Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 11 items for :

  • All: "subject" x
  • Biblical Interpretations x
  • Chapters/Articles x
Clear All Modify Search


Dorothy BEA Akoto-Abutiate

Marjo C.A. Korpel and Johannes C. de Moor

the American Academy of Religion. The Steering Committee for the second meeting consisted of Dr Brandon Gallaher, Dr Harold D. Hunter, Dr Paul Ladouceur, and Dr Daniela C. Augustine. The subject for discussion at the second meeting on November 16, 2018, was ‘Spiritual Experience’. The meeting heard

Pentecostalism and Experience

History, Theology, and Practice

Lisa P. Stephenson

Christian churches is that the Holy Spirit has become the subject of theological dogma rather than a burning experience in the personal lives of believers’. 14 As such, Pentecostalism was a protest movement. It ‘was a protest against the use of religious words without religious experiences to back them

John M. G. Barclay

” is the subject of the remarkable prayer in Eph 3:14-19, where the dwelling of Christ “in your hearts” entails a grounding and epistemic reshaping in love, specifically in the knowledge-surpassing love of Christ, by which believers are filled with all the fullness of God (3:18-19). At the ecclesial

A. K. M. Adam

determined , is always subject to negotiation, he anticipates the argument of this essay; but inasmuch as he offers such an account in terms of codes , his contribution collaborates with the conventional account’s model of texts (in this case, specifically “televised broadcasts”) that have meaning as a

Cleansing Instead of Combat?

E. Janet Warren’s Temple-Cosmos Model of Counteracting Evil, and its Implications for Charismatic Missiology

Christian J. Anderson

Publishers, 2000). 27 Samuel Hio-Kee Ooi, ‘A study of strategic level spiritual warfare from a Chinese perspective’, Asian Journal of Pentecostal Studies 9.1 (2006), pp. 143–61; cf. p. 160. On the subject of continuity of spirit cosmology, it is worth contrasting Paul Hiebert’s expectation that a self

Paul Ladouceur

essence and the divine energy is crucial to clarify how God makes himself known in creation. This distinction was the subject of a great philosophical, theological and spiritual quarrel in the 14th century over the possibility of knowing and experiencing God. The quarrel pitted the monks of Mount Athos

Wendell L. Willis

the interest in Christology that dominated the twentieth century. But for the present concern, the second half is our focus, because it does use χαρίζεσθαι to explain God’s affirmation of Jesus. As in 1:29 the same verb is used and in each case God is the subject-giver. Although most English


Edited by Thomas Hardtke, Ulrich Schmiedel and Tobias Tan