omitted unless they appear in the database of the ECtHR and in literature. 1.2 The Case Law of the ECtHR The European Commission of Human Rights (until 1998) and the European Court of Human Rights (hereafter ECtHR) in Strasbourg, among thousands of judgments and decisions, have issued several hundred
The Rise of the Civilizational Argument
Edited by Lauri Mälksoo
Edited by Benedetto Conforti, Luigi Ferrari Bravo, Francesco Francioni, Natalino Ronzitti, Giorgio Sacerdoti and Riccardo Pavoni
The doctrinal section of the Volume includes also articles on the international action against piracy off the coast of Somalia (Annoni), on international law and Nazi-looted art in the light of the Gurlitt case (Chechi), and on the role of regional organizations in the Hungarian affaire (Casolari).
The Notes and Comments section features timely commentaries on the Shalabayeva case (Gestri), the Mothers of Srebrenica decision of the European Court of Human Rights (Spiga), and the Nuhanoviç and Mustafić judgments of the Dutch Supreme Court (Bakker).
The section on Practice of International Courts and Tribunals contains reports and commentaries on the 2013 activities of the ICJ, the ITLOS, the WTO dispute settlement bodies, and international and mixed international criminal courts and tribunals.
The second part of the Volume covers as usual the most significant Italian practice in the areas of i) judicial decisions, with special attention given to the decisions involving the implementation of the 2012 ICJ judgment in Germany v. Italy; ii) diplomatic and parliamentary practice; iii) treaty and other international agreements practice; and iv) national legislation.
The third part of the Volume includes a bibliographical index of Italian contributions to international law scholarship published in 2013, a book review section, and an analytical index for easy consultation and reference to the materials cited in the Yearbook.
Edited by Francesco Francioni, Natalino Ronzitti, Giorgio Sacerdoti and Riccardo Pavoni
The remaining part of the Volume contains a bibliographical index of Italian contributions to international law scholarship published in 2016, a book review section, and an analytical index for easy consultation and reference to materials cited in the Yearbook.
Published with the contributions of ENI and Tenaris.
Edited by Stephan Wittich and Gerhard Loibl
Contributors are: Markus P. Beham, Christina Binder, Irene Etzersdorfer, Maria Hadjipavlou, Gerhard Hafner, Volker Hauck, Peter Hilpold, Jane Alice Hofbauer, Marios Ieronymides, Philipp Janig, Ralph R.A. Janik, Nikolas Kyriakou, Sara Mansour Fallah, Karl Müller, Adamantios Theodor Skordos, Helmut Tichy, Stephan Wittich, and Ioannis Zelepos
case of foreign ships suspected of being engaged in the ‘slave trade’, but makes no mention of trafficking. The clear distinction between ‘slavery’ and ‘trafficking in human beings’ was also highlighted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the Rantsev case. 13 Consequently, migrant
The Italian Way of Dealing with Migrant Smuggling and Trafficking within the European and International Context
Vincenzo Militello and Alessandro Spena
Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights FD Facilitation Directive FFD Facilitation Framework Decision g.i.p. Giudice per le indagini preliminari (Judge of preliminary investigations) ICCPR International covenant on civil and political rights (New York, 1966) l. legge (statute law
Mikkel Jarle Christensen
European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics’ [Blackwell Publishing Ltd] 32 Law & Social Inquiry 137. 23 Antoine Vauchez, Brokering Europe: Euro-lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity (9781107042360, Cambridge University Press 2015). 24
Rights and Károly Nagy The approach of the courts in Macdonald and Preston has also been given a degree of support by a recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (‘ECtHR’) in Károly Nagy . 52 Mr Nagy, a minister in the Hungarian Reformed Church, brought a compensation claim following
Ahmed Salisu Garba
different assessment tests that exist today, the European Court of Human Rights’ judicial review mechanism is the most suitable to the Nigerian environment in comparison with those of Germany, the United States of America and Canada. This is because it is more sensitive to people’s environment than the