17. A water culture perspective for food security

In: Justice and food security in a changing climate
Authors:
S. Meisch Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities (SVT), University of Bergen, Parkveien 9, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
International Centre for Ethics in the Sciences and Humanities (IZEW), University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstr. 19, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.

Search for other papers by S. Meisch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
S. Bremer Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities (SVT), University of Bergen, Parkveien 9, 5020 Bergen, Norway.

Search for other papers by S. Bremer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open Access

The changing climate is disrupting freshwater infrastructures and this affects food security. Dominant technocratic systems of knowledge and practice supporting water infrastructures are being undermined by rapid changes, which introduce new uncertainties and contest old securities. Novel ways of mobilising knowledge and practice for water infrastructures are needed that readmit communities’ diverse cultural interactions with water and promote adaptive decision-making. The paper introduces the project ‘Changing Water Cultures’ (CANALS) claiming: (1) that current understandings of water, climate and infrastructures struggle to address emerging uncertainties due to climate change; (2) that a proper regard for water cultures is needed to overcome these obstacles; particularly by (3) extending the ‘peer communities’ of diverse knowledge-holders. The paper’s water culture perspective understands cultures as both practices and systems of symbols and meanings. It recognises the hybrid character of water, which exists independently of humans and at the same time is culturally enacted through human practices. From this perspective, the paper looks beyond infrastructures physical manifestation to include the social practices connecting people and objects in the world in socio-material relations. A water-cultural perspective thus better captures the complex processes around water infrastructures and food in the context of challenges posed by climate change. The paper first argues for a novel way of analysing water infrastructures and second explains its relevance for understanding food security in a changing climate.

  • Bichsel, K. (2016). Water and the (Infra-)Structure of Political Rule: A Synthesis. Water Alternatives 9(2): 356-372. Böhme, H. (1988). Umriß einer Kulturgeschichte des Wassers. Eine Einleitung. In Böhme, H. (ed.) Kulturgeschichte des Wassers. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 7-42.

  • Bremer, S., Wardekker, A., Dessai, D., Sobolowski, S., Slaattelid, R. and van der Sluijs, J. (2019a). Toward a multi-faceted conception of co-production of climate services. Climate Services 13: 42-50.

  • Bremer, S.; Schneider, P. and Glavovic, B. (2019b). Climate Change and Amplified Representations of Natural Hazards in Institutional Cultures. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.354

  • Bremer, S. and Meisch, S. (2017). Co-production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives. WIREs Climate Change, 8: e482. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.482

  • Bruns, A., Meisch, S., Ahmed, A., Meissner, R. and Romero-Lankao, P. (2021). Nexus disrupted: Lived realities and the Water-Energy-Food Nexus in the urban and beyond. Geoforum (accepted).

  • Cairns, R. and Krzywoszynska, A. (2016). Anatomy of a buzzword: The emergence of ‘the water-energy-food nexus’ in UK natural resource debates. Environmental Science & Policy 64, 164-170.

  • Castree, N. (2017). Nature, in: The International Encyclopedia of Geography. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0522

  • Donner, S. (2011). Making the Climate a Part of the Human World. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 92(10): 1297-1302.

  • Floyd, R. (2013). Analyst, theory and security: A new framework for understanding Environmental Security Studies. In: Floyd, R. and Matthew, R. (eds) Environmental Security: Approaches and Issues, Routledge, London, pp. 1-20. Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7): 739-755.

  • Hulme, M. (2015). Climate and its changes: a cultural appraisal. Geo 2: 1-11.

  • Linton, J. and Budds, J. (2014). The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum 57: 170-180.

  • Lawhon, M.; Nilsson, D., Silver, J., Ernstson, H. and Lwasa, S. (2018). Thinking through heterogeneous infrastructure configurations. Urban Studies 55(4): 720-732.

  • Leese, M. and Meisch, S. (2015). Securitising Sustainability? Questioning the ‘Water, Energy and Food – Security Nexus’. Water Alternatives 8(1): 695-709.

  • McFarlane, C. and Silver, J. (2017). Navigating the city: Dialectics of everyday urbanism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42(3): 458-471.

  • Meisch, S. (2019). I Want to Tell You a Story: How Narrative Water Ethics Contributes to Re-theorizing Water Politics. Water 11(4), 631. http://doi.org/10.3390/w11040631

  • Meisch, S. (2018). Water Ethics – Lessons from Post-Normal Science. In: Springer, S. and Grimm, H. (eds) Professionals in Food Chains: Ethics, Roles and Responsibilities. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp. 459-464.

  • Perreault, T. (2014). What kind of governance for what kind of equity? Towards a theorization of justice in water governance. Water International 39(2): 233-245.

  • Rudiak-Gould, P. (2013). ‘We Have Seen It with Our Own Eyes’: Why We Disagree about Climate Change Visibility. Weather, Climate, and Society 5(2): 120-132.

  • Sewell, W. (1999). The Concept(s) of Culture. In: Bonell, V. and Hunt, L. (eds) Beyond the Cultural Turn. New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 86-94.

  • Strang, V. (2004). The Meaning of Water. Berg Publishers, Oxford, New York.

  • Orlove, B. and Caton, S. (2010). Water Sustainability: Anthropological Approaches and Prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 401-415.

  • Shove, E. (2017). Matters of Practice. In: Hui, A., Schatzki, T.R. and Shove, E. (eds) The nexus of practices. Connections, constellations and practitioners. Routledge, London, New York, pp. 155-168.

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The political economy and political ecology of the hydrosocial cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 142(1): 56-60.

  • Voelker, T., Blackstock, K.; Kovacic, Z.; Sindt, J.; Strand, R. and Waylen, K. (2019). The role of metrics in the governance of the water-energy-food nexus within the European Commission. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.08.001

  • Wesselink, A., Kooy, M. and Warner, J. (2017). Sociohydrology and hydrosocial analysis: toward dialogues across disciplines. WIREs Water, 4: e1196.

  • Wiegleb, V. and Bruns, A. (2018). What Is Driving the Water-Energy-Food Nexus? Discourses, Knowledge, and Politics of an Emerging Resource Governance Concept. Frontiers in Environmental Science 6, 870.

  • Williams, J., Bouzarovski, S. and Swyngedouw, E. (2019). The urban resource nexus: On the politics of relationality, water-energy infrastructure and the fallacy of integration. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37: 652-669.

Citation Info

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 106 94 1
PDF Views & Downloads 20 12 0