own, compliance with its decisions is subject to the political will of States. As Judge Shigeru Oda warned in Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo , 16 “the repeated disregard of the judgments or orders of the Court by the parties will inevitably impair the dignity of the Court and raise
transparency is only problematic if the Security Council and/or its individual members are subject to legal limits at all and if there are ways of reviewing compliance with these legal limits. This Section shows that such legal limits and means of review indeed exist. The Security Council’s actions must comply
article 56 of the 1969 Vienna Convention in the Law of Treaties :
(1) A treaty which contains no provision regarding its termination and which does not provide for denunciation or withdrawal is not subject to denunciation or withdrawal unless: a. It is established that the parties intended to admit the
subject to these considerations. The cjeu has held in Kaur and Rottman that the acquisition and loss of nationality present significantly different situations.
For example, whether or not an individual has a real connection to the member state (and Union) in the sense of Nottebohm
Resolution mentioned above. That would really be a clear and remarkable signal to celebrate its centenary anniversary.
There are of course also positive developments to report. In relation to the subject of fundamental labour rights, the ILO has certainly been very successful