Search Results
Abstract
Taking into account the wide variety of mystery cults and their remarkable apogee in late Hellenistic and Imperial times, this paper will argue that Imperial cult practices—at least in some places, according to our sources—probably included certain stimuli that were implemented in order to elicit specific emotions in worshippers. However, my interest here will not be in speculating about the content of these rites, nor about what people actually experienced. Instead, this paper shows that the use of mysteric jargon and certain ritual elements in Imperial cult was devised and adopted in order to suggest a specific understanding and experience of Imperial power. The world of mysteries provided the collective framework of meaning within which those stimuli made complete sense. To this end, one of the main lines of inquiry that runs through the present volume will be explored: how and why Imperial cult made use of the collective semantic value of the mysteries.
Abstract
Epigraphy tells about a deeply conservative Athens in Roman times. However, the civic religious life was not identical to that of earlier periods. This article is based on two main ideas. First, continuity is never mere survival; when surrounded by a new context, it may be interpreted as change. The interaction between the Roman empire and the Athenian elites provided such a new context: both Rome and local elites were interested in fostering continuity of religious forms. Secondly, notwithstanding this, epigraphy does indeed document some changes within the civic religion of Roman Athens. One of the most evident is the increasing oligarchization of religious power. It is my contention that this development had a deep impact on religiosity too.From Hellenistic times onwards, the ties between the demos and civic religion were progressively fading away. By Roman times, the democratic fiction did not need to be maintained anymore, as the changes in the management of civic religion show. The increasing religious power of the elite is one of the factors which contributed to create a new framework of meaning. Among other things, the success of certain gods, such as Asklepios, Isis, or Zeus Hypsistos, may also be explained within this new context. Reversely, the growing power of these gods may also account for the option taken by those members of the elite who chose the cult of Asklepios or Isis as a stage on which to display their generosity and improve their social prestige. It seems only fair to conclude that changes in civic religion should also be explained by the changing attitudes of the elites.
Abstract
From Herodotus on, Graeco-Roman tradition attributed an Egyptian origin to the widespread Mediterranean custom of parading the gods on a platform. The aim of this chapter is to analyse one of the many ways of creating and recreating a shared cultural universe that lessens the distance between two groups that were initially alien to each other. A combination of estrangement and rapprochement let Egyptian culture appear as fully exotic (it remained the “Other”), and at the same time as the antecedent of the dominant group’s customary way of doing things (thus also becoming part of “us”). Three passages by Claudian (IV Cos. 568–574), Servius (Ad Aen. 6.68) and Macrobius (Sat. 1.23.13) alluding to the Egyptian custom of transporting the images of the gods on platforms helped to recreate a common cultural space between the two traditions, and also conferred respectability on this ritual at times when this might be particularly necessary.