 369, 371–372, 376, 378

    European Court of Human Rights

  • Albert and others v Hungary, App no 5294/14 (ECtHR, 7 July 2020) 286n32

  • Agrotexim and others v Greece, App no 14807/89 (ECtHR, 24 October 1995) 286n34

  • Ališić and others v Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, App no 60642/08 (ECtHR, 16 July 2014) 291n64

  • Assanidze v Georgia, App no 71503/01 (ECtHR, 8 April 2004) 286n31

  • Bimer SA v Moldova, App no 15084/03 (ECtHR, 10 July 2007) 302n115

  • Blečić v Croatia, App no 59532/00 (ECtHR, 8 March 2006, Merits) 295n82

  • Broniowski v Poland, App no 31443/96 (ECtHR, 28 September 2005, Friendly Settlement) 303

  • Burmych and others v Ukraine, App no 46852/13 (ECtHR, 12 October 2017, Striking Out) 305

  • Catan and Others v Moldova and Russia, App no 43370/04 (ECtHR, 19 October 2012 [gc]) 451n89, 451

  • Chiragov and others v Armenia, App no 13216/05 (ECtHR, 16 June 2015, Merits) 290n58, 290n60, 296

  • Cyprus v Turkey, App no 25781/94 (ECtHR, 10 May 2001, Merits) 293n74, 344

  • Damayev v Russia, App no 36150/04 (ECtHR, 29 May 2012, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 290n58, 296n89

  • Demopoulos and others v Turkey, App nos 46113/99 and others (ECtHR, 1 March 2010, Decision) 258, 296

  • Drozd and Janousek v France and Spain, App no 12747/87 (ECtHR, 26 June 1992) 293n75

  • EG and 175 other Bug River Applications v Poland, App no 50425/99 (ECtHR, 23 September 2008, Decision) 303n129

  • Folgerø and others v Norway, App no 15472/02 (ECtHR, 14 February 2006, Decision) 297n95

  • Gasus Dosier- und Fördertechnik GmbH v The Netherlands, App no 15375/89 (ECtHR, 23 February 1995) 309n158

  • Georgia v Russia (II), App no 38263/08 (ECtHR) 294n79

  • Hassan v United Kingdom App no 29750/09 (ECtHR, 16 September 2014) 284n23

  • Hilal Mammadov v Azerbaijan, App no 81553/12 (ECtHR, 4 February 2016) 297n95

  • Iatridis v Greece, App no 31107/96 (ECtHR, 25 March 1999, Just Satisfaction) 302n119

  • Icyer v Turkey, App no 18888/02 (ECtHR, 12 January 2006, Decision) 304n131

  • Ilașcu and others v Moldova and Russia, App no 48787/99 (ECtHR, 4 July 2001, Decision) 286n31

  • Ilașcu and others v Moldova and Russia, App no 48787/99 (ECtHR, 8 July 2004, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 195n122, 286n31, 291, 344, 399n35

  • Industrial Financial Consortium Investment Metallurgical Union v Ukraine, App no 10640/05 (ECtHR, 26 June 2018, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 299

  • Isayeva v Russia, App no 57950/00 (ECtHR, 24 February 2005, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 296n87

  • Issa and others v Turkey, App no 31821/96 (ECtHR, 16 November 2004, Merits) 294n74

  • James and others v UK, App no 8793/79 (ECtHR, 21 February 1986) 288n45

  • Kerimova and others v Russia, App no 17170/04 (ECtHR, 3 May 2011, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 290n56, 296nn87–88

  • Khamidov v Russia, App no 72118/01 (ECtHR, 15 November 2007, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 290n56

  • Khlebik v Ukraine, App no 2945/16 (ECtHR, 25 July 2017) 453n102

  • Likvidējamā p/s Selga and Vasiļevska v Latvia, App no 17126/02 (ECtHR, 1 October 2013, Decision) 291n64

  • Lithgow and others v UK, App no 9006/80 (ECtHR, 8 July 1986, Merits) 280, 288, 302n114

  • Loizidou v Turkey, App no 15318/89 (ECtHR, 18 December 1996, Merits) 290, 295n83

  • Loizidou v Turkey, App no 15318/89 (ECtHR, 23 March 1995, Preliminary Objections) 293n74, 343n175

  • Loizidou v Turkey, App no 15318/89 (ECtHR, 28 July 1998, Just Satisfaction) 290, 299

  • Marckx v Belgium, App no 6833/74 (ECtHR, 13 June 1979, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 287

  • Marini v Albania, App no 3738/02 (ECtHR, 18 December 2007) 302n116

  • Matthews v UK, App no 24833/94 (ECtHR, 18 February 1999, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 44n115

  • Meleagrou and others v Turkey, App no 14434/09 (ECtHR, 2 April 2013, Decision) 296n92

  • National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers v UK, App no 31045/10 (ECtHR, 8 April 2014, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 297n100

  • Oao Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v Russia, App no 14902/04 (ECtHR, 20 September 2011, Merits) 297, 299

  • Oao Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v Russia, App no 14902/04 (ECtHR, 31 July 2014, Just Satisfaction) 297, 299, 307

  • Peraldi v France, App no 2096/05 (ECtHR, 7 April 2009, Decision) 297n100

  • Preussische Treuhand GmbH & Co KG aA v Poland, App no 47550/06 (ECtHR 7 October 2008, Decision) 295n82

  • Rosenzweig and Bonded Warehouses Ltd v Poland, App no 51728/99 (ECtHR, 5 June 2012, Just Satisfaction) 294n117

  • Sandu and others v Moldova and Russia App nos 21034/05 and seven others (ECtHR, 17 July 2018) 399n29, 402n41, 402nn43–44

  • Sargsyan v Azerbaijan, App no 40167/06 (ECtHR, 16 June 2015, Merits [gc]) 290n58, 296n90, 451nn89–93

  • Selçuk and Asker v Turkey, App nos 23184/94 and 23185/94 (ECtHR, 24 April 1998, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 290n56

  • Sovtransavto Holding v Ukraine, App no 48553/99 (ECtHR, 25 July 2002) 291n64

  • Suljagić v Bosnia and Herzegovina, App no 27912/02 (ECtHR, 3 November 2009) 304

  • Ukraine v Russia (re Crimea) App no 20958/14 (ECtHR, 11 September 2019) 336n120

  • Wolkenberg v Poland, App no 50003/99 (ECtHR, 4 December 2007, Decision) 303n128

  • Xenides-Arestis v Turkey, App no 46347/99 (ECtHR, 22 December 2005, Merits) 296, 304

  • Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v Ukraine, App no 40450/04 (ECtHR, 15 October 2009, Merits and Just Satisfaction) 305

  • Zadrić v Bosnia and Herzegovina, App no 18804/04 (ECtHR, 16 November 2010, Decision) 304n133

  • Zslinsat, Spol SRO v Bulgaria, App no 57785/00 (ECtHR, 10 January 2008, Just Satisfaction) 302n116

    Iran-US Claims Tribunal

  • Anaconda-Iran Inc v Government of Iran and the National Iranian Copper Industries Co (1986) 31 iusctr 199 119n37, 125n79

  • Dadras International and Per-Am Construction Corp v Iran and Tehran Redevelopment Co (1995) 31 iusctr 127 120n45

  • Gould Marketing, Inc, as Successor to Hoffman Export Corp v Ministry of Defence of Iran (1983) 3 iusctr 147 120n45, 121n52, 122n56

  • Mobil Oil Iran Inc and Mobil Sales and Supply Corporation v Government of Iran and National Iranian Oil Co (1987) 16 iusctr 3 119n37

  • Sylvania Technical Systems, Inc v Iran (1985) 8 iusctr 298 25n25, 122n60, 124n77, 129n98

  • USA v Iran (1996) 32 iusctr 162 25n23

    Investor-State Arbitration

  • Achmea BV (formerly Eureko BV) v Slovakia, pca Case no 2008–13, Award on Jurisdiction, Arbitrability, and Suspension (26 October 2010) 36n77

  • ACP Axos Capital GmbH v Republic of Kosovo, icsid Case no ARB/15/22, Award (3 May 2018) 140n10

  • ADC v Hungary, icsid Case no ARB/03/16, Award (2 October 2006) 76n106

  • ADF Group Inc v USA, icsid Case no ARB(AF)/00/1, Award (9 January 2003) 41n97, 78n117

  • Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v Russia, pca Case 2015-07 196n130, 209n3, 335n112, 348

  • Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v Russia, pca Case no 2015-07, Interim Award (24 February 2017) (not public) 334n101

  • AES Summit Generation Ltd and AES-Tisza Erömü Kft v Hungary, icsid Case no arb/07/22, Award (23 September 2010) 468n54

  • Africa Holding Co v drc, icsid Case no arb/05/21, Sentence sur les déclinatoires de compétence et la recevabilité (29 July 2008) 25n23

  • Aguas del Tunari v Bolivia, icsid Case no arb/02/3, Decision on Jurisdiction (21 October 2005) 66n65, 185n60

  • Amco Asia Corp and others v Indonesia, icsid Case no arb/81/1, Award (20 November 1984) 92n45, 291n61

  • American Manufacturing & Trading Inc (amt) v Zaire, icsid Case no arb/93/1, Award (21 February 1997) 28n43, 88n21, 92n45, 92–93n50, 116–117n27, 467n50, 475n85

  • Ampal-American Israel Corp and others v Egypt, icsid Case no arb/12/11, Decision on Jurisdiction (1 February 2016) 227n96, 229

  • Ampal-American Israel Corp and others v Egypt, icsid Case no arb/12/11, Decision on Liability and Heads of Loss (21 February 2017) 5n20, 28, 98, 227n96, 478nn95–96, 481n104

  • Archer Daniels Midland Co and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc v Mexico, icsid Case no arb(af)/04/5, Award (21 November 2007) 188n75

  • Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (aapl) v Sri Lanka, icsid Case no arb/87/3, Dissenting Opinion of Samuel KB Asante (15 June 1990), (1991) 6 icsid Rev 574 19n3

  • Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (aapl) v Sri Lanka, icsid Case no arb/87/3, Award (27 June 1990) 5, 19, 27–29n51, 37–38n88, 40n94, 45–46, 88n21, 92n46, 94nn56–57, 97, 114–115n20, 117n28, 117–118n32, 126, 324–325, 335, 467n49, 467n52, 475, 477n93

  • Autopista Concesionada de Venezuela CA (Aucoven) v Venezuela, icsid Case no arb/00/5, Award (23 September 2003) 119n39, 321n13

  • AWG Group Ltd v Argentina, uncitral, Decision on Liability (30 July 2010) 90–91

  • Azurix Corp v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/01/12, Decision on Jurisdiction (8 December 2003) 212n10

  • Azurix Corp v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/01/12, Award (14 July 2006) 89–90n35

  • Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS v Pakistan, icsid Case no arb/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction (14 November 2005) 212n10

  • Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS v Pakistan, icsid Case no arb/03/29, Award (27 August 2009) 468n56, 470nn69–70, 472n75

  • Bayview Irrigation District and others v Mexico, icsid Case no arb(af)/05/1, Award (19 June 2007) 349n220

  • Bernardus Henricus Funnekotter and others v Zimbabwe, icsid Case no arb/05/6, Award (22 April 2009) 127n90

  • Bernhard von Pezold and others v Zimbabwe, icsid Case no arb/10/15, Award (28 July 2015) 89n25

  • Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd v Tanzania, icsid Case no arb/05/22, Award (24 July 2008) 28n43, 94, 114n12

  • Burlington Resources Inc v Ecuador, icsid Case no arb/08/5, Decision on Ecuador’s Counterclaims (7 December 2017) 84n12

  • Camuzzi International SA v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/03/2, Decision on Objection to Jurisdiction (11 May 2005) 211n10

  • Canadian Cattlemen for Fair Trade v USA, Award on Jurisdiction (28 January 2008) 349n220

  • Cargill, Inc v Mexico, icsid Case no arb(af)/05/2, Award (28 September 2009) 188n75

  • Casinos Austria International GmbH and Casinos Austria AG v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/14/32, Decision on Jurisdiction, Dissenting Opinion and Declaration of Dissent of Santiago Torres Bernárdez (20 June 2018) 187n71

  • Cengiz İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret AS v Libya, icc Case no 21537/zf/ayz, Award (7 November 2018) 5n21, 112n3, 473n79

  • Chevron Corp and Texaco Petroleum v Ecuador, pca Case no 34877, Partial Award on the Merits (30 March 2010) 71n90

  • Chevron Corp and Texaco Petroleum v Ecuador, pca Case no 2009–23, Third Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility (27 February 2012) 193n108, 228

  • CME Czech Republic BV (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, Partial Award (13 September 2001) 211n10

  • CME Czech Republic BV (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, Legal Opinion Prepared by Christoph Schreuer and August Reinisch (20 June 2002) 228n110

  • CMS Gas Transmission Co v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/01/8, Award (12 May 2005) 129–130n107

  • CMS Gas Transmission Co v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/01/8, Annulment Decision (25 September 2007) 32n63, 112n8, 130n100

  • Compañiá de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA (formerly Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, SA and Compagnie Générale des Eaux) v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/97/3, Award (21 November 2000) 90n35

  • Compañiá de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/97/3, Award (20 August 2007) 89n24

  • Compañía del Desarrollo de Santa Elena SA v Costa Rica, icsid Case no arb/96/1, Award (17 February 2000) 101n99

  • Continental Casualty Co v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/03/9, Award (5 September 2008) 32n61, 416n93

  • Copper Mesa Mining Corp v Ecuador, uncitral, pca Case no 2012-2, Award (15 March 2016) 98–99

  • Corn Products International, Inc v Mexico, icsid Case no arb(af)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility (15 January 2008) 188n75

  • Daimler Financial Services AG v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/05/1, Award (22 August 2012) 193n108, 389n10

  • David R Aven and others v Costa Rica, icsid Case no unct/15/3, Award (18 September 2018) 104n118

  • Deutsche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, icsid Case no arb/09/02, Award (31 October 2012) 97n72

  • Deutsche Telekom v India, pca Case no 2014-10, Interim Award (13 December 2017) 113n8

  • Diag Human SE v Czech Republic Ministry of Health, Case no rsp 06/2003, Final Award (4 August 2008) 249–250

  • DS Construction FZCO v Libya, pca Case no 2017–21 461n9

  • Duke Energy Electroquil Partners & Electroquil SA v Ecuador, icsid Case no arb/04/19, Award (16 August 2008) 469–470n71

  • East Mediterranean Gas SAE v Egyptian General Petroleum Corp, Egypitan Natural Gas Holding Co, and Israel Electric Corp Ltd, icc Case no 18215/gz/mhm 227

  • Eastern Sugar v Czech Republic, scc Case no 088/2004, Partial Award (27 March 2007) 291n61

  • ECE Projektmanagement v Czech Republic, pca Case no 2010–5, Award, 13 September 2013 140n10

  • Egyptian General Petroleum Corp and Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Co v East Mediterranean Gas SAE, crcica Case no 829/2012 227

  • El Paso Energy International Co v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/03/15, Award (31 October 2011) 88–89, 476n87

  • Electrabel SA v Hungary, icsid Case no arb/07/19, Decision on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, and Liability (30 November 2012) 36n76

  • Emilio Agustín Maffezini v Spain, icsid Case no arb/97/7, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction (25 January 2000) 236–237

  • Emilio Agustín Maffezini v Spain, icsid Case no arb/97/7, Award (13 November 2000) 472n76

  • Empresas Lucchetti SA and Lucchetti Peru SA v Peru, icsid Case no arb/03/4, Award (7 February 2005) 227n102

  • EnCana Corp v Ecuador, lcia Case no UN3481, Award (3 February 2006) 469n58

  • Enron Corp and Ponderosa Assets LP v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/01/3, Decision on Jurisdiction (14 January 2004) 37n81

  • Enron Corp and Ponderosa Assets LP v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/01/3, Award (22 May 2007) 119n39, 122n61, 129–130n100, 132n122

  • Etrak İnşaat Taahut ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v Libya (icc Arbitration) 461n9

  • European American Investment Bank AG (Austria) v Slovak Republic, Award on Jurisdiction (22 October 2012) 399n28

  • Everest Estate LLC and others v Russia, pca Case no 2015–36, Press Release (9 August 2016) 320n9, 331n89

  • Everest Estate LLC and others v Russia, pca Case no 2015–36, Decision on Jurisdiction (20 March 2017) (not public) 67n70, 196n130, 209n3, 334n101, 341, 348–349n225, 352

  • Feldman v Mexico, icsid Case no arb(af)/99/1, Award (16 December 2002) 48n125

  • Franz Sedelmayer v Russia, Arbitration Award (7 July 1998) 249n17, 270

  • Frontier Petroleum Services Ltd v Czech Republic, Final Award (12 November 2010) 470n72

  • Gamesa Eólica SLU v Syria, pca Case no 2012-11, Award (5 April 2014) (not public) 112n2

  • Generation Ukraine, Inc v Ukraine, icsid Case no arb/00/9, Award (16 September 2003) 469–470n67

  • Glamis Gold Ltd v USA, Procedural Order no 2 (Revised) (31 May 2005) 335n113

  • Grand River Enterprises Six Nations Ltd et al v USA, Award (12 January 2011) 36n77

  • Gujarat State Petroleum Corp Ltd et al v Yemen and the Yemeni Ministry of Oil and Minerals, icc Case no 19299/mcp, Final Award (10 July 2015) 48n125

  • Güriş İnşaat ve Mühendislik AŞ v Libya (icc Arbitration) 461n9

  • Himpurna California Energy Ltd v PT (Persero) Perusahaan Listruik Negara, icc, Final Award (4 May 1999), (2000) 25 yb Comm Arb 13 113n9

  • Hrvatska Elektroprivreda dd v Slovenia, icsid Case no arb/05/24, Tribunal’s Ruling Regarding the Participation of David Mildon qc in Further Stages of the Proceedings (6 May 2008) 265nn97–98

  • Hulley Enterprises Ltd (Cyprus) v Russia, uncitral, pca Case no 226, Final Award (18 July 2014) 297

  • International Thunderbird Gaming Corp v Mexico, Award, Separate Opinion of Thomas Wälde (1 December 2005) 198n138

  • Interocean Development Company and Interocean Oil Exploration Co v Nigeria, icsid Case no arb/13/20, Procedural Order No. 5 on the Claimants’ Requests Regarding (i) the Authority of Volterra Fietta Lawyers to Represent the Respondent and (ii) the Source and Terms of the Funding of the Respondent’s Defence (15 October 2016) 265n97

  • Joseph Houben v Burundi, icsid Case no arb/13/7, Award (12 January 2016) 28n46

  • LESI SpA and ASTALDI SpA v Algeria, icsid Case no arb/05/3, Decision on Jurisdiction (12 July 2006) 185n60

  • LESI SpA and ASTALDI SpA v Algeria, icsid Case no arb/05/3, Award (12 November 2008) 126n86, 476n91, 478n96

  • LG&E Energy Corp, LG&E Capital Corp and LG&E International Inc v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/02/1, Decision on Liability (3 October 2006) 129–130n100, 325n42, 470n71

  • Libyan Arab Foreign Investment Co (lafico) v Burundi, Award (4 March 1991) 96 ilr 279 119n39, 124

  • Limited Liability Co Lugzor and others v Russia, pca Case no 2015–29 197n130, 209n3

  • Limited Liability Co Lugzor and others v Russia, pca Case no 2015–29, Press Release (28 November 2019) 320n9

  • Limited Liability Co Lugzor and others v Russia, pca Case no 2015–29, Tribunal’s Letter (29 August 2017) (not public) 334n101, 341n164, 341n166

  • Mabco Constructions SA v Republic of Kosovo, icsid Case no arb/17/25 168n177

  • Metalclad Corp v Mexico, icsid Case no arb(af)/97/1, Award (30 August 2000) 101n99, 470n67

  • Methanex Corp v USA, Award (3 August 2005) 41n97, 43n113, 48n125, 344n184

  • Middle East Cement v Egypt, icsid Case no arb/99/6, Award (12 April 2002) 76n106

  • MNSS BV and Recupero Credito Acciaio NV v Montenegro, icsid Case no arb(AF)/12/8, Award (4 May 2016) 89n25, 220n61

  • Mondev International Ltd v USA, icsid Case no arb(af)/99/2, Award (11 October 2002) 40n91, 78n117

  • MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile SA v Chile, icsid Case no arb/01/7, Award (25 May 2004) 470n67

  • National Grid v Argentina, uncitral, Award (3 November 2008) 89n24

  • Niko Resources (Bangladesh) Ltd v Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration & Production Co Ltd (‘Bapex’) and Bangladesh Oil Gas and Mineral Corp (‘Petrobangla’), icsid Case no arb/10/11, Decision on Jurisdiction (19 August 2013) 193n108

  • NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine (Ukraine) and others v Russia, pca Case no 2017-16 197n130, 346n194

  • Noble Ventures, Inc v Romania, icsid Case no arb/01/11, Award (12 October 2005) 469n61, 483n105

  • Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding AB v Latvia, scc Case no 118/2001, Arbitral Award (16 December 2003) 113n9

  • Occidental Petroleum Corp and Occidental Exploration and Production Co v Ecuador, icsid Case no arb/06/11, Award (5 October 2012) 90n35, 98

  • Olin Holdings Ltd v Libya, icc Case no 20355/mcp, Final Award (25 May 2018) 466n46

  • Oschadbank v Russia, pca Case no 2016-14 197n130, 209n3, 346n194

  • PacRim v El Salvador, icsid Case no arb/09/12, Decision on Jurisdiction (1 June 2012) 348n208

  • Pantechniki SA Contractors & Engineers (Greece) v Albania, icsid Case no arb/07/21, Award (30 July 2009) 28n46, 92–93, 100n87, 114–115n18, 476–478n94, 478nn96–97, 480n101

  • Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Lithuania, icsid Case no arb/05/8, Award (11 September 2007) 88n21, 92–94, 474

  • Patrick Mitchell v DRC, icsid arb/99/7, Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Award (1 November 2006) 132n117

  • Peter A Allard v Barbados, pca Case no 2012-06, Award (27 June 2016) 101n100, 104

  • Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v Norway, icsid Case no arb/20/11 176n6

  • Philip Morris Asia Ltd (Hong Kong) v Australia, pca Case no 2012-12, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility (17 December 2015) 237

  • Phoenix Action Ltd v Czech Republic, icsid Case no arb/06/5, Award (15 April 2009) 2n4, 38n83, 401n40

  • Ping An v Belgium, icsid Case no arb/12/29, Award (30 April 2015) 193n108, 228

  • PJSC CB PrivaBbank and Finance Co Finilion LLC v Russia, pca Case no 2015–21 196n130, 209n3

  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Co Finilon LLC v Russia, pca Case no 2015–21, Interim Award (24 February 2017) (not public) 334n101, 348

  • PJSC Ukrnafta v Russia, pca Case no 2015–34, Award on Jurisdiction (26 June 2017) (not public) 11, 196n130, 209n3, 222, 330–332, 340–341, 346–349, 351

  • Plama v Bulgaria, icsid Case no arb/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction (8 February 2005) 185n60

  • PSEG Global Inc and others v Turkey, icsid Case no arb/02/5, Award (19 January 2005) 90n35

  • Rompetrol Group NV v Romania, icsid Case no arb/06/3, Decision of the Tribunal on the Participation of a Counsel (14 January 2010) 265n97, 265n99

  • Rompetrol Group NV v Romania, icsid Case no arb/06/3, Award (6 May 2013) 44n116

  • Ronald S Lauder v Czech Republic, Final Award (3 September 2001) 93n50, 96

  • RosInvest Co UK Ltd v Russia, scc Case no V079/2005, Award on Jurisdiction (5 October 2007) 42n103

  • RSM Production Corp v Central African Republic, icsid Case no arb/07/2, Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability (7 December 2010) 113n9

  • RSM Production Corp v Grenada, icsid Case no arb/05/14, Final Award (18 March 2009) 194n117

  • RSM Production Corp v Saint Lucia, icsid Case no arb/12/10, Decision on Saint Lucia’s Request for Provisional Measures (12 December 2013) 194n119

  • Rumeli Telekom AS and Telsim Mobil Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri AS v Kazakhstan, icsid Case no arb/05/16, Award (29 July 2008) 48n125, 437n45

  • Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, Jurisdiction over the Counterclaim (7 May 2004) 220

  • Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, Partial Award (17 March 2006) 28n38, 28n41, 40n91, 72n90, 74n98, 92n45, 291n61, 467n51, 469n57, 470n66, 470n71

  • Sanum Investments Ltd v Laos, pca Case no 2013-13, Award on Jurisdiction (13 December 2013) 140n9, 183n42, 196n127, 218, 221–222n71, 338, 340, 399n30

  • Sempra Energy International v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/02/16, Award (28 September 2007) 119n39, 122n61, 129n97, 467n54

  • Sempra Energy International v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/02/16, Decision on Annulment (29 June 2010) 41n97

  • Sempra Energy International v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/02/16, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction (11 May 2005) 211n10

  • Siemens AG v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/02/8, Award (17 January 2007) 89n24, 232n137, 467n54

  • South American Silver Ltd v Bolivia, pca Case no 2013–15, Award (30 August 2018) 130n107, 132

  • Spyridon Roussalis v Romania, icsid Case no arb/06/1, Award (1 December 2011) 32n60

  • Stabil LLC and others v Russia, pca Case no 2015–35, Award on Jurisdiction (26 June 2017) (not public) 11, 196n130, 198–199n150, 209n3, 222, 330, 332, 334n101, 338, 340–341, 346–348n208, 448n77

  • Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/03/19, Decision on Liability (30 July 2010) 468n54

  • Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, SA v Mexico, icsid Case no arb(af)/00/2, Award (29 May 2003) 466–467n51, 469n58

  • Tidewater Inc and others v Venezuela, icsid Case no arb/10/5, Award (15 March 2015) 195n118

  • Toto Costruzioni Generali SpA v Lebanon, icsid Case no arb/07/12, Decision on Jurisdiction (11 September 2009) 126

  • Toto Costruzioni Generali SpA v Lebanon, icsid Case no arb/07/12, Award (7 June 2012) 126, 470n70, 474n81

  • Trasta Energy v Libya (uncitral) 473n79

  • Tza Yap Shum v Peru, icsid Case no arb/07/6, Decision on Jurisdiction and Competence (19 June 2009) 140n9

  • Tza Yap Shum v Peru, icsid Case no arb/07/6, Award (7 July 2011) 221

  • Unión Fenosa Gas SA v Egypt, icsid Case no arb/14/4, Award (31 August 2018) 127n90, 129n97

  • Urbaser SA and others v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/07/26, Award (8 December 2016) 84n12, 104–105, 401n40

  • Valores Mundiales SL and Consorcio Andino SL v Venezuela, icsid Case no arb13/11 – Annulment Proceedings Procedural Resolution no 2 (29 August 2019) 266, 269–270n111, 274–276

  • Veteran Petroleum Ltd (Cyprus) v Russia, uncitral, pca Case no AA228, Final Award (18 July 2014) 297

  • Waste Management Inc v Mexico, icsid Case no arb(af)/00/2, Final Award (20 April 2004) 37n80

  • Waste Management, Inc v Mexico (“Number 2”), icsid Case no arb(af)/00/3, Award (30 April 2004) 78n117, 466n40, 469n61

  • Way2B ACE v Libya, Award (24 May 2018) 5n21, 112n3

  • Wena Hotels Ltd v Egypt, icsid Case no arb/98/4, Award (8 December 2000) 88n21, 90n35, 92–94, 475n85

  • Wena Hotels Ltd v Egypt, icsid Case no arb/98/4, Decision on Annulment (28 January 2002) 211n10

  • William Nagel v Czech Republic, scc Case no 049/2002, Award (9 September 2003) 474

  • Wintershall AG v Argentina, icsid Case no arb/04/14, Award (8 December 2008) 195n118

  • WJ Holding Ltd v Transdniestrian Moldovan Republic, icc Case no 21717/mhm, Award (6 June 2018) and Addendum (30 August 2018) 12n34

  • World Wide Minerals v Kazakhstan, Award (22 December 2010) (not public) 220

  • World Wide Minerals v Kazakhstan (case 2), Decision on Jurisdiction (15 October 2015) (not public) 140n10

  • Yosef Maiman, Merhav (Mnf) Ltd, Merhav Ampal Group Ltd, and Merhav Ampal Energy Holdings Ltd Partnership v Egypt, pca Case no 2012–26 227n96, 473n79

  • Yukos Universal Ltd (Isle of Man) v Russia, uncitral, pca Case no 2005-04/AA 227, Final Award (18 July 2014) 99n84, 288n18, 297

    wto and gatt

  • gatt Panel, United States – Taxes on Petroleum and Certain Imported Substances, Report of the Panel adopted on 17 June 1987, L/6175 - 34S/136 389n8

  • European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products (29 September 2006) wt/DS291/R, wt/DS292/R, and wt/DS293/R 70n78

  • Peru – Additional Duty Imports of Certain Agricultural Products (20 July 2015) wt/DS457/ab/R 70n80

  • Russia – Measures Concerning Traffic in TransitPanel Report (5 April 2019) wt/DS512/R 389n8

  • United States – Sections 301–310 of the Trade Act of 1974 – Panel Report (11 December 1999) wt/DS152/R 389n9

  • United States – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties (China) (11 March 2011) wt/DS379/ab/R 38n87

    International Criminal Law Nuremberg Trials

  • United States v List (Wilhelm) and others (Hostage Case) (1948) 11 twc 757, 15 ilr 632 61, 117n26

  • United States v Carl Krauch et al (IG Farben Trial) (1948) 8 twc 1081 100n95

    International Criminal Court

  • Prosecutor v Katanga (Judgment pursuant to article 74 of the Statute) icc-01/04-01/07 (7 March 2014) 60nn28–29, 77n112

  • Prosecutor v Mbarushimana (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges) icc-01/04-01/10 (16 December 2011) 60n28

  • Prosecutor v Mudacumura (Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application under Article 58) icc-01/04-01/12 (13 July 2012) 60n28

  • Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Decision Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute on the Charges of the Prosecutor Against Bosco Ntaganda), icc-01/04-02/06 (9 June 2014) 60n28

    International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

  • Prosecutor v Hadzihasanoviæ and Kubura, it-01-47-T (15 March 2006) 39n90

  • Prosecutor v Dusko Tadic, it-94-1-A (15 July 1999) 444

  • Prosecutor v Naletilic and Martinovic, it-98-34-T (31 March 2003) 434n22

  • Prosecutor v Boškoski, it-04-82-T (10 July 2008) 26n31

  • Prosecutor v Kupreškić et al, it-95-16-T (14 January 2000) 31n57, 42n108

  • Prosecutor v Kunarac et al, it-96-23-T, it-96-23/1-T (22 February 2001) 43

    National Courts

  • Bridge of Varvarin [2013] Case no 2 BvR 2660/06 (German Federal Constitutional Court) 47

  • Chen Li Hong and others v Ting Lei Miao and others [2000] 3 hkcfar 9 150

  • Diaz v USA, 222 us 574 (1912) 62n38

  • Government of Laos v Sanum Investments Ltd [2015] sghc 15 140n9, 209n2, 218n66

  • Herrera v United States, 222 us 558 (1912) 62n38

  • Hesperides Hotels v Aegean Holidays Ltd [1978] qb 205 267n106

  • Jenny and Hedwige R v Belgium, Case no 133 (1933) 7 ilr 323 (Court of Appeal of Brussels) 120n44

  • John Doe I et al v Unocal Corp et al, 963 F Supp 880 (cd Cal 1997)

  • Juragua Iron Co, Ltd v USA, 212 us 297 (1909) 62n38

  • Kiobel v Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum Co, 569 us 108 (2013) 100n92

  • OI European Group v Venezuela, no 16-cv-01533, Memorandum Opinion and Order (ddc, 1 November 2019) 261–262n87

  • OI European Group v Venezuela, no 16-cv-1533, Memorandum Opinion (ddc, 21 May 2019) 261–262n87

  • Presbyterian Church of Sudan v Talisman Energy, 374 F Supp 2d 331 (sdny 2005) 100n93

  • Public Committee against Torture in Israel et al v Government of Israel et al [2006] hcj 769/02 (Supreme Court of Israel sitting as the High Court of Justice) 35n75

  • R v Reeves Taylor [2019] wlr(d) 648, [2019] uksc 51, [2019] 3 wlr 1073 252n30

  • Rusoro Mining Ltd v Venezuela, no 18–7044, Order (DC Cir, 1 May 2019) 260n75

  • Sanum Investments Ltd v Laos [2016] sgca 57 (Singapore Court of Appeal) 140n9, 151n59, 209n2, 218, 221, 237n171

  • Seadrill Ghana Operations Ltd v Tullow Ghana Ltd [2018] ewhc 1640 (Comm) 212n12

  • Russia v A (Russia v Ukrnafta) [2018] Case no 4A_396/2017, bge 144 iii 559 (Swiss Federal Tribunal) 11, 196n134, 213n17, 222, 330–332n91, 338, 340–341, 346–348n222, 380n101, 448

  • Russia v A and others (Russia v Stabil and others) [2018] Case no 4A_398/2017, (2019) 17(2) German Arb J 93 (Swiss Federal Tribunal) 11, 196n134, 213n17, 222, 330–332n91, 338, 340–341, 346–348n222, 380n101, 448

  • VEB Carl Zeiss Jena v Firma Carl Zeiss Heidenheim, atf 91 ii 117 (Swiss Federal Tribunal) 262n86

  • Wiwa v Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum Co, 392 F3d 812 (5th Cir 2004) 100n91

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Investments in Conflict Zones

The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories, and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts

Series: 

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 180 102 12
PDF Views & Downloads 0 0 0