Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 7 of 7 items for :

  • All: "European Court of Human Rights" x
  • Primary Language: English x
Clear All

Zoe Knox

, and religious elites. As such, it is likely to become a major test case in international law, bringing the anti-extremism law before the Council of Europe via the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The article will first consider why this particular religious minority has become a test case by

Tanya Richardson

building has filed a case against Ukraine in the European Court of Human Rights. The Ukrainian government has also been subject to criticism for violating citizens’ rights in the failure to conduct an investigation in a Report of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. 133 Mediators

Zoe Knox

liberty for many minority faith communities in Europe through the European Court of Human Rights. Baran argues that Soviet Witnesses should be viewed not as leading a dual existence, namely complying with the state in public but privately going against its policies, but instead in a wide variety of ways

Ararat L. Osipian

about state building in Russia, as one would expect from its title, as it is about police corruption. Even though this corruption, described in detail, is systemic, endemic, and hierarchical, it is far short of state building. The book reads more like a verdict, handed down by the European Court of

Emily B. Baran and Zoe Knox

other has led to a deluge of cases before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg from Russian citizens appealing Russian court decisions to what has become “…the de facto Supreme Court of human rights in Europe.” 18 This has highlighted the gulf between international human rights norms

Gordon B. Smith

relating to human rights questions. Con- sideration of international norms extends to inferior courts and even to inter- pretation of treaties by various international organs, including interpretations of the ECHR by the European Court of Human Rights .67 In 2006 approxi- mately 12,000 complaints were

Marat Shterin and Dmitry Dubrovsky

to full scrutiny in the adversarial process. In reality, experts are allowed both to establish facts and draw legal conclusions. One of the recent decisions of the European Court of Human Rights considers this dynamic a serious violation of the legal procedure as stipulated in Article 6 of the