Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 117 items for :

  • All: "European Court of Human Rights" x
  • All accessible content x
Clear All

Sophie van Bijsterveld

1 Introduction The 1993 Kokkinakis judgment was the first in which the European Court of Human Rights (hereafter: the European Court, the Court, or the ECtHR) found a violation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereafter: the Convention or the echr ), the right

Herman Nys

substantive limb of Article 2 of the Convention. 1 These summaries are based on the provisional text of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights. These judgments are still subject to editorial revision before their reproduction in Reports of Judgments and Decisions. For the full provisional text

Joseph Dute

patients was sufficient and that there had been no breach of the hospital’s duty of care as it had not been possible to foresee A.J.’s suicide. In a Chamber judgment of 28 March 2017, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of both the substantive and

Joseph Dute

torts case to a case raising an issue under Article 8. * These summaries are based on the provisional text of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights. These judgments are still subject to editorial revision before their reproduction in Reports of Judgments and Decisions. For the

Joseph Dute

limb of Article 2 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, holds that there has been a violation of the substantive and the procedural aspect of Article 2 of the Convention. These summaries are based on the provisional text of the judgements of the European Court of

Joseph Dute

. These summaries are based on the provisional text of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights. These judgments are still subject to editorial revision before their reproduction in Reports of Judgments and Decisions . For the full provisional text, see: http://www.echr.coe.int .

Joseph Dute

, following the European Court of Human Rights’ indication, under Rule 39 of its Rules of Court (interim measures), that he should be placed in the prison hospital and provided with adequate treatment for his cancer and chronic hcv , the applicant was transferred to the prison hospital. Subsequently he

Joseph Dute

the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights. These judgments are still subject to editorial revision before their reproduction in Reports of Judgments and Decisions. For the full provisional text, see: http://www.echr.coe.int .

Joseph Dute

interpretation or the content of any legal provisions. 1 These summaries are based on the provisional text of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights. These judgments are still subject to editorial revision before their reproduction in Reports of Judgments and Decisions. For the full provisional

Joseph Dute

her husband had undergone treatment that was not adapted to his clinical situation. She appealed against that decision to the Administrative Supreme Court, which dismissed her appeal in a judgment of 26 February 2013. Next, the applicant lodged an application with the European Court of Human Rights