Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 7 of 7 items for :

  • All: "European Court of Human Rights" x
  • Chapters/Articles x
  • Langue primair: English x
Clear All Modify Search

violate the European Convention on Human Rights. The victory before the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in the Lautsi judgment of a variegated coalition of actors ranging from the strong alliance between the Vati- can and the Italian Government to the Russia of the New Orthodoxy as

In: The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition

medical law and ethics. Combined with the emphasis on quality of life, autonomy results, Keown argues, in an instability of the law at the end of life. Proposals, whether adopted as in the Netherlands and Oregon, or merely contemplated, as in Britain and the European Court of Human Rights, to relax laws

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy

in 1892. Although international law has changed over time to become more accommodating to refugees and asylum-seekers, states and international law continue to affirm the core elements of the above view. For example, in 2005 the European Court of Human Rights argued that: “[a]s a matter of well

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy

be the subject of debate. Dennis Thompson refers to this as ‘partial secrecy’ (Thompson, Dennis F. 1999. Democratic Secrecy. Political Science Quarterly 114: 181–193). 43 Examples include the case law of the European Court of Human Rights ( EC t HR ) (e.g., EC t HR (Grand Chamber). Guja v

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy

grounds that Hiasl had not received a fair trial and that the question of the status of a person had not been investigated by withdrawing to procedural arguments, the case was to be continued and would be heard at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The appeal was registered there at the beginning

In: Cognitive Kin, Moral Strangers? Linking Animal Cognition, Animal Ethics & Animal Welfare

apparently secular job as imbued with religious significance? Consider the case of Obst v. Germany , decided by the European Court of Human Rights in 2010. 8 Michael Obst was the Mormon Church’s European Director for public affairs. He was dismissed for having an extra-marital affair, a serious sin within

In: Secular Studies

grounds that Hiasl had not received a fair trial and that the question of the status of a person had not been investigated by withdrawing to procedural arguments, the case was to be continued and would be heard at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The appeal was registered there at the beginning

In: Cognitive Kin, Moral Strangers? Linking Animal Cognition, Animal Ethics & Animal Welfare