Search Results
Abstract
Tertullian marked the boundaries between Catholic Christians and others—pagans, heretics, and Jews—in relation to doctrine (lex credendi), religious practices (lex orandi), and everyday life (lex agendi) in an unusually strict way. His eagerness to pinpoint differences could be explained as coming from his uncompromising personality, the threatened minority position of the Christians in Carthage in his time, and his responsibility to instruct newly-converted Christians. In this article, it is argued that the main reason for his strictness was, however, his fundamental principle in the light of which he believed that all beliefs and actions must be evaluated, namely that Christians must worship the one true God wholeheartedly and avoid idolatry in everything. In this article, several examples of concrete expressions of belief, religious practices and life will be analysed, and it will be shown that this principle steered his teaching.
Abstract
The Manichaean Bishop Faustus is one of the harshest critics of the Old Testament and Mosaic Torah in the first centuries AD. In his Capitula, he levels arguments against Catholic understanding and use of the Old Testament in general and Mosaic Torah in particular. Augustine, in his Contra Faustum Manichaeum, attacks against Faustus’ views and presents his own. Doing so, he formulates ideas that have lived further in Western theology, such as continuing worth of the Mosaic Torah even for the Christians, its correct understanding and use, and his later so famous doctrine of Jews as witnesses.