Search Results
’, such as democracy, the rule of law, social justice and respect for human rights, ‘the increasing convergence of attitudes to life’, ‘the awareness of having speci c interests in common’, ‘the determination to take part in the construction of a united Europe’ and the willingness ‘to play an
German regulation, that its application is con- sidered to be unacceptable.8 Th e provisions on spousal reunifi cation apply to persons who have entered into a marriage9 or, by virtue of Section 27(2) AufenthG, a homosexual part- nership. Same-sex partners within the meaning of the Life Partnership Act
also be set at a lower level of at least 1.2 times the average gross annual salary.135 Th is exception concerns mainly corporate and general managers and other business professionals, as well as teaching staff and professionals in the fi elds of physics, mathematics, engineering, life sci- ence and
./ Minderhoud, P., Security of Residence and Expulsion, pp. 41 ff . nationals from a country where close members of his or her family are living if the expulsion would lead to a breach of his right to family life.232 Th us, in family reunifi cation cases, the Court has considered a state’s obli- gation as a
any individual living permanently or temporarily on EU territory (9th indent). 111 See Council Decision 2004/100/EC of 26 January 2004 establishing a Community action programme to promote active European citizenship (civic participation), OJ L 30, 4/2/2004, p. 6. 112 Supra n. 110, Art. 11. 113
not a living law (…)’. Later on he adds, however, that ‘EU law is obviously an integral part of our law. That is natural. It is like that in the Treaty, isn’t it? It is more or less coherent but in the end it is one, integral thing’. As was mentioned in previous sections, the coherence and
appreciated immediately’, and stressed that harmonising domestic resale right systems should form part of the efforts deployed to improve the living and working conditions of cultural workers.200 In the framework programme of 1988–1992, launched with the aim of creating a European cultural area
recognises that the decisions complained of prevented Mr Velosa Barreto from living in his house, as he intended. Nevertheless, effective protection of respect for private and family life cannot require the existence in national law of legal protection enabling each family to have a home for themselves alone
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ( echr ). 8 Firstly, the umbrella of article 8 of the echr and the case for a human right to animal protection will be explored. Currently, it has been accepted that this right to respect for private and family life also entails the right to a healthy environment. It is
burden of fully ensuring the well-being of its citizens in all fi elds of life, an additional effort is necessary which requires ascending to a higher level of complexity in discharging public tasks. Curiously enough, in Latin America general awareness of the diffi culty of fully implementing