Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 23 items for

  • Author or Editor: Karin Finsterbusch x
  • 限定层级: All x
Clear All

This article studies how the word Torah is used in the Pentateuch to designate a collection of laws. In Deuteronomy – originally an independent composition – “Torah” is used for the first time as a designation of a substantial collection of laws. When Deuteronomy was integrated into the Pentateuch this deuteronomic signification of “Torah” changed: According to Exod 24:12, God gives on Mt. Sinai to Moses. Based on the key terms and , the adressees of the Pentateuch could only understand this Sinai-Torah as refering to Exod 25:1–31:17; Lev 1–27; Deut 5:1b–26:16; the blessings and curses of Deut 28; and the song of Deut 32. The Torah containing these passages forms the basis of the covenant in Moab (Deuteronomy 29–30) and is written down by Moses according to Deut 31:9, 24. This “Moabite” Torah Book is placed in the Pentateuch next to the “Book of the Covenant” which is written down by Moses as well (Exod 24:7) and which provides the basis for the covenant formed on Mt. Sinai.

In: Journal of Ancient Judaism

This article studies the relationship of Deuteronomy and Joshua on the subject of Torah, one of the main topics and themes of Deuteronomy. Four major conclusions are reached. First, the Torah was not part of a (hypothetically independent, pre-exilic) Deuteronomy–Joshua conquest story of the land. Second, exilic/early post-exilic redactors tried to link Joshua with Deuteronomy (still an independent composition) and to support the authority of the Torah (i. e., Deuteronomy) and especially the Deuteronomic law, through the insertion of the Ebal-Gerizim episode and the addition of Josh 22:5, with the related narrative of Josh 22:9–34. Third, a “Pentateuchoriented redaction,” reflected by Josh 1:7–8 and 23:6, emphasizes that the book of Joshua is not part of the Torah, in the sense of a (proto-) Pentateuch, containing at least Exodus–Deuteronomy. Finally, a “Hexateuch-oriented redaction” tried to redefine Torah as Hexateuch by adding a last chapter, Josh 24. Joshua wrote “Joshua,” and “Joshua” became Torah: “The book of the Torah of Moses” (Josh 23:6) metamorphosed at the very end of this process into “the book of the Torah of God” (Josh 24:26). However, this expression became as under-used as the Hexateuch itself: Joshua became part of the Prophets, and Deuteronomy became the “fifth book of Moses.”

In: Journal of Ancient Judaism
In: Journal of Ancient Judaism
In: Biblische Zeitschrift
In: Biblische Zeitschrift

Abstract

In the present study the relevant texts in the Hebrew Bible concerning sacrifice or redemption of the first born of humans and animals are considered in detail. The most important findings are the following: 1. An Israelite could understand the instructions in Ex. xxii 28f. to mean that he should sacrifice his first-born child to JHWH. 2. Ez. xx 25f. describes such first-born sacrifices for JHWH as practised. Therefore it cannot be ruled out that in early Israel at a particular time such a sacrificial practice could indeed have occurred. 3. In the laws of the first-born in the Book of Covenant, in the Dodecalogue and in the original layer of Num. xviii 15-18 (P) the corresponding terms bekôr and peter rekhem refer to the male and female first-born of human and animal. The regulation in Deut. xv, to consecrate only the male first-born clean animals to JHWH and to consume them in JHWH's presence during the Feast, is connected with a clearly farmer-friendly tendency of the deuteronomic law-maker. Apart from that a limitation to the male first-born prevails only in the later post-exilic period. According to the note in Num. xviii 16, the redemption of the human first-born applies only to male children; according to the law of the first-born in Exod. xiii only the male first-born of human and animal (of female Israelites and animals) are affected.

In: Vetus Testamentum
In: Human Sacrifice in Jewish and Christian Tradition
In: Wisdom and Torah