Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 15 items for

  • Author or Editor: Vassilis P. Tzevelekos x
  • Search level: All x
Clear All
In: Reflections on International Law
In: European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, The
Follow the European Convention on Human Rights Law Review also on Twitter

The first scholarly journal devoted exclusively to the legal regime of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The Review offers peer-reviewed, legal scholarship on the protection of fundamental human rights within the ECHR framework and on its implications for other regional human rights regimes. It is a forum for inter alia comparative law, human rights law, international law and philosophy of law analysis of the practice and procedures of the ECHR regime.

While favouring legal (doctrinal, theoretical and philosophical) analysis, the Review also publishes multi-disciplinary works at the crossroads of law, history, political science and economics. It is open to all methods and schools of thought, including, comparative, doctrinal, quantitative and economic analysis of (case) law. It offers scholarship and information of interest to scholars and practitioners, both in the member states and other regions, as well as to all those working in the field of human rights law.
  • Print Only
    €474.00$537.00
  • Print + Online
    €517.00$586.00
  • Online only
    €431.00$488.00
  • To place an order, please contact customerservices@brill.com
  • Print Only
    €144.00$167.00
  • Online only
    €144.00$167.00
  • To place an order, please contact customerservices@brill.com

Although migration is a transnational phenomenon involving a plurality of states, the state of departure is often unwilling/unable to offer protection. Receiving/transit states can refrain from engaging with the problem until migrants have already entered their territory. With high seas, this can result in the deaths of people taking the risk of travelling to a new place. The article argues that states have a duty to offer (some) protection even when migrants are not in their territory, based on human rights’ positive effect and the principle of due diligence. Because of the transnational nature of migration, all involved states have the responsibility to offer protection. This may lead to concurrent state liability for failure to protect. The duty to protect may extend to the high seas, even when the traditional links for the establishment of jurisdiction are absent. The duty is not unlimited, it needs to prevail over other considerations.

Open Access
In: Nordic Journal of International Law