Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 5 of 5 items for

  • Author or Editor: Giancarlo Abbamonte x
  • Search level: All x
Clear All

Abstract

Statius’ Silvae were discovered by Poggio around 1416, but they were not studied carefully until they were first copied by Pomponio Leto (around 1463) in Rome. Then Niccolò Perotti first emended and commented on the Silvae (1470), and finally Domizio Calderini lectured on these poems in the classrooms at the university of Rome and first published a printed commentary on the Silvae (1475). After this decade, when the Silvae were intensively studied by Roman Humanists, they occuppied a stable position in the curricula of the Italian and European schools until the eighteenth century.

In: Editing and Commenting on Statius' Silvae
In: A Companion to the Renaissance in Southern Italy (1350–1600)

Abstract

Scholars have lengthy debated on the originality of the humanistic commentary on the classical authors with respect to the medieval commentaries on the same authors. If the question can be regarded as still open for the works written in the first half of the 15th century, the birth of the printing determined a dramatic change in the contents and the form of the commentaries. From the point of view of the content the humanists are much more interested in the different readings transmitted by the manuscripts, whilst the printing allows both to have different layouts of the commentaries and to insert new tools as indexes and page numbers for consulting them. The present paper will present the new aspects of the printed commentaries and will try to explain the reasons which produced each change.

Open Access
In: AION (filol.) Annali dell'Università degli Studi di Napoli "L'Orientale"
Studies in Book History, the Classical Tradition, and Humanism in Honor of Craig Kallendorf
Habent sua fata libelli honors the work of Craig Kallendorf, offering studies in several fields in which he chiefly distinguished himself: the history of the book and reading, the classical tradition and reception studies, Renaissance humanism, and Virgilian scholarship with a special focus on the creative transformation of the Aeneid through the centuries. The volume is rounded out by an appreciation of Craig Kallendorf, including a review of his scholarship and its significance.

In addition to the topics mentioned above, the volume’s twenty-five contributions are of relevance to those working in the fields of classical philology, Neo-Latin, political philosophy, poetry and poetics, printing and print culture, Romance languages, art history, translation studies, and Renaissance and early modern Europe generally.

Contributors: Alessandro Barchiesi, Susanna Braund, Hélène Casanova-Robin, Jean-Louis Charlet, Federica Ciccolella, Ingrid De Smet, Margaret Ezell, Edoardo Fumagalli, Julia Gaisser, Lucia Gualdo Rosa, James Hankins, Andrew Laird, Marc Laureys, John Monfasani, Timothy Moore, Colette Nativel, Marianne Pade, Lisa Pon, Wayne Rebhorn, Alden Smith, Sarah Spence, Fabio Stok, Richard Thomas, and Marino Zorzi.
In: Habent sua fata libelli