This short paper aims to respond to some of the observations and insights of the five reviewers of our book, The Sacred Is the Profane.
William Arnal and Russell McCutcheon
André Droogers and Kim Knibbe
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2011 DOI: 10.1163/157006811X608395 Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 23 (2011) 283-303 brill.nl/mtsr M E T H O D T H E O R Y in the S T U D Y O F R E L I G I O N & Methodological Ludism and the Academic Study of Religion Kim Knibbe Department of Theology
Armin W. Geertz
GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON METHODOLOGY IN THE STUDY OF RELIGION ARMIN W. GEERTZ This paper explores the methodological problems raised by what broadly can be called postmodern challenges to the study of religion. In dealing with the religions of living cultures and especially with cultures that
is more likely to be a community of interest rather than a community of place. It may seem pedestrian to shift from globalization to church membership rates but the declining importance of geography creates a major methodological problem for sociologists who wish to assess the relative popularity
new scholarship in this area. Department of Religion University of Manitoba Emyr Vaughan Thomas, Wittgensteinian Values: Philosophy, Religious Belief and Descriptivist Methodology. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001. ISBN 1-84014- 853-5. 144 pp. $59.95 (cloth). K S Famously, Ludwig Wittgenstein
K. Merinda Simmons
Atalia Omer’s essay “In the Critic vs. Caretaker Dichotomy A Magic Dwells: Parroting McCutcheon, Policing ‘Religion’ (A Rejoinder to Merinda Simmons)” responds to my MTSR article “Regulating Identities: The Silences of Critical Caretaking.” In this rejoinder to her response, I answer to her main critiques of my article, and I suggest that her distinction between the academy and “the real world” is a problematic one that exempts, and thus protects, scholarship from critique.
Methodological Reﬂ ections 1 Justin L. Barrett Centre for Anthropology & Mind, Institute of Cognitive & Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, 64 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6PN United Kingdom firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract Boyer’s theory of counterintuitive cultural concept transmission claims